LMW Ltd.
LMW Ltd. (LMW.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LMW.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMW.NS | ₹15,651.00 | +3.06% | 164.3B | 143.30 | ₹107.33 | +0.20% |
| CUMMINSIND.BO | ₹4,856.60 | +4.55% | 1.3T | 58.43 | ₹81.08 | +1.13% |
| CUMMINSIND.NS | ₹4,873.60 | +4.90% | 1.3T | 58.56 | ₹80.84 | +1.13% |
| ABB.NS | ₹5,787.00 | +1.18% | 1.3T | 71.70 | ₹83.50 | +0.72% |
| ABB.BO | ₹5,805.60 | +1.57% | 1.3T | 71.78 | ₹83.38 | +0.72% |
| SIEMENS.BO | ₹3,251.20 | +4.54% | 1.1T | 67.71 | ₹47.37 | N/A |
| SIEMENS.NS | ₹3,248.40 | +4.55% | 1.1T | 67.50 | ₹47.50 | N/A |
| BHEL.NS | ₹257.50 | +1.46% | 895.9B | 109.96 | ₹2.34 | +0.19% |
| BHEL.BO | ₹256.70 | +1.04% | 895.4B | 109.89 | ₹2.34 | +0.19% |
| VOLTAS.NS | ₹1,534.60 | +1.45% | 511.8B | 102.17 | ₹15.14 | +0.45% |
Stock Comparison
LMW.NS vs CUMMINSIND.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, CUMMINSIND.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while CUMMINSIND.BO trades at ₹4,856.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas CUMMINSIND.BO's P/E ratio is 58.43. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CUMMINSIND.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to CUMMINSIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check CUMMINSIND.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs CUMMINSIND.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, CUMMINSIND.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while CUMMINSIND.NS trades at ₹4,873.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas CUMMINSIND.NS's P/E ratio is 58.56. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CUMMINSIND.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to CUMMINSIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check CUMMINSIND.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs ABB.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, ABB.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while ABB.NS trades at ₹5,787.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas ABB.NS's P/E ratio is 71.70. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ABB.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to ABB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ABB.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs ABB.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, ABB.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while ABB.BO trades at ₹5,805.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas ABB.BO's P/E ratio is 71.78. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ABB.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to ABB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ABB.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs SIEMENS.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, SIEMENS.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while SIEMENS.BO trades at ₹3,251.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas SIEMENS.BO's P/E ratio is 67.71. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SIEMENS.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to SIEMENS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check SIEMENS.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs SIEMENS.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, SIEMENS.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while SIEMENS.NS trades at ₹3,248.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas SIEMENS.NS's P/E ratio is 67.50. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SIEMENS.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to SIEMENS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check SIEMENS.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs BHEL.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, BHEL.NS has a market cap of 895.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while BHEL.NS trades at ₹257.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas BHEL.NS's P/E ratio is 109.96. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHEL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS and BHEL.NS have similar daily volatility (2.15).Check BHEL.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs BHEL.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, BHEL.BO has a market cap of 895.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while BHEL.BO trades at ₹256.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas BHEL.BO's P/E ratio is 109.89. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHEL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to BHEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check BHEL.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs VOLTAS.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, VOLTAS.NS has a market cap of 511.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while VOLTAS.NS trades at ₹1,534.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas VOLTAS.NS's P/E ratio is 102.17. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VOLTAS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to VOLTAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check VOLTAS.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs VOLTAS.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, VOLTAS.BO has a market cap of 511.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while VOLTAS.BO trades at ₹1,533.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas VOLTAS.BO's P/E ratio is 101.66. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VOLTAS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to VOLTAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check VOLTAS.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs BLUESTARCO.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, BLUESTARCO.NS has a market cap of 404.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while BLUESTARCO.NS trades at ₹1,964.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas BLUESTARCO.NS's P/E ratio is 81.91. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BLUESTARCO.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to BLUESTARCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check BLUESTARCO.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs GET&D.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, GET&D.NS has a market cap of 397.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while GET&D.NS trades at ₹1,552.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas GET&D.NS's P/E ratio is 100.73. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GET&D.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to GET&D.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check GET&D.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs AIAENG.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, AIAENG.NS has a market cap of 368.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while AIAENG.NS trades at ₹3,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas AIAENG.NS's P/E ratio is 31.76. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AIAENG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to AIAENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check AIAENG.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs AIAENG.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, AIAENG.BO has a market cap of 368.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while AIAENG.BO trades at ₹3,901.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas AIAENG.BO's P/E ratio is 31.67. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AIAENG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to AIAENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check AIAENG.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs THERMAX.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, THERMAX.NS has a market cap of 355B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while THERMAX.NS trades at ₹3,156.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas THERMAX.NS's P/E ratio is 52.00. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to THERMAX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to THERMAX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check THERMAX.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs THERMAX.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, THERMAX.BO has a market cap of 354.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while THERMAX.BO trades at ₹3,158.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas THERMAX.BO's P/E ratio is 52.16. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to THERMAX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to THERMAX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check THERMAX.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs KAYNES.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, KAYNES.NS has a market cap of 259.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while KAYNES.NS trades at ₹3,821.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas KAYNES.NS's P/E ratio is 65.23. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KAYNES.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to KAYNES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check KAYNES.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs KAYNES.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, KAYNES.BO has a market cap of 259.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while KAYNES.BO trades at ₹3,838.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas KAYNES.BO's P/E ratio is 65.31. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KAYNES.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to KAYNES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check KAYNES.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs SCHNEIDER.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, SCHNEIDER.NS has a market cap of 220.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while SCHNEIDER.NS trades at ₹913.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas SCHNEIDER.NS's P/E ratio is 90.28. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCHNEIDER.NS's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to SCHNEIDER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check SCHNEIDER.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs KIRLOSENG.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.NS has a market cap of 206.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while KIRLOSENG.NS trades at ₹1,385.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas KIRLOSENG.NS's P/E ratio is 37.92. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KIRLOSENG.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check KIRLOSENG.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs KIRLOSENG.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.BO has a market cap of 205.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while KIRLOSENG.BO trades at ₹1,383.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas KIRLOSENG.BO's P/E ratio is 37.83. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check KIRLOSENG.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs JYOTICNC.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, JYOTICNC.NS has a market cap of 190.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while JYOTICNC.NS trades at ₹864.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas JYOTICNC.NS's P/E ratio is 0.77. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JYOTICNC.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to JYOTICNC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check JYOTICNC.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs LAXMIMACH.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.BO has a market cap of 185.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while LAXMIMACH.BO trades at ₹17,338.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas LAXMIMACH.BO's P/E ratio is 63.86. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LAXMIMACH.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check LAXMIMACH.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs LAXMIMACH.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.NS has a market cap of 185.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while LAXMIMACH.NS trades at ₹17,324.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas LAXMIMACH.NS's P/E ratio is 63.45. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LAXMIMACH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check LAXMIMACH.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs ELGIEQUIP.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.NS has a market cap of 168.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while ELGIEQUIP.NS trades at ₹545.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas ELGIEQUIP.NS's P/E ratio is 41.71. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ELGIEQUIP.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs ELGIEQUIP.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.BO has a market cap of 168B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while ELGIEQUIP.BO trades at ₹543.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas ELGIEQUIP.BO's P/E ratio is 41.70. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ELGIEQUIP.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs LMW.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, LMW.BO has a market cap of 165.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while LMW.BO trades at ₹15,660.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas LMW.BO's P/E ratio is 144.29. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LMW.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to LMW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check LMW.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs TRITURBINE.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, TRITURBINE.BO has a market cap of 156.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while TRITURBINE.BO trades at ₹485.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas TRITURBINE.BO's P/E ratio is 45.46. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRITURBINE.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to TRITURBINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check TRITURBINE.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs TRITURBINE.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, TRITURBINE.NS has a market cap of 155.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while TRITURBINE.NS trades at ₹488.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas TRITURBINE.NS's P/E ratio is 45.39. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRITURBINE.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to TRITURBINE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check TRITURBINE.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs TDPOWERSYS.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, TDPOWERSYS.BO has a market cap of 137.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while TDPOWERSYS.BO trades at ₹931.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas TDPOWERSYS.BO's P/E ratio is 62.71. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TDPOWERSYS.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to TDPOWERSYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check TDPOWERSYS.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs TDPOWERSYS.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, TDPOWERSYS.NS has a market cap of 137.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while TDPOWERSYS.NS trades at ₹920.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas TDPOWERSYS.NS's P/E ratio is 62.73. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TDPOWERSYS.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to TDPOWERSYS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check TDPOWERSYS.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs KIRLOSBROS.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.NS has a market cap of 127B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while KIRLOSBROS.NS trades at ₹1,644.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas KIRLOSBROS.NS's P/E ratio is 31.83. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check KIRLOSBROS.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs KIRLOSBROS.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.BO has a market cap of 126.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while KIRLOSBROS.BO trades at ₹1,617.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas KIRLOSBROS.BO's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check KIRLOSBROS.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs KSB.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, KSB.BO has a market cap of 125.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while KSB.BO trades at ₹720.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas KSB.BO's P/E ratio is 47.78. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KSB.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to KSB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check KSB.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs KSB.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, KSB.NS has a market cap of 125.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while KSB.NS trades at ₹721.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas KSB.NS's P/E ratio is 47.76. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KSB.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to KSB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check KSB.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs TEGA.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, TEGA.NS has a market cap of 122.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while TEGA.NS trades at ₹1,713.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas TEGA.NS's P/E ratio is 54.21. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TEGA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to TEGA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check TEGA.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs TEGA.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, TEGA.BO has a market cap of 122.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while TEGA.BO trades at ₹1,708.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas TEGA.BO's P/E ratio is 54.24. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TEGA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to TEGA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check TEGA.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs INGERRAND.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, INGERRAND.BO has a market cap of 121.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while INGERRAND.BO trades at ₹3,885.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas INGERRAND.BO's P/E ratio is 46.01. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INGERRAND.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to INGERRAND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check INGERRAND.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs INGERRAND.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, INGERRAND.NS has a market cap of 121.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while INGERRAND.NS trades at ₹3,900.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas INGERRAND.NS's P/E ratio is 46.91. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INGERRAND.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to INGERRAND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check INGERRAND.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs VESUVIUS.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, VESUVIUS.BO has a market cap of 113.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while VESUVIUS.BO trades at ₹524.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas VESUVIUS.BO's P/E ratio is 46.68. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VESUVIUS.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to VESUVIUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check VESUVIUS.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs VESUVIUS.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, VESUVIUS.NS has a market cap of 113B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while VESUVIUS.NS trades at ₹527.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas VESUVIUS.NS's P/E ratio is 46.38. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VESUVIUS.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to VESUVIUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check VESUVIUS.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs MTARTECH.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, MTARTECH.NS has a market cap of 112.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while MTARTECH.NS trades at ₹3,694.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas MTARTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 176.95. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTARTECH.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to MTARTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check MTARTECH.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs MTARTECH.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, MTARTECH.BO has a market cap of 112.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while MTARTECH.BO trades at ₹3,690.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas MTARTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 177.00. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTARTECH.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to MTARTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check MTARTECH.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs AZAD.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, AZAD.NS has a market cap of 111.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while AZAD.NS trades at ₹1,713.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas AZAD.NS's P/E ratio is 89.59. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AZAD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to AZAD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check AZAD.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs INOXINDIA.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, INOXINDIA.NS has a market cap of 102.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while INOXINDIA.NS trades at ₹1,152.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas INOXINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 41.51. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INOXINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to INOXINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check INOXINDIA.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs ELECON.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, ELECON.BO has a market cap of 95.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while ELECON.BO trades at ₹426.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas ELECON.BO's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELECON.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to ELECON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ELECON.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs ELECON.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, ELECON.NS has a market cap of 94.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while ELECON.NS trades at ₹430.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas ELECON.NS's P/E ratio is 20.27. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELECON.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to ELECON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ELECON.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs KIRLPNU.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, KIRLPNU.NS has a market cap of 74.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while KIRLPNU.NS trades at ₹1,142.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas KIRLPNU.NS's P/E ratio is 38.98. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KIRLPNU.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLPNU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check KIRLPNU.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs KIRLPNU.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, KIRLPNU.BO has a market cap of 74.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while KIRLPNU.BO trades at ₹1,129.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas KIRLPNU.BO's P/E ratio is 38.94. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KIRLPNU.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLPNU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check KIRLPNU.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs DIACABS.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, DIACABS.BO has a market cap of 71.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while DIACABS.BO trades at ₹135.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas DIACABS.BO's P/E ratio is 115.73. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DIACABS.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to DIACABS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check DIACABS.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs DIACABS.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, DIACABS.NS has a market cap of 71.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while DIACABS.NS trades at ₹135.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas DIACABS.NS's P/E ratio is 116.64. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DIACABS.NS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to DIACABS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check DIACABS.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs SHAKTIPUMP.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.BO has a market cap of 69.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while SHAKTIPUMP.BO trades at ₹555.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.BO's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check SHAKTIPUMP.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs SHAKTIPUMP.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.NS has a market cap of 69.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while SHAKTIPUMP.NS trades at ₹556.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.NS's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check SHAKTIPUMP.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs ISGEC.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, ISGEC.BO has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while ISGEC.BO trades at ₹861.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas ISGEC.BO's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ISGEC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to ISGEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ISGEC.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs ISGEC.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, ISGEC.NS has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while ISGEC.NS trades at ₹864.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas ISGEC.NS's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ISGEC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to ISGEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ISGEC.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs LLOYDSENGG.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.BO has a market cap of 60.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while LLOYDSENGG.BO trades at ₹49.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas LLOYDSENGG.BO's P/E ratio is 42.82. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check LLOYDSENGG.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs LLOYDSENGG.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.NS has a market cap of 60.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while LLOYDSENGG.NS trades at ₹49.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas LLOYDSENGG.NS's P/E ratio is 42.69. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check LLOYDSENGG.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs BALUFORGE.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, BALUFORGE.BO has a market cap of 56.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while BALUFORGE.BO trades at ₹480.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas BALUFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BALUFORGE.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to BALUFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check BALUFORGE.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs DIAPOWER.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, DIAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while DIAPOWER.NS trades at ₹195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas DIAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DIAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to DIAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check DIAPOWER.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs LSIL.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, LSIL.NS has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while LSIL.NS trades at ₹48.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas LSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 130.41. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LSIL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to LSIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check LSIL.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs TEXRAIL.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, TEXRAIL.BO has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while TEXRAIL.BO trades at ₹111.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas TEXRAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TEXRAIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to TEXRAIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check TEXRAIL.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs TEXRAIL.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, TEXRAIL.NS has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while TEXRAIL.NS trades at ₹111.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas TEXRAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TEXRAIL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to TEXRAIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check TEXRAIL.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs GMMPFAUDLR.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.NS has a market cap of 43.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while GMMPFAUDLR.NS trades at ₹972.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.NS's P/E ratio is 248.08. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check GMMPFAUDLR.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs GMMPFAUDLR.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.BO has a market cap of 43.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while GMMPFAUDLR.BO trades at ₹971.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.BO's P/E ratio is 246.78. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check GMMPFAUDLR.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs WPIL.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, WPIL.BO has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while WPIL.BO trades at ₹397.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas WPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 32.35. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WPIL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to WPIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check WPIL.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs GREAVESCOT.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.BO has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while GREAVESCOT.BO trades at ₹161.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas GREAVESCOT.BO's P/E ratio is 36.45. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GREAVESCOT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check GREAVESCOT.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs GREAVESCOT.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.NS has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while GREAVESCOT.NS trades at ₹160.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas GREAVESCOT.NS's P/E ratio is 34.83. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GREAVESCOT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check GREAVESCOT.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs SHANTIGEAR.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.NS has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while SHANTIGEAR.NS trades at ₹450.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas SHANTIGEAR.NS's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check SHANTIGEAR.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs SHANTIGEAR.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.BO has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while SHANTIGEAR.BO trades at ₹452.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas SHANTIGEAR.BO's P/E ratio is 41.63. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check SHANTIGEAR.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs ANUP.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, ANUP.BO has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while ANUP.BO trades at ₹1,734.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas ANUP.BO's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ANUP.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to ANUP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ANUP.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs ANUP.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, ANUP.NS has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while ANUP.NS trades at ₹1,731.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas ANUP.NS's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ANUP.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to ANUP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ANUP.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs SGLTL.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, SGLTL.NS has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while SGLTL.NS trades at ₹137.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas SGLTL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SGLTL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to SGLTL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check SGLTL.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs KLBRENG-B.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, KLBRENG-B.BO has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while KLBRENG-B.BO trades at ₹510.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas KLBRENG-B.BO's P/E ratio is 28.10. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KLBRENG-B.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to KLBRENG-B.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check KLBRENG-B.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs SETL.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, SETL.NS has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while SETL.NS trades at ₹127.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas SETL.NS's P/E ratio is 34.90. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SETL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to SETL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check SETL.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs JASH.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, JASH.NS has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while JASH.NS trades at ₹384.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas JASH.NS's P/E ratio is 32.54. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JASH.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to JASH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check JASH.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs GMM.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, GMM.BO has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while GMM.BO trades at ₹1,563.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas GMM.BO's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GMM.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to GMM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check GMM.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs HONDAPOWER.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, HONDAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while HONDAPOWER.NS trades at ₹2,213.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas HONDAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 29.58. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HONDAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to HONDAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check HONDAPOWER.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs HONDAPOWER.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, HONDAPOWER.BO has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while HONDAPOWER.BO trades at ₹2,220.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas HONDAPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 29.51. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HONDAPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to HONDAPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check HONDAPOWER.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs HLEGLAS.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, HLEGLAS.BO has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while HLEGLAS.BO trades at ₹324.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas HLEGLAS.BO's P/E ratio is 33.78. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HLEGLAS.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to HLEGLAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check HLEGLAS.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs HLEGLAS.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, HLEGLAS.NS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while HLEGLAS.NS trades at ₹323.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas HLEGLAS.NS's P/E ratio is 32.94. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HLEGLAS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to HLEGLAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check HLEGLAS.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs WINDMACHIN.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, WINDMACHIN.BO has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while WINDMACHIN.BO trades at ₹238.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas WINDMACHIN.BO's P/E ratio is -762.19. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WINDMACHIN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to WINDMACHIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check WINDMACHIN.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs WINDMACHIN.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, WINDMACHIN.NS has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while WINDMACHIN.NS trades at ₹240.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas WINDMACHIN.NS's P/E ratio is -759.22. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WINDMACHIN.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to WINDMACHIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check WINDMACHIN.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs PIXTRANS.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, PIXTRANS.BO has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while PIXTRANS.BO trades at ₹1,504.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas PIXTRANS.BO's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PIXTRANS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to PIXTRANS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check PIXTRANS.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs PIXTRANS.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, PIXTRANS.NS has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while PIXTRANS.NS trades at ₹1,496.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas PIXTRANS.NS's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PIXTRANS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to PIXTRANS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check PIXTRANS.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs PENIND.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, PENIND.BO has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while PENIND.BO trades at ₹146.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas PENIND.BO's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PENIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to PENIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check PENIND.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs PENIND.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, PENIND.NS has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while PENIND.NS trades at ₹147.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas PENIND.NS's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PENIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to PENIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check PENIND.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs KMEW.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, KMEW.BO has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while KMEW.BO trades at ₹1,576.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas KMEW.BO's P/E ratio is 71.38. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KMEW.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to KMEW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check KMEW.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs ADVAIT.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, ADVAIT.BO has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while ADVAIT.BO trades at ₹1,723.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas ADVAIT.BO's P/E ratio is 41.98. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADVAIT.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to ADVAIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ADVAIT.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs ADOR.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, ADOR.BO has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while ADOR.BO trades at ₹1,072.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas ADOR.BO's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADOR.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to ADOR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ADOR.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs ADOR.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, ADOR.NS has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while ADOR.NS trades at ₹1,067.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas ADOR.NS's P/E ratio is 28.61. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADOR.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to ADOR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ADOR.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs THEJO.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, THEJO.NS has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while THEJO.NS trades at ₹1,704.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas THEJO.NS's P/E ratio is 38.22. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to THEJO.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to THEJO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check THEJO.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs DISAQ.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, DISAQ.BO has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while DISAQ.BO trades at ₹12,505.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas DISAQ.BO's P/E ratio is 33.23. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DISAQ.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to DISAQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check DISAQ.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs LXMIATO.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, LXMIATO.BO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while LXMIATO.BO trades at ₹2,483.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas LXMIATO.BO's P/E ratio is 584.15. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LXMIATO.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to LXMIATO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check LXMIATO.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs JYOTISTRUC.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, JYOTISTRUC.NS has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while JYOTISTRUC.NS trades at ₹12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas JYOTISTRUC.NS's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JYOTISTRUC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to JYOTISTRUC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check JYOTISTRUC.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs JYOTISTRUC.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, JYOTISTRUC.BO has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while JYOTISTRUC.BO trades at ₹12.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas JYOTISTRUC.BO's P/E ratio is 27.84. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JYOTISTRUC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to JYOTISTRUC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check JYOTISTRUC.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs ADORWELD.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, ADORWELD.NS has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while ADORWELD.NS trades at ₹852.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas ADORWELD.NS's P/E ratio is 33.22. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADORWELD.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to ADORWELD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ADORWELD.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs ADORWELD.BO Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, ADORWELD.BO has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while ADORWELD.BO trades at ₹852.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas ADORWELD.BO's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADORWELD.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to ADORWELD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ADORWELD.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs JNKINDIA.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, JNKINDIA.NS has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while JNKINDIA.NS trades at ₹247.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas JNKINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 29.92. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JNKINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to JNKINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check JNKINDIA.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs ICEMAKE.NS Comparison February 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 164.3B. In comparison, ICEMAKE.NS has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹15,651.00, while ICEMAKE.NS trades at ₹831.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 143.30, whereas ICEMAKE.NS's P/E ratio is 87.60. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ICEMAKE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to ICEMAKE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ICEMAKE.NS's competition here