Albioma
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for ABIO.PA
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for ABIO.PA
Albioma (ABIO.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ABIO.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABIO.PA | €47.14 | +0.08% | 0 | 26.94 | €1.75 | N/A |
| EDPR.LS | €14.05 | -2.84% | 14.8B | 66.90 | €0.21 | +0.60% |
| NEOEN.PA | €39.00 | +0.00% | 6.3B | 72.22 | €0.54 | N/A |
| ELEC.PA | €230.50 | +2.44% | 1.7B | 10.63 | €21.69 | +4.77% |
| GVOLT.LS | €8.22 | N/A | 1.3B | 822.00 | €0.01 | N/A |
| VLTSA.PA | €6.82 | -1.30% | 893M | -8.86 | -€0.77 | N/A |
| GRP.IR | €0.73 | -1.35% | 806.2M | 14.60 | €0.05 | +9.33% |
| COXE.MC | €1.32 | +0.00% | 244.1M | 16.50 | €0.08 | N/A |
| ARVEN.PA | €6.50 | +19.93% | 240.5M | -26.00 | -€0.25 | N/A |
| ALESE.PA | €9.76 | -2.30% | 143.5M | 195.20 | €0.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ABIO.PA vs EDPR.LS Comparison April 2026
ABIO.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABIO.PA stands at 0. In comparison, EDPR.LS has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ABIO.PA is priced at €47.14, while EDPR.LS trades at €14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABIO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.94, whereas EDPR.LS's P/E ratio is 66.90. In terms of profitability, ABIO.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EDPR.LS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ABIO.PA is less volatile compared to EDPR.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABIO.PA.Check EDPR.LS's competition here
ABIO.PA vs NEOEN.PA Comparison April 2026
ABIO.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABIO.PA stands at 0. In comparison, NEOEN.PA has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABIO.PA is priced at €47.14, while NEOEN.PA trades at €39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABIO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.94, whereas NEOEN.PA's P/E ratio is 72.22. In terms of profitability, ABIO.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEOEN.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ABIO.PA is less volatile compared to NEOEN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABIO.PA.Check NEOEN.PA's competition here
ABIO.PA vs ELEC.PA Comparison April 2026
ABIO.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABIO.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ELEC.PA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ABIO.PA is priced at €47.14, while ELEC.PA trades at €230.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABIO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.94, whereas ELEC.PA's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, ABIO.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ELEC.PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ABIO.PA is less volatile compared to ELEC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABIO.PA.Check ELEC.PA's competition here
ABIO.PA vs GVOLT.LS Comparison April 2026
ABIO.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABIO.PA stands at 0. In comparison, GVOLT.LS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ABIO.PA is priced at €47.14, while GVOLT.LS trades at €8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABIO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.94, whereas GVOLT.LS's P/E ratio is 822.00. In terms of profitability, ABIO.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GVOLT.LS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ABIO.PA is more volatile compared to GVOLT.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABIO.PA.Check GVOLT.LS's competition here
ABIO.PA vs VLTSA.PA Comparison April 2026
ABIO.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABIO.PA stands at 0. In comparison, VLTSA.PA has a market cap of 893M. Regarding current trading prices, ABIO.PA is priced at €47.14, while VLTSA.PA trades at €6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABIO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.94, whereas VLTSA.PA's P/E ratio is -8.86. In terms of profitability, ABIO.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VLTSA.PA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ABIO.PA is less volatile compared to VLTSA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABIO.PA.Check VLTSA.PA's competition here
ABIO.PA vs GRP.IR Comparison April 2026
ABIO.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABIO.PA stands at 0. In comparison, GRP.IR has a market cap of 806.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABIO.PA is priced at €47.14, while GRP.IR trades at €0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABIO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.94, whereas GRP.IR's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, ABIO.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRP.IR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ABIO.PA is less volatile compared to GRP.IR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABIO.PA.Check GRP.IR's competition here
ABIO.PA vs COXE.MC Comparison April 2026
ABIO.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABIO.PA stands at 0. In comparison, COXE.MC has a market cap of 244.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABIO.PA is priced at €47.14, while COXE.MC trades at €1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABIO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.94, whereas COXE.MC's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, ABIO.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to COXE.MC's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ABIO.PA is less volatile compared to COXE.MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABIO.PA.Check COXE.MC's competition here
ABIO.PA vs ARVEN.PA Comparison April 2026
ABIO.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABIO.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ARVEN.PA has a market cap of 240.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABIO.PA is priced at €47.14, while ARVEN.PA trades at €6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABIO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.94, whereas ARVEN.PA's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, ABIO.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARVEN.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABIO.PA is less volatile compared to ARVEN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABIO.PA.Check ARVEN.PA's competition here
ABIO.PA vs ALESE.PA Comparison April 2026
ABIO.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABIO.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ALESE.PA has a market cap of 143.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABIO.PA is priced at €47.14, while ALESE.PA trades at €9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABIO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.94, whereas ALESE.PA's P/E ratio is 195.20. In terms of profitability, ABIO.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALESE.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ABIO.PA is less volatile compared to ALESE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABIO.PA.Check ALESE.PA's competition here
ABIO.PA vs LHYFE.PA Comparison April 2026
ABIO.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABIO.PA stands at 0. In comparison, LHYFE.PA has a market cap of 113.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABIO.PA is priced at €47.14, while LHYFE.PA trades at €2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABIO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.94, whereas LHYFE.PA's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, ABIO.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LHYFE.PA's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ABIO.PA is more volatile compared to LHYFE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABIO.PA.Check LHYFE.PA's competition here
ABIO.PA vs HDF.PA Comparison April 2026
ABIO.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABIO.PA stands at 0. In comparison, HDF.PA has a market cap of 57.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABIO.PA is priced at €47.14, while HDF.PA trades at €3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABIO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.94, whereas HDF.PA's P/E ratio is -10.09. In terms of profitability, ABIO.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HDF.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ABIO.PA is less volatile compared to HDF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABIO.PA.Check HDF.PA's competition here
ABIO.PA vs MLECO.PA Comparison April 2026
ABIO.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABIO.PA stands at 0. In comparison, MLECO.PA has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ABIO.PA is priced at €47.14, while MLECO.PA trades at €1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABIO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.94, whereas MLECO.PA's P/E ratio is -125.00. In terms of profitability, ABIO.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MLECO.PA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ABIO.PA is more volatile compared to MLECO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABIO.PA.Check MLECO.PA's competition here
ABIO.PA vs ALCWE.PA Comparison April 2026
ABIO.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABIO.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ALCWE.PA has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ABIO.PA is priced at €47.14, while ALCWE.PA trades at €3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABIO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.94, whereas ALCWE.PA's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, ABIO.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALCWE.PA's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ABIO.PA is less volatile compared to ALCWE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABIO.PA.Check ALCWE.PA's competition here
ABIO.PA vs MLBSP.PA Comparison April 2026
ABIO.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABIO.PA stands at 0. In comparison, MLBSP.PA has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ABIO.PA is priced at €47.14, while MLBSP.PA trades at €3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABIO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.94, whereas MLBSP.PA's P/E ratio is 330.00. In terms of profitability, ABIO.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MLBSP.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ABIO.PA is more volatile compared to MLBSP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABIO.PA.Check MLBSP.PA's competition here
ABIO.PA vs ALAGO.PA Comparison April 2026
ABIO.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABIO.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ALAGO.PA has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, ABIO.PA is priced at €47.14, while ALAGO.PA trades at €0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABIO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.94, whereas ALAGO.PA's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, ABIO.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALAGO.PA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ABIO.PA is less volatile compared to ALAGO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABIO.PA.Check ALAGO.PA's competition here
ABIO.PA vs MLCMG.PA Comparison April 2026
ABIO.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABIO.PA stands at 0. In comparison, MLCMG.PA has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ABIO.PA is priced at €47.14, while MLCMG.PA trades at €0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABIO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.94, whereas MLCMG.PA's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, ABIO.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MLCMG.PA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ABIO.PA is more volatile compared to MLCMG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABIO.PA.Check MLCMG.PA's competition here
ABIO.PA vs ALAGP.PA Comparison April 2026
ABIO.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABIO.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ALAGP.PA has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ABIO.PA is priced at €47.14, while ALAGP.PA trades at €1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABIO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.94, whereas ALAGP.PA's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, ABIO.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALAGP.PA's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ABIO.PA is less volatile compared to ALAGP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABIO.PA.Check ALAGP.PA's competition here
ABIO.PA vs ALOKW.PA Comparison April 2026
ABIO.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABIO.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ALOKW.PA has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ABIO.PA is priced at €47.14, while ALOKW.PA trades at €0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABIO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.94, whereas ALOKW.PA's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, ABIO.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALOKW.PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ABIO.PA is less volatile compared to ALOKW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABIO.PA.Check ALOKW.PA's competition here
ABIO.PA vs ALHAF.PA Comparison April 2026
ABIO.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABIO.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ALHAF.PA has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ABIO.PA is priced at €47.14, while ALHAF.PA trades at €0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABIO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.94, whereas ALHAF.PA's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, ABIO.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALHAF.PA's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ABIO.PA is less volatile compared to ALHAF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABIO.PA.Check ALHAF.PA's competition here
ABIO.PA vs NSE.AS Comparison April 2026
ABIO.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABIO.PA stands at 0. In comparison, NSE.AS has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ABIO.PA is priced at €47.14, while NSE.AS trades at €0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABIO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.94, whereas NSE.AS's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, ABIO.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NSE.AS's ROE of +8.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ABIO.PA is more volatile compared to NSE.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABIO.PA.Check NSE.AS's competition here
ABIO.PA vs MLEES.PA Comparison April 2026
ABIO.PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ABIO.PA stands at 0. In comparison, MLEES.PA has a market cap of 285.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ABIO.PA is priced at €47.14, while MLEES.PA trades at €0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ABIO.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 26.94, whereas MLEES.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ABIO.PA's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MLEES.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ABIO.PA is more volatile compared to MLEES.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ABIO.PA.Check MLEES.PA's competition here