Laramide Resources Ltd. (TSX: LAM.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See LAM.TO's competitors and their performance on the TSX and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Uranium Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for LAM.TO and its TSX peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAM.TO | CA$0.65 | +6.56% | 190.2M | -22.04 | -CA$0.03 | N/A |
| CCO.TO | CA$141.19 | +4.39% | 57.4B | 74.62 | CA$1.77 | +0.17% |
| NXE.TO | CA$14.91 | +5.82% | 9.9B | -34.89 | -CA$0.43 | N/A |
| EFR.TO | CA$20.87 | +8.64% | 5.2B | -46.56 | -CA$0.45 | N/A |
| DML.TO | CA$4.81 | +10.83% | 4.4B | -15.19 | -CA$0.32 | N/A |
| URE.TO | CA$1.95 | +5.41% | 774.8M | -6.38 | -CA$0.31 | N/A |
| FCU.TO | CA$0.72 | -2.70% | 618.3M | -72.00 | -CA$0.01 | N/A |
| URC.TO | CA$3.89 | +1.57% | 613.9M | 139.13 | CA$0.03 | N/A |
| MGA.TO | CA$0.63 | +3.28% | 249.5M | 29.53 | CA$0.02 | N/A |
| FSY.TO | CA$0.58 | +1.75% | 141.9M | -58.29 | -CA$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Cameco Corporation (TSX: CCO.TO)
LAM.TO vs CCO.TO Comparison August 2026
Laramide Resources Ltd. (TSX: LAM.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAM.TO stands at 190.2M. In comparison, CCO.TO has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LAM.TO is priced at CA$0.65 on the TSX, while CCO.TO trades at CA$141.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.04, whereas CCO.TO's P/E ratio is 74.62. In terms of profitability, LAM.TO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CCO.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LAM.TO is more volatile compared to CCO.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAM.TO.Check CCO.TO's competition here
NexGen Energy Ltd. (TSX: NXE.TO)
LAM.TO vs NXE.TO Comparison August 2026
Laramide Resources Ltd. (TSX: LAM.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAM.TO stands at 190.2M. In comparison, NXE.TO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LAM.TO is priced at CA$0.65 on the TSX, while NXE.TO trades at CA$14.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.04, whereas NXE.TO's P/E ratio is -34.89. In terms of profitability, LAM.TO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NXE.TO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LAM.TO is more volatile compared to NXE.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAM.TO.Check NXE.TO's competition here
Energy Fuels Inc. (TSX: EFR.TO)
LAM.TO vs EFR.TO Comparison August 2026
Laramide Resources Ltd. (TSX: LAM.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAM.TO stands at 190.2M. In comparison, EFR.TO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LAM.TO is priced at CA$0.65 on the TSX, while EFR.TO trades at CA$20.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.04, whereas EFR.TO's P/E ratio is -46.56. In terms of profitability, LAM.TO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EFR.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LAM.TO is more volatile compared to EFR.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAM.TO.Check EFR.TO's competition here
Denison Mines Corp. (TSX: DML.TO)
LAM.TO vs DML.TO Comparison August 2026
Laramide Resources Ltd. (TSX: LAM.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAM.TO stands at 190.2M. In comparison, DML.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LAM.TO is priced at CA$0.65 on the TSX, while DML.TO trades at CA$4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.04, whereas DML.TO's P/E ratio is -15.19. In terms of profitability, LAM.TO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DML.TO's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, LAM.TO is more volatile compared to DML.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAM.TO.Check DML.TO's competition here
Ur-Energy Inc. (TSX: URE.TO)
LAM.TO vs URE.TO Comparison August 2026
Laramide Resources Ltd. (TSX: LAM.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAM.TO stands at 190.2M. In comparison, URE.TO has a market cap of 774.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LAM.TO is priced at CA$0.65 on the TSX, while URE.TO trades at CA$1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.04, whereas URE.TO's P/E ratio is -6.38. In terms of profitability, LAM.TO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to URE.TO's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LAM.TO is more volatile compared to URE.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAM.TO.Check URE.TO's competition here
Fission Uranium Corp. (TSX: FCU.TO)
LAM.TO vs FCU.TO Comparison August 2026
Laramide Resources Ltd. (TSX: LAM.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAM.TO stands at 190.2M. In comparison, FCU.TO has a market cap of 618.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LAM.TO is priced at CA$0.65 on the TSX, while FCU.TO trades at CA$0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.04, whereas FCU.TO's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, LAM.TO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FCU.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LAM.TO is more volatile compared to FCU.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAM.TO.Check FCU.TO's competition here
Uranium Royalty Corp. (TSX: URC.TO)
LAM.TO vs URC.TO Comparison August 2026
Laramide Resources Ltd. (TSX: LAM.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAM.TO stands at 190.2M. In comparison, URC.TO has a market cap of 613.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LAM.TO is priced at CA$0.65 on the TSX, while URC.TO trades at CA$3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.04, whereas URC.TO's P/E ratio is 139.13. In terms of profitability, LAM.TO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to URC.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LAM.TO is more volatile compared to URC.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAM.TO.Check URC.TO's competition here
Mega Uranium Ltd. (TSX: MGA.TO)
LAM.TO vs MGA.TO Comparison August 2026
Laramide Resources Ltd. (TSX: LAM.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAM.TO stands at 190.2M. In comparison, MGA.TO has a market cap of 249.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LAM.TO is priced at CA$0.65 on the TSX, while MGA.TO trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.04, whereas MGA.TO's P/E ratio is 29.53. In terms of profitability, LAM.TO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MGA.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LAM.TO is more volatile compared to MGA.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAM.TO.Check MGA.TO's competition here
Forsys Metals Corp. (TSX: FSY.TO)
LAM.TO vs FSY.TO Comparison August 2026
Laramide Resources Ltd. (TSX: LAM.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAM.TO stands at 190.2M. In comparison, FSY.TO has a market cap of 141.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LAM.TO is priced at CA$0.65 on the TSX, while FSY.TO trades at CA$0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.04, whereas FSY.TO's P/E ratio is -58.29. In terms of profitability, LAM.TO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FSY.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LAM.TO is more volatile compared to FSY.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAM.TO.Check FSY.TO's competition here
Labrador Uranium Inc. (CNQ: LUR.CN)
LAM.TO vs LUR.CN Comparison August 2026
Laramide Resources Ltd. (TSX: LAM.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAM.TO stands at 190.2M. In comparison, LUR.CN has a market cap of 55.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LAM.TO is priced at CA$0.65 on the TSX, while LUR.CN trades at CA$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.04, whereas LUR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, LAM.TO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LUR.CN's ROE of -4.67%. Regarding short-term risk, LAM.TO is more volatile compared to LUR.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAM.TO.Check LUR.CN's competition here
Appia Rare Earths & Uranium Corp. (CNQ: API.CN)
LAM.TO vs API.CN Comparison August 2026
Laramide Resources Ltd. (TSX: LAM.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAM.TO stands at 190.2M. In comparison, API.CN has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, LAM.TO is priced at CA$0.65 on the TSX, while API.CN trades at CA$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.04, whereas API.CN's P/E ratio is 116.28. In terms of profitability, LAM.TO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to API.CN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LAM.TO is more volatile compared to API.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAM.TO.Check API.CN's competition here
Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp. (CNQ: WUC.CN)
LAM.TO vs WUC.CN Comparison August 2026
Laramide Resources Ltd. (TSX: LAM.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAM.TO stands at 190.2M. In comparison, WUC.CN has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LAM.TO is priced at CA$0.65 on the TSX, while WUC.CN trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.04, whereas WUC.CN's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, LAM.TO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WUC.CN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LAM.TO is more volatile compared to WUC.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAM.TO.Check WUC.CN's competition here
Radio Fuels Energy Corp. (CNQ: CAKE.CN)
LAM.TO vs CAKE.CN Comparison August 2026
Laramide Resources Ltd. (TSX: LAM.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAM.TO stands at 190.2M. In comparison, CAKE.CN has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LAM.TO is priced at CA$0.65 on the TSX, while CAKE.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.04, whereas CAKE.CN's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, LAM.TO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CAKE.CN's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LAM.TO is more volatile compared to CAKE.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAM.TO.Check CAKE.CN's competition here
Madison Metals Inc. (CNQ: GREN.CN)
LAM.TO vs GREN.CN Comparison August 2026
Laramide Resources Ltd. (TSX: LAM.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAM.TO stands at 190.2M. In comparison, GREN.CN has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LAM.TO is priced at CA$0.65 on the TSX, while GREN.CN trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.04, whereas GREN.CN's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, LAM.TO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GREN.CN's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LAM.TO is more volatile compared to GREN.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAM.TO.Check GREN.CN's competition here
Oberon Uranium Corp. (CNQ: OBRN.CN)
LAM.TO vs OBRN.CN Comparison August 2026
Laramide Resources Ltd. (TSX: LAM.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAM.TO stands at 190.2M. In comparison, OBRN.CN has a market cap of 125.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LAM.TO is priced at CA$0.65 on the TSX, while OBRN.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.04, whereas OBRN.CN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LAM.TO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OBRN.CN's ROE of -7.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LAM.TO is less volatile compared to OBRN.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAM.TO.Check OBRN.CN's competition here
Azarga Uranium Corp. (TSX: AZZ.TO)
LAM.TO vs AZZ.TO Comparison August 2026
Laramide Resources Ltd. (TSX: LAM.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LAM.TO stands at 190.2M. In comparison, AZZ.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LAM.TO is priced at CA$0.65 on the TSX, while AZZ.TO trades at CA$0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LAM.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -22.04, whereas AZZ.TO's P/E ratio is -15.11. In terms of profitability, LAM.TO's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AZZ.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LAM.TO is more volatile compared to AZZ.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAM.TO.Check AZZ.TO's competition here