Leggett & Platt, Incorporated
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated LEG Peers
See (LEG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEG | $9.57 | +0.21% | 1.29B | -2.56 | -$3.74 | +2.10% |
| SN | $102.14 | +1.44% | 14.34B | 32.32 | $3.16 | N/A |
| TPX | $65.81 | +1.04% | 13.68B | 30.05 | $2.19 | +0.62% |
| MHK | $108.20 | +0.42% | 6.77B | 14.05 | $7.70 | N/A |
| WHR | $82.66 | -1.16% | 4.60B | 635.85 | $0.13 | +8.46% |
| PATK | $88.53 | +1.78% | 2.96B | 21.28 | $4.16 | +2.16% |
| LZB | $44.25 | +0.39% | 1.83B | 15.21 | $2.91 | +1.89% |
| MBC | $11.18 | +0.72% | 1.42B | 14.52 | $0.77 | N/A |
| TILE | $20.53 | -1.30% | 1.20B | 14.06 | $1.46 | +0.19% |
| MLKN | $17.69 | -0.23% | 1.20B | 41.14 | $0.43 | +4.21% |
Stock Comparison
LEG vs SN Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, SN has a market cap of 14.34B. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while SN trades at $102.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas SN's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to SN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to SN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs TPX Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, TPX has a market cap of 13.68B. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while TPX trades at $65.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas TPX's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to TPX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to TPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs MHK Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, MHK has a market cap of 6.77B. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while MHK trades at $108.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas MHK's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to MHK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to MHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs WHR Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, WHR has a market cap of 4.60B. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while WHR trades at $82.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas WHR's P/E ratio is 635.85. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to WHR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to WHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs PATK Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, PATK has a market cap of 2.96B. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while PATK trades at $88.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas PATK's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to PATK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to PATK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs LZB Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, LZB has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while LZB trades at $44.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas LZB's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to LZB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG and LZB have similar daily volatility (1.10).
LEG vs MBC Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, MBC has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while MBC trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas MBC's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to MBC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to MBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs TILE Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, TILE has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while TILE trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas TILE's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to TILE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to TILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs MLKN Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, MLKN has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while MLKN trades at $17.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas MLKN's P/E ratio is 41.14. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to MLKN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to MLKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs AMWD Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, AMWD has a market cap of 913.08M. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while AMWD trades at $61.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas AMWD's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to AMWD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to AMWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs ETD Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, ETD has a market cap of 700.98M. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while ETD trades at $27.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas ETD's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to ETD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to ETD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs LOVE Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, LOVE has a market cap of 293.49M. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while LOVE trades at $19.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas LOVE's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to LOVE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to LOVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs HBB Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, HBB has a market cap of 247.31M. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while HBB trades at $18.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas HBB's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to HBB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to HBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs SNBR Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, SNBR has a market cap of 210.06M. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while SNBR trades at $9.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas SNBR's P/E ratio is -10.30. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to SNBR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to SNBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs COOK Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, COOK has a market cap of 208.96M. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while COOK trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas COOK's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to COOK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to COOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs FLXS Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, FLXS has a market cap of 175.44M. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while FLXS trades at $33.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas FLXS's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to FLXS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to FLXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs BSET Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, BSET has a market cap of 150.58M. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while BSET trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas BSET's P/E ratio is -22.76. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to BSET's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to BSET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs VIRC Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, VIRC has a market cap of 139.96M. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while VIRC trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas VIRC's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to VIRC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to VIRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs KEQU Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, KEQU has a market cap of 106.50M. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while KEQU trades at $37.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas KEQU's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to KEQU's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to KEQU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs HOFT Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, HOFT has a market cap of 104.35M. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while HOFT trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas HOFT's P/E ratio is -8.19. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to HOFT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to HOFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs PRPL Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, PRPL has a market cap of 96.10M. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while PRPL trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas PRPL's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to PRPL's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to PRPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs IRBT Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, IRBT has a market cap of 93.32M. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while IRBT trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas IRBT's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to IRBT's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to IRBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs LCUT Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, LCUT has a market cap of 73.52M. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while LCUT trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas LCUT's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to LCUT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to LCUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs NCL Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, NCL has a market cap of 56.35M. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while NCL trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas NCL's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to NCL's ROE of -4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to NCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs CRWS Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, CRWS has a market cap of 34.09M. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while CRWS trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas CRWS's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to CRWS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to CRWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs VIOT Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, VIOT has a market cap of 29.33M. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while VIOT trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas VIOT's P/E ratio is 4.45. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to VIOT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to VIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs ATER Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, ATER has a market cap of 15.40M. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while ATER trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas ATER's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to ATER's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to ATER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs NVFY Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, NVFY has a market cap of 14.53M. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while NVFY trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas NVFY's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to NVFY's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to NVFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs EFOI Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, EFOI has a market cap of 9.44M. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while EFOI trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas EFOI's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to EFOI's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to EFOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs NTZ Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, NTZ has a market cap of 7.53M. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while NTZ trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas NTZ's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to NTZ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to NTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs FGI Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, FGI has a market cap of 5.36M. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while FGI trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas FGI's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to FGI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to FGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs AUVI Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, AUVI has a market cap of 1.37M. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while AUVI trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas AUVI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to AUVI's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to AUVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs AUVIP Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, AUVIP has a market cap of 1.37M. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while AUVIP trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas AUVIP's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to AUVIP's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to AUVIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.
LEG vs FGIWW Comparison
LEG plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LEG stands at 1.29B. In comparison, FGIWW has a market cap of 383662.00. Regarding current trading prices, LEG is priced at $9.57, while FGIWW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LEG currently has a P/E ratio of -2.56, whereas FGIWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEG's ROE is -0.72%, compared to FGIWW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LEG is less volatile compared to FGIWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEG.