Cox Energy, S.A.B. de C.V.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for COXE.MC
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for COXE.MC
Cox Energy, S.A.B. de C.V. (COXE.MC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (COXE.MC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COXE.MC | €1.32 | +0.00% | 244.1M | 16.50 | €0.08 | N/A |
| EDPR.LS | €14.17 | +0.85% | 14.9B | 67.48 | €0.21 | +0.59% |
| NEOEN.PA | €39.00 | +0.00% | 6.3B | 72.22 | €0.54 | N/A |
| ELEC.PA | €231.50 | +0.43% | 1.7B | 10.67 | €21.69 | +4.75% |
| GVOLT.LS | €8.22 | N/A | 1.3B | 822.00 | €0.01 | N/A |
| VLTSA.PA | €6.91 | +1.32% | 904.7M | -8.97 | -€0.77 | N/A |
| GRP.IR | €0.72 | -0.82% | 799.1M | 14.48 | €0.05 | +9.41% |
| ARVEN.PA | €6.24 | -4.00% | 230.9M | -24.96 | -€0.25 | N/A |
| ALESE.PA | €9.60 | -1.64% | 141.2M | 192.00 | €0.05 | N/A |
| LHYFE.PA | €2.33 | -1.48% | 111.7M | -3.02 | -€0.77 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
COXE.MC vs EDPR.LS Comparison April 2026
COXE.MC plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COXE.MC stands at 244.1M. In comparison, EDPR.LS has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, COXE.MC is priced at €1.32, while EDPR.LS trades at €14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COXE.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas EDPR.LS's P/E ratio is 67.48. In terms of profitability, COXE.MC's ROE is -0.26%, compared to EDPR.LS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, COXE.MC is more volatile compared to EDPR.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COXE.MC.Check EDPR.LS's competition here
COXE.MC vs NEOEN.PA Comparison April 2026
COXE.MC plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COXE.MC stands at 244.1M. In comparison, NEOEN.PA has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COXE.MC is priced at €1.32, while NEOEN.PA trades at €39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COXE.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas NEOEN.PA's P/E ratio is 72.22. In terms of profitability, COXE.MC's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NEOEN.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, COXE.MC is less volatile compared to NEOEN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COXE.MC.Check NEOEN.PA's competition here
COXE.MC vs ELEC.PA Comparison April 2026
COXE.MC plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COXE.MC stands at 244.1M. In comparison, ELEC.PA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, COXE.MC is priced at €1.32, while ELEC.PA trades at €231.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COXE.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas ELEC.PA's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, COXE.MC's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ELEC.PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, COXE.MC is more volatile compared to ELEC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COXE.MC.Check ELEC.PA's competition here
COXE.MC vs GVOLT.LS Comparison April 2026
COXE.MC plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COXE.MC stands at 244.1M. In comparison, GVOLT.LS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, COXE.MC is priced at €1.32, while GVOLT.LS trades at €8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COXE.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas GVOLT.LS's P/E ratio is 822.00. In terms of profitability, COXE.MC's ROE is -0.26%, compared to GVOLT.LS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, COXE.MC is more volatile compared to GVOLT.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COXE.MC.Check GVOLT.LS's competition here
COXE.MC vs VLTSA.PA Comparison April 2026
COXE.MC plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COXE.MC stands at 244.1M. In comparison, VLTSA.PA has a market cap of 904.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COXE.MC is priced at €1.32, while VLTSA.PA trades at €6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COXE.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas VLTSA.PA's P/E ratio is -8.97. In terms of profitability, COXE.MC's ROE is -0.26%, compared to VLTSA.PA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, COXE.MC is more volatile compared to VLTSA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COXE.MC.Check VLTSA.PA's competition here
COXE.MC vs GRP.IR Comparison April 2026
COXE.MC plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COXE.MC stands at 244.1M. In comparison, GRP.IR has a market cap of 799.1M. Regarding current trading prices, COXE.MC is priced at €1.32, while GRP.IR trades at €0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COXE.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas GRP.IR's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, COXE.MC's ROE is -0.26%, compared to GRP.IR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, COXE.MC is more volatile compared to GRP.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COXE.MC.Check GRP.IR's competition here
COXE.MC vs ARVEN.PA Comparison April 2026
COXE.MC plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COXE.MC stands at 244.1M. In comparison, ARVEN.PA has a market cap of 230.9M. Regarding current trading prices, COXE.MC is priced at €1.32, while ARVEN.PA trades at €6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COXE.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas ARVEN.PA's P/E ratio is -24.96. In terms of profitability, COXE.MC's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ARVEN.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COXE.MC is less volatile compared to ARVEN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COXE.MC.Check ARVEN.PA's competition here
COXE.MC vs ALESE.PA Comparison April 2026
COXE.MC plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COXE.MC stands at 244.1M. In comparison, ALESE.PA has a market cap of 141.2M. Regarding current trading prices, COXE.MC is priced at €1.32, while ALESE.PA trades at €9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COXE.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas ALESE.PA's P/E ratio is 192.00. In terms of profitability, COXE.MC's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ALESE.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, COXE.MC is less volatile compared to ALESE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COXE.MC.Check ALESE.PA's competition here
COXE.MC vs LHYFE.PA Comparison April 2026
COXE.MC plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COXE.MC stands at 244.1M. In comparison, LHYFE.PA has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, COXE.MC is priced at €1.32, while LHYFE.PA trades at €2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COXE.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas LHYFE.PA's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, COXE.MC's ROE is -0.26%, compared to LHYFE.PA's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, COXE.MC is less volatile compared to LHYFE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COXE.MC.Check LHYFE.PA's competition here
COXE.MC vs HDF.PA Comparison April 2026
COXE.MC plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COXE.MC stands at 244.1M. In comparison, HDF.PA has a market cap of 58.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COXE.MC is priced at €1.32, while HDF.PA trades at €4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COXE.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas HDF.PA's P/E ratio is -10.26. In terms of profitability, COXE.MC's ROE is -0.26%, compared to HDF.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, COXE.MC is less volatile compared to HDF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COXE.MC.Check HDF.PA's competition here
COXE.MC vs MLECO.PA Comparison April 2026
COXE.MC plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COXE.MC stands at 244.1M. In comparison, MLECO.PA has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, COXE.MC is priced at €1.32, while MLECO.PA trades at €1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COXE.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas MLECO.PA's P/E ratio is -125.00. In terms of profitability, COXE.MC's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MLECO.PA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, COXE.MC is more volatile compared to MLECO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COXE.MC.Check MLECO.PA's competition here
COXE.MC vs ALCWE.PA Comparison April 2026
COXE.MC plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COXE.MC stands at 244.1M. In comparison, ALCWE.PA has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, COXE.MC is priced at €1.32, while ALCWE.PA trades at €3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COXE.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas ALCWE.PA's P/E ratio is -6.94. In terms of profitability, COXE.MC's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ALCWE.PA's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, COXE.MC is less volatile compared to ALCWE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COXE.MC.Check ALCWE.PA's competition here
COXE.MC vs MLBSP.PA Comparison April 2026
COXE.MC plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COXE.MC stands at 244.1M. In comparison, MLBSP.PA has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, COXE.MC is priced at €1.32, while MLBSP.PA trades at €3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COXE.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas MLBSP.PA's P/E ratio is 328.00. In terms of profitability, COXE.MC's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MLBSP.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, COXE.MC is more volatile compared to MLBSP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COXE.MC.Check MLBSP.PA's competition here
COXE.MC vs ALAGO.PA Comparison April 2026
COXE.MC plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COXE.MC stands at 244.1M. In comparison, ALAGO.PA has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, COXE.MC is priced at €1.32, while ALAGO.PA trades at €0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COXE.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas ALAGO.PA's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, COXE.MC's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ALAGO.PA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, COXE.MC is less volatile compared to ALAGO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COXE.MC.Check ALAGO.PA's competition here
COXE.MC vs MLCMG.PA Comparison April 2026
COXE.MC plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COXE.MC stands at 244.1M. In comparison, MLCMG.PA has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, COXE.MC is priced at €1.32, while MLCMG.PA trades at €0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COXE.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas MLCMG.PA's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, COXE.MC's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MLCMG.PA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, COXE.MC is more volatile compared to MLCMG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COXE.MC.Check MLCMG.PA's competition here
COXE.MC vs ALAGP.PA Comparison April 2026
COXE.MC plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COXE.MC stands at 244.1M. In comparison, ALAGP.PA has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, COXE.MC is priced at €1.32, while ALAGP.PA trades at €1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COXE.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas ALAGP.PA's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, COXE.MC's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ALAGP.PA's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, COXE.MC is less volatile compared to ALAGP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COXE.MC.Check ALAGP.PA's competition here
COXE.MC vs ALOKW.PA Comparison April 2026
COXE.MC plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COXE.MC stands at 244.1M. In comparison, ALOKW.PA has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, COXE.MC is priced at €1.32, while ALOKW.PA trades at €0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COXE.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas ALOKW.PA's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, COXE.MC's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ALOKW.PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, COXE.MC is less volatile compared to ALOKW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COXE.MC.Check ALOKW.PA's competition here
COXE.MC vs ALHAF.PA Comparison April 2026
COXE.MC plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COXE.MC stands at 244.1M. In comparison, ALHAF.PA has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, COXE.MC is priced at €1.32, while ALHAF.PA trades at €0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COXE.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas ALHAF.PA's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, COXE.MC's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ALHAF.PA's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, COXE.MC is less volatile compared to ALHAF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COXE.MC.Check ALHAF.PA's competition here
COXE.MC vs NSE.AS Comparison April 2026
COXE.MC plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COXE.MC stands at 244.1M. In comparison, NSE.AS has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, COXE.MC is priced at €1.32, while NSE.AS trades at €0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COXE.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas NSE.AS's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, COXE.MC's ROE is -0.26%, compared to NSE.AS's ROE of +8.06%. Regarding short-term risk, COXE.MC is more volatile compared to NSE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COXE.MC.Check NSE.AS's competition here
COXE.MC vs MLEES.PA Comparison April 2026
COXE.MC plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COXE.MC stands at 244.1M. In comparison, MLEES.PA has a market cap of 285.8K. Regarding current trading prices, COXE.MC is priced at €1.32, while MLEES.PA trades at €0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COXE.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas MLEES.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, COXE.MC's ROE is -0.26%, compared to MLEES.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, COXE.MC is more volatile compared to MLEES.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COXE.MC.Check MLEES.PA's competition here
COXE.MC vs ABIO.PA Comparison April 2026
COXE.MC plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, COXE.MC stands at 244.1M. In comparison, ABIO.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, COXE.MC is priced at €1.32, while ABIO.PA trades at €47.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
COXE.MC currently has a P/E ratio of 16.50, whereas ABIO.PA's P/E ratio is 26.94. In terms of profitability, COXE.MC's ROE is -0.26%, compared to ABIO.PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, COXE.MC is more volatile compared to ABIO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for COXE.MC.Check ABIO.PA's competition here