Lumen Technologies, Inc.
Lumen Technologies, Inc. LUMN Peers
See (LUMN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LUMN | $4.36 | +0.23% | 4.6B | -14.09 | -$0.32 | N/A |
| TMUS | $237.01 | +2.42% | 267.1B | 23.00 | $10.23 | +1.40% |
| VZA | $25.55 | -0.43% | 241.3B | 3.27 | $7.82 | N/A |
| T | $28.62 | +2.21% | 201.9B | 17.21 | $1.63 | +3.97% |
| TBB | $22.41 | -0.43% | 198.2B | 4.37 | $5.12 | +5.98% |
| TBC | $24.97 | -0.68% | 179.8B | N/A | N/A | +5.63% |
| VZ | $42.69 | +1.39% | 178.2B | 10.06 | $4.20 | +6.42% |
| T-PA | $20.20 | +0.50% | 143.8B | 8.41 | $2.38 | +3.97% |
| T-PC | $19.03 | -0.37% | 136.4B | 7.97 | $2.38 | +3.97% |
| CMCSA | $35.46 | +0.71% | 131.5B | 8.70 | $4.06 | +3.57% |
Stock Comparison
LUMN vs TMUS Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TMUS has a market cap of 267.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while TMUS trades at $237.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas TMUS's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to TMUS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TMUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs VZA Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while VZA trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to VZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs T Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, T has a market cap of 201.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while T trades at $28.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas T's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs TBB Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 198.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while TBB trades at $22.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 4.37. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs TBC Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TBC has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while TBC trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas TBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to TBC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs VZ Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 178.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while VZ trades at $42.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to VZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs T-PA Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 143.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while T-PA trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs T-PC Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 136.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while T-PC trades at $19.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs CMCSA Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 131.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while CMCSA trades at $35.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs AMOV Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while AMOV trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs CHTR Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while CHTR trades at $403.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs AMX Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while AMX trades at $17.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to AMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs CHT Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CHT has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while CHT trades at $46.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas CHT's P/E ratio is 28.94. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to CHT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to CHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs ORAN Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while ORAN trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs TEF Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while TEF trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -52.00. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs VOD Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while VOD trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to VOD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to VOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs TU Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while TU trades at $15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 27.29. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to TU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs BCE Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while BCE trades at $22.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 70.35. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to BCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs VIV Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while VIV trades at $11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to VIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs TLK Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while TLK trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs RCI Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while RCI trades at $29.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to RCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs SJR Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while SJR trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to SJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs LBRDA Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while LBRDA trades at $96.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs LBRDK Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while LBRDK trades at $97.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs LBRDP Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while LBRDP trades at $24.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs KT Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while KT trades at $20.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to KT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to KT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs TIMB Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while TIMB trades at $19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs MBT Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while MBT trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to MBT's ROE of -7.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to MBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs FYBR Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while FYBR trades at $36.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -23.27. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to FYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs SKM Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while SKM trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to SKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs CTDD Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while CTDD trades at $18.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to CTDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs TIGO Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while TIGO trades at $37.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs USM Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while USM trades at $63.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -135.96. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to USM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to USM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs UZF Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while UZF trades at $20.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to UZF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to UZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs UZD Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while UZD trades at $23.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to UZD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to UZD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs UZE Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while UZE trades at $20.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to UZE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to UZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs TKC Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while TKC trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs PHI Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while PHI trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to PHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs LBYKV Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to LBYKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs CTBB Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while CTBB trades at $18.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to CTBB's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs SNRE Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while SNRE trades at $56.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -13.56. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs TDS Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while TDS trades at $35.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is -32.67. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to TDS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs TDS-PV Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while TDS-PV trades at $18.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs TDS-PU Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while TDS-PU trades at $19.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs LBTYB Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while LBTYB trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -15.84. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs LBTYA Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while LBTYA trades at $9.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -15.97. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs LBTYK Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while LBTYK trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -16.35. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs IRDM Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while IRDM trades at $30.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 28.61. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs VEON Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while VEON trades at $45.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to VEON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs DISH Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while DISH trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to DISH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to DISH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs GSAT Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while GSAT trades at $23.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -37.97. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs TEO Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while TEO trades at $9.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is 89.00. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to TEO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs CCOI Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while CCOI trades at $47.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to CCOI's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs GOGO Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while GOGO trades at $14.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is -369.75. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to GOGO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs IHS Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while IHS trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is -42.77. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to IHS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to IHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs ASTSW Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs IDT Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while IDT trades at $68.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to IDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs RADI Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while RADI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to RADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs LILAK Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while LILAK trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs LILA Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while LILA trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to LILA's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to LILA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs ATUS Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 991.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while ATUS trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -6.42. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs SHEN Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 750.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while SHEN trades at $13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -19.54. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs CABO Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CABO has a market cap of 735.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while CABO trades at $131.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas CABO's P/E ratio is -36.22. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to CABO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to CABO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs RBBN Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, RBBN has a market cap of 697.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while RBBN trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas RBBN's P/E ratio is -14.11. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to RBBN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to RBBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs CNSL Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while CNSL trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs ATEX Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 480.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while ATEX trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is -42.10. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to ATEX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs OOMA Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, OOMA has a market cap of 346.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while OOMA trades at $12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas OOMA's P/E ratio is -66.11. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to OOMA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to OOMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs WOW Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 346.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while WOW trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to WOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs HCHC Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while HCHC trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to HCHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs ATNI Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 251.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while ATNI trades at $15.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is -7.21. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to ATNI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs TV Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 245.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while TV trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs RDCM Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 215.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while RDCM trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 25.38. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs CXDO Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 174.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while CXDO trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 75.25. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs FNGR Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, FNGR has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while FNGR trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas FNGR's P/E ratio is -22.78. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to FNGR's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to FNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs MTSL Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while MTSL trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs TDI Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TDI has a market cap of 57.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while TDI trades at $33.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas TDI's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to TDI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs SIFY Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while SIFY trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs KORE Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 41.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while KORE trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to KORE's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to KORE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs IQST Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, IQST has a market cap of 33.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while IQST trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas IQST's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to IQST's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to IQST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs PCLA Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PCLA has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while PCLA trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas PCLA's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to PCLA's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to PCLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs ANTE Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ANTE has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while ANTE trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas ANTE's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to ANTE's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to ANTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs MIMO Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MIMO has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while MIMO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas MIMO's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to MIMO's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to MIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs UCL Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, UCL has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while UCL trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas UCL's P/E ratio is -9.35. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to UCL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to UCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs QTEK Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, QTEK has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while QTEK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas QTEK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to QTEK's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to QTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs QTEKW Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, QTEKW has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while QTEKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas QTEKW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to QTEKW's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to QTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs COMSP Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, COMSP has a market cap of 513. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while COMSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas COMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to COMSP's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to COMSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs COMSW Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, COMSW has a market cap of 257. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while COMSW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas COMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to COMSW's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to COMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs LORL Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LORL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while LORL trades at $41.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas LORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to LORL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to LORL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs GTT Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GTT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while GTT trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas GTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to GTT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to GTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs PTNR Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PTNR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while PTNR trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas PTNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to PTNR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to PTNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs TDA Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TDA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while TDA trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas TDA's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to TDA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to TDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs MIMO-WT Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MIMO-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while MIMO-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas MIMO-WT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to MIMO-WT's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to MIMO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs ALSK Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ALSK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while ALSK trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas ALSK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to ALSK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to ALSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs STRY Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, STRY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while STRY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas STRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to STRY's ROE of +6.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to STRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs OIBR-C Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, OIBR-C has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while OIBR-C trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas OIBR-C's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to OIBR-C's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to OIBR-C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs LBYAV Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LBYAV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while LBYAV trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas LBYAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to LBYAV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to LBYAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs CBB Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CBB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while CBB trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas CBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to CBB's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to CBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs UZA Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, UZA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while UZA trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas UZA's P/E ratio is 72.43. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to UZA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is more volatile compared to UZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.
LUMN vs TIGOR Comparison
LUMN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUMN stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TIGOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUMN is priced at $4.36, while TIGOR trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUMN currently has a P/E ratio of -14.09, whereas TIGOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUMN's ROE is -0.80%, compared to TIGOR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUMN is less volatile compared to TIGOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUMN.