Louisiana Central Oil & Gas Co.
Louisiana Central Oil & Gas Co. (LCNTU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LCNTU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCNTU | $460.25 | +0.00% | 6.9M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| JXHLY | $9.85 | -3.48% | 14.4B | 213.50 | $0.05 | +2.42% |
| JXHGF | $5.27 | +0.00% | 14.2B | 175.73 | $0.03 | +3.09% |
| NTOIY | $8.32 | +6.14% | 12.6B | -58.46 | -$0.14 | +5.36% |
| NTOIF | $16.08 | +2.62% | 12.4B | -57.43 | -$0.28 | +5.50% |
| KLYCY | $9.15 | -9.14% | 8.7B | 10.49 | $0.96 | +4.28% |
| KUNUF | $0.92 | -6.63% | 8.6B | 9.90 | $0.10 | +4.38% |
| SAAFY | $8.80 | +2.33% | 8.4B | 5.06 | $1.74 | N/A |
| IDKOF | $6.35 | +0.00% | 8.2B | 11.98 | $0.53 | +0.03% |
| IDKOY | $12.30 | -6.39% | 7.5B | 11.83 | $1.04 | +2.45% |
Stock Comparison
LCNTU vs JXHLY Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, JXHLY has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while JXHLY trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JXHLY's P/E ratio is 213.50. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to JXHLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is less volatile compared to JXHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check JXHLY's competition here
LCNTU vs JXHGF Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, JXHGF has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while JXHGF trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JXHGF's P/E ratio is 175.73. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to JXHGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to JXHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check JXHGF's competition here
LCNTU vs NTOIY Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, NTOIY has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while NTOIY trades at $8.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTOIY's P/E ratio is -58.46. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to NTOIY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to NTOIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check NTOIY's competition here
LCNTU vs NTOIF Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, NTOIF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while NTOIF trades at $16.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTOIF's P/E ratio is -57.43. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to NTOIF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to NTOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check NTOIF's competition here
LCNTU vs KLYCY Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, KLYCY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while KLYCY trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLYCY's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to KLYCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to KLYCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check KLYCY's competition here
LCNTU vs KUNUF Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, KUNUF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while KUNUF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KUNUF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to KUNUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to KUNUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check KUNUF's competition here
LCNTU vs SAAFY Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, SAAFY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while SAAFY trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAAFY's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to SAAFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to SAAFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check SAAFY's competition here
LCNTU vs IDKOF Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, IDKOF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while IDKOF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDKOF's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to IDKOF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is less volatile compared to IDKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check IDKOF's competition here
LCNTU vs IDKOY Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, IDKOY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while IDKOY trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDKOY's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to IDKOY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to IDKOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check IDKOY's competition here
LCNTU vs DCCPY Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, DCCPY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while DCCPY trades at $32.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCCPY's P/E ratio is 23.41. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to DCCPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is less volatile compared to DCCPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check DCCPY's competition here
LCNTU vs DCCPF Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, DCCPF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while DCCPF trades at $62.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCCPF's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to DCCPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is less volatile compared to DCCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check DCCPF's competition here
LCNTU vs MOHCY Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, MOHCY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while MOHCY trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOHCY's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to MOHCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is less volatile compared to MOHCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check MOHCY's competition here
LCNTU vs PKIUF Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, PKIUF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while PKIUF trades at $28.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKIUF's P/E ratio is 35.60. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to PKIUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to PKIUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check PKIUF's competition here
LCNTU vs PNADF Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, PNADF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while PNADF trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNADF's P/E ratio is 37.33. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to PNADF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to PNADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check PNADF's competition here
LCNTU vs SHIIY Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, SHIIY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while SHIIY trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHIIY's P/E ratio is 35.84. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to SHIIY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to SHIIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check SHIIY's competition here
LCNTU vs CTXAY Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, CTXAY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while CTXAY trades at $35.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTXAY's P/E ratio is 52.27. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to CTXAY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to CTXAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check CTXAY's competition here
LCNTU vs CTXAF Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, CTXAF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while CTXAF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTXAF's P/E ratio is 49.39. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to CTXAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is less volatile compared to CTXAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check CTXAF's competition here
LCNTU vs RBSFY Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, RBSFY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while RBSFY trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBSFY's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to RBSFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to RBSFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check RBSFY's competition here
LCNTU vs RUBSF Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, RUBSF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while RUBSF trades at $32.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUBSF's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to RUBSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is less volatile compared to RUBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check RUBSF's competition here
LCNTU vs MOHCF Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, MOHCF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while MOHCF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOHCF's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to MOHCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to MOHCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check MOHCF's competition here
LCNTU vs TOIPF Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, TOIPF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while TOIPF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOIPF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to TOIPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is less volatile compared to TOIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check TOIPF's competition here
LCNTU vs TOIPY Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, TOIPY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while TOIPY trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOIPY's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to TOIPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to TOIPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check TOIPY's competition here
LCNTU vs PKCPY Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, PKCPY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while PKCPY trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKCPY's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to PKCPY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is less volatile compared to PKCPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check PKCPY's competition here
LCNTU vs FJLLF Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, FJLLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while FJLLF trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FJLLF's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to FJLLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to FJLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check FJLLF's competition here
LCNTU vs OILRF Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, OILRF has a market cap of 808.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while OILRF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OILRF's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to OILRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to OILRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check OILRF's competition here
LCNTU vs TPHIF Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, TPHIF has a market cap of 679.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while TPHIF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPHIF's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to TPHIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to TPHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check TPHIF's competition here
LCNTU vs IRPSY Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, IRPSY has a market cap of 510.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while IRPSY trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IRPSY's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to IRPSY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is less volatile compared to IRPSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check IRPSY's competition here
LCNTU vs CAOLF Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, CAOLF has a market cap of 474M. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while CAOLF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAOLF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to CAOLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to CAOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check CAOLF's competition here
LCNTU vs NZRFF Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, NZRFF has a market cap of 410M. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while NZRFF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NZRFF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to NZRFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is less volatile compared to NZRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check NZRFF's competition here
LCNTU vs FGPRB Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, FGPRB has a market cap of 246.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while FGPRB trades at $135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGPRB's P/E ratio is -8.89. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to FGPRB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to FGPRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check FGPRB's competition here
LCNTU vs REGX Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, REGX has a market cap of 152.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while REGX trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REGX's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to REGX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to REGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check REGX's competition here
LCNTU vs CLSZF Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, CLSZF has a market cap of 93.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while CLSZF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLSZF's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to CLSZF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to CLSZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check CLSZF's competition here
LCNTU vs FGPR Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, FGPR has a market cap of 68.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while FGPR trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGPR's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to FGPR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to FGPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check FGPR's competition here
LCNTU vs BDCO Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, BDCO has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while BDCO trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDCO's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to BDCO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to BDCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check BDCO's competition here
LCNTU vs ISRJF Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, ISRJF has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while ISRJF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISRJF's P/E ratio is -7.32. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to ISRJF's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to ISRJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check ISRJF's competition here
LCNTU vs QREE Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, QREE has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while QREE trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to QREE's ROE of +5.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is less volatile compared to QREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check QREE's competition here
LCNTU vs SRNW Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, SRNW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while SRNW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRNW's P/E ratio is -8.10. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to SRNW's ROE of -5.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to SRNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check SRNW's competition here
LCNTU vs WTLC Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, WTLC has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while WTLC trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTLC's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to WTLC's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to WTLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check WTLC's competition here
LCNTU vs BERI Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, BERI has a market cap of 146.2K. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while BERI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BERI's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to BERI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to BERI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check BERI's competition here
LCNTU vs DVFI Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, DVFI has a market cap of 28.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while DVFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DVFI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to DVFI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to DVFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check DVFI's competition here
LCNTU vs IAHL Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, IAHL has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while IAHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to IAHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to IAHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check IAHL's competition here
LCNTU vs ABLE Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, ABLE has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while ABLE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABLE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to ABLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is less volatile compared to ABLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check ABLE's competition here
LCNTU vs TOAOF Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, TOAOF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while TOAOF trades at $23.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOAOF's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to TOAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to TOAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check TOAOF's competition here
LCNTU vs LNKE Comparison August 2025
LCNTU plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LCNTU stands at 6.9M. In comparison, LNKE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LCNTU is priced at $460.25, while LNKE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LCNTU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNKE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LCNTU's ROE is N/A, compared to LNKE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LCNTU is more volatile compared to LNKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LCNTU.Check LNKE's competition here