MediaCo Holding Inc.
MediaCo Holding Inc. (MDIA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MDIA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Broadcasting Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDIA | $0.60 | +0.00% | 32.2M | -1.14 | -$0.53 | N/A |
| CCZ | $64.38 | +0.00% | 61B | 54.93 | $1.17 | +2.80% |
| LSXMA | $22.29 | -1.20% | 7.3B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMK | $22.29 | -1.15% | 7.3B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMB | $22.51 | -4.62% | 7.3B | 8.83 | $2.55 | N/A |
| TGNA | $20.87 | +0.00% | 3.4B | 9.97 | $2.09 | +2.40% |
| GTN-A | $12.21 | +0.00% | 691.9M | 28.37 | $0.43 | +6.57% |
| NMAX | $5.59 | +0.00% | 504.3M | -6.52 | -$0.86 | N/A |
| IHRT | $3.51 | +0.00% | 465.6M | -1.40 | -$2.58 | N/A |
| GTN | $4.88 | +0.00% | 450.5M | 11.33 | $0.43 | +6.57% |
Stock Comparison
MDIA vs CCZ Comparison February 2026
MDIA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDIA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, CCZ has a market cap of 61B. Regarding current trading prices, MDIA is priced at $0.60, while CCZ trades at $64.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDIA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas CCZ's P/E ratio is 54.93. In terms of profitability, MDIA's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CCZ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MDIA is more volatile compared to CCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDIA.Check CCZ's competition here
MDIA vs LSXMA Comparison February 2026
MDIA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDIA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, LSXMA has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MDIA is priced at $0.60, while LSXMA trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDIA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas LSXMA's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, MDIA's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LSXMA's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MDIA is more volatile compared to LSXMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDIA.Check LSXMA's competition here
MDIA vs LSXMK Comparison February 2026
MDIA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDIA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, LSXMK has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MDIA is priced at $0.60, while LSXMK trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDIA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas LSXMK's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, MDIA's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LSXMK's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MDIA is more volatile compared to LSXMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDIA.Check LSXMK's competition here
MDIA vs LSXMB Comparison February 2026
MDIA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDIA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, LSXMB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MDIA is priced at $0.60, while LSXMB trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDIA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas LSXMB's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, MDIA's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LSXMB's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MDIA is more volatile compared to LSXMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDIA.Check LSXMB's competition here
MDIA vs TGNA Comparison February 2026
MDIA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDIA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, TGNA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MDIA is priced at $0.60, while TGNA trades at $20.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDIA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas TGNA's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, MDIA's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TGNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MDIA is more volatile compared to TGNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDIA.Check TGNA's competition here
MDIA vs GTN-A Comparison February 2026
MDIA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDIA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, GTN-A has a market cap of 691.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MDIA is priced at $0.60, while GTN-A trades at $12.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDIA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas GTN-A's P/E ratio is 28.37. In terms of profitability, MDIA's ROE is -0.50%, compared to GTN-A's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDIA is more volatile compared to GTN-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDIA.Check GTN-A's competition here
MDIA vs NMAX Comparison February 2026
MDIA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDIA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, NMAX has a market cap of 504.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MDIA is priced at $0.60, while NMAX trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDIA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas NMAX's P/E ratio is -6.52. In terms of profitability, MDIA's ROE is -0.50%, compared to NMAX's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MDIA is more volatile compared to NMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDIA.Check NMAX's competition here
MDIA vs IHRT Comparison February 2026
MDIA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDIA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, IHRT has a market cap of 465.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MDIA is priced at $0.60, while IHRT trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDIA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas IHRT's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, MDIA's ROE is -0.50%, compared to IHRT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MDIA is more volatile compared to IHRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDIA.Check IHRT's competition here
MDIA vs GTN Comparison February 2026
MDIA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDIA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, GTN has a market cap of 450.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MDIA is priced at $0.60, while GTN trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDIA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas GTN's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, MDIA's ROE is -0.50%, compared to GTN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDIA is more volatile compared to GTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDIA.Check GTN's competition here
MDIA vs FUBO Comparison February 2026
MDIA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDIA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, FUBO has a market cap of 442.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MDIA is priced at $0.60, while FUBO trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDIA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas FUBO's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, MDIA's ROE is -0.50%, compared to FUBO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MDIA is more volatile compared to FUBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDIA.Check FUBO's competition here
MDIA vs SSP Comparison February 2026
MDIA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDIA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, SSP has a market cap of 437.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MDIA is priced at $0.60, while SSP trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDIA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas SSP's P/E ratio is -8.63. In terms of profitability, MDIA's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SSP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MDIA is more volatile compared to SSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDIA.Check SSP's competition here
MDIA vs EVC Comparison February 2026
MDIA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDIA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, EVC has a market cap of 269.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MDIA is priced at $0.60, while EVC trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDIA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas EVC's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, MDIA's ROE is -0.50%, compared to EVC's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MDIA is more volatile compared to EVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDIA.Check EVC's competition here
MDIA vs CURI Comparison February 2026
MDIA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDIA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, CURI has a market cap of 189.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MDIA is priced at $0.60, while CURI trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDIA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas CURI's P/E ratio is -32.50. In terms of profitability, MDIA's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CURI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MDIA is more volatile compared to CURI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDIA.Check CURI's competition here
MDIA vs SGA Comparison February 2026
MDIA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDIA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, SGA has a market cap of 77.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MDIA is priced at $0.60, while SGA trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDIA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas SGA's P/E ratio is 239.52. In terms of profitability, MDIA's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SGA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MDIA is more volatile compared to SGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDIA.Check SGA's competition here
MDIA vs SJ Comparison February 2026
MDIA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDIA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, SJ has a market cap of 50.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MDIA is priced at $0.60, while SJ trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDIA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas SJ's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, MDIA's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDIA is more volatile compared to SJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDIA.Check SJ's competition here
MDIA vs UONEK Comparison February 2026
MDIA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDIA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, UONEK has a market cap of 47.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MDIA is priced at $0.60, while UONEK trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDIA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas UONEK's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, MDIA's ROE is -0.50%, compared to UONEK's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MDIA is less volatile compared to UONEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDIA.Check UONEK's competition here
MDIA vs UONE Comparison February 2026
MDIA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDIA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, UONE has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MDIA is priced at $0.60, while UONE trades at $13.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDIA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas UONE's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, MDIA's ROE is -0.50%, compared to UONE's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MDIA is less volatile compared to UONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDIA.Check UONE's competition here
MDIA vs AUD Comparison February 2026
MDIA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDIA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, AUD has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MDIA is priced at $0.60, while AUD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDIA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas AUD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, MDIA's ROE is -0.50%, compared to AUD's ROE of +24.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MDIA is less volatile compared to AUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDIA.Check AUD's competition here
MDIA vs SALM Comparison February 2026
MDIA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDIA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, SALM has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MDIA is priced at $0.60, while SALM trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDIA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas SALM's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, MDIA's ROE is -0.50%, compared to SALM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDIA is more volatile compared to SALM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDIA.Check SALM's competition here
MDIA vs BBGI Comparison February 2026
MDIA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDIA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, BBGI has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MDIA is priced at $0.60, while BBGI trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDIA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas BBGI's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, MDIA's ROE is -0.50%, compared to BBGI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MDIA is more volatile compared to BBGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDIA.Check BBGI's competition here
MDIA vs XHLD Comparison February 2026
MDIA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDIA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, XHLD has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MDIA is priced at $0.60, while XHLD trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDIA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas XHLD's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, MDIA's ROE is -0.50%, compared to XHLD's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MDIA is more volatile compared to XHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDIA.Check XHLD's competition here
MDIA vs CMLS Comparison February 2026
MDIA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDIA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, CMLS has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MDIA is priced at $0.60, while CMLS trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDIA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas CMLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDIA's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CMLS's ROE of +10.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MDIA is less volatile compared to CMLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDIA.Check CMLS's competition here
MDIA vs CURIW Comparison February 2026
MDIA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDIA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, CURIW has a market cap of 723.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MDIA is priced at $0.60, while CURIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDIA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas CURIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDIA's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CURIW's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MDIA is more volatile compared to CURIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDIA.Check CURIW's competition here
MDIA vs QVCD Comparison February 2026
MDIA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDIA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, QVCD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MDIA is priced at $0.60, while QVCD trades at $8.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDIA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas QVCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDIA's ROE is -0.50%, compared to QVCD's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MDIA is more volatile compared to QVCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDIA.Check QVCD's competition here
MDIA vs DISCA Comparison February 2026
MDIA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDIA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, DISCA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MDIA is priced at $0.60, while DISCA trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDIA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas DISCA's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, MDIA's ROE is -0.50%, compared to DISCA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDIA is more volatile compared to DISCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDIA.Check DISCA's competition here
MDIA vs QVCC Comparison February 2026
MDIA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDIA stands at 32.2M. In comparison, QVCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MDIA is priced at $0.60, while QVCC trades at $8.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDIA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.14, whereas QVCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDIA's ROE is -0.50%, compared to QVCC's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MDIA is more volatile compared to QVCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDIA.Check QVCC's competition here