Lear Corporation

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, APTV-PA has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while APTV-PA trades at $108.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas APTV-PA's P/E ratio is 92.08. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APTV-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to APTV-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, APTV has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while APTV trades at $70.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas APTV's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APTV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to APTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, MBLY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while MBLY trades at $16.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas MBLY's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MBLY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to MBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, MGA has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while MGA trades at $38.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas MGA's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to MGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, LKQ has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while LKQ trades at $39.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas LKQ's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LKQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to LKQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, ALSN has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while ALSN trades at $102.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas ALSN's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALSN's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to ALSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, ALV has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while ALV trades at $108.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas ALV's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to ALV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, BWA has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while BWA trades at $33.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas BWA's P/E ratio is 23.73. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BWA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to BWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, GNTX has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while GNTX trades at $22.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas GNTX's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GNTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to GNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while MOD trades at $94.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 27.52. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to MOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, DORM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while DORM trades at $127.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas DORM's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DORM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to DORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, BC-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while BC-PB trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas BC-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BC-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to BC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, BC-PA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while BC-PA trades at $23.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas BC-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BC-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to BC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, GT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while GT trades at $11.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas GT's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to GT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, HSAI has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while HSAI trades at $20.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas HSAI's P/E ratio is -2062.00. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HSAI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to HSAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, QS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while QS trades at $4.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas QS's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to QS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, DAN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while DAN trades at $17.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas DAN's P/E ratio is -73.77. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to DAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, VC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while VC trades at $91.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas VC's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to VC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, GTX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while GTX trades at $10.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas GTX's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GTX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to GTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, PHIN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while PHIN trades at $44.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas PHIN's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PHIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to PHIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, ADNT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while ADNT trades at $18.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas ADNT's P/E ratio is -5.82. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADNT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to ADNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while AEVA trades at $23.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -8.28. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, FOXF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while FOXF trades at $27.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas FOXF's P/E ratio is -4.63. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FOXF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to FOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, XPEL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while XPEL trades at $37.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas XPEL's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XPEL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to XPEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, THRM has a market cap of 868.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while THRM trades at $28.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas THRM's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to THRM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to THRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, SMP has a market cap of 678.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while SMP trades at $30.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas SMP's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to SMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 667.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while PLOW trades at $28.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, GTXAP has a market cap of 557.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while GTXAP trades at $8.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas GTXAP's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GTXAP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to GTXAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, AXL has a market cap of 536.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while AXL trades at $4.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas AXL's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AXL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to AXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, MLR has a market cap of 528M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while MLR trades at $46.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas MLR's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MLR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to MLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, ECX has a market cap of 527.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while ECX trades at $1.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas ECX's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ECX's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to ECX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, ALLG has a market cap of 496.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while ALLG trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas ALLG's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALLG's ROE of +4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to ALLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, MNRO has a market cap of 467.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while MNRO trades at $15.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas MNRO's P/E ratio is -70.95. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MNRO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to MNRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, CPS has a market cap of 421.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while CPS trades at $24.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas CPS's P/E ratio is -9.32. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CPS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to CPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, SES has a market cap of 370.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while SES trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas SES's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SES's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to SES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, HYLN has a market cap of 279.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while HYLN trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas HYLN's P/E ratio is -4.98. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HYLN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to HYLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, HLLY-WT has a market cap of 277.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while HLLY-WT trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas HLLY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLLY-WT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to HLLY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, HLLY has a market cap of 257.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while HLLY trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas HLLY's P/E ratio is -10.29. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLLY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to HLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, STRT has a market cap of 249.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while STRT trades at $59.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas STRT's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STRT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to STRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, MPAA has a market cap of 210.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while MPAA trades at $10.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas MPAA's P/E ratio is -10.23. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MPAA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to MPAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, INVZ has a market cap of 187.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while INVZ trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas INVZ's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INVZ's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to INVZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, SRI has a market cap of 174M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while SRI trades at $6.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas SRI's P/E ratio is -9.77. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to SRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, XL has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while XL trades at $1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas XL's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to XL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, INVZW has a market cap of 160.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while INVZW trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas INVZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INVZW's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to INVZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, LAZR has a market cap of 153.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while LAZR trades at $3.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas LAZR's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LAZR's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to LAZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, CAAS has a market cap of 129.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while CAAS trades at $4.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas CAAS's P/E ratio is 4.48. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CAAS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to CAAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, KNDI has a market cap of 95.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while KNDI trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas KNDI's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KNDI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to KNDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, GGR has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while GGR trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas GGR's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GGR's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to GGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, CVGI has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while CVGI trades at $1.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas CVGI's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CVGI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to CVGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, WPRT has a market cap of 50.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while WPRT trades at $2.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas WPRT's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WPRT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to WPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, SYPR has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while SYPR trades at $1.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas SYPR's P/E ratio is -96.50. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SYPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to SYPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, MKDW has a market cap of 42.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while MKDW trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas MKDW's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MKDW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to MKDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, MKDWW has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while MKDWW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas MKDWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MKDWW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to MKDWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, ECXWW has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while ECXWW trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas ECXWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ECXWW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to ECXWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, NCNCW has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while NCNCW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas NCNCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NCNCW's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to NCNCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, NCNC has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while NCNC trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas NCNC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NCNC's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to NCNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, AMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while AMV trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas AMV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to AMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, WKSP has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while WKSP trades at $3.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas WKSP's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WKSP's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to WKSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, INEO has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while INEO trades at $1.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas INEO's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INEO's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to INEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, LIDR has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while LIDR trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas LIDR's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LIDR's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to LIDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, LIDRW has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while LIDRW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas LIDRW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LIDRW's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to LIDRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, SUP has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while SUP trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas SUP's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SUP's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to SUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, FRSX has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while FRSX trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas FRSX's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FRSX's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to FRSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, SAG has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while SAG trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas SAG's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAG's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to SAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, CREV has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while CREV trades at $2.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas CREV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CREV's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to CREV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, GGROW has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while GGROW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas GGROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GGROW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to GGROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, UFAB has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while UFAB trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas UFAB's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UFAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to UFAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, WKSPW has a market cap of 575.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while WKSPW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas WKSPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WKSPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to WKSPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, CREVW has a market cap of 115.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while CREVW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas CREVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CREVW's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to CREVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, HYZNW has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while HYZNW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas HYZNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HYZNW's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to HYZNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, HZN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while HZN trades at $1.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas HZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HZN's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to HZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, RMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while RMO trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas RMO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RMO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to RMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, VNE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while VNE trades at $36.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas VNE's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VNE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to VNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5B. In comparison, MTOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $94.05, while MTOR trades at $36.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 10.99, whereas MTOR's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTOR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to MTOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.