Lifetime Brands, Inc.
Lifetime Brands, Inc. (LCUT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LCUT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCUT | $5.74 | +7.89% | 130M | -4.63 | -$1.24 | +3.01% |
| SN | $105.90 | +8.48% | 15B | 21.44 | $4.94 | N/A |
| TPX | $65.81 | +1.04% | 13.7B | 30.05 | $2.19 | +0.94% |
| MHK | $98.46 | +3.26% | 6.1B | 16.59 | $5.93 | N/A |
| PATK | $111.07 | +5.08% | 3.7B | 28.47 | $3.90 | +1.57% |
| ALH | $20.74 | +6.36% | 3.6B | 37.06 | $0.56 | N/A |
| WHR | $53.92 | +6.00% | 3B | 9.53 | $5.66 | +8.23% |
| TILE | $24.92 | +1.80% | 1.5B | 12.71 | $1.96 | +0.32% |
| LEG | $9.88 | +2.92% | 1.3B | 5.85 | $1.69 | +2.04% |
| LZB | $32.14 | +0.56% | 1.3B | 16.07 | $2.00 | +2.88% |
Stock Comparison
LCUT vs SN Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, SN has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while SN trades at $105.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas SN's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is more volatile compared to SN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check SN's competition here
LCUT vs TPX Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, TPX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while TPX trades at $65.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas TPX's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TPX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is more volatile compared to TPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check TPX's competition here
LCUT vs MHK Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, MHK has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while MHK trades at $98.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas MHK's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MHK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is more volatile compared to MHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check MHK's competition here
LCUT vs PATK Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, PATK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while PATK trades at $111.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas PATK's P/E ratio is 28.47. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PATK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is less volatile compared to PATK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check PATK's competition here
LCUT vs ALH Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, ALH has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while ALH trades at $20.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas ALH's P/E ratio is 37.06. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ALH's ROE of -4.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is more volatile compared to ALH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check ALH's competition here
LCUT vs WHR Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, WHR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while WHR trades at $53.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas WHR's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WHR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is more volatile compared to WHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check WHR's competition here
LCUT vs TILE Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, TILE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while TILE trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas TILE's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to TILE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is more volatile compared to TILE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check TILE's competition here
LCUT vs LEG Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, LEG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while LEG trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas LEG's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LEG's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is more volatile compared to LEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check LEG's competition here
LCUT vs LZB Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, LZB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while LZB trades at $32.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas LZB's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LZB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is more volatile compared to LZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check LZB's competition here
LCUT vs MBC Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, MBC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while MBC trades at $8.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas MBC's P/E ratio is 39.62. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MBC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is more volatile compared to MBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check MBC's competition here
LCUT vs MLKN Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, MLKN has a market cap of 990.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while MLKN trades at $14.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas MLKN's P/E ratio is 96.40. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MLKN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is more volatile compared to MLKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check MLKN's competition here
LCUT vs AMWD Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, AMWD has a market cap of 580.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while AMWD trades at $39.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas AMWD's P/E ratio is 34.34. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AMWD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is more volatile compared to AMWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check AMWD's competition here
LCUT vs ETD Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, ETD has a market cap of 566.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while ETD trades at $22.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas ETD's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ETD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is more volatile compared to ETD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check ETD's competition here
LCUT vs XWIN Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, XWIN has a market cap of 311.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while XWIN trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas XWIN's P/E ratio is 241.33. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to XWIN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is more volatile compared to XWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check XWIN's competition here
LCUT vs HBB Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, HBB has a market cap of 257.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while HBB trades at $18.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas HBB's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HBB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is more volatile compared to HBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check HBB's competition here
LCUT vs FLXS Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, FLXS has a market cap of 240.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while FLXS trades at $44.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas FLXS's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FLXS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is more volatile compared to FLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check FLXS's competition here
LCUT vs LOVE Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, LOVE has a market cap of 215.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while LOVE trades at $14.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas LOVE's P/E ratio is 52.75. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to LOVE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is more volatile compared to LOVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check LOVE's competition here
LCUT vs HOFT Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, HOFT has a market cap of 138.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while HOFT trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas HOFT's P/E ratio is -6.71. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to HOFT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is more volatile compared to HOFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check HOFT's competition here
LCUT vs BSET Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, BSET has a market cap of 122.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while BSET trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas BSET's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BSET's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is more volatile compared to BSET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check BSET's competition here
LCUT vs KEQU Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, KEQU has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while KEQU trades at $34.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas KEQU's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KEQU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is more volatile compared to KEQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check KEQU's competition here
LCUT vs VIRC Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, VIRC has a market cap of 96.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while VIRC trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas VIRC's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VIRC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is more volatile compared to VIRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check VIRC's competition here
LCUT vs NVFY Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, NVFY has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while NVFY trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas NVFY's P/E ratio is -9.09. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NVFY's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is more volatile compared to NVFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check NVFY's competition here
LCUT vs COOK Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, COOK has a market cap of 79.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while COOK trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas COOK's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to COOK's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is more volatile compared to COOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check COOK's competition here
LCUT vs VIOT Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, VIOT has a market cap of 75.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while VIOT trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas VIOT's P/E ratio is 3.83. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VIOT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is less volatile compared to VIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check VIOT's competition here
LCUT vs PRPL Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, PRPL has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while PRPL trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas PRPL's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to PRPL's ROE of +2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is less volatile compared to PRPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check PRPL's competition here
LCUT vs SNBR Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, SNBR has a market cap of 41M. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while SNBR trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas SNBR's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SNBR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is less volatile compared to SNBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check SNBR's competition here
LCUT vs NTZ Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, NTZ has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while NTZ trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas NTZ's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NTZ's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is less volatile compared to NTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check NTZ's competition here
LCUT vs CRWS Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, CRWS has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while CRWS trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas CRWS's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CRWS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is more volatile compared to CRWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check CRWS's competition here
LCUT vs NCL Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, NCL has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while NCL trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas NCL's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to NCL's ROE of -5.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is more volatile compared to NCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check NCL's competition here
LCUT vs EFOI Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, EFOI has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while EFOI trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas EFOI's P/E ratio is -11.06. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EFOI's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is more volatile compared to EFOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check EFOI's competition here
LCUT vs FGI Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, FGI has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while FGI trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas FGI's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FGI's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is less volatile compared to FGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check FGI's competition here
LCUT vs ATER Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, ATER has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while ATER trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas ATER's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ATER's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is less volatile compared to ATER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check ATER's competition here
LCUT vs IRBT Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, IRBT has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while IRBT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas IRBT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to IRBT's ROE of -32.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is more volatile compared to IRBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check IRBT's competition here
LCUT vs AUVIP Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, AUVIP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while AUVIP trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas AUVIP's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AUVIP's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is less volatile compared to AUVIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check AUVIP's competition here
LCUT vs AUVI Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, AUVI has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while AUVI trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas AUVI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AUVI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is more volatile compared to AUVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check AUVI's competition here
LCUT vs FGIWW Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, FGIWW has a market cap of 67.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while FGIWW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas FGIWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to FGIWW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is less volatile compared to FGIWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check FGIWW's competition here
LCUT vs KBAL Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, KBAL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while KBAL trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas KBAL's P/E ratio is -23.21. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to KBAL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is more volatile compared to KBAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check KBAL's competition here
LCUT vs WEBR Comparison April 2026
LCUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCUT stands at 130M. In comparison, WEBR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LCUT is priced at $5.74, while WEBR trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCUT currently has a P/E ratio of -4.63, whereas WEBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCUT's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WEBR's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LCUT is more volatile compared to WEBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCUT.Check WEBR's competition here