Madison Metals Inc. (CNQ: GREN.CN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See GREN.CN's competitors and their performance on the CNQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Uranium Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for GREN.CN and its CNQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GREN.CN | CA$0.23 | +6.98% | 6.4M | -1.64 | -CA$0.14 | N/A |
| CCO.TO | CA$141.19 | +4.39% | 57.4B | 74.62 | CA$1.77 | +0.17% |
| NXE.TO | CA$14.91 | +5.82% | 9.9B | -34.89 | -CA$0.43 | N/A |
| EFR.TO | CA$20.87 | +8.64% | 5.2B | -46.56 | -CA$0.45 | N/A |
| DML.TO | CA$4.81 | +10.83% | 4.4B | -15.19 | -CA$0.32 | N/A |
| URE.TO | CA$1.95 | +5.41% | 774.8M | -6.38 | -CA$0.31 | N/A |
| FCU.TO | CA$0.72 | -2.70% | 618.3M | -72.00 | -CA$0.01 | N/A |
| URC.TO | CA$3.89 | +1.57% | 613.9M | 139.13 | CA$0.03 | N/A |
| MGA.TO | CA$0.63 | +3.28% | 249.5M | 29.53 | CA$0.02 | N/A |
| LAM.TO | CA$0.65 | +6.56% | 190.2M | -22.04 | -CA$0.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Cameco Corporation (TSX: CCO.TO)
GREN.CN vs CCO.TO Comparison August 2026
Madison Metals Inc. (CNQ: GREN.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GREN.CN stands at 6.4M. In comparison, CCO.TO has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GREN.CN is priced at CA$0.23 on the CNQ, while CCO.TO trades at CA$141.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GREN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas CCO.TO's P/E ratio is 74.62. In terms of profitability, GREN.CN's ROE is -1.76%, compared to CCO.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GREN.CN is less volatile compared to CCO.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GREN.CN.Check CCO.TO's competition here
NexGen Energy Ltd. (TSX: NXE.TO)
GREN.CN vs NXE.TO Comparison August 2026
Madison Metals Inc. (CNQ: GREN.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GREN.CN stands at 6.4M. In comparison, NXE.TO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GREN.CN is priced at CA$0.23 on the CNQ, while NXE.TO trades at CA$14.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GREN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas NXE.TO's P/E ratio is -34.89. In terms of profitability, GREN.CN's ROE is -1.76%, compared to NXE.TO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GREN.CN is less volatile compared to NXE.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GREN.CN.Check NXE.TO's competition here
Energy Fuels Inc. (TSX: EFR.TO)
GREN.CN vs EFR.TO Comparison August 2026
Madison Metals Inc. (CNQ: GREN.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GREN.CN stands at 6.4M. In comparison, EFR.TO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GREN.CN is priced at CA$0.23 on the CNQ, while EFR.TO trades at CA$20.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GREN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas EFR.TO's P/E ratio is -46.56. In terms of profitability, GREN.CN's ROE is -1.76%, compared to EFR.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GREN.CN is less volatile compared to EFR.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GREN.CN.Check EFR.TO's competition here
Denison Mines Corp. (TSX: DML.TO)
GREN.CN vs DML.TO Comparison August 2026
Madison Metals Inc. (CNQ: GREN.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GREN.CN stands at 6.4M. In comparison, DML.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GREN.CN is priced at CA$0.23 on the CNQ, while DML.TO trades at CA$4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GREN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas DML.TO's P/E ratio is -15.19. In terms of profitability, GREN.CN's ROE is -1.76%, compared to DML.TO's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, GREN.CN is less volatile compared to DML.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GREN.CN.Check DML.TO's competition here
Ur-Energy Inc. (TSX: URE.TO)
GREN.CN vs URE.TO Comparison August 2026
Madison Metals Inc. (CNQ: GREN.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GREN.CN stands at 6.4M. In comparison, URE.TO has a market cap of 774.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GREN.CN is priced at CA$0.23 on the CNQ, while URE.TO trades at CA$1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GREN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas URE.TO's P/E ratio is -6.38. In terms of profitability, GREN.CN's ROE is -1.76%, compared to URE.TO's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GREN.CN is less volatile compared to URE.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GREN.CN.Check URE.TO's competition here
Fission Uranium Corp. (TSX: FCU.TO)
GREN.CN vs FCU.TO Comparison August 2026
Madison Metals Inc. (CNQ: GREN.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GREN.CN stands at 6.4M. In comparison, FCU.TO has a market cap of 618.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GREN.CN is priced at CA$0.23 on the CNQ, while FCU.TO trades at CA$0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GREN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas FCU.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, GREN.CN's ROE is -1.76%, compared to FCU.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GREN.CN is less volatile compared to FCU.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GREN.CN.Check FCU.TO's competition here
Uranium Royalty Corp. (TSX: URC.TO)
GREN.CN vs URC.TO Comparison August 2026
Madison Metals Inc. (CNQ: GREN.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GREN.CN stands at 6.4M. In comparison, URC.TO has a market cap of 613.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GREN.CN is priced at CA$0.23 on the CNQ, while URC.TO trades at CA$3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GREN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas URC.TO's P/E ratio is 139.13. In terms of profitability, GREN.CN's ROE is -1.76%, compared to URC.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GREN.CN is less volatile compared to URC.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GREN.CN.Check URC.TO's competition here
Mega Uranium Ltd. (TSX: MGA.TO)
GREN.CN vs MGA.TO Comparison August 2026
Madison Metals Inc. (CNQ: GREN.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GREN.CN stands at 6.4M. In comparison, MGA.TO has a market cap of 249.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GREN.CN is priced at CA$0.23 on the CNQ, while MGA.TO trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GREN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas MGA.TO's P/E ratio is 29.53. In terms of profitability, GREN.CN's ROE is -1.76%, compared to MGA.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GREN.CN is less volatile compared to MGA.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GREN.CN.Check MGA.TO's competition here
Laramide Resources Ltd. (TSX: LAM.TO)
GREN.CN vs LAM.TO Comparison August 2026
Madison Metals Inc. (CNQ: GREN.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GREN.CN stands at 6.4M. In comparison, LAM.TO has a market cap of 190.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GREN.CN is priced at CA$0.23 on the CNQ, while LAM.TO trades at CA$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GREN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas LAM.TO's P/E ratio is -22.04. In terms of profitability, GREN.CN's ROE is -1.76%, compared to LAM.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GREN.CN is less volatile compared to LAM.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GREN.CN.Check LAM.TO's competition here
Forsys Metals Corp. (TSX: FSY.TO)
GREN.CN vs FSY.TO Comparison August 2026
Madison Metals Inc. (CNQ: GREN.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GREN.CN stands at 6.4M. In comparison, FSY.TO has a market cap of 141.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GREN.CN is priced at CA$0.23 on the CNQ, while FSY.TO trades at CA$0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GREN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas FSY.TO's P/E ratio is -58.29. In terms of profitability, GREN.CN's ROE is -1.76%, compared to FSY.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GREN.CN is less volatile compared to FSY.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GREN.CN.Check FSY.TO's competition here
Labrador Uranium Inc. (CNQ: LUR.CN)
GREN.CN vs LUR.CN Comparison August 2026
Madison Metals Inc. (CNQ: GREN.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GREN.CN stands at 6.4M. In comparison, LUR.CN has a market cap of 55.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GREN.CN is priced at CA$0.23 on the CNQ, while LUR.CN trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GREN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas LUR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, GREN.CN's ROE is -1.76%, compared to LUR.CN's ROE of -4.67%. Regarding short-term risk, GREN.CN is less volatile compared to LUR.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GREN.CN.Check LUR.CN's competition here
Appia Rare Earths & Uranium Corp. (CNQ: API.CN)
GREN.CN vs API.CN Comparison August 2026
Madison Metals Inc. (CNQ: GREN.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GREN.CN stands at 6.4M. In comparison, API.CN has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, GREN.CN is priced at CA$0.23 on the CNQ, while API.CN trades at CA$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GREN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas API.CN's P/E ratio is 116.28. In terms of profitability, GREN.CN's ROE is -1.76%, compared to API.CN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GREN.CN is less volatile compared to API.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GREN.CN.Check API.CN's competition here
Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp. (CNQ: WUC.CN)
GREN.CN vs WUC.CN Comparison August 2026
Madison Metals Inc. (CNQ: GREN.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GREN.CN stands at 6.4M. In comparison, WUC.CN has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GREN.CN is priced at CA$0.23 on the CNQ, while WUC.CN trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GREN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas WUC.CN's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, GREN.CN's ROE is -1.76%, compared to WUC.CN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GREN.CN is less volatile compared to WUC.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GREN.CN.Check WUC.CN's competition here
Radio Fuels Energy Corp. (CNQ: CAKE.CN)
GREN.CN vs CAKE.CN Comparison August 2026
Madison Metals Inc. (CNQ: GREN.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GREN.CN stands at 6.4M. In comparison, CAKE.CN has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GREN.CN is priced at CA$0.23 on the CNQ, while CAKE.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GREN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas CAKE.CN's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, GREN.CN's ROE is -1.76%, compared to CAKE.CN's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GREN.CN is similarly volatile compared to CAKE.CN. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GREN.CN.Check CAKE.CN's competition here
Oberon Uranium Corp. (CNQ: OBRN.CN)
GREN.CN vs OBRN.CN Comparison August 2026
Madison Metals Inc. (CNQ: GREN.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GREN.CN stands at 6.4M. In comparison, OBRN.CN has a market cap of 125.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GREN.CN is priced at CA$0.23 on the CNQ, while OBRN.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GREN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas OBRN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, GREN.CN's ROE is -1.76%, compared to OBRN.CN's ROE of -7.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GREN.CN is less volatile compared to OBRN.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GREN.CN.Check OBRN.CN's competition here
Azarga Uranium Corp. (TSX: AZZ.TO)
GREN.CN vs AZZ.TO Comparison August 2026
Madison Metals Inc. (CNQ: GREN.CN) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GREN.CN stands at 6.4M. In comparison, AZZ.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GREN.CN is priced at CA$0.23 on the CNQ, while AZZ.TO trades at CA$0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GREN.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -1.64, whereas AZZ.TO's P/E ratio is -15.11. In terms of profitability, GREN.CN's ROE is -1.76%, compared to AZZ.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GREN.CN is less volatile compared to AZZ.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GREN.CN.Check AZZ.TO's competition here