Lumen Technologies, Inc.
Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LUMN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LUMN | $4.34 | -2.03% | 4.8B | -3.94 | -$1.19 | N/A |
| TMUS | $250.31 | -1.70% | 287.2B | 24.10 | $10.59 | +1.29% |
| VZA | $25.55 | -0.43% | 241.3B | 3.27 | $7.82 | N/A |
| T | $28.75 | -0.42% | 206.8B | 16.52 | $1.75 | +3.83% |
| TBB | $23.09 | +0.13% | 203.8B | 4.53 | $5.12 | +5.79% |
| VZ | $43.50 | -1.67% | 187.1B | 10.32 | $4.30 | +6.11% |
| TBC | $24.97 | -0.68% | 179.8B | N/A | N/A | +2.82% |
| T-PA | $20.51 | +0.59% | 146.4B | 8.61 | $2.38 | +3.83% |
| T-PC | $19.50 | +0.41% | 139.6B | 8.22 | $2.38 | +3.83% |
| CMCSA | $32.90 | -1.64% | 123.1B | 5.54 | $6.03 | +3.83% |
Stock Comparison
LUMN vs TMUS Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TMUS has a market cap of 287.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while TMUS trades at $250.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas TMUS's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to TMUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TMUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check TMUS's competition here
LUMN vs VZA Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while VZA trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to VZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check VZA's competition here
LUMN vs T Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, T has a market cap of 206.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while T trades at $28.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas T's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check T's competition here
LUMN vs TBB Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 203.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while TBB trades at $23.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check TBB's competition here
LUMN vs VZ Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 187.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while VZ trades at $43.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to VZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check VZ's competition here
LUMN vs TBC Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TBC has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while TBC trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas TBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to TBC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check TBC's competition here
LUMN vs T-PA Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 146.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while T-PA trades at $20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check T-PA's competition here
LUMN vs T-PC Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 139.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while T-PC trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check T-PC's competition here
LUMN vs CMCSA Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 123.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while CMCSA trades at $32.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check CMCSA's competition here
LUMN vs AMOV Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while AMOV trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check AMOV's competition here
LUMN vs AMX Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 57.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while AMX trades at $18.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to AMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check AMX's competition here
LUMN vs CHTR Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while CHTR trades at $263.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check CHTR's competition here
LUMN vs CHT Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CHT has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while CHT trades at $45.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas CHT's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to CHT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to CHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check CHT's competition here
LUMN vs TEF Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while TEF trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -35.41. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check TEF's competition here
LUMN vs ORAN Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while ORAN trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check ORAN's competition here
LUMN vs VOD Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while VOD trades at $11.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is -6.29. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to VOD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to VOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check VOD's competition here
LUMN vs TU Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while TU trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 35.06. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to TU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check TU's competition here
LUMN vs BCE Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while BCE trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 75.19. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to BCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check BCE's competition here
LUMN vs VIV Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while VIV trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 18.93. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to VIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check VIV's competition here
LUMN vs TLK Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while TLK trades at $20.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 14.01. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check TLK's competition here
LUMN vs RCI Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while RCI trades at $35.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to RCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check RCI's competition here
LUMN vs SJR Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while SJR trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to SJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check SJR's competition here
LUMN vs KT Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while KT trades at $20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to KT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to KT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check KT's competition here
LUMN vs TIMB Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while TIMB trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check TIMB's competition here
LUMN vs FYBR Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while FYBR trades at $37.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -23.80. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to FYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check FYBR's competition here
LUMN vs MBT Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while MBT trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to MBT's ROE of -4.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to MBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check MBT's competition here
LUMN vs CTDD Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while CTDD trades at $20.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to CTDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check CTDD's competition here
LUMN vs LBRDK Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while LBRDK trades at $60.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check LBRDK's competition here
LUMN vs LBRDA Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while LBRDA trades at $59.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check LBRDA's competition here
LUMN vs LBRDP Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while LBRDP trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is 4.58. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check LBRDP's competition here
LUMN vs SKM Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while SKM trades at $22.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to SKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check SKM's competition here
LUMN vs TIGO Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while TIGO trades at $44.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check TIGO's competition here
LUMN vs USM Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while USM trades at $76.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -265.55. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to USM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to USM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check USM's competition here
LUMN vs UZF Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while UZF trades at $17.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to UZF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to UZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check UZF's competition here
LUMN vs UZD Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while UZD trades at $20.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to UZD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to UZD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check UZD's competition here
LUMN vs UZE Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while UZE trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to UZE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to UZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check UZE's competition here
LUMN vs TKC Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while TKC trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check TKC's competition here
LUMN vs PHI Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while PHI trades at $22.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to PHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check PHI's competition here
LUMN vs TEO Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while TEO trades at $9.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is -21.85. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to TEO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to TEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check TEO's competition here
LUMN vs VEON Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while VEON trades at $58.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to VEON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check VEON's competition here
LUMN vs LBYKV Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to LBYKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check LBYKV's competition here
LUMN vs TDS Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while TDS trades at $38.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is -40.34. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to TDS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check TDS's competition here
LUMN vs CTBB Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while CTBB trades at $19.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to CTBB's ROE of -9.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check CTBB's competition here
LUMN vs TDS-PV Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while TDS-PV trades at $18.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check TDS-PV's competition here
LUMN vs TDS-PU Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while TDS-PU trades at $20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check TDS-PU's competition here
LUMN vs SNRE Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while SNRE trades at $56.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -13.47. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check SNRE's competition here
LUMN vs LBTYK Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while LBTYK trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check LBTYK's competition here
LUMN vs LBTYA Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while LBTYA trades at $11.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check LBTYA's competition here
LUMN vs LBTYB Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while LBTYB trades at $12.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check LBTYB's competition here
LUMN vs GSAT Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while GSAT trades at $26.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -65.87. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check GSAT's competition here
LUMN vs DISH Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while DISH trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to DISH's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to DISH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check DISH's competition here
LUMN vs IRDM Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while IRDM trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check IRDM's competition here
LUMN vs IHS Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while IHS trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to IHS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to IHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check IHS's competition here
LUMN vs CCOI Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while CCOI trades at $34.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -8.16. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to CCOI's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check CCOI's competition here
LUMN vs ASTSW Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check ASTSW's competition here
LUMN vs GOGO Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while GOGO trades at $12.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is 300.50. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to GOGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check GOGO's competition here
LUMN vs LILAK Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while LILAK trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check LILAK's competition here
LUMN vs LILA Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while LILA trades at $7.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to LILA's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to LILA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check LILA's competition here
LUMN vs IDT Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while IDT trades at $62.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 16.46. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to IDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check IDT's competition here
LUMN vs RADI Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while RADI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to RADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check RADI's competition here
LUMN vs TV Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while TV trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check TV's competition here
LUMN vs ATUS Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while ATUS trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -4.03. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check ATUS's competition here
LUMN vs CABO Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CABO has a market cap of 888.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while CABO trades at $151.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas CABO's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to CABO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to CABO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check CABO's competition here
LUMN vs RBBN Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, RBBN has a market cap of 690.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while RBBN trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas RBBN's P/E ratio is -15.60. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to RBBN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to RBBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check RBBN's competition here
LUMN vs SHEN Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 686.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while SHEN trades at $12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -19.23. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check SHEN's competition here
LUMN vs SIFY Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 636M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while SIFY trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is -43.95. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check SIFY's competition here
LUMN vs CNSL Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while CNSL trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check CNSL's competition here
LUMN vs WOW Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 434M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while WOW trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -6.49. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to WOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check WOW's competition here
LUMN vs ATEX Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 416.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while ATEX trades at $21.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to ATEX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check ATEX's competition here
LUMN vs OOMA Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, OOMA has a market cap of 322.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while OOMA trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas OOMA's P/E ratio is -61.42. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to OOMA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to OOMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check OOMA's competition here
LUMN vs HCHC Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while HCHC trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to HCHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check HCHC's competition here
LUMN vs ATNI Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 241.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while ATNI trades at $15.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is -4.73. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to ATNI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check ATNI's competition here
LUMN vs RDCM Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 210.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while RDCM trades at $12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check RDCM's competition here
LUMN vs CXDO Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 183.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while CXDO trades at $6.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 60.90. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check CXDO's competition here
LUMN vs FNGR Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, FNGR has a market cap of 95.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while FNGR trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas FNGR's P/E ratio is -17.89. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to FNGR's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to FNGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check FNGR's competition here
LUMN vs MTSL Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while MTSL trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check MTSL's competition here
LUMN vs TDI Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TDI has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while TDI trades at $35.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas TDI's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to TDI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check TDI's competition here
LUMN vs KORE Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 37.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while KORE trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to KORE's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to KORE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check KORE's competition here
LUMN vs IQST Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, IQST has a market cap of 20.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while IQST trades at $7.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas IQST's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to IQST's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to IQST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check IQST's competition here
LUMN vs ANTE Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ANTE has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while ANTE trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas ANTE's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to ANTE's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to ANTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check ANTE's competition here
LUMN vs UCL Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, UCL has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while UCL trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas UCL's P/E ratio is -18.05. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to UCL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to UCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check UCL's competition here
LUMN vs PCLA Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, PCLA has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while PCLA trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas PCLA's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to PCLA's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to PCLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check PCLA's competition here
LUMN vs MIMO Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, MIMO has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while MIMO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas MIMO's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to MIMO's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to MIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check MIMO's competition here
LUMN vs QTEKW Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, QTEKW has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while QTEKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas QTEKW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to QTEKW's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to QTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check QTEKW's competition here
LUMN vs QTEK Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, QTEK has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while QTEK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas QTEK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to QTEK's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to QTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check QTEK's competition here
LUMN vs COMSP Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, COMSP has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while COMSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas COMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to COMSP's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to COMSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check COMSP's competition here
LUMN vs COMSW Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, COMSW has a market cap of 270. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while COMSW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas COMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to COMSW's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to COMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check COMSW's competition here
LUMN vs TIGOR Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TIGOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while TIGOR trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas TIGOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to TIGOR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to TIGOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check TIGOR's competition here
LUMN vs LBYAV Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, LBYAV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while LBYAV trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas LBYAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to LBYAV's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to LBYAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check LBYAV's competition here
LUMN vs TDA Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, TDA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while TDA trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas TDA's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to TDA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check TDA's competition here
LUMN vs STRY Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, STRY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while STRY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas STRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to STRY's ROE of +6.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to STRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check STRY's competition here
LUMN vs PTNR Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, PTNR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while PTNR trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas PTNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to PTNR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to PTNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check PTNR's competition here
LUMN vs ALSK Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, ALSK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while ALSK trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas ALSK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to ALSK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to ALSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check ALSK's competition here
LUMN vs UZA Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, UZA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while UZA trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas UZA's P/E ratio is 72.43. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to UZA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to UZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check UZA's competition here
LUMN vs GTT Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, GTT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while GTT trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas GTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to GTT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to GTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check GTT's competition here
LUMN vs CBB Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, CBB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while CBB trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas CBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to CBB's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to CBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check CBB's competition here
LUMN vs MIMO-WT Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, MIMO-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while MIMO-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas MIMO-WT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to MIMO-WT's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to MIMO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check MIMO-WT's competition here
LUMN vs OIBR-C Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, OIBR-C has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while OIBR-C trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas OIBR-C's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to OIBR-C's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to OIBR-C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check OIBR-C's competition here
LUMN vs LORL Comparison August 2025
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.8B. In comparison, LORL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.34, while LORL trades at $41.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -3.94, whereas LORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -9.43%, compared to LORL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to LORL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.Check LORL's competition here