EDP Renováveis, S.A.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for EDPR.LS
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for EDPR.LS
EDP Renováveis, S.A. (EDPR.LS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EDPR.LS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDPR.LS | €14.46 | +1.69% | 15.2B | 68.86 | €0.21 | +0.58% |
| NEOEN.PA | €39.00 | +0.00% | 6.3B | 72.22 | €0.54 | N/A |
| ELEC.PA | €225.00 | +2.27% | 1.6B | 10.38 | €21.68 | +4.89% |
| GVOLT.LS | €8.22 | N/A | 1.3B | 822.00 | €0.01 | N/A |
| VLTSA.PA | €6.91 | +2.98% | 904.7M | -8.97 | -€0.77 | N/A |
| GRP.IR | €0.74 | +1.37% | 817.3M | 14.80 | €0.05 | +9.20% |
| COXE.MC | €1.32 | -2.22% | 244.1M | 16.50 | €0.08 | N/A |
| ARVEN.PA | €5.42 | +1.88% | 200.5M | -21.68 | -€0.25 | N/A |
| ALESE.PA | €9.99 | +0.91% | 146.9M | 199.80 | €0.05 | N/A |
| LHYFE.PA | €2.37 | -1.25% | 113.6M | -3.07 | -€0.77 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
EDPR.LS vs NEOEN.PA Comparison April 2026
EDPR.LS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDPR.LS stands at 15.2B. In comparison, NEOEN.PA has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDPR.LS is priced at €14.46, while NEOEN.PA trades at €39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDPR.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 68.86, whereas NEOEN.PA's P/E ratio is 72.22. In terms of profitability, EDPR.LS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NEOEN.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EDPR.LS is less volatile compared to NEOEN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDPR.LS.Check NEOEN.PA's competition here
EDPR.LS vs ELEC.PA Comparison April 2026
EDPR.LS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDPR.LS stands at 15.2B. In comparison, ELEC.PA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EDPR.LS is priced at €14.46, while ELEC.PA trades at €225.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDPR.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 68.86, whereas ELEC.PA's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, EDPR.LS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ELEC.PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EDPR.LS is less volatile compared to ELEC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDPR.LS.Check ELEC.PA's competition here
EDPR.LS vs GVOLT.LS Comparison April 2026
EDPR.LS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDPR.LS stands at 15.2B. In comparison, GVOLT.LS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EDPR.LS is priced at €14.46, while GVOLT.LS trades at €8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDPR.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 68.86, whereas GVOLT.LS's P/E ratio is 822.00. In terms of profitability, EDPR.LS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GVOLT.LS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDPR.LS is more volatile compared to GVOLT.LS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDPR.LS.Check GVOLT.LS's competition here
EDPR.LS vs VLTSA.PA Comparison April 2026
EDPR.LS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDPR.LS stands at 15.2B. In comparison, VLTSA.PA has a market cap of 904.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EDPR.LS is priced at €14.46, while VLTSA.PA trades at €6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDPR.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 68.86, whereas VLTSA.PA's P/E ratio is -8.97. In terms of profitability, EDPR.LS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VLTSA.PA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EDPR.LS is less volatile compared to VLTSA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDPR.LS.Check VLTSA.PA's competition here
EDPR.LS vs GRP.IR Comparison April 2026
EDPR.LS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDPR.LS stands at 15.2B. In comparison, GRP.IR has a market cap of 817.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EDPR.LS is priced at €14.46, while GRP.IR trades at €0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDPR.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 68.86, whereas GRP.IR's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, EDPR.LS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GRP.IR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EDPR.LS is more volatile compared to GRP.IR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDPR.LS.Check GRP.IR's competition here
EDPR.LS vs COXE.MC Comparison April 2026
EDPR.LS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDPR.LS stands at 15.2B. In comparison, COXE.MC has a market cap of 244.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EDPR.LS is priced at €14.46, while COXE.MC trades at €1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDPR.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 68.86, whereas COXE.MC's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, EDPR.LS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COXE.MC's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EDPR.LS is less volatile compared to COXE.MC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDPR.LS.Check COXE.MC's competition here
EDPR.LS vs ARVEN.PA Comparison April 2026
EDPR.LS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDPR.LS stands at 15.2B. In comparison, ARVEN.PA has a market cap of 200.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EDPR.LS is priced at €14.46, while ARVEN.PA trades at €5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDPR.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 68.86, whereas ARVEN.PA's P/E ratio is -21.68. In terms of profitability, EDPR.LS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARVEN.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EDPR.LS is less volatile compared to ARVEN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDPR.LS.Check ARVEN.PA's competition here
EDPR.LS vs ALESE.PA Comparison April 2026
EDPR.LS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDPR.LS stands at 15.2B. In comparison, ALESE.PA has a market cap of 146.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EDPR.LS is priced at €14.46, while ALESE.PA trades at €9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDPR.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 68.86, whereas ALESE.PA's P/E ratio is 199.80. In terms of profitability, EDPR.LS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALESE.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EDPR.LS is more volatile compared to ALESE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDPR.LS.Check ALESE.PA's competition here
EDPR.LS vs LHYFE.PA Comparison April 2026
EDPR.LS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDPR.LS stands at 15.2B. In comparison, LHYFE.PA has a market cap of 113.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EDPR.LS is priced at €14.46, while LHYFE.PA trades at €2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDPR.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 68.86, whereas LHYFE.PA's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, EDPR.LS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LHYFE.PA's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EDPR.LS is less volatile compared to LHYFE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDPR.LS.Check LHYFE.PA's competition here
EDPR.LS vs HDF.PA Comparison April 2026
EDPR.LS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDPR.LS stands at 15.2B. In comparison, HDF.PA has a market cap of 58.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EDPR.LS is priced at €14.46, while HDF.PA trades at €3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDPR.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 68.86, whereas HDF.PA's P/E ratio is -10.19. In terms of profitability, EDPR.LS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HDF.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EDPR.LS is more volatile compared to HDF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDPR.LS.Check HDF.PA's competition here
EDPR.LS vs MLECO.PA Comparison April 2026
EDPR.LS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDPR.LS stands at 15.2B. In comparison, MLECO.PA has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EDPR.LS is priced at €14.46, while MLECO.PA trades at €1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDPR.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 68.86, whereas MLECO.PA's P/E ratio is -125.00. In terms of profitability, EDPR.LS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MLECO.PA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EDPR.LS is more volatile compared to MLECO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDPR.LS.Check MLECO.PA's competition here
EDPR.LS vs ALCWE.PA Comparison April 2026
EDPR.LS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDPR.LS stands at 15.2B. In comparison, ALCWE.PA has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EDPR.LS is priced at €14.46, while ALCWE.PA trades at €3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDPR.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 68.86, whereas ALCWE.PA's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, EDPR.LS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALCWE.PA's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, EDPR.LS is less volatile compared to ALCWE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDPR.LS.Check ALCWE.PA's competition here
EDPR.LS vs MLBSP.PA Comparison April 2026
EDPR.LS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDPR.LS stands at 15.2B. In comparison, MLBSP.PA has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EDPR.LS is priced at €14.46, while MLBSP.PA trades at €3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDPR.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 68.86, whereas MLBSP.PA's P/E ratio is 330.00. In terms of profitability, EDPR.LS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MLBSP.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EDPR.LS is more volatile compared to MLBSP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDPR.LS.Check MLBSP.PA's competition here
EDPR.LS vs ALAGO.PA Comparison April 2026
EDPR.LS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDPR.LS stands at 15.2B. In comparison, ALAGO.PA has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EDPR.LS is priced at €14.46, while ALAGO.PA trades at €0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDPR.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 68.86, whereas ALAGO.PA's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, EDPR.LS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALAGO.PA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, EDPR.LS is less volatile compared to ALAGO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDPR.LS.Check ALAGO.PA's competition here
EDPR.LS vs MLCMG.PA Comparison April 2026
EDPR.LS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDPR.LS stands at 15.2B. In comparison, MLCMG.PA has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EDPR.LS is priced at €14.46, while MLCMG.PA trades at €0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDPR.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 68.86, whereas MLCMG.PA's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, EDPR.LS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MLCMG.PA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EDPR.LS is more volatile compared to MLCMG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDPR.LS.Check MLCMG.PA's competition here
EDPR.LS vs ALAGP.PA Comparison April 2026
EDPR.LS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDPR.LS stands at 15.2B. In comparison, ALAGP.PA has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EDPR.LS is priced at €14.46, while ALAGP.PA trades at €1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDPR.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 68.86, whereas ALAGP.PA's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, EDPR.LS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALAGP.PA's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, EDPR.LS is less volatile compared to ALAGP.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDPR.LS.Check ALAGP.PA's competition here
EDPR.LS vs ALOKW.PA Comparison April 2026
EDPR.LS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDPR.LS stands at 15.2B. In comparison, ALOKW.PA has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EDPR.LS is priced at €14.46, while ALOKW.PA trades at €0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDPR.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 68.86, whereas ALOKW.PA's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, EDPR.LS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALOKW.PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EDPR.LS is less volatile compared to ALOKW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDPR.LS.Check ALOKW.PA's competition here
EDPR.LS vs ALHAF.PA Comparison April 2026
EDPR.LS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDPR.LS stands at 15.2B. In comparison, ALHAF.PA has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EDPR.LS is priced at €14.46, while ALHAF.PA trades at €0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDPR.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 68.86, whereas ALHAF.PA's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, EDPR.LS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALHAF.PA's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, EDPR.LS is less volatile compared to ALHAF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDPR.LS.Check ALHAF.PA's competition here
EDPR.LS vs NSE.AS Comparison April 2026
EDPR.LS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDPR.LS stands at 15.2B. In comparison, NSE.AS has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EDPR.LS is priced at €14.46, while NSE.AS trades at €0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDPR.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 68.86, whereas NSE.AS's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, EDPR.LS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NSE.AS's ROE of +8.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EDPR.LS is less volatile compared to NSE.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDPR.LS.Check NSE.AS's competition here
EDPR.LS vs MLEES.PA Comparison April 2026
EDPR.LS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDPR.LS stands at 15.2B. In comparison, MLEES.PA has a market cap of 285.8K. Regarding current trading prices, EDPR.LS is priced at €14.46, while MLEES.PA trades at €0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDPR.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 68.86, whereas MLEES.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EDPR.LS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MLEES.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EDPR.LS is more volatile compared to MLEES.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDPR.LS.Check MLEES.PA's competition here
EDPR.LS vs ABIO.PA Comparison April 2026
EDPR.LS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EDPR.LS stands at 15.2B. In comparison, ABIO.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EDPR.LS is priced at €14.46, while ABIO.PA trades at €47.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EDPR.LS currently has a P/E ratio of 68.86, whereas ABIO.PA's P/E ratio is 26.94. In terms of profitability, EDPR.LS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ABIO.PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EDPR.LS is more volatile compared to ABIO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EDPR.LS.Check ABIO.PA's competition here