Mobileye Global Inc.
Mobileye Global Inc. MBLY Peers
See (MBLY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBLY | $17.98 | -1.96% | 14.6B | -4.89 | -$3.68 | N/A |
| APTV-PA | $108.66 | +0.15% | 29.4B | 92.08 | $1.18 | N/A |
| APTV | $68.22 | -0.81% | 14.9B | 11.15 | $6.12 | N/A |
| MGA | $38.61 | +0.42% | 10.9B | 9.63 | $4.01 | +4.98% |
| LKQ | $37.01 | -0.30% | 9.6B | 13.76 | $2.69 | +3.25% |
| ALV | $111.90 | -1.06% | 8.6B | 12.92 | $8.66 | +2.49% |
| ALSN | $94.99 | +0.35% | 8B | 11.00 | $8.64 | +1.09% |
| BWA | $33.48 | -0.39% | 7.4B | 23.56 | $1.42 | +1.31% |
| MOD | $98.50 | -2.80% | 5.2B | 28.80 | $3.42 | N/A |
| LEA | $94.98 | +0.70% | 5.1B | 11.09 | $8.56 | +3.25% |
Stock Comparison
MBLY vs APTV-PA Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, APTV-PA has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while APTV-PA trades at $108.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas APTV-PA's P/E ratio is 92.08. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to APTV-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to APTV-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs APTV Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, APTV has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while APTV trades at $68.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas APTV's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to APTV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to APTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs MGA Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, MGA has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while MGA trades at $38.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas MGA's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to MGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs LKQ Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, LKQ has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while LKQ trades at $37.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas LKQ's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to LKQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to LKQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs ALV Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, ALV has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while ALV trades at $111.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas ALV's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ALV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to ALV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs ALSN Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, ALSN has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while ALSN trades at $94.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas ALSN's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ALSN's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to ALSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs BWA Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, BWA has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while BWA trades at $33.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas BWA's P/E ratio is 23.56. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to BWA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to BWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs MOD Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while MOD trades at $98.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 28.80. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to MOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs LEA Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, LEA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while LEA trades at $94.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas LEA's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to LEA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to LEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs GNTX Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, GNTX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while GNTX trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas GNTX's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GNTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to GNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs QS Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, QS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while QS trades at $6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas QS's P/E ratio is -7.38. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to QS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to QS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs DORM Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, DORM has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while DORM trades at $122.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas DORM's P/E ratio is 17.63. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to DORM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to DORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs BC-PA Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, BC-PA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while BC-PA trades at $24.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas BC-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to BC-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to BC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs BC-PB Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, BC-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while BC-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas BC-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to BC-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to BC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs GT Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, GT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while GT trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas GT's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to GT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs HSAI Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, HSAI has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while HSAI trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas HSAI's P/E ratio is -2195.00. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to HSAI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to HSAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs VC Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, VC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while VC trades at $93.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas VC's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to VC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to VC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs DAN Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, DAN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while DAN trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas DAN's P/E ratio is -71.50. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to DAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to DAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs GTX Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, GTX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while GTX trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas GTX's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GTX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to GTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs AEVA Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while AEVA trades at $37.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -13.40. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs PHIN Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, PHIN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while PHIN trades at $44.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas PHIN's P/E ratio is 25.15. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to PHIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to PHIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs ADNT Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, ADNT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while ADNT trades at $19.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas ADNT's P/E ratio is -6.03. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ADNT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to ADNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs FOXF Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, FOXF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while FOXF trades at $25.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas FOXF's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to FOXF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to FOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs XPEL Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, XPEL has a market cap of 993.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while XPEL trades at $35.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas XPEL's P/E ratio is 20.87. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to XPEL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to XPEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs THRM Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, THRM has a market cap of 873M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while THRM trades at $28.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas THRM's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to THRM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to THRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs PLOW Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 683.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while PLOW trades at $29.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs SMP Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, SMP has a market cap of 674.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while SMP trades at $30.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas SMP's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SMP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to SMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs ECX Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, ECX has a market cap of 665.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while ECX trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas ECX's P/E ratio is -5.86. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ECX's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to ECX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs GTXAP Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, GTXAP has a market cap of 557.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while GTXAP trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas GTXAP's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GTXAP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to GTXAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs MLR Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, MLR has a market cap of 509.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while MLR trades at $44.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas MLR's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MLR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to MLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs ALLG Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, ALLG has a market cap of 496.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while ALLG trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas ALLG's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ALLG's ROE of +4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to ALLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs AXL Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, AXL has a market cap of 483M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while AXL trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas AXL's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to AXL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to AXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs MNRO Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, MNRO has a market cap of 446.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while MNRO trades at $14.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas MNRO's P/E ratio is -67.77. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MNRO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to MNRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs CPS Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, CPS has a market cap of 376.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while CPS trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas CPS's P/E ratio is -8.32. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CPS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to CPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs INVZ Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, INVZ has a market cap of 326.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while INVZ trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas INVZ's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to INVZ's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to INVZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs SES Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, SES has a market cap of 324.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while SES trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas SES's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SES's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to SES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs INVZW Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, INVZW has a market cap of 304.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while INVZW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas INVZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to INVZW's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to INVZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs STRT Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, STRT has a market cap of 259.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while STRT trades at $62.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas STRT's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to STRT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to STRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs HLLY Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, HLLY has a market cap of 238.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while HLLY trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas HLLY's P/E ratio is -9.55. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to HLLY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to HLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs HYLN Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, HYLN has a market cap of 233.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while HYLN trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas HYLN's P/E ratio is -4.45. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to HYLN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to HYLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs MPAA Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, MPAA has a market cap of 217.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while MPAA trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas MPAA's P/E ratio is -11.31. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MPAA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to MPAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs HLLY-WT Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, HLLY-WT has a market cap of 217.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while HLLY-WT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas HLLY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to HLLY-WT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to HLLY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs SRI Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, SRI has a market cap of 195.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while SRI trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas SRI's P/E ratio is -10.99. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SRI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to SRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs XL Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, XL has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while XL trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas XL's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to XL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to XL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs LAZR Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, LAZR has a market cap of 142.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while LAZR trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas LAZR's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to LAZR's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to LAZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs CAAS Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, CAAS has a market cap of 124M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while CAAS trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas CAAS's P/E ratio is 4.28. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CAAS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to CAAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs KNDI Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, KNDI has a market cap of 96.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while KNDI trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas KNDI's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to KNDI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to KNDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs GGR Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, GGR has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while GGR trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas GGR's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GGR's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to GGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs CVGI Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, CVGI has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while CVGI trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas CVGI's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CVGI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to CVGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs WPRT Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, WPRT has a market cap of 54.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while WPRT trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas WPRT's P/E ratio is -5.06. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to WPRT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to WPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs SYPR Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, SYPR has a market cap of 50.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while SYPR trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas SYPR's P/E ratio is -110.50. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SYPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to SYPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs MKDWW Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, MKDWW has a market cap of 35.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while MKDWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas MKDWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MKDWW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to MKDWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs MKDW Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, MKDW has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while MKDW trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas MKDW's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MKDW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to MKDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs LIDRW Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, LIDRW has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while LIDRW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas LIDRW's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to LIDRW's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to LIDRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs NCNCW Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, NCNCW has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while NCNCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas NCNCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to NCNCW's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to NCNCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs NCNC Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, NCNC has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while NCNC trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas NCNC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to NCNC's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to NCNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs LIDR Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, LIDR has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while LIDR trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas LIDR's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to LIDR's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to LIDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs ECXWW Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, ECXWW has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while ECXWW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas ECXWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ECXWW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to ECXWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs AMV Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, AMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while AMV trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas AMV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to AMV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to AMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs WKSP Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, WKSP has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while WKSP trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas WKSP's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to WKSP's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to WKSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs INEO Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, INEO has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while INEO trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas INEO's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to INEO's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to INEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs SAG Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, SAG has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while SAG trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas SAG's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SAG's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to SAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs SUP Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, SUP has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while SUP trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas SUP's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SUP's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to SUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs FRSX Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, FRSX has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while FRSX trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas FRSX's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to FRSX's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to FRSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs CREV Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, CREV has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while CREV trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas CREV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CREV's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to CREV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs GGROW Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, GGROW has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while GGROW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas GGROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GGROW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to GGROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs UFAB Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, UFAB has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while UFAB trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas UFAB's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to UFAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to UFAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs WKSPW Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, WKSPW has a market cap of 575.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while WKSPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas WKSPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to WKSPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to WKSPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs CREVW Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, CREVW has a market cap of 122.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while CREVW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas CREVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CREVW's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to CREVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs HYZNW Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, HYZNW has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while HYZNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas HYZNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to HYZNW's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to HYZNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs VNE Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, VNE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while VNE trades at $36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas VNE's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to VNE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to VNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs MTOR Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, MTOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while MTOR trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas MTOR's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MTOR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to MTOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs HZN Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, HZN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while HZN trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas HZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to HZN's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is more volatile compared to HZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.
MBLY vs RMO Comparison
MBLY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBLY stands at 14.6B. In comparison, RMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MBLY is priced at $17.98, while RMO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBLY currently has a P/E ratio of -4.89, whereas RMO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, MBLY's ROE is -0.23%, compared to RMO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBLY is less volatile compared to RMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBLY.