Arcimoto, Inc.
Arcimoto, Inc. (FUV) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FUV) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Recreational Vehicles Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FUV | $0.38 | -5.94% | 4.2M | -0.04 | -$9.72 | N/A |
| BC | $80.20 | -0.71% | 5.3B | -39.85 | -$2.05 | +2.12% |
| DOOO | $64.23 | +0.75% | 4.7B | 26.76 | $2.40 | +1.01% |
| DOO | $56.40 | +1.13% | 4.2B | 16.73 | $3.41 | +0.88% |
| THO | $76.40 | -0.70% | 4.1B | 13.71 | $5.63 | +2.66% |
| PII | $66.51 | -0.82% | 3.9B | -8.71 | -$7.84 | +3.94% |
| LCII | $117.99 | +1.34% | 2.9B | 14.56 | $8.16 | +3.89% |
| HOG | $26.11 | +10.45% | 2.8B | 13.18 | $1.93 | +2.89% |
| BC-PC | $24.56 | +0.03% | 1.6B | N/A | N/A | +2.12% |
| WGO | $31.11 | -2.45% | 897.3M | 21.60 | $1.47 | +4.38% |
Stock Comparison
FUV vs BC Comparison May 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, BC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while BC trades at $80.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BC's P/E ratio is -39.85. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to BC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to BC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check BC's competition here
FUV vs DOOO Comparison May 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, DOOO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while DOOO trades at $64.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas DOOO's P/E ratio is 26.76. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to DOOO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to DOOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check DOOO's competition here
FUV vs DOO Comparison May 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, DOO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while DOO trades at $56.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas DOO's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to DOO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to DOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check DOO's competition here
FUV vs THO Comparison May 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, THO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while THO trades at $76.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas THO's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to THO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to THO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check THO's competition here
FUV vs PII Comparison May 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, PII has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while PII trades at $66.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PII's P/E ratio is -8.71. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to PII's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to PII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check PII's competition here
FUV vs LCII Comparison May 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, LCII has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while LCII trades at $117.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LCII's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to LCII's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to LCII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check LCII's competition here
FUV vs HOG Comparison May 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, HOG has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while HOG trades at $26.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HOG's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to HOG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to HOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check HOG's competition here
FUV vs BC-PC Comparison May 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, BC-PC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while BC-PC trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BC-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to BC-PC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to BC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check BC-PC's competition here
FUV vs WGO Comparison May 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, WGO has a market cap of 897.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while WGO trades at $31.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas WGO's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to WGO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to WGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check WGO's competition here
FUV vs MBUU Comparison May 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, MBUU has a market cap of 559.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while MBUU trades at $29.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MBUU's P/E ratio is 40.66. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MBUU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to MBUU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check MBUU's competition here
FUV vs MCFT Comparison May 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, MCFT has a market cap of 445.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while MCFT trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MCFT's P/E ratio is 29.13. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MCFT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to MCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check MCFT's competition here
FUV vs MPX Comparison May 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, MPX has a market cap of 309.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while MPX trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MPX's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MPX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to MPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check MPX's competition here
FUV vs ONEW Comparison May 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, ONEW has a market cap of 200.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while ONEW trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ONEW's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to ONEW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to ONEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check ONEW's competition here
FUV vs EMPD Comparison May 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, EMPD has a market cap of 139.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while EMPD trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas EMPD's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to EMPD's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to EMPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check EMPD's competition here
FUV vs MAMO Comparison May 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, MAMO has a market cap of 41.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while MAMO trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MAMO's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MAMO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to MAMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check MAMO's competition here
FUV vs HLBZ Comparison May 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, HLBZ has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while HLBZ trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HLBZ's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to HLBZ's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is less volatile compared to HLBZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check HLBZ's competition here
FUV vs REE Comparison May 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, REE has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while REE trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas REE's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to REE's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to REE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check REE's competition here
FUV vs FRZA Comparison May 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, FRZA has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while FRZA trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FRZA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to FRZA's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is less volatile compared to FRZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check FRZA's competition here
FUV vs VMAR Comparison May 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, VMAR has a market cap of 906.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while VMAR trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VMAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to VMAR's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to VMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check VMAR's competition here
FUV vs MCOM Comparison May 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, MCOM has a market cap of 710.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while MCOM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MCOM's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MCOM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to MCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check MCOM's competition here
FUV vs VEEE Comparison May 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, VEEE has a market cap of 316.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while VEEE trades at $7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VEEE's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to VEEE's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is less volatile compared to VEEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check VEEE's competition here
FUV vs EZGO Comparison May 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, EZGO has a market cap of 9.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while EZGO trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas EZGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to EZGO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is less volatile compared to EZGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check EZGO's competition here
FUV vs REEAW Comparison May 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, REEAW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while REEAW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas REEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to REEAW's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is less volatile compared to REEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check REEAW's competition here
FUV vs HLBZW Comparison May 2026
FUV plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, HLBZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38, while HLBZW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HLBZW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to HLBZW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is less volatile compared to HLBZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check HLBZW's competition here