Lhyfe SA
Lhyfe SA (LHYFE.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LHYFE.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LHYFE.PA | €2.35 | +0.43% | 112.7M | -2.21 | -€1.06 | N/A |
| EDPR.LS | €14.53 | +1.25% | 15.2B | 68.95 | €0.21 | +0.86% |
| NEOEN.PA | €39.00 | +0.00% | 6.3B | 72.22 | €0.54 | N/A |
| ELEC.PA | €251.50 | +1.82% | 1.8B | 11.12 | €22.03 | +4.49% |
| GVOLT.LS | €8.22 | N/A | 1.3B | 822.00 | €0.01 | N/A |
| VLTSA.PA | €8.29 | +2.35% | 1.1B | -10.94 | -€0.77 | N/A |
| GRP.IR | €0.78 | +0.26% | 868.2M | 15.88 | €0.05 | +8.58% |
| ARVEN.PA | €9.82 | +7.44% | 407M | -21.57 | -€0.51 | N/A |
| COXE.MC | €1.70 | +3.03% | 308.8M | 20.88 | €0.08 | N/A |
| ALESE.PA | €10.66 | +1.14% | 154.8M | 263.00 | €0.04 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LHYFE.PA vs EDPR.LS Comparison May 2026
LHYFE.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHYFE.PA stands at 112.7M. In comparison, EDPR.LS has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LHYFE.PA is priced at €2.35, while EDPR.LS trades at €14.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHYFE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas EDPR.LS's P/E ratio is 68.95. In terms of profitability, LHYFE.PA's ROE is -1.40%, compared to EDPR.LS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LHYFE.PA is more volatile compared to EDPR.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHYFE.PA.Check EDPR.LS's competition here
LHYFE.PA vs NEOEN.PA Comparison May 2026
LHYFE.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHYFE.PA stands at 112.7M. In comparison, NEOEN.PA has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LHYFE.PA is priced at €2.35, while NEOEN.PA trades at €39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHYFE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas NEOEN.PA's P/E ratio is 72.22. In terms of profitability, LHYFE.PA's ROE is -1.40%, compared to NEOEN.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LHYFE.PA is less volatile compared to NEOEN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHYFE.PA.Check NEOEN.PA's competition here
LHYFE.PA vs ELEC.PA Comparison May 2026
LHYFE.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHYFE.PA stands at 112.7M. In comparison, ELEC.PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LHYFE.PA is priced at €2.35, while ELEC.PA trades at €251.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHYFE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas ELEC.PA's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, LHYFE.PA's ROE is -1.40%, compared to ELEC.PA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LHYFE.PA is less volatile compared to ELEC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHYFE.PA.Check ELEC.PA's competition here
LHYFE.PA vs GVOLT.LS Comparison May 2026
LHYFE.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHYFE.PA stands at 112.7M. In comparison, GVOLT.LS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LHYFE.PA is priced at €2.35, while GVOLT.LS trades at €8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHYFE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas GVOLT.LS's P/E ratio is 822.00. In terms of profitability, LHYFE.PA's ROE is -1.40%, compared to GVOLT.LS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LHYFE.PA is more volatile compared to GVOLT.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHYFE.PA.Check GVOLT.LS's competition here
LHYFE.PA vs VLTSA.PA Comparison May 2026
LHYFE.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHYFE.PA stands at 112.7M. In comparison, VLTSA.PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LHYFE.PA is priced at €2.35, while VLTSA.PA trades at €8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHYFE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas VLTSA.PA's P/E ratio is -10.94. In terms of profitability, LHYFE.PA's ROE is -1.40%, compared to VLTSA.PA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LHYFE.PA is less volatile compared to VLTSA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHYFE.PA.Check VLTSA.PA's competition here
LHYFE.PA vs GRP.IR Comparison May 2026
LHYFE.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHYFE.PA stands at 112.7M. In comparison, GRP.IR has a market cap of 868.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LHYFE.PA is priced at €2.35, while GRP.IR trades at €0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHYFE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas GRP.IR's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, LHYFE.PA's ROE is -1.40%, compared to GRP.IR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LHYFE.PA is more volatile compared to GRP.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHYFE.PA.Check GRP.IR's competition here
LHYFE.PA vs ARVEN.PA Comparison May 2026
LHYFE.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHYFE.PA stands at 112.7M. In comparison, ARVEN.PA has a market cap of 407M. Regarding current trading prices, LHYFE.PA is priced at €2.35, while ARVEN.PA trades at €9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHYFE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas ARVEN.PA's P/E ratio is -21.57. In terms of profitability, LHYFE.PA's ROE is -1.40%, compared to ARVEN.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LHYFE.PA is less volatile compared to ARVEN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHYFE.PA.Check ARVEN.PA's competition here
LHYFE.PA vs COXE.MC Comparison May 2026
LHYFE.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHYFE.PA stands at 112.7M. In comparison, COXE.MC has a market cap of 308.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LHYFE.PA is priced at €2.35, while COXE.MC trades at €1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHYFE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas COXE.MC's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, LHYFE.PA's ROE is -1.40%, compared to COXE.MC's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LHYFE.PA is more volatile compared to COXE.MC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHYFE.PA.Check COXE.MC's competition here
LHYFE.PA vs ALESE.PA Comparison May 2026
LHYFE.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHYFE.PA stands at 112.7M. In comparison, ALESE.PA has a market cap of 154.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LHYFE.PA is priced at €2.35, while ALESE.PA trades at €10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHYFE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas ALESE.PA's P/E ratio is 263.00. In terms of profitability, LHYFE.PA's ROE is -1.40%, compared to ALESE.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LHYFE.PA is less volatile compared to ALESE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHYFE.PA.Check ALESE.PA's competition here
LHYFE.PA vs HDF.PA Comparison May 2026
LHYFE.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHYFE.PA stands at 112.7M. In comparison, HDF.PA has a market cap of 55.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LHYFE.PA is priced at €2.35, while HDF.PA trades at €3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHYFE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas HDF.PA's P/E ratio is -9.79. In terms of profitability, LHYFE.PA's ROE is -1.40%, compared to HDF.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LHYFE.PA is more volatile compared to HDF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHYFE.PA.Check HDF.PA's competition here
LHYFE.PA vs MLECO.PA Comparison May 2026
LHYFE.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHYFE.PA stands at 112.7M. In comparison, MLECO.PA has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LHYFE.PA is priced at €2.35, while MLECO.PA trades at €1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHYFE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas MLECO.PA's P/E ratio is -125.00. In terms of profitability, LHYFE.PA's ROE is -1.40%, compared to MLECO.PA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LHYFE.PA is more volatile compared to MLECO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHYFE.PA.Check MLECO.PA's competition here
LHYFE.PA vs MLBSP.PA Comparison May 2026
LHYFE.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHYFE.PA stands at 112.7M. In comparison, MLBSP.PA has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LHYFE.PA is priced at €2.35, while MLBSP.PA trades at €3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHYFE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas MLBSP.PA's P/E ratio is 340.00. In terms of profitability, LHYFE.PA's ROE is -1.40%, compared to MLBSP.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LHYFE.PA is more volatile compared to MLBSP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHYFE.PA.Check MLBSP.PA's competition here
LHYFE.PA vs ALCWE.PA Comparison May 2026
LHYFE.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHYFE.PA stands at 112.7M. In comparison, ALCWE.PA has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LHYFE.PA is priced at €2.35, while ALCWE.PA trades at €3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHYFE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas ALCWE.PA's P/E ratio is -9.23. In terms of profitability, LHYFE.PA's ROE is -1.40%, compared to ALCWE.PA's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LHYFE.PA is less volatile compared to ALCWE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHYFE.PA.Check ALCWE.PA's competition here
LHYFE.PA vs ALHAF.PA Comparison May 2026
LHYFE.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHYFE.PA stands at 112.7M. In comparison, ALHAF.PA has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LHYFE.PA is priced at €2.35, while ALHAF.PA trades at €0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHYFE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas ALHAF.PA's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, LHYFE.PA's ROE is -1.40%, compared to ALHAF.PA's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LHYFE.PA is less volatile compared to ALHAF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHYFE.PA.Check ALHAF.PA's competition here
LHYFE.PA vs MLCMG.PA Comparison May 2026
LHYFE.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHYFE.PA stands at 112.7M. In comparison, MLCMG.PA has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LHYFE.PA is priced at €2.35, while MLCMG.PA trades at €0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHYFE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas MLCMG.PA's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, LHYFE.PA's ROE is -1.40%, compared to MLCMG.PA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LHYFE.PA is more volatile compared to MLCMG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHYFE.PA.Check MLCMG.PA's competition here
LHYFE.PA vs ALAGO.PA Comparison May 2026
LHYFE.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHYFE.PA stands at 112.7M. In comparison, ALAGO.PA has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LHYFE.PA is priced at €2.35, while ALAGO.PA trades at €0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHYFE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas ALAGO.PA's P/E ratio is -15.64. In terms of profitability, LHYFE.PA's ROE is -1.40%, compared to ALAGO.PA's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LHYFE.PA is less volatile compared to ALAGO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHYFE.PA.Check ALAGO.PA's competition here
LHYFE.PA vs ALAGP.PA Comparison May 2026
LHYFE.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHYFE.PA stands at 112.7M. In comparison, ALAGP.PA has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LHYFE.PA is priced at €2.35, while ALAGP.PA trades at €1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHYFE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas ALAGP.PA's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, LHYFE.PA's ROE is -1.40%, compared to ALAGP.PA's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LHYFE.PA is less volatile compared to ALAGP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHYFE.PA.Check ALAGP.PA's competition here
LHYFE.PA vs ALOKW.PA Comparison May 2026
LHYFE.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHYFE.PA stands at 112.7M. In comparison, ALOKW.PA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LHYFE.PA is priced at €2.35, while ALOKW.PA trades at €0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHYFE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas ALOKW.PA's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, LHYFE.PA's ROE is -1.40%, compared to ALOKW.PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LHYFE.PA is less volatile compared to ALOKW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHYFE.PA.Check ALOKW.PA's competition here
LHYFE.PA vs NSE.AS Comparison May 2026
LHYFE.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHYFE.PA stands at 112.7M. In comparison, NSE.AS has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LHYFE.PA is priced at €2.35, while NSE.AS trades at €0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHYFE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas NSE.AS's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, LHYFE.PA's ROE is -1.40%, compared to NSE.AS's ROE of +8.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LHYFE.PA is more volatile compared to NSE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHYFE.PA.Check NSE.AS's competition here
LHYFE.PA vs MLEES.PA Comparison May 2026
LHYFE.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHYFE.PA stands at 112.7M. In comparison, MLEES.PA has a market cap of 285.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LHYFE.PA is priced at €2.35, while MLEES.PA trades at €0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHYFE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas MLEES.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LHYFE.PA's ROE is -1.40%, compared to MLEES.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LHYFE.PA is more volatile compared to MLEES.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHYFE.PA.Check MLEES.PA's competition here
LHYFE.PA vs ABIO.PA Comparison May 2026
LHYFE.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LHYFE.PA stands at 112.7M. In comparison, ABIO.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LHYFE.PA is priced at €2.35, while ABIO.PA trades at €47.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LHYFE.PA currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas ABIO.PA's P/E ratio is 26.94. In terms of profitability, LHYFE.PA's ROE is -1.40%, compared to ABIO.PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LHYFE.PA is more volatile compared to ABIO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LHYFE.PA.Check ABIO.PA's competition here