Arcimoto, Inc. (NASDAQ: FUV) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Arcimoto, Inc. (NASDAQ: FUV) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, BC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38 on the NASDAQ, while BC trades at $82.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BC's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to BC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to BC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check BC's competition here

Arcimoto, Inc. (NASDAQ: FUV) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, BC-PC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38 on the NASDAQ, while BC-PC trades at $23.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BC-PC's P/E ratio is -13.71. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to BC-PC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to BC-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check BC-PC's competition here

Arcimoto, Inc. (NASDAQ: FUV) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, DOO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38 on the NASDAQ, while DOO trades at $64.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas DOO's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to DOO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to DOO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check DOO's competition here

Arcimoto, Inc. (NASDAQ: FUV) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, DOOO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38 on the NASDAQ, while DOOO trades at $64.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas DOOO's P/E ratio is 26.76. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to DOOO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to DOOO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check DOOO's competition here

Arcimoto, Inc. (NASDAQ: FUV) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, THO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38 on the NASDAQ, while THO trades at $79.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas THO's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to THO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to THO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check THO's competition here

Arcimoto, Inc. (NASDAQ: FUV) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, PII has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38 on the NASDAQ, while PII trades at $69.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PII's P/E ratio is 68.13. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to PII's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to PII. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check PII's competition here

Arcimoto, Inc. (NASDAQ: FUV) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, LCII has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38 on the NASDAQ, while LCII trades at $106.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LCII's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to LCII's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to LCII. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check LCII's competition here

Arcimoto, Inc. (NASDAQ: FUV) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, WGO has a market cap of 891.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38 on the NASDAQ, while WGO trades at $31.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas WGO's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to WGO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to WGO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check WGO's competition here

Arcimoto, Inc. (NASDAQ: FUV) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, MCFT has a market cap of 605.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38 on the NASDAQ, while MCFT trades at $24.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MCFT's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MCFT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to MCFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check MCFT's competition here

Arcimoto, Inc. (NASDAQ: FUV) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, MBUU has a market cap of 576M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38 on the NASDAQ, while MBUU trades at $29.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MBUU's P/E ratio is 26.42. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MBUU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to MBUU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check MBUU's competition here

Arcimoto, Inc. (NASDAQ: FUV) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, MPX has a market cap of 280M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38 on the NASDAQ, while MPX trades at $8.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MPX's P/E ratio is 40.90. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MPX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to MPX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check MPX's competition here

Arcimoto, Inc. (NASDAQ: FUV) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, MAMO has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38 on the NASDAQ, while MAMO trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MAMO's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MAMO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to MAMO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check MAMO's competition here

Arcimoto, Inc. (NASDAQ: FUV) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, HLBZ has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38 on the NASDAQ, while HLBZ trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HLBZ's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to HLBZ's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is less volatile compared to HLBZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check HLBZ's competition here

Arcimoto, Inc. (NASDAQ: FUV) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, VEEE has a market cap of 622.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38 on the NASDAQ, while VEEE trades at $11.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VEEE's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to VEEE's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to VEEE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check VEEE's competition here

Arcimoto, Inc. (NASDAQ: FUV) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, VMAR has a market cap of 483.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38 on the NASDAQ, while VMAR trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VMAR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to VMAR's ROE of -3.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is more volatile compared to VMAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check VMAR's competition here

Arcimoto, Inc. (NASDAQ: FUV) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, EZGO has a market cap of 260.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38 on the NASDAQ, while EZGO trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas EZGO's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to EZGO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is less volatile compared to EZGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check EZGO's competition here

Arcimoto, Inc. (NASDAQ: FUV) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, REEAW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38 on the NASDAQ, while REEAW trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas REEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to REEAW's ROE of -4.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is less volatile compared to REEAW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check REEAW's competition here

Arcimoto, Inc. (NASDAQ: FUV) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FUV stands at 4.2M. In comparison, HLBZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FUV is priced at $0.38 on the NASDAQ, while HLBZW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FUV currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HLBZW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FUV's ROE is -1.48%, compared to HLBZW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FUV is less volatile compared to HLBZW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FUV.Check HLBZW's competition here