LMW Ltd.
LMW Ltd. (LMW.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LMW.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMW.NS | ₹13,639.50 | +5.24% | 145.5B | 126.62 | ₹107.57 | +0.22% |
| ABB.NS | ₹6,565.00 | +4.72% | 1.4T | 83.11 | ₹78.99 | +0.66% |
| ABB.BO | ₹6,564.65 | +4.71% | 1.4T | 78.73 | ₹83.38 | +0.66% |
| CUMMINSIND.BO | ₹4,799.55 | +3.47% | 1.3T | 59.20 | ₹81.08 | +1.12% |
| CUMMINSIND.NS | ₹4,796.30 | +3.39% | 1.3T | 59.32 | ₹80.85 | +1.12% |
| SIEMENS.BO | ₹3,227.60 | +4.99% | 1.1T | 68.14 | ₹47.37 | N/A |
| SIEMENS.NS | ₹3,226.10 | +4.90% | 1.1T | 67.89 | ₹47.52 | N/A |
| BHEL.BO | ₹265.80 | +4.85% | 925.5B | 114.08 | ₹2.33 | +0.19% |
| BHEL.NS | ₹265.70 | +4.78% | 925.2B | 114.03 | ₹2.33 | +0.19% |
| VOLTAS.NS | ₹1,264.80 | +3.66% | 418.5B | 83.49 | ₹15.15 | +0.55% |
Stock Comparison
LMW.NS vs ABB.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, ABB.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while ABB.NS trades at ₹6,565.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas ABB.NS's P/E ratio is 83.11. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ABB.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to ABB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ABB.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs ABB.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, ABB.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while ABB.BO trades at ₹6,564.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas ABB.BO's P/E ratio is 78.73. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ABB.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to ABB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ABB.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs CUMMINSIND.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, CUMMINSIND.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while CUMMINSIND.BO trades at ₹4,799.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas CUMMINSIND.BO's P/E ratio is 59.20. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CUMMINSIND.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to CUMMINSIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check CUMMINSIND.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs CUMMINSIND.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, CUMMINSIND.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while CUMMINSIND.NS trades at ₹4,796.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas CUMMINSIND.NS's P/E ratio is 59.32. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CUMMINSIND.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to CUMMINSIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check CUMMINSIND.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs SIEMENS.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, SIEMENS.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while SIEMENS.BO trades at ₹3,227.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas SIEMENS.BO's P/E ratio is 68.14. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SIEMENS.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to SIEMENS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check SIEMENS.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs SIEMENS.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, SIEMENS.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while SIEMENS.NS trades at ₹3,226.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas SIEMENS.NS's P/E ratio is 67.89. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SIEMENS.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to SIEMENS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check SIEMENS.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs BHEL.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, BHEL.BO has a market cap of 925.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while BHEL.BO trades at ₹265.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas BHEL.BO's P/E ratio is 114.08. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHEL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to BHEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check BHEL.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs BHEL.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, BHEL.NS has a market cap of 925.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while BHEL.NS trades at ₹265.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas BHEL.NS's P/E ratio is 114.03. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHEL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to BHEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check BHEL.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs VOLTAS.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, VOLTAS.NS has a market cap of 418.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while VOLTAS.NS trades at ₹1,264.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas VOLTAS.NS's P/E ratio is 83.49. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VOLTAS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to VOLTAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check VOLTAS.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs VOLTAS.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, VOLTAS.BO has a market cap of 418.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while VOLTAS.BO trades at ₹1,263.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas VOLTAS.BO's P/E ratio is 83.15. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VOLTAS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to VOLTAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check VOLTAS.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs GET&D.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, GET&D.NS has a market cap of 397.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while GET&D.NS trades at ₹1,552.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas GET&D.NS's P/E ratio is 100.73. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GET&D.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to GET&D.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check GET&D.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs THERMAX.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, THERMAX.BO has a market cap of 371.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while THERMAX.BO trades at ₹3,301.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas THERMAX.BO's P/E ratio is 54.67. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to THERMAX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to THERMAX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check THERMAX.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs THERMAX.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, THERMAX.NS has a market cap of 370.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while THERMAX.NS trades at ₹3,291.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas THERMAX.NS's P/E ratio is 54.28. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to THERMAX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to THERMAX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check THERMAX.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs AIAENG.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, AIAENG.NS has a market cap of 342.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while AIAENG.NS trades at ₹3,674.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas AIAENG.NS's P/E ratio is 29.49. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AIAENG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to AIAENG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check AIAENG.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs AIAENG.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, AIAENG.BO has a market cap of 342.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while AIAENG.BO trades at ₹3,672.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas AIAENG.BO's P/E ratio is 29.47. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AIAENG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to AIAENG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check AIAENG.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs BLUESTARCO.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, BLUESTARCO.NS has a market cap of 332.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while BLUESTARCO.NS trades at ₹1,619.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas BLUESTARCO.NS's P/E ratio is 67.50. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BLUESTARCO.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to BLUESTARCO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check BLUESTARCO.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs KAYNES.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, KAYNES.BO has a market cap of 262.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while KAYNES.BO trades at ₹3,914.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas KAYNES.BO's P/E ratio is 66.05. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KAYNES.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to KAYNES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check KAYNES.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs KAYNES.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, KAYNES.NS has a market cap of 262.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while KAYNES.NS trades at ₹3,911.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas KAYNES.NS's P/E ratio is 66.21. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KAYNES.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to KAYNES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check KAYNES.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs SCHNEIDER.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, SCHNEIDER.NS has a market cap of 232.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while SCHNEIDER.NS trades at ₹973.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas SCHNEIDER.NS's P/E ratio is 95.10. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCHNEIDER.NS's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to SCHNEIDER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check SCHNEIDER.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs KIRLOSENG.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.BO has a market cap of 213B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while KIRLOSENG.BO trades at ₹1,465.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas KIRLOSENG.BO's P/E ratio is 39.27. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check KIRLOSENG.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs KIRLOSENG.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.NS has a market cap of 213B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while KIRLOSENG.NS trades at ₹1,465.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas KIRLOSENG.NS's P/E ratio is 39.21. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KIRLOSENG.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check KIRLOSENG.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs LAXMIMACH.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.BO has a market cap of 185.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while LAXMIMACH.BO trades at ₹17,338.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas LAXMIMACH.BO's P/E ratio is 63.86. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LAXMIMACH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check LAXMIMACH.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs LAXMIMACH.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.NS has a market cap of 185.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while LAXMIMACH.NS trades at ₹17,324.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas LAXMIMACH.NS's P/E ratio is 63.45. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LAXMIMACH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check LAXMIMACH.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs JYOTICNC.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, JYOTICNC.NS has a market cap of 184.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while JYOTICNC.NS trades at ₹809.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas JYOTICNC.NS's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JYOTICNC.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to JYOTICNC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check JYOTICNC.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs ELGIEQUIP.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.NS has a market cap of 157.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while ELGIEQUIP.NS trades at ₹499.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas ELGIEQUIP.NS's P/E ratio is 39.11. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ELGIEQUIP.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs ELGIEQUIP.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.BO has a market cap of 157.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while ELGIEQUIP.BO trades at ₹498.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas ELGIEQUIP.BO's P/E ratio is 39.04. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ELGIEQUIP.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs KSB.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, KSB.BO has a market cap of 148.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while KSB.BO trades at ₹852.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas KSB.BO's P/E ratio is 54.78. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KSB.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to KSB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check KSB.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs KSB.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, KSB.NS has a market cap of 148.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while KSB.NS trades at ₹852.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas KSB.NS's P/E ratio is 54.95. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KSB.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to KSB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check KSB.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs TRITURBINE.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, TRITURBINE.NS has a market cap of 147.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while TRITURBINE.NS trades at ₹464.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas TRITURBINE.NS's P/E ratio is 43.15. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRITURBINE.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to TRITURBINE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check TRITURBINE.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs TRITURBINE.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, TRITURBINE.BO has a market cap of 147.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while TRITURBINE.BO trades at ₹464.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas TRITURBINE.BO's P/E ratio is 43.14. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRITURBINE.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to TRITURBINE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check TRITURBINE.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs LMW.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, LMW.BO has a market cap of 145.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while LMW.BO trades at ₹13,639.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas LMW.BO's P/E ratio is 126.88. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LMW.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS and LMW.BO have similar daily volatility (2.98).Check LMW.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs TDPOWERSYS.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, TDPOWERSYS.BO has a market cap of 138.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while TDPOWERSYS.BO trades at ₹886.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas TDPOWERSYS.BO's P/E ratio is 63.25. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TDPOWERSYS.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to TDPOWERSYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check TDPOWERSYS.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs TDPOWERSYS.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, TDPOWERSYS.NS has a market cap of 138.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while TDPOWERSYS.NS trades at ₹884.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas TDPOWERSYS.NS's P/E ratio is 62.87. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TDPOWERSYS.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to TDPOWERSYS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check TDPOWERSYS.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs TEGA.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, TEGA.BO has a market cap of 129.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while TEGA.BO trades at ₹1,729.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas TEGA.BO's P/E ratio is 58.46. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TEGA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to TEGA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check TEGA.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs TEGA.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, TEGA.NS has a market cap of 129.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while TEGA.NS trades at ₹1,728.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas TEGA.NS's P/E ratio is 57.51. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TEGA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to TEGA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check TEGA.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs MTARTECH.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, MTARTECH.NS has a market cap of 127.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while MTARTECH.NS trades at ₹4,140.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas MTARTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 200.41. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTARTECH.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to MTARTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check MTARTECH.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs MTARTECH.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, MTARTECH.BO has a market cap of 127.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while MTARTECH.BO trades at ₹4,139.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas MTARTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 199.88. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTARTECH.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to MTARTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check MTARTECH.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs KIRLOSBROS.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.NS has a market cap of 121.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while KIRLOSBROS.NS trades at ₹1,528.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas KIRLOSBROS.NS's P/E ratio is 30.40. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check KIRLOSBROS.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs KIRLOSBROS.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.BO has a market cap of 121.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while KIRLOSBROS.BO trades at ₹1,524.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas KIRLOSBROS.BO's P/E ratio is 30.84. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check KIRLOSBROS.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs INGERRAND.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, INGERRAND.BO has a market cap of 120.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while INGERRAND.BO trades at ₹3,804.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas INGERRAND.BO's P/E ratio is 45.42. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INGERRAND.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to INGERRAND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check INGERRAND.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs INGERRAND.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, INGERRAND.NS has a market cap of 120B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while INGERRAND.NS trades at ₹3,800.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas INGERRAND.NS's P/E ratio is 46.27. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INGERRAND.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to INGERRAND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check INGERRAND.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs INOXINDIA.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, INOXINDIA.NS has a market cap of 111.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while INOXINDIA.NS trades at ₹1,231.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas INOXINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 45.06. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INOXINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to INOXINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check INOXINDIA.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs AZAD.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, AZAD.NS has a market cap of 105.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while AZAD.NS trades at ₹1,635.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas AZAD.NS's P/E ratio is 85.32. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AZAD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to AZAD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check AZAD.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs ELECON.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, ELECON.NS has a market cap of 94.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while ELECON.NS trades at ₹419.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas ELECON.NS's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELECON.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to ELECON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ELECON.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs ELECON.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, ELECON.BO has a market cap of 94.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while ELECON.BO trades at ₹419.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas ELECON.BO's P/E ratio is 19.54. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELECON.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to ELECON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ELECON.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs VESUVIUS.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, VESUVIUS.NS has a market cap of 94B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while VESUVIUS.NS trades at ₹463.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas VESUVIUS.NS's P/E ratio is 35.63. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VESUVIUS.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to VESUVIUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check VESUVIUS.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs VESUVIUS.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, VESUVIUS.BO has a market cap of 94B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while VESUVIUS.BO trades at ₹463.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas VESUVIUS.BO's P/E ratio is 35.56. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VESUVIUS.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to VESUVIUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check VESUVIUS.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs KIRLPNU.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, KIRLPNU.NS has a market cap of 76B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while KIRLPNU.NS trades at ₹1,169.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas KIRLPNU.NS's P/E ratio is 39.88. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KIRLPNU.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLPNU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check KIRLPNU.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs KIRLPNU.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, KIRLPNU.BO has a market cap of 75.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while KIRLPNU.BO trades at ₹1,167.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas KIRLPNU.BO's P/E ratio is 38.96. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KIRLPNU.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLPNU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check KIRLPNU.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs DIACABS.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, DIACABS.NS has a market cap of 70.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while DIACABS.NS trades at ₹133.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas DIACABS.NS's P/E ratio is 67.53. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DIACABS.NS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to DIACABS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check DIACABS.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs DIACABS.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, DIACABS.BO has a market cap of 70.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while DIACABS.BO trades at ₹133.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas DIACABS.BO's P/E ratio is 67.37. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DIACABS.BO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to DIACABS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check DIACABS.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs ISGEC.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, ISGEC.NS has a market cap of 67.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while ISGEC.NS trades at ₹921.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas ISGEC.NS's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ISGEC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to ISGEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ISGEC.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs ISGEC.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, ISGEC.BO has a market cap of 67.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while ISGEC.BO trades at ₹921.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas ISGEC.BO's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ISGEC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to ISGEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ISGEC.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs SHAKTIPUMP.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.BO has a market cap of 63.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while SHAKTIPUMP.BO trades at ₹517.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.BO's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check SHAKTIPUMP.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs SHAKTIPUMP.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.NS has a market cap of 63.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while SHAKTIPUMP.NS trades at ₹517.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.NS's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check SHAKTIPUMP.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs LLOYDSENGG.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.NS has a market cap of 59.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while LLOYDSENGG.NS trades at ₹49.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas LLOYDSENGG.NS's P/E ratio is 41.75. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check LLOYDSENGG.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs LLOYDSENGG.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.BO has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while LLOYDSENGG.BO trades at ₹49.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas LLOYDSENGG.BO's P/E ratio is 41.64. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check LLOYDSENGG.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs BALUFORGE.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, BALUFORGE.BO has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while BALUFORGE.BO trades at ₹481.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas BALUFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BALUFORGE.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to BALUFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check BALUFORGE.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs DIAPOWER.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, DIAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while DIAPOWER.NS trades at ₹195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas DIAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DIAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to DIAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check DIAPOWER.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs LSIL.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, LSIL.NS has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while LSIL.NS trades at ₹48.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas LSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 130.41. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LSIL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to LSIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check LSIL.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs GMMPFAUDLR.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.BO has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while GMMPFAUDLR.BO trades at ₹905.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.BO's P/E ratio is 230.93. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check GMMPFAUDLR.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs GMMPFAUDLR.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.NS has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while GMMPFAUDLR.NS trades at ₹904.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.NS's P/E ratio is 231.32. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check GMMPFAUDLR.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs TEXRAIL.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, TEXRAIL.BO has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while TEXRAIL.BO trades at ₹97.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas TEXRAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TEXRAIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to TEXRAIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check TEXRAIL.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs TEXRAIL.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, TEXRAIL.NS has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while TEXRAIL.NS trades at ₹97.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas TEXRAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TEXRAIL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to TEXRAIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check TEXRAIL.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs WPIL.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, WPIL.BO has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while WPIL.BO trades at ₹397.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas WPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 32.49. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WPIL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to WPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check WPIL.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs ANUP.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, ANUP.BO has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while ANUP.BO trades at ₹1,834.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas ANUP.BO's P/E ratio is 31.99. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ANUP.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to ANUP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ANUP.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs ANUP.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, ANUP.NS has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while ANUP.NS trades at ₹1,834.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas ANUP.NS's P/E ratio is 31.91. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ANUP.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to ANUP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ANUP.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs SHANTIGEAR.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.BO has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while SHANTIGEAR.BO trades at ₹460.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas SHANTIGEAR.BO's P/E ratio is 42.67. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check SHANTIGEAR.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs SHANTIGEAR.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.NS has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while SHANTIGEAR.NS trades at ₹458.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas SHANTIGEAR.NS's P/E ratio is 42.48. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check SHANTIGEAR.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs GREAVESCOT.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.NS has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while GREAVESCOT.NS trades at ₹146.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas GREAVESCOT.NS's P/E ratio is 31.75. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GREAVESCOT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check GREAVESCOT.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs GREAVESCOT.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.BO has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while GREAVESCOT.BO trades at ₹146.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas GREAVESCOT.BO's P/E ratio is 33.01. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GREAVESCOT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check GREAVESCOT.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs SGLTL.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, SGLTL.NS has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while SGLTL.NS trades at ₹137.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas SGLTL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SGLTL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to SGLTL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check SGLTL.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs SETL.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, SETL.NS has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while SETL.NS trades at ₹134.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas SETL.NS's P/E ratio is 35.47. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SETL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to SETL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check SETL.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs KLBRENG-B.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, KLBRENG-B.BO has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while KLBRENG-B.BO trades at ₹499.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas KLBRENG-B.BO's P/E ratio is 26.85. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KLBRENG-B.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to KLBRENG-B.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check KLBRENG-B.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs JASH.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, JASH.NS has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while JASH.NS trades at ₹410.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas JASH.NS's P/E ratio is 45.45. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JASH.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to JASH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check JASH.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs GMM.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, GMM.BO has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while GMM.BO trades at ₹1,563.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas GMM.BO's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GMM.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to GMM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check GMM.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs PENIND.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, PENIND.NS has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while PENIND.NS trades at ₹161.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas PENIND.NS's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PENIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to PENIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check PENIND.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs PENIND.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, PENIND.BO has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while PENIND.BO trades at ₹161.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas PENIND.BO's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PENIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to PENIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check PENIND.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs WINDMACHIN.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, WINDMACHIN.NS has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while WINDMACHIN.NS trades at ₹248.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas WINDMACHIN.NS's P/E ratio is -800.52. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WINDMACHIN.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to WINDMACHIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check WINDMACHIN.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs WINDMACHIN.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, WINDMACHIN.BO has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while WINDMACHIN.BO trades at ₹247.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas WINDMACHIN.BO's P/E ratio is -774.06. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WINDMACHIN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to WINDMACHIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check WINDMACHIN.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs HONDAPOWER.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, HONDAPOWER.BO has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while HONDAPOWER.BO trades at ₹2,100.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas HONDAPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 28.98. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HONDAPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to HONDAPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check HONDAPOWER.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs HONDAPOWER.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, HONDAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while HONDAPOWER.NS trades at ₹2,097.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas HONDAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 28.92. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HONDAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to HONDAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check HONDAPOWER.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs KMEW.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, KMEW.BO has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while KMEW.BO trades at ₹1,731.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas KMEW.BO's P/E ratio is 61.71. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KMEW.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to KMEW.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check KMEW.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs HLEGLAS.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, HLEGLAS.BO has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while HLEGLAS.BO trades at ₹299.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas HLEGLAS.BO's P/E ratio is 30.65. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HLEGLAS.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to HLEGLAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check HLEGLAS.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs HLEGLAS.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, HLEGLAS.NS has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while HLEGLAS.NS trades at ₹298.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas HLEGLAS.NS's P/E ratio is 30.54. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HLEGLAS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to HLEGLAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check HLEGLAS.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs ADVAIT.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, ADVAIT.BO has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while ADVAIT.BO trades at ₹1,826.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas ADVAIT.BO's P/E ratio is 43.87. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADVAIT.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to ADVAIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ADVAIT.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs PIXTRANS.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, PIXTRANS.NS has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while PIXTRANS.NS trades at ₹1,462.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas PIXTRANS.NS's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PIXTRANS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to PIXTRANS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check PIXTRANS.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs PIXTRANS.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, PIXTRANS.BO has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while PIXTRANS.BO trades at ₹1,458.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas PIXTRANS.BO's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PIXTRANS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to PIXTRANS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check PIXTRANS.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs DISAQ.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, DISAQ.BO has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while DISAQ.BO trades at ₹11,898.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas DISAQ.BO's P/E ratio is 32.52. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DISAQ.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to DISAQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check DISAQ.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs THEJO.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, THEJO.NS has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while THEJO.NS trades at ₹1,575.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas THEJO.NS's P/E ratio is 35.16. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to THEJO.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to THEJO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check THEJO.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs LXMIATO.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, LXMIATO.BO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while LXMIATO.BO trades at ₹2,483.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas LXMIATO.BO's P/E ratio is 584.15. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LXMIATO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to LXMIATO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check LXMIATO.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs ADOR.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, ADOR.BO has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while ADOR.BO trades at ₹871.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas ADOR.BO's P/E ratio is 23.05. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADOR.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to ADOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ADOR.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs ADOR.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, ADOR.NS has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while ADOR.NS trades at ₹869.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas ADOR.NS's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADOR.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to ADOR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ADOR.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs JNKINDIA.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, JNKINDIA.NS has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while JNKINDIA.NS trades at ₹270.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas JNKINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 32.89. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JNKINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to JNKINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check JNKINDIA.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs ADORWELD.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, ADORWELD.NS has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while ADORWELD.NS trades at ₹852.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas ADORWELD.NS's P/E ratio is 33.22. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADORWELD.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is more volatile compared to ADORWELD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ADORWELD.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs ADORWELD.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, ADORWELD.BO has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while ADORWELD.BO trades at ₹852.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas ADORWELD.BO's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADORWELD.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to ADORWELD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check ADORWELD.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs JYOTISTRUC.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, JYOTISTRUC.BO has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while JYOTISTRUC.BO trades at ₹11.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas JYOTISTRUC.BO's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JYOTISTRUC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to JYOTISTRUC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check JYOTISTRUC.BO's competition here
LMW.NS vs JYOTISTRUC.NS Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, JYOTISTRUC.NS has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while JYOTISTRUC.NS trades at ₹11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas JYOTISTRUC.NS's P/E ratio is 26.66. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JYOTISTRUC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to JYOTISTRUC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check JYOTISTRUC.NS's competition here
LMW.NS vs EKC.BO Comparison April 2026
LMW.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMW.NS stands at 145.5B. In comparison, EKC.BO has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMW.NS is priced at ₹13,639.50, while EKC.BO trades at ₹110.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMW.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 126.62, whereas EKC.BO's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, LMW.NS's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EKC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMW.NS is less volatile compared to EKC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMW.NS.Check EKC.BO's competition here