Lloyds Engineering Works Limited
Lloyds Engineering Works Limited (LLOYDSENGG.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LLOYDSENGG.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLOYDSENGG.BO | ₹48.89 | -3.25% | 59.1B | 41.64 | ₹1.18 | +0.51% |
| CUMMINSIND.NS | ₹4,910.40 | +3.73% | 1.4T | 60.42 | ₹80.84 | +1.10% |
| CUMMINSIND.BO | ₹4,914.45 | +3.73% | 1.4T | 60.23 | ₹81.08 | +1.10% |
| ABB.NS | ₹6,056.00 | +1.15% | 1.3T | 71.11 | ₹83.22 | +0.73% |
| ABB.BO | ₹6,053.95 | +1.15% | 1.3T | 70.95 | ₹83.38 | +0.73% |
| SIEMENS.BO | ₹3,364.00 | +4.88% | 1.2T | 69.73 | ₹47.37 | N/A |
| SIEMENS.NS | ₹3,365.60 | +4.97% | 1.2T | 69.59 | ₹47.45 | N/A |
| BHEL.BO | ₹261.90 | +1.85% | 902B | 110.71 | ₹2.34 | +0.19% |
| BHEL.NS | ₹261.80 | +1.75% | 899.2B | 110.84 | ₹2.33 | +0.19% |
| VOLTAS.BO | ₹1,537.90 | -0.48% | 509.2B | 101.25 | ₹15.20 | +0.46% |
Stock Comparison
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs CUMMINSIND.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, CUMMINSIND.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while CUMMINSIND.NS trades at ₹4,910.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas CUMMINSIND.NS's P/E ratio is 60.42. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CUMMINSIND.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to CUMMINSIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check CUMMINSIND.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs CUMMINSIND.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, CUMMINSIND.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while CUMMINSIND.BO trades at ₹4,914.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas CUMMINSIND.BO's P/E ratio is 60.23. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CUMMINSIND.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to CUMMINSIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check CUMMINSIND.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs ABB.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, ABB.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while ABB.NS trades at ₹6,056.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas ABB.NS's P/E ratio is 71.11. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ABB.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to ABB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check ABB.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs ABB.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, ABB.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while ABB.BO trades at ₹6,053.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas ABB.BO's P/E ratio is 70.95. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ABB.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to ABB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check ABB.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs SIEMENS.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, SIEMENS.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while SIEMENS.BO trades at ₹3,364.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas SIEMENS.BO's P/E ratio is 69.73. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SIEMENS.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to SIEMENS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check SIEMENS.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs SIEMENS.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, SIEMENS.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while SIEMENS.NS trades at ₹3,365.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas SIEMENS.NS's P/E ratio is 69.59. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SIEMENS.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to SIEMENS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check SIEMENS.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs BHEL.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, BHEL.BO has a market cap of 902B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while BHEL.BO trades at ₹261.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas BHEL.BO's P/E ratio is 110.71. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BHEL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to BHEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check BHEL.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs BHEL.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, BHEL.NS has a market cap of 899.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while BHEL.NS trades at ₹261.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas BHEL.NS's P/E ratio is 110.84. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BHEL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to BHEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check BHEL.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs VOLTAS.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, VOLTAS.BO has a market cap of 509.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while VOLTAS.BO trades at ₹1,537.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas VOLTAS.BO's P/E ratio is 101.25. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VOLTAS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to VOLTAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check VOLTAS.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs VOLTAS.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, VOLTAS.NS has a market cap of 509B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while VOLTAS.NS trades at ₹1,538.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas VOLTAS.NS's P/E ratio is 101.46. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VOLTAS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to VOLTAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check VOLTAS.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs BLUESTARCO.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, BLUESTARCO.NS has a market cap of 403.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while BLUESTARCO.NS trades at ₹1,959.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas BLUESTARCO.NS's P/E ratio is 81.71. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BLUESTARCO.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to BLUESTARCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check BLUESTARCO.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs GET&D.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, GET&D.NS has a market cap of 397.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while GET&D.NS trades at ₹1,552.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas GET&D.NS's P/E ratio is 100.73. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GET&D.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to GET&D.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check GET&D.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs AIAENG.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, AIAENG.BO has a market cap of 358.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while AIAENG.BO trades at ₹3,854.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas AIAENG.BO's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AIAENG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to AIAENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check AIAENG.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs AIAENG.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, AIAENG.NS has a market cap of 357.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while AIAENG.NS trades at ₹3,859.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas AIAENG.NS's P/E ratio is 30.83. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AIAENG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to AIAENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check AIAENG.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs THERMAX.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, THERMAX.BO has a market cap of 355.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while THERMAX.BO trades at ₹3,145.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas THERMAX.BO's P/E ratio is 52.26. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to THERMAX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to THERMAX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check THERMAX.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs THERMAX.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, THERMAX.NS has a market cap of 355.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while THERMAX.NS trades at ₹3,148.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas THERMAX.NS's P/E ratio is 52.15. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to THERMAX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to THERMAX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check THERMAX.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs KAYNES.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, KAYNES.NS has a market cap of 254.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while KAYNES.NS trades at ₹3,838.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas KAYNES.NS's P/E ratio is 64.03. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KAYNES.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to KAYNES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check KAYNES.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs KAYNES.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, KAYNES.BO has a market cap of 254.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while KAYNES.BO trades at ₹3,837.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas KAYNES.BO's P/E ratio is 64.13. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KAYNES.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to KAYNES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check KAYNES.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs SCHNEIDER.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, SCHNEIDER.NS has a market cap of 218.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while SCHNEIDER.NS trades at ₹896.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas SCHNEIDER.NS's P/E ratio is 89.30. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SCHNEIDER.NS's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to SCHNEIDER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check SCHNEIDER.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs KIRLOSENG.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.BO has a market cap of 203.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while KIRLOSENG.BO trades at ₹1,395.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas KIRLOSENG.BO's P/E ratio is 37.48. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check KIRLOSENG.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs KIRLOSENG.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.NS has a market cap of 203.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while KIRLOSENG.NS trades at ₹1,392.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas KIRLOSENG.NS's P/E ratio is 37.46. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KIRLOSENG.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check KIRLOSENG.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs JYOTICNC.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, JYOTICNC.NS has a market cap of 195.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while JYOTICNC.NS trades at ₹848.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas JYOTICNC.NS's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JYOTICNC.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to JYOTICNC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check JYOTICNC.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs LAXMIMACH.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.BO has a market cap of 185.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while LAXMIMACH.BO trades at ₹17,338.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas LAXMIMACH.BO's P/E ratio is 63.86. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LAXMIMACH.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check LAXMIMACH.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs LAXMIMACH.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.NS has a market cap of 185.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while LAXMIMACH.NS trades at ₹17,324.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas LAXMIMACH.NS's P/E ratio is 63.45. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LAXMIMACH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check LAXMIMACH.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs ELGIEQUIP.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.BO has a market cap of 173.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while ELGIEQUIP.BO trades at ₹540.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas ELGIEQUIP.BO's P/E ratio is 43.02. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check ELGIEQUIP.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs ELGIEQUIP.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.NS has a market cap of 173.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while ELGIEQUIP.NS trades at ₹540.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas ELGIEQUIP.NS's P/E ratio is 43.02. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check ELGIEQUIP.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs LMW.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, LMW.BO has a market cap of 167.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while LMW.BO trades at ₹15,490.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas LMW.BO's P/E ratio is 146.78. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LMW.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to LMW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check LMW.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs LMW.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, LMW.NS has a market cap of 167.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while LMW.NS trades at ₹15,490.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas LMW.NS's P/E ratio is 145.60. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LMW.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to LMW.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check LMW.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs TRITURBINE.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, TRITURBINE.NS has a market cap of 156.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while TRITURBINE.NS trades at ₹484.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas TRITURBINE.NS's P/E ratio is 45.77. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TRITURBINE.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to TRITURBINE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check TRITURBINE.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs TRITURBINE.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, TRITURBINE.BO has a market cap of 156.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while TRITURBINE.BO trades at ₹484.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas TRITURBINE.BO's P/E ratio is 45.66. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TRITURBINE.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to TRITURBINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check TRITURBINE.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs TDPOWERSYS.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, TDPOWERSYS.NS has a market cap of 141.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while TDPOWERSYS.NS trades at ₹888.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas TDPOWERSYS.NS's P/E ratio is 64.42. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TDPOWERSYS.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to TDPOWERSYS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check TDPOWERSYS.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs TDPOWERSYS.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, TDPOWERSYS.BO has a market cap of 141B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while TDPOWERSYS.BO trades at ₹888.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas TDPOWERSYS.BO's P/E ratio is 64.30. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TDPOWERSYS.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to TDPOWERSYS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check TDPOWERSYS.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs TEGA.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, TEGA.NS has a market cap of 129.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while TEGA.NS trades at ₹1,782.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas TEGA.NS's P/E ratio is 57.43. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TEGA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to TEGA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check TEGA.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs TEGA.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, TEGA.BO has a market cap of 129.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while TEGA.BO trades at ₹1,784.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas TEGA.BO's P/E ratio is 57.44. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TEGA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to TEGA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check TEGA.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs KIRLOSBROS.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.NS has a market cap of 128.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while KIRLOSBROS.NS trades at ₹1,565.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas KIRLOSBROS.NS's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check KIRLOSBROS.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs KIRLOSBROS.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.BO has a market cap of 128.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while KIRLOSBROS.BO trades at ₹1,569.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas KIRLOSBROS.BO's P/E ratio is 32.65. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check KIRLOSBROS.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs KSB.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, KSB.BO has a market cap of 126.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while KSB.BO trades at ₹711.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas KSB.BO's P/E ratio is 48.10. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KSB.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to KSB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check KSB.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs KSB.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, KSB.NS has a market cap of 126.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while KSB.NS trades at ₹710.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas KSB.NS's P/E ratio is 48.20. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KSB.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to KSB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check KSB.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs INGERRAND.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, INGERRAND.NS has a market cap of 125.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while INGERRAND.NS trades at ₹3,955.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas INGERRAND.NS's P/E ratio is 48.72. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INGERRAND.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to INGERRAND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check INGERRAND.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs INGERRAND.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, INGERRAND.BO has a market cap of 125.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while INGERRAND.BO trades at ₹3,951.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas INGERRAND.BO's P/E ratio is 47.48. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INGERRAND.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to INGERRAND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check INGERRAND.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs MTARTECH.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, MTARTECH.BO has a market cap of 114.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while MTARTECH.BO trades at ₹3,761.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas MTARTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 182.05. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MTARTECH.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to MTARTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check MTARTECH.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs MTARTECH.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, MTARTECH.NS has a market cap of 114.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while MTARTECH.NS trades at ₹3,759.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas MTARTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 181.92. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MTARTECH.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to MTARTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check MTARTECH.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs AZAD.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, AZAD.NS has a market cap of 110.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while AZAD.NS trades at ₹1,742.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas AZAD.NS's P/E ratio is 89.37. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AZAD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to AZAD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check AZAD.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs VESUVIUS.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, VESUVIUS.BO has a market cap of 105.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while VESUVIUS.BO trades at ₹507.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas VESUVIUS.BO's P/E ratio is 43.42. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VESUVIUS.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to VESUVIUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check VESUVIUS.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs VESUVIUS.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, VESUVIUS.NS has a market cap of 105.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while VESUVIUS.NS trades at ₹506.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas VESUVIUS.NS's P/E ratio is 43.29. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VESUVIUS.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to VESUVIUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check VESUVIUS.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs INOXINDIA.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, INOXINDIA.NS has a market cap of 103.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while INOXINDIA.NS trades at ₹1,155.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas INOXINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 41.87. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INOXINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to INOXINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check INOXINDIA.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs ELECON.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, ELECON.NS has a market cap of 95.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while ELECON.NS trades at ₹419.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas ELECON.NS's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ELECON.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to ELECON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check ELECON.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs ELECON.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, ELECON.BO has a market cap of 95.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while ELECON.BO trades at ₹419.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas ELECON.BO's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ELECON.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to ELECON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check ELECON.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs KIRLPNU.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, KIRLPNU.BO has a market cap of 74.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while KIRLPNU.BO trades at ₹1,133.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas KIRLPNU.BO's P/E ratio is 39.08. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KIRLPNU.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to KIRLPNU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check KIRLPNU.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs KIRLPNU.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, KIRLPNU.NS has a market cap of 74.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while KIRLPNU.NS trades at ₹1,136.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas KIRLPNU.NS's P/E ratio is 39.03. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KIRLPNU.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to KIRLPNU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check KIRLPNU.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs DIACABS.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, DIACABS.NS has a market cap of 71.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while DIACABS.NS trades at ₹132.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas DIACABS.NS's P/E ratio is 67.76. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DIACABS.NS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to DIACABS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check DIACABS.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs DIACABS.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, DIACABS.BO has a market cap of 70.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while DIACABS.BO trades at ₹132.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas DIACABS.BO's P/E ratio is 67.54. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DIACABS.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to DIACABS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check DIACABS.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs SHAKTIPUMP.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.BO has a market cap of 68.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while SHAKTIPUMP.BO trades at ₹538.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.BO's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check SHAKTIPUMP.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs SHAKTIPUMP.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.NS has a market cap of 68.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while SHAKTIPUMP.NS trades at ₹537.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.NS's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check SHAKTIPUMP.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs ISGEC.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, ISGEC.BO has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while ISGEC.BO trades at ₹883.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas ISGEC.BO's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ISGEC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to ISGEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check ISGEC.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs ISGEC.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, ISGEC.NS has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while ISGEC.NS trades at ₹884.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas ISGEC.NS's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ISGEC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to ISGEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check ISGEC.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs LLOYDSENGG.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.NS has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while LLOYDSENGG.NS trades at ₹48.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas LLOYDSENGG.NS's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check LLOYDSENGG.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs BALUFORGE.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, BALUFORGE.BO has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while BALUFORGE.BO trades at ₹460.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas BALUFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BALUFORGE.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to BALUFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check BALUFORGE.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs DIAPOWER.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, DIAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while DIAPOWER.NS trades at ₹195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas DIAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DIAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to DIAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check DIAPOWER.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs LSIL.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, LSIL.NS has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while LSIL.NS trades at ₹48.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas LSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 130.41. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LSIL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to LSIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check LSIL.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs TEXRAIL.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, TEXRAIL.NS has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while TEXRAIL.NS trades at ₹106.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas TEXRAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 25.15. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TEXRAIL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to TEXRAIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check TEXRAIL.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs TEXRAIL.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, TEXRAIL.BO has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while TEXRAIL.BO trades at ₹106.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas TEXRAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 25.20. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TEXRAIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to TEXRAIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check TEXRAIL.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs GMMPFAUDLR.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.BO has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while GMMPFAUDLR.BO trades at ₹958.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.BO's P/E ratio is 248.96. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check GMMPFAUDLR.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs GMMPFAUDLR.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.NS has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while GMMPFAUDLR.NS trades at ₹960.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.NS's P/E ratio is 248.76. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check GMMPFAUDLR.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs WPIL.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, WPIL.BO has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while WPIL.BO trades at ₹395.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas WPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 32.76. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WPIL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to WPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check WPIL.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs GREAVESCOT.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.BO has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while GREAVESCOT.BO trades at ₹154.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas GREAVESCOT.BO's P/E ratio is 36.03. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GREAVESCOT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check GREAVESCOT.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs GREAVESCOT.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.NS has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while GREAVESCOT.NS trades at ₹154.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas GREAVESCOT.NS's P/E ratio is 34.69. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GREAVESCOT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check GREAVESCOT.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs SHANTIGEAR.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.BO has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while SHANTIGEAR.BO trades at ₹450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas SHANTIGEAR.BO's P/E ratio is 41.83. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check SHANTIGEAR.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs ANUP.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, ANUP.BO has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while ANUP.BO trades at ₹1,629.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas ANUP.BO's P/E ratio is 30.16. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ANUP.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to ANUP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check ANUP.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs ANUP.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, ANUP.NS has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while ANUP.NS trades at ₹1,629.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas ANUP.NS's P/E ratio is 30.18. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ANUP.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to ANUP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check ANUP.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs SHANTIGEAR.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.NS has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while SHANTIGEAR.NS trades at ₹450.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas SHANTIGEAR.NS's P/E ratio is 41.75. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check SHANTIGEAR.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs SGLTL.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, SGLTL.NS has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while SGLTL.NS trades at ₹137.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas SGLTL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SGLTL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to SGLTL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check SGLTL.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs KLBRENG-B.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, KLBRENG-B.BO has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while KLBRENG-B.BO trades at ₹498.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas KLBRENG-B.BO's P/E ratio is 27.32. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KLBRENG-B.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to KLBRENG-B.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check KLBRENG-B.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs SETL.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, SETL.NS has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while SETL.NS trades at ₹124.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas SETL.NS's P/E ratio is 34.67. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SETL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to SETL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check SETL.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs JASH.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, JASH.NS has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while JASH.NS trades at ₹394.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas JASH.NS's P/E ratio is 44.97. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JASH.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to JASH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check JASH.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs GMM.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, GMM.BO has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while GMM.BO trades at ₹1,563.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas GMM.BO's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GMM.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to GMM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check GMM.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs HONDAPOWER.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, HONDAPOWER.BO has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while HONDAPOWER.BO trades at ₹2,181.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas HONDAPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 30.66. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HONDAPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to HONDAPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check HONDAPOWER.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs HONDAPOWER.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, HONDAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while HONDAPOWER.NS trades at ₹2,187.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas HONDAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 30.35. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HONDAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to HONDAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check HONDAPOWER.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs HLEGLAS.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, HLEGLAS.BO has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while HLEGLAS.BO trades at ₹315.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas HLEGLAS.BO's P/E ratio is 33.45. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HLEGLAS.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to HLEGLAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check HLEGLAS.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs HLEGLAS.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, HLEGLAS.NS has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while HLEGLAS.NS trades at ₹315.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas HLEGLAS.NS's P/E ratio is 32.64. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HLEGLAS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to HLEGLAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check HLEGLAS.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs WINDMACHIN.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, WINDMACHIN.NS has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while WINDMACHIN.NS trades at ₹237.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas WINDMACHIN.NS's P/E ratio is -757.81. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WINDMACHIN.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to WINDMACHIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check WINDMACHIN.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs WINDMACHIN.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, WINDMACHIN.BO has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while WINDMACHIN.BO trades at ₹237.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas WINDMACHIN.BO's P/E ratio is -745.94. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WINDMACHIN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to WINDMACHIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check WINDMACHIN.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs PIXTRANS.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, PIXTRANS.NS has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while PIXTRANS.NS trades at ₹1,489.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas PIXTRANS.NS's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PIXTRANS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to PIXTRANS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check PIXTRANS.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs PIXTRANS.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, PIXTRANS.BO has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while PIXTRANS.BO trades at ₹1,488.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas PIXTRANS.BO's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PIXTRANS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to PIXTRANS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check PIXTRANS.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs PENIND.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, PENIND.NS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while PENIND.NS trades at ₹141.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas PENIND.NS's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PENIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to PENIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check PENIND.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs PENIND.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, PENIND.BO has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while PENIND.BO trades at ₹141.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas PENIND.BO's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to PENIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to PENIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check PENIND.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs KMEW.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, KMEW.BO has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while KMEW.BO trades at ₹1,567.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas KMEW.BO's P/E ratio is 55.46. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to KMEW.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to KMEW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check KMEW.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs THEJO.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, THEJO.NS has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while THEJO.NS trades at ₹1,671.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas THEJO.NS's P/E ratio is 38.47. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to THEJO.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to THEJO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check THEJO.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs ADOR.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, ADOR.BO has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while ADOR.BO trades at ₹1,065.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas ADOR.BO's P/E ratio is 28.40. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ADOR.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to ADOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check ADOR.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs ADOR.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, ADOR.NS has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while ADOR.NS trades at ₹1,065.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas ADOR.NS's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ADOR.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to ADOR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check ADOR.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs ADVAIT.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, ADVAIT.BO has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while ADVAIT.BO trades at ₹1,717.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas ADVAIT.BO's P/E ratio is 40.94. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ADVAIT.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to ADVAIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check ADVAIT.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs DISAQ.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, DISAQ.BO has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while DISAQ.BO trades at ₹12,211.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas DISAQ.BO's P/E ratio is 34.18. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to DISAQ.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to DISAQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check DISAQ.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs LXMIATO.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, LXMIATO.BO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while LXMIATO.BO trades at ₹2,483.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas LXMIATO.BO's P/E ratio is 584.15. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to LXMIATO.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to LXMIATO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check LXMIATO.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs ADORWELD.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, ADORWELD.NS has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while ADORWELD.NS trades at ₹852.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas ADORWELD.NS's P/E ratio is 33.22. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ADORWELD.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to ADORWELD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check ADORWELD.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs ADORWELD.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, ADORWELD.BO has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while ADORWELD.BO trades at ₹852.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas ADORWELD.BO's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ADORWELD.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to ADORWELD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check ADORWELD.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs JYOTISTRUC.BO Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, JYOTISTRUC.BO has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while JYOTISTRUC.BO trades at ₹12.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas JYOTISTRUC.BO's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JYOTISTRUC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to JYOTISTRUC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check JYOTISTRUC.BO's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs JYOTISTRUC.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, JYOTISTRUC.NS has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while JYOTISTRUC.NS trades at ₹12.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas JYOTISTRUC.NS's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JYOTISTRUC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to JYOTISTRUC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check JYOTISTRUC.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs JNKINDIA.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, JNKINDIA.NS has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while JNKINDIA.NS trades at ₹245.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas JNKINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 29.93. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to JNKINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is less volatile compared to JNKINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check JNKINDIA.NS's competition here
LLOYDSENGG.BO vs EKC.NS Comparison February 2026
LLOYDSENGG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LLOYDSENGG.BO stands at 59.1B. In comparison, EKC.NS has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LLOYDSENGG.BO is priced at ₹48.89, while EKC.NS trades at ₹115.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LLOYDSENGG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.64, whereas EKC.NS's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EKC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LLOYDSENGG.BO is more volatile compared to EKC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LLOYDSENGG.BO.Check EKC.NS's competition here