Lear Corporation

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, APTV-PA has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while APTV-PA trades at $108.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas APTV-PA's P/E ratio is 92.08. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APTV-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to APTV-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, APTV has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while APTV trades at $72.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas APTV's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APTV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to APTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, MBLY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while MBLY trades at $18.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas MBLY's P/E ratio is -5.14. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MBLY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to MBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, MGA has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while MGA trades at $41.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas MGA's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to MGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LKQ has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while LKQ trades at $38.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas LKQ's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LKQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to LKQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ALV has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while ALV trades at $118.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas ALV's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to ALV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ALSN has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while ALSN trades at $97.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas ALSN's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALSN's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to ALSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, BWA has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while BWA trades at $35.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas BWA's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BWA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to BWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while MOD trades at $102.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to MOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, GNTX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while GNTX trades at $23.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas GNTX's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GNTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to GNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, DORM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while DORM trades at $127.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas DORM's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DORM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to DORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, QS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while QS trades at $6.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas QS's P/E ratio is -7.48. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to QS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, BC-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while BC-PB trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas BC-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BC-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to BC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, BC-PA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while BC-PA trades at $24.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas BC-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BC-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to BC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, GT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while GT trades at $11.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas GT's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to GT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, VC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while VC trades at $102.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas VC's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to VC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, HSAI has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while HSAI trades at $20.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas HSAI's P/E ratio is -2072.00. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HSAI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to HSAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, DAN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while DAN trades at $17.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas DAN's P/E ratio is -74.00. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to DAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, GTX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while GTX trades at $10.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas GTX's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GTX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to GTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, PHIN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while PHIN trades at $47.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas PHIN's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PHIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to PHIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ADNT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while ADNT trades at $22.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas ADNT's P/E ratio is -6.86. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ADNT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to ADNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while AEVA trades at $30.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -10.95. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, FOXF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while FOXF trades at $28.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas FOXF's P/E ratio is -4.76. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FOXF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to FOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, XPEL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while XPEL trades at $38.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas XPEL's P/E ratio is 22.53. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XPEL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to XPEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, THRM has a market cap of 945.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while THRM trades at $30.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas THRM's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to THRM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to THRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SMP has a market cap of 731.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while SMP trades at $33.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas SMP's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to SMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ECX has a market cap of 721M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while ECX trades at $2.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas ECX's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ECX's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to ECX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 715.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while PLOW trades at $30.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, GTXAP has a market cap of 557.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while GTXAP trades at $8.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas GTXAP's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GTXAP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to GTXAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, MLR has a market cap of 533.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while MLR trades at $46.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas MLR's P/E ratio is 9.92. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MLR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to MLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, AXL has a market cap of 519.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while AXL trades at $4.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas AXL's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AXL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to AXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, MNRO has a market cap of 498.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while MNRO trades at $16.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas MNRO's P/E ratio is -75.59. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MNRO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to MNRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ALLG has a market cap of 496.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while ALLG trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas ALLG's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALLG's ROE of +4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to ALLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CPS has a market cap of 424M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while CPS trades at $24.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas CPS's P/E ratio is -9.36. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CPS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to CPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SES has a market cap of 325M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while SES trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas SES's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SES's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to SES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, INVZ has a market cap of 299.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while INVZ trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas INVZ's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INVZ's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to INVZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, STRT has a market cap of 279.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while STRT trades at $67.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas STRT's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STRT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to STRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, HLLY has a market cap of 267.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while HLLY trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas HLLY's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLLY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to HLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, INVZW has a market cap of 253.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while INVZW trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas INVZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INVZW's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to INVZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, HYLN has a market cap of 245.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while HYLN trades at $1.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas HYLN's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HYLN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to HYLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, MPAA has a market cap of 240.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while MPAA trades at $12.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas MPAA's P/E ratio is -12.48. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MPAA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to MPAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SRI has a market cap of 215.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while SRI trades at $7.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas SRI's P/E ratio is -12.11. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to SRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, HLLY-WT has a market cap of 203.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while HLLY-WT trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas HLLY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HLLY-WT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to HLLY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, XL has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while XL trades at $1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas XL's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to XL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LAZR has a market cap of 140.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while LAZR trades at $2.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas LAZR's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LAZR's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to LAZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CAAS has a market cap of 124.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while CAAS trades at $4.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas CAAS's P/E ratio is 4.31. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CAAS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to CAAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, KNDI has a market cap of 94.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while KNDI trades at $1.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas KNDI's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KNDI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to KNDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, GGR has a market cap of 92.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while GGR trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas GGR's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GGR's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to GGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CVGI has a market cap of 69.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while CVGI trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas CVGI's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CVGI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to CVGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, WPRT has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while WPRT trades at $3.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas WPRT's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WPRT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to WPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SYPR has a market cap of 48.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while SYPR trades at $2.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas SYPR's P/E ratio is -105.00. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SYPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to SYPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, MKDWW has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while MKDWW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas MKDWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MKDWW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to MKDWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, MKDW has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while MKDW trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas MKDW's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MKDW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to MKDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ECXWW has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while ECXWW trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas ECXWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ECXWW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to ECXWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, NCNC has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while NCNC trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas NCNC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NCNC's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to NCNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, NCNCW has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while NCNCW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas NCNCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NCNCW's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to NCNCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LIDRW has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while LIDRW trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas LIDRW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LIDRW's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to LIDRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LIDR has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while LIDR trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas LIDR's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LIDR's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to LIDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, AMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while AMV trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas AMV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to AMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, WKSP has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while WKSP trades at $3.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas WKSP's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WKSP's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to WKSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, INEO has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while INEO trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas INEO's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INEO's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to INEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SAG has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while SAG trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas SAG's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAG's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to SAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, FRSX has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while FRSX trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas FRSX's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FRSX's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to FRSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, SUP has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while SUP trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas SUP's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SUP's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to SUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, GGROW has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while GGROW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas GGROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GGROW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to GGROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CREV has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while CREV trades at $2.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas CREV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CREV's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to CREV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, UFAB has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while UFAB trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas UFAB's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UFAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to UFAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, WKSPW has a market cap of 575.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while WKSPW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas WKSPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WKSPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to WKSPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CREVW has a market cap of 139.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while CREVW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas CREVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CREVW's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to CREVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, HYZNW has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while HYZNW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas HYZNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HYZNW's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to HYZNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, HZN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while HZN trades at $1.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas HZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HZN's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to HZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, MTOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while MTOR trades at $36.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas MTOR's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTOR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to MTOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, RMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while RMO trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas RMO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RMO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is less volatile compared to RMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.

LEA plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LEA stands at 5.5B. In comparison, VNE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LEA is priced at $103.20, while VNE trades at $36.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LEA currently has a P/E ratio of 12.05, whereas VNE's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, LEA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VNE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LEA is more volatile compared to VNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LEA.