Luda Technology Group Limited
Luda Technology Group Limited LUD Peers
See (LUD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LUD | $5.36 | +29.16% | 121.6M | -268.00 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| NUE | $121.67 | -0.21% | 28.1B | 21.46 | $5.67 | +1.80% |
| MT | $30.98 | +2.82% | 23.6B | 19.73 | $1.57 | +1.56% |
| STLD | $132.12 | -1.02% | 19.6B | 17.36 | $7.61 | +1.43% |
| RS | $305.55 | -1.47% | 16.1B | 21.55 | $14.18 | +1.51% |
| PKX | $47.72 | -1.57% | 14.4B | 23.51 | $2.03 | +2.23% |
| X | $54.85 | +5.10% | 12.4B | 148.24 | $0.37 | +0.36% |
| GGB | $3.05 | +1.84% | 6.1B | 10.87 | $0.28 | +3.49% |
| TX | $29.90 | -0.07% | 5.9B | -16.61 | -$1.80 | +9.01% |
| CMC | $48.43 | +0.10% | 5.5B | 80.72 | $0.60 | +1.49% |
Stock Comparison
LUD vs NUE Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, NUE has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while NUE trades at $121.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas NUE's P/E ratio is 21.46. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NUE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to NUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs MT Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, MT has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while MT trades at $30.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas MT's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to MT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs STLD Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, STLD has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while STLD trades at $132.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas STLD's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to STLD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to STLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs RS Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, RS has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while RS trades at $305.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas RS's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to RS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs PKX Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, PKX has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while PKX trades at $47.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas PKX's P/E ratio is 23.51. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PKX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to PKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs X Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, X has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while X trades at $54.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas X's P/E ratio is 148.24. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to X's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to X. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs GGB Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, GGB has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while GGB trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas GGB's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GGB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to GGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs TX Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, TX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while TX trades at $29.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas TX's P/E ratio is -16.61. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to TX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs CMC Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, CMC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while CMC trades at $48.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas CMC's P/E ratio is 80.72. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CMC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to CMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs CLF Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, CLF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while CLF trades at $7.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas CLF's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CLF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to CLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs SID Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, SID has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while SID trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas SID's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SID's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to SID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs SIM Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, SIM has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while SIM trades at $26.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas SIM's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SIM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to SIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs WS Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, WS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while WS trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas WS's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to WS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs SCHN Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, SCHN has a market cap of 906.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while SCHN trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas SCHN's P/E ratio is 87.37. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SCHN's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to SCHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs TMST Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, TMST has a market cap of 895.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while TMST trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas TMST's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TMST's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to TMST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs RDUS Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, RDUS has a market cap of 828.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while RDUS trades at $29.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas RDUS's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RDUS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to RDUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs ASTL Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, ASTL has a market cap of 687.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while ASTL trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas ASTL's P/E ratio is -6.18. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ASTL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to ASTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs MTUS Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, MTUS has a market cap of 595.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while MTUS trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas MTUS's P/E ratio is -28.94. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MTUS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to MTUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs USAP Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, USAP has a market cap of 423.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while USAP trades at $44.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas USAP's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to USAP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to USAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs ZEUS Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, ZEUS has a market cap of 344.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while ZEUS trades at $30.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas ZEUS's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ZEUS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to ZEUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs MSB Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, MSB has a market cap of 318.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while MSB trades at $24.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas MSB's P/E ratio is 3.41. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MSB's ROE of +2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to MSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs SYNL Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, SYNL has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while SYNL trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas SYNL's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SYNL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to SYNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs ACNT Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 131.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while ACNT trades at $12.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -14.89. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ACNT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs FRD Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, FRD has a market cap of 117.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while FRD trades at $16.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas FRD's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FRD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to FRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs KBSX Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, KBSX has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while KBSX trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas KBSX's P/E ratio is -26.57. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KBSX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to KBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs HLP Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, HLP has a market cap of 68.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while HLP trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas HLP's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HLP's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to HLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs ASTLW Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, ASTLW has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while ASTLW trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas ASTLW's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ASTLW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to ASTLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs HUDI Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, HUDI has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while HUDI trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas HUDI's P/E ratio is 136.00. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HUDI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to HUDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs ZKIN Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, ZKIN has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while ZKIN trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas ZKIN's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ZKIN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to ZKIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs INHD Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while INHD trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to INHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs MTL Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, MTL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while MTL trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas MTL's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to MTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs MTL-P Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, MTL-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while MTL-P trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas MTL-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MTL-P's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to MTL-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.
LUD vs OSN Comparison
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 121.6M. In comparison, OSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $5.36, while OSN trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -268.00, whereas OSN's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is more volatile compared to OSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.