Lear Corporation

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, APTV-PA has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while APTV-PA trades at $108.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas APTV-PA's P/E ratio is 92.08. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to APTV-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to APTV-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check APTV-PA's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, APTV has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while APTV trades at $70.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas APTV's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to APTV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to APTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check APTV's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, MGA has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while MGA trades at $42.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas MGA's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to MGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check MGA's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, MBLY has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while MBLY trades at $14.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas MBLY's P/E ratio is -4.06. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MBLY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to MBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check MBLY's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ALV has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while ALV trades at $117.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas ALV's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to ALV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check ALV's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, LKQ has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while LKQ trades at $32.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas LKQ's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LKQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to LKQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check LKQ's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, BWA has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while BWA trades at $36.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas BWA's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BWA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to BWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check BWA's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ALSN has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while ALSN trades at $89.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas ALSN's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALSN's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to ALSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check ALSN's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, QS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while QS trades at $11.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas QS's P/E ratio is -13.92. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to QS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check QS's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, GNTX has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while GNTX trades at $27.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas GNTX's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNTX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to GNTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check GNTX's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while MOD trades at $103.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 30.35. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to MOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check MOD's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, BC-PA has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while BC-PA trades at $24.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas BC-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BC-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to BC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check BC-PA's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, BC-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while BC-PB trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas BC-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BC-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to BC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check BC-PB's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, DORM has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while DORM trades at $122.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas DORM's P/E ratio is 17.51. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DORM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to DORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check DORM's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, GT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while GT trades at $10.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas GT's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to GT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check GT's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, VC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while VC trades at $113.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas VC's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to VC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check VC's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, HSAI has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while HSAI trades at $21.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas HSAI's P/E ratio is -2130.00. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HSAI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to HSAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check HSAI's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, GTX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while GTX trades at $12.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas GTX's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to GTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check GTX's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, DAN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while DAN trades at $16.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas DAN's P/E ratio is -67.81. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to DAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check DAN's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, PHIN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while PHIN trades at $52.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas PHIN's P/E ratio is 20.22. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PHIN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to PHIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check PHIN's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ADNT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while ADNT trades at $22.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas ADNT's P/E ratio is -7.04. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADNT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to ADNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check ADNT's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, FOXF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while FOXF trades at $30.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas FOXF's P/E ratio is -5.04. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FOXF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to FOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check FOXF's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while AEVA trades at $21.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -7.62. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check AEVA's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, THRM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while THRM trades at $34.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas THRM's P/E ratio is 34.06. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to THRM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to THRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check THRM's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, XPEL has a market cap of 977.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while XPEL trades at $35.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas XPEL's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XPEL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to XPEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check XPEL's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SMP has a market cap of 718.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while SMP trades at $32.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas SMP's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to SMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check SMP's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 679.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while PLOW trades at $29.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check PLOW's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, AXL has a market cap of 586.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while AXL trades at $4.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas AXL's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AXL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to AXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check AXL's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, GTXAP has a market cap of 557.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while GTXAP trades at $8.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas GTXAP's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTXAP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to GTXAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check GTXAP's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ECX has a market cap of 519.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while ECX trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas ECX's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ECX's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to ECX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check ECX's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, MLR has a market cap of 498.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while MLR trades at $43.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas MLR's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MLR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to MLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check MLR's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ALLG has a market cap of 496.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while ALLG trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas ALLG's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALLG's ROE of +4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to ALLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check ALLG's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, MNRO has a market cap of 473.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while MNRO trades at $15.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas MNRO's P/E ratio is -71.77. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MNRO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to MNRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check MNRO's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SES has a market cap of 436.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while SES trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas SES's P/E ratio is -3.98. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SES's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to SES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check SES's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CPS has a market cap of 426.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while CPS trades at $24.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas CPS's P/E ratio is -9.41. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CPS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to CPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check CPS's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, INVZ has a market cap of 382M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while INVZ trades at $1.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas INVZ's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INVZ's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to INVZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check INVZ's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, INVZW has a market cap of 380M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while INVZW trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas INVZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INVZW's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to INVZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check INVZW's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, HLLY-WT has a market cap of 300.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while HLLY-WT trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas HLLY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLLY-WT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to HLLY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check HLLY-WT's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, HYLN has a market cap of 297M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while HYLN trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas HYLN's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HYLN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to HYLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check HYLN's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, HLLY has a market cap of 274.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while HLLY trades at $2.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas HLLY's P/E ratio is -10.98. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HLLY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to HLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check HLLY's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, STRT has a market cap of 268.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while STRT trades at $64.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas STRT's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STRT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to STRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check STRT's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, MPAA has a market cap of 236.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while MPAA trades at $12.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas MPAA's P/E ratio is -12.28. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MPAA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to MPAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check MPAA's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SRI has a market cap of 218.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while SRI trades at $7.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas SRI's P/E ratio is -12.24. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SRI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to SRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check SRI's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, XL has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while XL trades at $1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas XL's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to XL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check XL's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, LAZR has a market cap of 159M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while LAZR trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas LAZR's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LAZR's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to LAZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check LAZR's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CAAS has a market cap of 127.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while CAAS trades at $4.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas CAAS's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CAAS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to CAAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check CAAS's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, GGR has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while GGR trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas GGR's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GGR's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to GGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check GGR's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, KNDI has a market cap of 110.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while KNDI trades at $1.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas KNDI's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KNDI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to KNDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check KNDI's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, LIDRW has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while LIDRW trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas LIDRW's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LIDRW's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to LIDRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check LIDRW's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, LIDR has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while LIDR trades at $4.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas LIDR's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LIDR's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to LIDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check LIDR's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, WPRT has a market cap of 69.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while WPRT trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas WPRT's P/E ratio is -6.47. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WPRT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to WPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check WPRT's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CVGI has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while CVGI trades at $1.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas CVGI's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CVGI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to CVGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check CVGI's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SYPR has a market cap of 46.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while SYPR trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas SYPR's P/E ratio is -101.50. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SYPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to SYPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check SYPR's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, MKDW has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while MKDW trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas MKDW's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MKDW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to MKDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check MKDW's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, NCNCW has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while NCNCW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas NCNCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NCNCW's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to NCNCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check NCNCW's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, WKSP has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while WKSP trades at $3.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas WKSP's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WKSP's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to WKSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check WKSP's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, ECXWW has a market cap of 19.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while ECXWW trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas ECXWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ECXWW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to ECXWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check ECXWW's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, AMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while AMV trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas AMV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to AMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check AMV's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, INEO has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while INEO trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas INEO's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INEO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to INEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check INEO's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SAG has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while SAG trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas SAG's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SAG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to SAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check SAG's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, SUP has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while SUP trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas SUP's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SUP's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to SUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check SUP's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CREV has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while CREV trades at $4.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas CREV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CREV's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to CREV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check CREV's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, FRSX has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while FRSX trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas FRSX's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRSX's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to FRSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check FRSX's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, GGROW has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while GGROW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas GGROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GGROW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to GGROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check GGROW's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, MKDWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while MKDWW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas MKDWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MKDWW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to MKDWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check MKDWW's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, UFAB has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while UFAB trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas UFAB's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UFAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to UFAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check UFAB's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, WKSPW has a market cap of 575.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while WKSPW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas WKSPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WKSPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to WKSPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check WKSPW's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, CREVW has a market cap of 154.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while CREVW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas CREVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CREVW's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to CREVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check CREVW's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, HYZNW has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while HYZNW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas HYZNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HYZNW's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to HYZNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check HYZNW's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, NCNC has a market cap of 13.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while NCNC trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas NCNC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NCNC's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to NCNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check NCNC's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, HZN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while HZN trades at $1.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas HZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HZN's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to HZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check HZN's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, VNE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while VNE trades at $36.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas VNE's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VNE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to VNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check VNE's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, MTOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while MTOR trades at $36.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas MTOR's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTOR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to MTOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check MTOR's competition here

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.3B. In comparison, RMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $99.39, while RMO trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.60, whereas RMO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RMO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to RMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.Check RMO's competition here