Helbiz, Inc. (HLBZ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HLBZ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Recreational Vehicles Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLBZ | $0.12 | -4.50% | 36.3M | -0.05 | -$2.33 | N/A |
| BC | $78.97 | +1.89% | 5.1B | 23.16 | $3.41 | +2.25% |
| BC-PC | $23.94 | -0.46% | 5B | -13.70 | -$1.75 | +2.25% |
| DOOO | $64.23 | +0.75% | 4.7B | 26.76 | $2.40 | +0.76% |
| DOO | $60.06 | +2.11% | 4.4B | 14.76 | $4.07 | +0.88% |
| PII | $71.55 | +6.00% | 4.1B | 70.15 | $1.02 | +4.02% |
| THO | $74.96 | +3.66% | 3.9B | 16.23 | $4.62 | +2.88% |
| HOG | $25.95 | +3.47% | 2.7B | 14.74 | $1.76 | +2.94% |
| LCII | $104.02 | +0.45% | 2.5B | 12.94 | $8.04 | +4.46% |
| WGO | $30.50 | +5.12% | 862.1M | 15.10 | $2.02 | +4.82% |
Stock Comparison
HLBZ vs BC Comparison July 2026
HLBZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZ stands at 36.3M. In comparison, BC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZ is priced at $0.12, while BC trades at $78.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BC's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, HLBZ's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZ is more volatile compared to BC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZ.Check BC's competition here
HLBZ vs BC-PC Comparison July 2026
HLBZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZ stands at 36.3M. In comparison, BC-PC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZ is priced at $0.12, while BC-PC trades at $23.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas BC-PC's P/E ratio is -13.70. In terms of profitability, HLBZ's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BC-PC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZ is more volatile compared to BC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZ.Check BC-PC's competition here
HLBZ vs DOOO Comparison July 2026
HLBZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZ stands at 36.3M. In comparison, DOOO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZ is priced at $0.12, while DOOO trades at $64.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas DOOO's P/E ratio is 26.76. In terms of profitability, HLBZ's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DOOO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZ is more volatile compared to DOOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZ.Check DOOO's competition here
HLBZ vs DOO Comparison July 2026
HLBZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZ stands at 36.3M. In comparison, DOO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZ is priced at $0.12, while DOO trades at $60.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas DOO's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, HLBZ's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DOO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZ is more volatile compared to DOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZ.Check DOO's competition here
HLBZ vs PII Comparison July 2026
HLBZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZ stands at 36.3M. In comparison, PII has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZ is priced at $0.12, while PII trades at $71.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas PII's P/E ratio is 70.15. In terms of profitability, HLBZ's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PII's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZ is more volatile compared to PII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZ.Check PII's competition here
HLBZ vs THO Comparison July 2026
HLBZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZ stands at 36.3M. In comparison, THO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZ is priced at $0.12, while THO trades at $74.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas THO's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, HLBZ's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZ is more volatile compared to THO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZ.Check THO's competition here
HLBZ vs HOG Comparison July 2026
HLBZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZ stands at 36.3M. In comparison, HOG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZ is priced at $0.12, while HOG trades at $25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HOG's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, HLBZ's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HOG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZ is more volatile compared to HOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZ.Check HOG's competition here
HLBZ vs LCII Comparison July 2026
HLBZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZ stands at 36.3M. In comparison, LCII has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZ is priced at $0.12, while LCII trades at $104.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas LCII's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, HLBZ's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LCII's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZ is more volatile compared to LCII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZ.Check LCII's competition here
HLBZ vs WGO Comparison July 2026
HLBZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZ stands at 36.3M. In comparison, WGO has a market cap of 862.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZ is priced at $0.12, while WGO trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas WGO's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, HLBZ's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WGO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZ is more volatile compared to WGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZ.Check WGO's competition here
HLBZ vs MBUU Comparison July 2026
HLBZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZ stands at 36.3M. In comparison, MBUU has a market cap of 549.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZ is priced at $0.12, while MBUU trades at $27.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MBUU's P/E ratio is 25.20. In terms of profitability, HLBZ's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MBUU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZ is more volatile compared to MBUU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZ.Check MBUU's competition here
HLBZ vs MCFT Comparison July 2026
HLBZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZ stands at 36.3M. In comparison, MCFT has a market cap of 400.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZ is priced at $0.12, while MCFT trades at $24.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MCFT's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, HLBZ's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MCFT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZ is more volatile compared to MCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZ.Check MCFT's competition here
HLBZ vs MPX Comparison July 2026
HLBZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZ stands at 36.3M. In comparison, MPX has a market cap of 280M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZ is priced at $0.12, while MPX trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MPX's P/E ratio is 40.90. In terms of profitability, HLBZ's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MPX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZ is more volatile compared to MPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZ.Check MPX's competition here
HLBZ vs ONEW Comparison July 2026
HLBZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZ stands at 36.3M. In comparison, ONEW has a market cap of 203.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZ is priced at $0.12, while ONEW trades at $12.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas ONEW's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, HLBZ's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ONEW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZ is more volatile compared to ONEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZ.Check ONEW's competition here
HLBZ vs EMPD Comparison July 2026
HLBZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZ stands at 36.3M. In comparison, EMPD has a market cap of 94.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZ is priced at $0.12, while EMPD trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas EMPD's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, HLBZ's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EMPD's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZ is more volatile compared to EMPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZ.Check EMPD's competition here
HLBZ vs MAMO Comparison July 2026
HLBZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZ stands at 36.3M. In comparison, MAMO has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZ is priced at $0.12, while MAMO trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas MAMO's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, HLBZ's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZ is more volatile compared to MAMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZ.Check MAMO's competition here
HLBZ vs FUV Comparison July 2026
HLBZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZ stands at 36.3M. In comparison, FUV has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZ is priced at $0.12, while FUV trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas FUV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, HLBZ's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FUV's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZ is more volatile compared to FUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZ.Check FUV's competition here
HLBZ vs REE Comparison July 2026
HLBZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZ stands at 36.3M. In comparison, REE has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZ is priced at $0.12, while REE trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas REE's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HLBZ's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REE's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZ is more volatile compared to REE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZ.Check REE's competition here
HLBZ vs VEEE Comparison July 2026
HLBZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZ stands at 36.3M. In comparison, VEEE has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZ is priced at $0.12, while VEEE trades at $26.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas VEEE's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, HLBZ's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VEEE's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZ is less volatile compared to VEEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZ.Check VEEE's competition here
HLBZ vs VMAR Comparison July 2026
HLBZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZ stands at 36.3M. In comparison, VMAR has a market cap of 952.4K. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZ is priced at $0.12, while VMAR trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas VMAR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HLBZ's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VMAR's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZ is less volatile compared to VMAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZ.Check VMAR's competition here
HLBZ vs EZGO Comparison July 2026
HLBZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZ stands at 36.3M. In comparison, EZGO has a market cap of 273.9K. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZ is priced at $0.12, while EZGO trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas EZGO's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, HLBZ's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EZGO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZ is more volatile compared to EZGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZ.Check EZGO's competition here
HLBZ vs REEAW Comparison July 2026
HLBZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZ stands at 36.3M. In comparison, REEAW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZ is priced at $0.12, while REEAW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas REEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLBZ's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REEAW's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZ is less volatile compared to REEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZ.Check REEAW's competition here
HLBZ vs HLBZW Comparison July 2026
HLBZ plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZ stands at 36.3M. In comparison, HLBZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZ is priced at $0.12, while HLBZW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZ currently has a P/E ratio of -0.05, whereas HLBZW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HLBZ's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HLBZW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZ is less volatile compared to HLBZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZ.Check HLBZW's competition here