LCI Industries (LCII) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LCII) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Recreational Vehicles Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCII | $93.06 | +1.61% | 2.3B | 11.40 | $8.16 | +4.94% |
| BC-PC | $24.08 | +0.17% | 5.4B | N/A | N/A | +2.10% |
| BC | $82.56 | +1.15% | 5.4B | -40.27 | -$2.05 | +2.10% |
| DOOO | $64.23 | +0.75% | 4.7B | 26.76 | $2.40 | +1.01% |
| DOO | $60.28 | +1.96% | 4.4B | 20.09 | $3.00 | +0.52% |
| PII | $70.93 | +2.22% | 4B | -9.05 | -$7.84 | +3.82% |
| THO | $77.17 | +0.57% | 4B | 15.63 | $4.94 | +2.66% |
| HOG | $25.64 | -0.39% | 2.7B | 13.28 | $1.93 | +2.87% |
| WGO | $29.24 | +4.58% | 814.1M | 19.59 | $1.47 | +3.57% |
| MBUU | $27.88 | +2.73% | 547.5M | -557.60 | -$0.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LCII vs BC-PC Comparison June 2026
LCII plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCII stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BC-PC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCII is priced at $93.06, while BC-PC trades at $24.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCII currently has a P/E ratio of 11.40, whereas BC-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCII's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BC-PC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LCII is more volatile compared to BC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCII.Check BC-PC's competition here
LCII vs BC Comparison June 2026
LCII plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCII stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCII is priced at $93.06, while BC trades at $82.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCII currently has a P/E ratio of 11.40, whereas BC's P/E ratio is -40.27. In terms of profitability, LCII's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LCII is more volatile compared to BC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCII.Check BC's competition here
LCII vs DOOO Comparison June 2026
LCII plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCII stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DOOO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LCII is priced at $93.06, while DOOO trades at $64.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCII currently has a P/E ratio of 11.40, whereas DOOO's P/E ratio is 26.76. In terms of profitability, LCII's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DOOO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LCII is more volatile compared to DOOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCII.Check DOOO's competition here
LCII vs DOO Comparison June 2026
LCII plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCII stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DOO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCII is priced at $93.06, while DOO trades at $60.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCII currently has a P/E ratio of 11.40, whereas DOO's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, LCII's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DOO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LCII is less volatile compared to DOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCII.Check DOO's competition here
LCII vs PII Comparison June 2026
LCII plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCII stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PII has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCII is priced at $93.06, while PII trades at $70.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCII currently has a P/E ratio of 11.40, whereas PII's P/E ratio is -9.05. In terms of profitability, LCII's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PII's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LCII is more volatile compared to PII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCII.Check PII's competition here
LCII vs THO Comparison June 2026
LCII plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCII stands at 2.3B. In comparison, THO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCII is priced at $93.06, while THO trades at $77.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCII currently has a P/E ratio of 11.40, whereas THO's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, LCII's ROE is +0.15%, compared to THO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LCII is more volatile compared to THO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCII.Check THO's competition here
LCII vs HOG Comparison June 2026
LCII plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCII stands at 2.3B. In comparison, HOG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LCII is priced at $93.06, while HOG trades at $25.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCII currently has a P/E ratio of 11.40, whereas HOG's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, LCII's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HOG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LCII is more volatile compared to HOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCII.Check HOG's competition here
LCII vs WGO Comparison June 2026
LCII plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCII stands at 2.3B. In comparison, WGO has a market cap of 814.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCII is priced at $93.06, while WGO trades at $29.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCII currently has a P/E ratio of 11.40, whereas WGO's P/E ratio is 19.59. In terms of profitability, LCII's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WGO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LCII is less volatile compared to WGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCII.Check WGO's competition here
LCII vs MBUU Comparison June 2026
LCII plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCII stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MBUU has a market cap of 547.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LCII is priced at $93.06, while MBUU trades at $27.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCII currently has a P/E ratio of 11.40, whereas MBUU's P/E ratio is -557.60. In terms of profitability, LCII's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MBUU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LCII is less volatile compared to MBUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCII.Check MBUU's competition here
LCII vs MCFT Comparison June 2026
LCII plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCII stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MCFT has a market cap of 378M. Regarding current trading prices, LCII is priced at $93.06, while MCFT trades at $23.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCII currently has a P/E ratio of 11.40, whereas MCFT's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, LCII's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MCFT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LCII and MCFT have similar daily volatility (2.77).Check MCFT's competition here
LCII vs MPX Comparison June 2026
LCII plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCII stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MPX has a market cap of 280M. Regarding current trading prices, LCII is priced at $93.06, while MPX trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCII currently has a P/E ratio of 11.40, whereas MPX's P/E ratio is 40.90. In terms of profitability, LCII's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MPX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LCII is less volatile compared to MPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCII.Check MPX's competition here
LCII vs ONEW Comparison June 2026
LCII plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCII stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ONEW has a market cap of 184.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LCII is priced at $93.06, while ONEW trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCII currently has a P/E ratio of 11.40, whereas ONEW's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, LCII's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ONEW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LCII is less volatile compared to ONEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCII.Check ONEW's competition here
LCII vs EMPD Comparison June 2026
LCII plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCII stands at 2.3B. In comparison, EMPD has a market cap of 101.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LCII is priced at $93.06, while EMPD trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCII currently has a P/E ratio of 11.40, whereas EMPD's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, LCII's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EMPD's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LCII is less volatile compared to EMPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCII.Check EMPD's competition here
LCII vs MAMO Comparison June 2026
LCII plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCII stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MAMO has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LCII is priced at $93.06, while MAMO trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCII currently has a P/E ratio of 11.40, whereas MAMO's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, LCII's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MAMO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LCII is less volatile compared to MAMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCII.Check MAMO's competition here
LCII vs HLBZ Comparison June 2026
LCII plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCII stands at 2.3B. In comparison, HLBZ has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LCII is priced at $93.06, while HLBZ trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCII currently has a P/E ratio of 11.40, whereas HLBZ's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LCII's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HLBZ's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LCII is less volatile compared to HLBZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCII.Check HLBZ's competition here
LCII vs REE Comparison June 2026
LCII plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCII stands at 2.3B. In comparison, REE has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LCII is priced at $93.06, while REE trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCII currently has a P/E ratio of 11.40, whereas REE's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, LCII's ROE is +0.15%, compared to REE's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LCII is less volatile compared to REE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCII.Check REE's competition here
LCII vs FUV Comparison June 2026
LCII plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCII stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FUV has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LCII is priced at $93.06, while FUV trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCII currently has a P/E ratio of 11.40, whereas FUV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LCII's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FUV's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LCII is less volatile compared to FUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCII.Check FUV's competition here
LCII vs VMAR Comparison June 2026
LCII plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCII stands at 2.3B. In comparison, VMAR has a market cap of 323.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LCII is priced at $93.06, while VMAR trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCII currently has a P/E ratio of 11.40, whereas VMAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCII's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VMAR's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LCII is less volatile compared to VMAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCII.Check VMAR's competition here
LCII vs VEEE Comparison June 2026
LCII plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCII stands at 2.3B. In comparison, VEEE has a market cap of 301.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LCII is priced at $93.06, while VEEE trades at $5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCII currently has a P/E ratio of 11.40, whereas VEEE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LCII's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VEEE's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LCII is less volatile compared to VEEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCII.Check VEEE's competition here
LCII vs EZGO Comparison June 2026
LCII plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCII stands at 2.3B. In comparison, EZGO has a market cap of 2.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LCII is priced at $93.06, while EZGO trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCII currently has a P/E ratio of 11.40, whereas EZGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCII's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EZGO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LCII is less volatile compared to EZGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCII.Check EZGO's competition here
LCII vs REEAW Comparison June 2026
LCII plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCII stands at 2.3B. In comparison, REEAW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LCII is priced at $93.06, while REEAW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCII currently has a P/E ratio of 11.40, whereas REEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCII's ROE is +0.15%, compared to REEAW's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LCII is less volatile compared to REEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCII.Check REEAW's competition here
LCII vs HLBZW Comparison June 2026
LCII plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCII stands at 2.3B. In comparison, HLBZW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LCII is priced at $93.06, while HLBZW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCII currently has a P/E ratio of 11.40, whereas HLBZW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LCII's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HLBZW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LCII is less volatile compared to HLBZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCII.Check HLBZW's competition here