Luda Technology Group Limited
Luda Technology Group Limited (LUD) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LUD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LUD | $6.31 | +0.00% | 143.4M | -79.00 | -$0.08 | N/A |
| MT | $67.55 | +1.07% | 50B | 15.86 | $4.11 | +0.91% |
| NUE | $175.22 | -2.03% | 40.1B | 23.30 | $7.52 | +1.26% |
| STLD | $192.16 | -1.96% | 27.9B | 23.89 | $7.99 | +1.04% |
| PKX | $71.02 | +5.41% | 20.9B | 49.38 | $1.40 | +2.43% |
| RS | $317.78 | -1.52% | 16.6B | 23.08 | $13.75 | +1.51% |
| X | $54.84 | +0.00% | 12.4B | 148.22 | $0.37 | +0.09% |
| TX | $43.19 | -0.32% | 8.4B | 14.78 | $2.90 | +6.32% |
| GGB | $4.11 | -1.32% | 8.3B | 14.09 | $0.29 | +2.67% |
| CMC | $74.77 | -1.15% | 8.2B | 19.21 | $3.86 | +0.96% |
Stock Comparison
LUD vs MT Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, MT has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while MT trades at $67.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas MT's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to MT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check MT's competition here
LUD vs NUE Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, NUE has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while NUE trades at $175.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas NUE's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to NUE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to NUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check NUE's competition here
LUD vs STLD Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, STLD has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while STLD trades at $192.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas STLD's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to STLD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to STLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check STLD's competition here
LUD vs PKX Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, PKX has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while PKX trades at $71.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas PKX's P/E ratio is 49.38. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to PKX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to PKX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check PKX's competition here
LUD vs RS Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, RS has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while RS trades at $317.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas RS's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to RS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check RS's competition here
LUD vs X Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, X has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while X trades at $54.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas X's P/E ratio is 148.22. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to X's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to X. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check X's competition here
LUD vs TX Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, TX has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while TX trades at $43.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas TX's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to TX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check TX's competition here
LUD vs GGB Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, GGB has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while GGB trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas GGB's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to GGB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to GGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check GGB's competition here
LUD vs CMC Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, CMC has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while CMC trades at $74.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas CMC's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CMC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to CMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check CMC's competition here
LUD vs CLF Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, CLF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while CLF trades at $10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas CLF's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to CLF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to CLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check CLF's competition here
LUD vs SIM Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, SIM has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while SIM trades at $32.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas SIM's P/E ratio is 26.62. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SIM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD and SIM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SIM's competition here
LUD vs SID Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, SID has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while SID trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas SID's P/E ratio is -7.57. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SID's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to SID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check SID's competition here
LUD vs WS Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, WS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while WS trades at $43.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas WS's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to WS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to WS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check WS's competition here
LUD vs SCHN Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, SCHN has a market cap of 906.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while SCHN trades at $33.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas SCHN's P/E ratio is 87.37. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SCHN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to SCHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check SCHN's competition here
LUD vs TMST Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, TMST has a market cap of 895.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while TMST trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas TMST's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to TMST's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to TMST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check TMST's competition here
LUD vs RDUS Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, RDUS has a market cap of 841.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while RDUS trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas RDUS's P/E ratio is -8.36. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to RDUS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to RDUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check RDUS's competition here
LUD vs MTUS Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, MTUS has a market cap of 701.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while MTUS trades at $16.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas MTUS's P/E ratio is -93.56. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MTUS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to MTUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check MTUS's competition here
LUD vs ZEUS Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, ZEUS has a market cap of 539M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while ZEUS trades at $47.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas ZEUS's P/E ratio is 40.91. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ZEUS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD and ZEUS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZEUS's competition here
LUD vs ASTL Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, ASTL has a market cap of 482.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while ASTL trades at $4.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas ASTL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ASTL's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to ASTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check ASTL's competition here
LUD vs USAP Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, USAP has a market cap of 423.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while USAP trades at $44.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas USAP's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to USAP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to USAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check USAP's competition here
LUD vs MSB Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, MSB has a market cap of 416.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while MSB trades at $31.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas MSB's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MSB's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to MSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check MSB's competition here
LUD vs ACNT Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, ACNT has a market cap of 161.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while ACNT trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas ACNT's P/E ratio is -53.94. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ACNT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to ACNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check ACNT's competition here
LUD vs SYNL Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, SYNL has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while SYNL trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas SYNL's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to SYNL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to SYNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check SYNL's competition here
LUD vs FRD Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, FRD has a market cap of 130.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while FRD trades at $18.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas FRD's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to FRD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to FRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check FRD's competition here
LUD vs HLP Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, HLP has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while HLP trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas HLP's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HLP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to HLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check HLP's competition here
LUD vs KBSX Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, KBSX has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while KBSX trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas KBSX's P/E ratio is -7.47. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to KBSX's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD and KBSX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KBSX's competition here
LUD vs ASTLW Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, ASTLW has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while ASTLW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas ASTLW's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ASTLW's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to ASTLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check ASTLW's competition here
LUD vs HUDI Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, HUDI has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while HUDI trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas HUDI's P/E ratio is -11.30. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to HUDI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to HUDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check HUDI's competition here
LUD vs ZKIN Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, ZKIN has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while ZKIN trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas ZKIN's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to ZKIN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to ZKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check ZKIN's competition here
LUD vs INHD Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, INHD has a market cap of 355.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while INHD trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas INHD's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to INHD's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to INHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check INHD's competition here
LUD vs MTL Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, MTL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while MTL trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas MTL's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to MTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check MTL's competition here
LUD vs MTL-P Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, MTL-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while MTL-P trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas MTL-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to MTL-P's ROE of -85.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to MTL-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check MTL-P's competition here
LUD vs OSN Comparison February 2026
LUD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LUD stands at 143.4M. In comparison, OSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LUD is priced at $6.31, while OSN trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LUD currently has a P/E ratio of -79.00, whereas OSN's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, LUD's ROE is -0.02%, compared to OSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LUD is less volatile compared to OSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LUD.Check OSN's competition here