Liberty Global Ltd.
Liberty Global Ltd. (LBYKV) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LBYKV) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBYKV | $11.55 | N/A | 4.2B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TMUS | $251.74 | -0.08% | 283.3B | 23.79 | $10.58 | +1.31% |
| VZA | $25.55 | -0.43% | 241.3B | 3.27 | $7.82 | N/A |
| T | $28.74 | -0.10% | 205.5B | 16.43 | $1.75 | +3.85% |
| TBB | $23.15 | -0.90% | 204B | 4.53 | $5.12 | +5.79% |
| VZ | $44.23 | -0.47% | 186.4B | 10.28 | $4.30 | +6.14% |
| TBC | $24.97 | -0.68% | 179.8B | N/A | N/A | +2.82% |
| T-PA | $20.91 | +0.05% | 149.2B | 8.78 | $2.38 | +3.85% |
| T-PC | $19.93 | -0.25% | 142.6B | 8.39 | $2.38 | +3.85% |
| CMCSA | $34.01 | -0.41% | 125.3B | 5.64 | $6.03 | +3.78% |
Stock Comparison
LBYKV vs TMUS Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, TMUS has a market cap of 283.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while TMUS trades at $251.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMUS's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TMUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to TMUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check TMUS's competition here
LBYKV vs VZA Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while VZA trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to VZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check VZA's competition here
LBYKV vs T Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, T has a market cap of 205.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while T trades at $28.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas T's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to T's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check T's competition here
LBYKV vs TBB Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 204B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while TBB trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to TBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check TBB's competition here
LBYKV vs VZ Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 186.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while VZ trades at $44.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to VZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check VZ's competition here
LBYKV vs TBC Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, TBC has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while TBC trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TBC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to TBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check TBC's competition here
LBYKV vs T-PA Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 149.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while T-PA trades at $20.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check T-PA's competition here
LBYKV vs T-PC Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 142.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while T-PC trades at $19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check T-PC's competition here
LBYKV vs CMCSA Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 125.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while CMCSA trades at $34.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check CMCSA's competition here
LBYKV vs AMOV Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while AMOV trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check AMOV's competition here
LBYKV vs AMX Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 60.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while AMX trades at $20.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to AMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check AMX's competition here
LBYKV vs CHTR Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while CHTR trades at $273.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check CHTR's competition here
LBYKV vs CHT Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, CHT has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while CHT trades at $44.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHT's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CHT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to CHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check CHT's competition here
LBYKV vs TEF Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while TEF trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -33.59. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to TEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check TEF's competition here
LBYKV vs ORAN Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while ORAN trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check ORAN's competition here
LBYKV vs VOD Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while VOD trades at $11.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is -6.42. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to VOD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to VOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check VOD's competition here
LBYKV vs TU Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while TU trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 35.12. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to TU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check TU's competition here
LBYKV vs BCE Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while BCE trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 76.42. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to BCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check BCE's competition here
LBYKV vs VIV Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while VIV trades at $12.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to VIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check VIV's competition here
LBYKV vs TLK Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while TLK trades at $20.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to TLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check TLK's competition here
LBYKV vs RCI Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while RCI trades at $35.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to RCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check RCI's competition here
LBYKV vs SJR Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while SJR trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to SJR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check SJR's competition here
LBYKV vs KT Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while KT trades at $20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to KT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to KT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check KT's competition here
LBYKV vs TIMB Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while TIMB trades at $21.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check TIMB's competition here
LBYKV vs MBT Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while MBT trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MBT's ROE of -4.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to MBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check MBT's competition here
LBYKV vs FYBR Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while FYBR trades at $36.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -23.66. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to FYBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check FYBR's competition here
LBYKV vs CTDD Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while CTDD trades at $20.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CTDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check CTDD's competition here
LBYKV vs LBRDA Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while LBRDA trades at $62.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check LBRDA's competition here
LBYKV vs LBRDK Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while LBRDK trades at $62.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check LBRDK's competition here
LBYKV vs LBRDP Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while LBRDP trades at $24.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is 4.57. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check LBRDP's competition here
LBYKV vs SKM Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while SKM trades at $22.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to SKM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check SKM's competition here
LBYKV vs TIGO Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while TIGO trades at $47.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check TIGO's competition here
LBYKV vs USM Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while USM trades at $77.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -265.55. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to USM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to USM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check USM's competition here
LBYKV vs UZF Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while UZF trades at $17.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to UZF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to UZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check UZF's competition here
LBYKV vs UZD Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while UZD trades at $19.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to UZD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to UZD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check UZD's competition here
LBYKV vs UZE Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while UZE trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to UZE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to UZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check UZE's competition here
LBYKV vs TKC Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while TKC trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to TKC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check TKC's competition here
LBYKV vs PHI Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while PHI trades at $23.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to PHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check PHI's competition here
LBYKV vs LUMN Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, LUMN has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while LUMN trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUMN's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to LUMN's ROE of -9.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to LUMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check LUMN's competition here
LBYKV vs TDS-PV Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while TDS-PV trades at $18.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check TDS-PV's competition here
LBYKV vs CTBB Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while CTBB trades at $20.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CTBB's ROE of -9.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check CTBB's competition here
LBYKV vs TDS Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while TDS trades at $38.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is -39.77. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TDS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to TDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check TDS's competition here
LBYKV vs TDS-PU Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while TDS-PU trades at $20.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check TDS-PU's competition here
LBYKV vs LBTYB Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while LBTYB trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV and LBTYB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LBTYB's competition here
LBYKV vs VEON Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while VEON trades at $57.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 0.24. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to VEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check VEON's competition here
LBYKV vs LBTYK Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while LBTYK trades at $11.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check LBTYK's competition here
LBYKV vs SNRE Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while SNRE trades at $55.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check SNRE's competition here
LBYKV vs LBTYA Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while LBTYA trades at $11.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check LBTYA's competition here
LBYKV vs TEO Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while TEO trades at $8.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is -18.90. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TEO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to TEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check TEO's competition here
LBYKV vs GSAT Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while GSAT trades at $26.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -66.85. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check GSAT's competition here
LBYKV vs DISH Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while DISH trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to DISH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to DISH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check DISH's competition here
LBYKV vs IRDM Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while IRDM trades at $24.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 24.83. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check IRDM's competition here
LBYKV vs IHS Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while IHS trades at $7.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is 22.53. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to IHS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to IHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check IHS's competition here
LBYKV vs CCOI Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while CCOI trades at $38.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -8.47. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CCOI's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check CCOI's competition here
LBYKV vs ASTSW Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check ASTSW's competition here
LBYKV vs LILAK Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while LILAK trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check LILAK's competition here
LBYKV vs LILA Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while LILA trades at $8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to LILA's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to LILA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check LILA's competition here
LBYKV vs IDT Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while IDT trades at $63.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to IDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check IDT's competition here
LBYKV vs RADI Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while RADI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to RADI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check RADI's competition here
LBYKV vs GOGO Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while GOGO trades at $11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is 278.00. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GOGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check GOGO's competition here
LBYKV vs TV Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while TV trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to TV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check TV's competition here
LBYKV vs ATUS Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while ATUS trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -4.09. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check ATUS's competition here
LBYKV vs CABO Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, CABO has a market cap of 916.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while CABO trades at $162.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CABO's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CABO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to CABO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check CABO's competition here
LBYKV vs SHEN Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 726.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while SHEN trades at $13.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -20.35. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check SHEN's competition here
LBYKV vs RBBN Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, RBBN has a market cap of 695.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while RBBN trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBBN's P/E ratio is -15.72. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to RBBN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to RBBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check RBBN's competition here
LBYKV vs SIFY Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 651.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while SIFY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is -45.00. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check SIFY's competition here
LBYKV vs CNSL Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while CNSL trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check CNSL's competition here
LBYKV vs WOW Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 435.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while WOW trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -6.51. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to WOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check WOW's competition here
LBYKV vs ATEX Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 419.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while ATEX trades at $22.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ATEX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check ATEX's competition here
LBYKV vs OOMA Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, OOMA has a market cap of 330.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while OOMA trades at $11.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OOMA's P/E ratio is -63.05. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to OOMA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to OOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check OOMA's competition here
LBYKV vs HCHC Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while HCHC trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to HCHC's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check HCHC's competition here
LBYKV vs ATNI Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 242.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while ATNI trades at $15.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ATNI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check ATNI's competition here
LBYKV vs RDCM Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 212.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while RDCM trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check RDCM's competition here
LBYKV vs CXDO Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 182.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while CXDO trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 60.60. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check CXDO's competition here
LBYKV vs FNGR Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, FNGR has a market cap of 102.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while FNGR trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNGR's P/E ratio is -17.20. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to FNGR's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to FNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check FNGR's competition here
LBYKV vs MTSL Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while MTSL trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check MTSL's competition here
LBYKV vs TDI Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, TDI has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while TDI trades at $36.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDI's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TDI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to TDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check TDI's competition here
LBYKV vs KORE Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while KORE trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to KORE's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to KORE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check KORE's competition here
LBYKV vs ANTE Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, ANTE has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while ANTE trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANTE's P/E ratio is -2.89. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ANTE's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to ANTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check ANTE's competition here
LBYKV vs IQST Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, IQST has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while IQST trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQST's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to IQST's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to IQST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check IQST's competition here
LBYKV vs UCL Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, UCL has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while UCL trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UCL's P/E ratio is -19.75. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to UCL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to UCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check UCL's competition here
LBYKV vs PCLA Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, PCLA has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while PCLA trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCLA's P/E ratio is -3.69. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to PCLA's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to PCLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check PCLA's competition here
LBYKV vs MIMO Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, MIMO has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while MIMO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIMO's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MIMO's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to MIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check MIMO's competition here
LBYKV vs QTEKW Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, QTEKW has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while QTEKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTEKW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to QTEKW's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to QTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check QTEKW's competition here
LBYKV vs QTEK Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, QTEK has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while QTEK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTEK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to QTEK's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV and QTEK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QTEK's competition here
LBYKV vs COMSP Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, COMSP has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while COMSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to COMSP's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV and COMSP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check COMSP's competition here
LBYKV vs COMSW Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, COMSW has a market cap of 270. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while COMSW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to COMSW's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV and COMSW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check COMSW's competition here
LBYKV vs ALSK Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, ALSK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while ALSK trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALSK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ALSK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to ALSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check ALSK's competition here
LBYKV vs STRY Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, STRY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while STRY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to STRY's ROE of +6.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV and STRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STRY's competition here
LBYKV vs PTNR Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, PTNR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while PTNR trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to PTNR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to PTNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check PTNR's competition here
LBYKV vs UZA Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, UZA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while UZA trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UZA's P/E ratio is 72.43. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to UZA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to UZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check UZA's competition here
LBYKV vs CBB Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, CBB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while CBB trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CBB's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to CBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check CBB's competition here
LBYKV vs GTT Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, GTT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while GTT trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GTT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to GTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check GTT's competition here
LBYKV vs OIBR-C Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, OIBR-C has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while OIBR-C trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OIBR-C's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to OIBR-C's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to OIBR-C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check OIBR-C's competition here
LBYKV vs LORL Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, LORL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while LORL trades at $41.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to LORL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to LORL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check LORL's competition here
LBYKV vs MIMO-WT Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, MIMO-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while MIMO-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIMO-WT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MIMO-WT's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to MIMO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check MIMO-WT's competition here
LBYKV vs LBYAV Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, LBYAV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while LBYAV trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBYAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to LBYAV's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV and LBYAV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LBYAV's competition here
LBYKV vs TIGOR Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, TIGOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while TIGOR trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIGOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TIGOR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to TIGOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check TIGOR's competition here
LBYKV vs TDA Comparison August 2025
LBYKV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBYKV stands at 4.2B. In comparison, TDA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LBYKV is priced at $11.55, while TDA trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBYKV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDA's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, LBYKV's ROE is -0.23%, compared to TDA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LBYKV is less volatile compared to TDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBYKV.Check TDA's competition here