MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. (MCFT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MCFT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Recreational Vehicles Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCFT | $23.00 | -0.95% | 372.2M | 34.12 | $0.67 | N/A |
| BC-PC | $24.11 | +0.10% | 5.4B | N/A | N/A | +2.12% |
| BC | $82.19 | -0.45% | 5.3B | -40.07 | -$2.05 | +2.12% |
| DOOO | $64.23 | +0.75% | 4.7B | 26.76 | $2.40 | +1.01% |
| DOO | $59.86 | -0.71% | 4.4B | 20.12 | $3.00 | +0.52% |
| PII | $69.93 | -1.41% | 4B | -8.94 | -$7.84 | +3.82% |
| THO | $75.91 | -1.63% | 4B | 15.39 | $4.94 | +2.72% |
| HOG | $25.91 | +1.05% | 2.7B | 13.51 | $1.93 | +2.82% |
| LCII | $92.09 | -1.04% | 2.2B | 11.34 | $8.16 | +4.97% |
| WGO | $29.11 | -0.46% | 833.8M | 20.07 | $1.47 | +3.56% |
Stock Comparison
MCFT vs BC-PC Comparison June 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 372.2M. In comparison, BC-PC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $23.00, while BC-PC trades at $24.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.12, whereas BC-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BC-PC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is more volatile compared to BC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check BC-PC's competition here
MCFT vs BC Comparison June 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 372.2M. In comparison, BC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $23.00, while BC trades at $82.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.12, whereas BC's P/E ratio is -40.07. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to BC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check BC's competition here
MCFT vs DOOO Comparison June 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 372.2M. In comparison, DOOO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $23.00, while DOOO trades at $64.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.12, whereas DOOO's P/E ratio is 26.76. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DOOO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to DOOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check DOOO's competition here
MCFT vs DOO Comparison June 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 372.2M. In comparison, DOO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $23.00, while DOO trades at $59.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.12, whereas DOO's P/E ratio is 20.12. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DOO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to DOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check DOO's competition here
MCFT vs PII Comparison June 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 372.2M. In comparison, PII has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $23.00, while PII trades at $69.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.12, whereas PII's P/E ratio is -8.94. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PII's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to PII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check PII's competition here
MCFT vs THO Comparison June 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 372.2M. In comparison, THO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $23.00, while THO trades at $75.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.12, whereas THO's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to THO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to THO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check THO's competition here
MCFT vs HOG Comparison June 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 372.2M. In comparison, HOG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $23.00, while HOG trades at $25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.12, whereas HOG's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HOG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to HOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check HOG's competition here
MCFT vs LCII Comparison June 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 372.2M. In comparison, LCII has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $23.00, while LCII trades at $92.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.12, whereas LCII's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LCII's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to LCII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check LCII's competition here
MCFT vs WGO Comparison June 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 372.2M. In comparison, WGO has a market cap of 833.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $23.00, while WGO trades at $29.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.12, whereas WGO's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WGO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to WGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check WGO's competition here
MCFT vs MBUU Comparison June 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 372.2M. In comparison, MBUU has a market cap of 543.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $23.00, while MBUU trades at $27.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.12, whereas MBUU's P/E ratio is -553.80. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MBUU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to MBUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check MBUU's competition here
MCFT vs MPX Comparison June 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 372.2M. In comparison, MPX has a market cap of 280M. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $23.00, while MPX trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.12, whereas MPX's P/E ratio is 40.90. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MPX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to MPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check MPX's competition here
MCFT vs ONEW Comparison June 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 372.2M. In comparison, ONEW has a market cap of 192.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $23.00, while ONEW trades at $11.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.12, whereas ONEW's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ONEW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to ONEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check ONEW's competition here
MCFT vs EMPD Comparison June 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 372.2M. In comparison, EMPD has a market cap of 108.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $23.00, while EMPD trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.12, whereas EMPD's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EMPD's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to EMPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check EMPD's competition here
MCFT vs MAMO Comparison June 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 372.2M. In comparison, MAMO has a market cap of 40.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $23.00, while MAMO trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.12, whereas MAMO's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MAMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to MAMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check MAMO's competition here
MCFT vs HLBZ Comparison June 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 372.2M. In comparison, HLBZ has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $23.00, while HLBZ trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.12, whereas HLBZ's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HLBZ's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to HLBZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check HLBZ's competition here
MCFT vs REE Comparison June 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 372.2M. In comparison, REE has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $23.00, while REE trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.12, whereas REE's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to REE's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to REE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check REE's competition here
MCFT vs FUV Comparison June 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 372.2M. In comparison, FUV has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $23.00, while FUV trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.12, whereas FUV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FUV's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to FUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check FUV's competition here
MCFT vs VEEE Comparison June 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 372.2M. In comparison, VEEE has a market cap of 305.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $23.00, while VEEE trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.12, whereas VEEE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VEEE's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to VEEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check VEEE's competition here
MCFT vs VMAR Comparison June 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 372.2M. In comparison, VMAR has a market cap of 271.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $23.00, while VMAR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.12, whereas VMAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VMAR's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to VMAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check VMAR's competition here
MCFT vs EZGO Comparison June 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 372.2M. In comparison, EZGO has a market cap of 2.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $23.00, while EZGO trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.12, whereas EZGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EZGO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to EZGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check EZGO's competition here
MCFT vs REEAW Comparison June 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 372.2M. In comparison, REEAW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $23.00, while REEAW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.12, whereas REEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to REEAW's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to REEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check REEAW's competition here
MCFT vs HLBZW Comparison June 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 372.2M. In comparison, HLBZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $23.00, while HLBZW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 34.12, whereas HLBZW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HLBZW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to HLBZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check HLBZW's competition here