MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.
MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. (MCFT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MCFT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Recreational Vehicles Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCFT | $26.37 | +3.13% | 445.7M | 29.13 | $0.94 | N/A |
| BC | $79.77 | -1.24% | 5.3B | -39.85 | -$2.05 | +2.12% |
| DOOO | $64.23 | +0.75% | 4.7B | 26.76 | $2.40 | +1.01% |
| DOO | $56.76 | +1.78% | 4.2B | 16.73 | $3.41 | +0.88% |
| THO | $74.94 | -2.61% | 4.1B | 13.71 | $5.63 | +2.66% |
| PII | $67.36 | +0.44% | 3.9B | -8.71 | -$7.84 | +3.94% |
| LCII | $116.93 | +0.43% | 2.9B | 14.56 | $8.16 | +3.89% |
| HOG | $25.82 | +9.20% | 2.8B | 13.18 | $1.93 | +2.89% |
| BC-PC | $24.70 | +0.59% | 1.6B | N/A | N/A | +2.12% |
| WGO | $30.80 | -3.42% | 897.3M | 21.60 | $1.47 | +4.38% |
Stock Comparison
MCFT vs BC Comparison May 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 445.7M. In comparison, BC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $26.37, while BC trades at $79.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.13, whereas BC's P/E ratio is -39.85. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is more volatile compared to BC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check BC's competition here
MCFT vs DOOO Comparison May 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 445.7M. In comparison, DOOO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $26.37, while DOOO trades at $64.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.13, whereas DOOO's P/E ratio is 26.76. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DOOO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is more volatile compared to DOOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check DOOO's competition here
MCFT vs DOO Comparison May 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 445.7M. In comparison, DOO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $26.37, while DOO trades at $56.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.13, whereas DOO's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DOO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is more volatile compared to DOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check DOO's competition here
MCFT vs THO Comparison May 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 445.7M. In comparison, THO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $26.37, while THO trades at $74.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.13, whereas THO's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to THO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is more volatile compared to THO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check THO's competition here
MCFT vs PII Comparison May 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 445.7M. In comparison, PII has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $26.37, while PII trades at $67.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.13, whereas PII's P/E ratio is -8.71. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PII's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is more volatile compared to PII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check PII's competition here
MCFT vs LCII Comparison May 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 445.7M. In comparison, LCII has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $26.37, while LCII trades at $116.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.13, whereas LCII's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LCII's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is more volatile compared to LCII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check LCII's competition here
MCFT vs HOG Comparison May 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 445.7M. In comparison, HOG has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $26.37, while HOG trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.13, whereas HOG's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HOG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to HOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check HOG's competition here
MCFT vs BC-PC Comparison May 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 445.7M. In comparison, BC-PC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $26.37, while BC-PC trades at $24.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.13, whereas BC-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BC-PC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is more volatile compared to BC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check BC-PC's competition here
MCFT vs WGO Comparison May 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 445.7M. In comparison, WGO has a market cap of 897.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $26.37, while WGO trades at $30.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.13, whereas WGO's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WGO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is more volatile compared to WGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check WGO's competition here
MCFT vs MBUU Comparison May 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 445.7M. In comparison, MBUU has a market cap of 559.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $26.37, while MBUU trades at $30.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.13, whereas MBUU's P/E ratio is 40.66. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MBUU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to MBUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check MBUU's competition here
MCFT vs MPX Comparison May 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 445.7M. In comparison, MPX has a market cap of 309.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $26.37, while MPX trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.13, whereas MPX's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MPX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is more volatile compared to MPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check MPX's competition here
MCFT vs ONEW Comparison May 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 445.7M. In comparison, ONEW has a market cap of 200.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $26.37, while ONEW trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.13, whereas ONEW's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ONEW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is more volatile compared to ONEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check ONEW's competition here
MCFT vs EMPD Comparison May 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 445.7M. In comparison, EMPD has a market cap of 139.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $26.37, while EMPD trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.13, whereas EMPD's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EMPD's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to EMPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check EMPD's competition here
MCFT vs MAMO Comparison May 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 445.7M. In comparison, MAMO has a market cap of 41.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $26.37, while MAMO trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.13, whereas MAMO's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MAMO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is more volatile compared to MAMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check MAMO's competition here
MCFT vs HLBZ Comparison May 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 445.7M. In comparison, HLBZ has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $26.37, while HLBZ trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.13, whereas HLBZ's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HLBZ's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to HLBZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check HLBZ's competition here
MCFT vs REE Comparison May 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 445.7M. In comparison, REE has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $26.37, while REE trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.13, whereas REE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to REE's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to REE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check REE's competition here
MCFT vs FUV Comparison May 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 445.7M. In comparison, FUV has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $26.37, while FUV trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.13, whereas FUV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FUV's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to FUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check FUV's competition here
MCFT vs FRZA Comparison May 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 445.7M. In comparison, FRZA has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $26.37, while FRZA trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.13, whereas FRZA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FRZA's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to FRZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check FRZA's competition here
MCFT vs VMAR Comparison May 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 445.7M. In comparison, VMAR has a market cap of 906.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $26.37, while VMAR trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.13, whereas VMAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VMAR's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is more volatile compared to VMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check VMAR's competition here
MCFT vs MCOM Comparison May 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 445.7M. In comparison, MCOM has a market cap of 710.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $26.37, while MCOM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.13, whereas MCOM's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MCOM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is more volatile compared to MCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check MCOM's competition here
MCFT vs VEEE Comparison May 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 445.7M. In comparison, VEEE has a market cap of 316.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $26.37, while VEEE trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.13, whereas VEEE's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VEEE's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to VEEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check VEEE's competition here
MCFT vs EZGO Comparison May 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 445.7M. In comparison, EZGO has a market cap of 9.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $26.37, while EZGO trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.13, whereas EZGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EZGO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to EZGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check EZGO's competition here
MCFT vs REEAW Comparison May 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 445.7M. In comparison, REEAW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $26.37, while REEAW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.13, whereas REEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to REEAW's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to REEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check REEAW's competition here
MCFT vs HLBZW Comparison May 2026
MCFT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MCFT stands at 445.7M. In comparison, HLBZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MCFT is priced at $26.37, while HLBZW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MCFT currently has a P/E ratio of 29.13, whereas HLBZW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MCFT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HLBZW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MCFT is less volatile compared to HLBZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCFT.Check HLBZW's competition here