MDU Resources Group, Inc.
MDU Resources Group, Inc. MDU Peers
See (MDU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDU | $17.01 | +1.80% | 3.48B | 19.33 | $0.88 | +2.69% |
| HON | $218.22 | -0.51% | 140.25B | 25.11 | $8.69 | +2.02% |
| MMM | $150.72 | +0.26% | 81.11B | 18.77 | $8.03 | +1.87% |
| VMI | $321.49 | -0.05% | 6.45B | 18.71 | $17.18 | +0.76% |
| IEP | $9.19 | +0.22% | 5.02B | -5.60 | -$1.64 | +32.43% |
| GFF | $73.55 | +0.85% | 3.46B | 15.01 | $4.90 | +0.89% |
| SEB | $2,521.69 | +0.87% | 2.45B | 25.00 | $100.86 | +0.36% |
| VRTV | $169.99 | +0.02% | 2.31B | 8.58 | $19.82 | N/A |
| BBU | $24.66 | +1.40% | 2.20B | -70.46 | -$0.35 | +1.00% |
| CODI-PC | $16.50 | +3.51% | 1.24B | 19.16 | $0.86 | +13.10% |
Stock Comparison
MDU vs HON Comparison
MDU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDU stands at 3.48B. In comparison, HON has a market cap of 140.25B. Regarding current trading prices, MDU is priced at $17.01, while HON trades at $218.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas HON's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, MDU's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HON's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MDU is more volatile compared to HON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDU.
MDU vs MMM Comparison
MDU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDU stands at 3.48B. In comparison, MMM has a market cap of 81.11B. Regarding current trading prices, MDU is priced at $17.01, while MMM trades at $150.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas MMM's P/E ratio is 18.77. In terms of profitability, MDU's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MMM's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDU is more volatile compared to MMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDU.
MDU vs VMI Comparison
MDU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDU stands at 3.48B. In comparison, VMI has a market cap of 6.45B. Regarding current trading prices, MDU is priced at $17.01, while VMI trades at $321.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas VMI's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, MDU's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MDU is more volatile compared to VMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDU.
MDU vs IEP Comparison
MDU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDU stands at 3.48B. In comparison, IEP has a market cap of 5.02B. Regarding current trading prices, MDU is priced at $17.01, while IEP trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas IEP's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, MDU's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IEP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MDU is less volatile compared to IEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDU.
MDU vs GFF Comparison
MDU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDU stands at 3.48B. In comparison, GFF has a market cap of 3.46B. Regarding current trading prices, MDU is priced at $17.01, while GFF trades at $73.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas GFF's P/E ratio is 15.01. In terms of profitability, MDU's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GFF's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MDU is less volatile compared to GFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDU.
MDU vs SEB Comparison
MDU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDU stands at 3.48B. In comparison, SEB has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, MDU is priced at $17.01, while SEB trades at $2,521.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas SEB's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, MDU's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MDU is less volatile compared to SEB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDU.
MDU vs VRTV Comparison
MDU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDU stands at 3.48B. In comparison, VRTV has a market cap of 2.31B. Regarding current trading prices, MDU is priced at $17.01, while VRTV trades at $169.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas VRTV's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, MDU's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VRTV's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MDU is more volatile compared to VRTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDU.
MDU vs BBU Comparison
MDU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDU stands at 3.48B. In comparison, BBU has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, MDU is priced at $17.01, while BBU trades at $24.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas BBU's P/E ratio is -70.46. In terms of profitability, MDU's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BBU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDU is more volatile compared to BBU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDU.
MDU vs CODI-PC Comparison
MDU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDU stands at 3.48B. In comparison, CODI-PC has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, MDU is priced at $17.01, while CODI-PC trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CODI-PC's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, MDU's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CODI-PC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDU is less volatile compared to CODI-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDU.
MDU vs SPLP Comparison
MDU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDU stands at 3.48B. In comparison, SPLP has a market cap of 727.72M. Regarding current trading prices, MDU is priced at $17.01, while SPLP trades at $38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas SPLP's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, MDU's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPLP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MDU is less volatile compared to SPLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDU.
MDU vs CRESY Comparison
MDU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDU stands at 3.48B. In comparison, CRESY has a market cap of 702.82M. Regarding current trading prices, MDU is priced at $17.01, while CRESY trades at $11.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CRESY's P/E ratio is -9.39. In terms of profitability, MDU's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRESY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MDU is less volatile compared to CRESY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDU.
MDU vs MATW Comparison
MDU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDU stands at 3.48B. In comparison, MATW has a market cap of 658.00M. Regarding current trading prices, MDU is priced at $17.01, while MATW trades at $21.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas MATW's P/E ratio is -8.32. In terms of profitability, MDU's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MATW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MDU is less volatile compared to MATW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDU.
MDU vs FIP Comparison
MDU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDU stands at 3.48B. In comparison, FIP has a market cap of 589.87M. Regarding current trading prices, MDU is priced at $17.01, while FIP trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas FIP's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, MDU's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FIP's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MDU is less volatile compared to FIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDU.
MDU vs CODI Comparison
MDU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDU stands at 3.48B. In comparison, CODI has a market cap of 575.93M. Regarding current trading prices, MDU is priced at $17.01, while CODI trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CODI's P/E ratio is -6.12. In terms of profitability, MDU's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CODI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDU is less volatile compared to CODI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDU.
MDU vs CRESW Comparison
MDU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDU stands at 3.48B. In comparison, CRESW has a market cap of 544.54M. Regarding current trading prices, MDU is priced at $17.01, while CRESW trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CRESW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDU's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRESW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MDU is less volatile compared to CRESW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDU.
MDU vs CODI-PB Comparison
MDU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDU stands at 3.48B. In comparison, CODI-PB has a market cap of 537.53M. Regarding current trading prices, MDU is priced at $17.01, while CODI-PB trades at $16.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CODI-PB's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, MDU's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CODI-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDU is less volatile compared to CODI-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDU.
MDU vs CODI-PA Comparison
MDU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDU stands at 3.48B. In comparison, CODI-PA has a market cap of 524.29M. Regarding current trading prices, MDU is priced at $17.01, while CODI-PA trades at $15.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas CODI-PA's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, MDU's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CODI-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDU is less volatile compared to CODI-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDU.
MDU vs TRC Comparison
MDU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDU stands at 3.48B. In comparison, TRC has a market cap of 437.89M. Regarding current trading prices, MDU is priced at $17.01, while TRC trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas TRC's P/E ratio is 162.90. In terms of profitability, MDU's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MDU is more volatile compared to TRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDU.
MDU vs SPLP-PA Comparison
MDU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDU stands at 3.48B. In comparison, SPLP-PA has a market cap of 369.78M. Regarding current trading prices, MDU is priced at $17.01, while SPLP-PA trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas SPLP-PA's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, MDU's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPLP-PA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MDU is less volatile compared to SPLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDU.
MDU vs FIPWV Comparison
MDU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDU stands at 3.48B. In comparison, FIPWV has a market cap of 328.17M. Regarding current trading prices, MDU is priced at $17.01, while FIPWV trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas FIPWV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDU's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FIPWV's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MDU is less volatile compared to FIPWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDU.
MDU vs FBYD Comparison
MDU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDU stands at 3.48B. In comparison, FBYD has a market cap of 289.63M. Regarding current trading prices, MDU is priced at $17.01, while FBYD trades at $7.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas FBYD's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, MDU's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FBYD's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, MDU is less volatile compared to FBYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDU.
MDU vs RCMT Comparison
MDU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDU stands at 3.48B. In comparison, RCMT has a market cap of 163.48M. Regarding current trading prices, MDU is priced at $17.01, while RCMT trades at $22.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas RCMT's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, MDU's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RCMT's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MDU is less volatile compared to RCMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDU.
MDU vs TUSK Comparison
MDU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDU stands at 3.48B. In comparison, TUSK has a market cap of 123.69M. Regarding current trading prices, MDU is priced at $17.01, while TUSK trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas TUSK's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, MDU's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TUSK's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MDU is less volatile compared to TUSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDU.
MDU vs IRS Comparison
MDU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDU stands at 3.48B. In comparison, IRS has a market cap of 113.95M. Regarding current trading prices, MDU is priced at $17.01, while IRS trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas IRS's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, MDU's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IRS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MDU is less volatile compared to IRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDU.
MDU vs NNBR Comparison
MDU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDU stands at 3.48B. In comparison, NNBR has a market cap of 110.48M. Regarding current trading prices, MDU is priced at $17.01, while NNBR trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas NNBR's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, MDU's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NNBR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MDU is less volatile compared to NNBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDU.
MDU vs FBYDW Comparison
MDU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDU stands at 3.48B. In comparison, FBYDW has a market cap of 27.83M. Regarding current trading prices, MDU is priced at $17.01, while FBYDW trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas FBYDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDU's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FBYDW's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, MDU is more volatile compared to FBYDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDU.
MDU vs IGC Comparison
MDU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDU stands at 3.48B. In comparison, IGC has a market cap of 23.59M. Regarding current trading prices, MDU is priced at $17.01, while IGC trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas IGC's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, MDU's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IGC's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MDU is less volatile compared to IGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDU.
MDU vs EFSH Comparison
MDU plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDU stands at 3.48B. In comparison, EFSH has a market cap of 1.88M. Regarding current trading prices, MDU is priced at $17.01, while EFSH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDU currently has a P/E ratio of 19.33, whereas EFSH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MDU's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EFSH's ROE of +2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MDU is less volatile compared to EFSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDU.