Liberty Broadband Corporation Class A Common Stock Ex-distribution When-Issued

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while VZA trades at $25.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to VZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check VZA's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TMUS has a market cap of 241B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while TMUS trades at $215.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMUS's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to TMUS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to TMUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check TMUS's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 207.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while VZ trades at $48.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to VZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check VZ's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, T has a market cap of 198.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while T trades at $27.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas T's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check T's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TBC has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while TBC trades at $24.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to TBC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to TBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check TBC's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 151.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while T-PA trades at $21.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check T-PA's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 140.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while T-PC trades at $19.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check T-PC's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 139.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while TBB trades at $22.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 4.45. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to TBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check TBB's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 114.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while CMCSA trades at $31.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check CMCSA's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 72.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while AMX trades at $23.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 15.03. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to AMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check AMX's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while AMOV trades at $20.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check AMOV's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while VOD trades at $15.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is -8.03. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to VOD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to VOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check VOD's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, CHT has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while CHT trades at $42.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHT's P/E ratio is 27.17. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to CHT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to CHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check CHT's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while CHTR trades at $231.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check CHTR's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while ORAN trades at $11.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check ORAN's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while VIV trades at $15.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 21.87. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to VIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check VIV's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while BCE trades at $25.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to BCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check BCE's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while TEF trades at $3.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -17.32. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to TEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check TEF's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while TU trades at $13.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to TU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to TU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check TU's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while TLK trades at $20.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to TLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check TLK's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while RCI trades at $38.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to RCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check RCI's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while SJR trades at $30.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to SJR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check SJR's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, LBDKV has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while LBDKV trades at $90.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to LBDKV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to LBDKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check LBDKV's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while TIMB trades at $25.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check TIMB's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while SKM trades at $31.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 30.53. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to SKM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check SKM's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while KT trades at $24.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to KT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to KT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check KT's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while TIGO trades at $63.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check TIGO's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while FYBR trades at $38.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -25.16. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV and FYBR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FYBR's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while MBT trades at $5.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to MBT's ROE of -7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to MBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check MBT's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while CTDD trades at $20.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to CTDD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check CTDD's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, LUMN has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while LUMN trades at $8.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUMN's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to LUMN's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to LUMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check LUMN's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while LBRDK trades at $53.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to LBRDK's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check LBRDK's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while LBRDA trades at $53.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to LBRDA's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check LBRDA's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while GSAT trades at $59.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -130.65. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check GSAT's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while UZE trades at $19.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to UZE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to UZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check UZE's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while UZF trades at $19.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to UZF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to UZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check UZF's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while UZD trades at $21.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to UZD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to UZD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check UZD's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while USM trades at $77.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -265.55. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to USM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to USM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check USM's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while TKC trades at $6.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to TKC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check TKC's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while PHI trades at $23.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to PHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check PHI's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while TEO trades at $11.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is -13.47. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to TEO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to TEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check TEO's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while TDS trades at $45.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is -73.04. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to TDS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to TDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check TDS's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while TDS-PV trades at $20.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check TDS-PV's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while TDS-PU trades at $22.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 25.14. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check TDS-PU's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while LBTYB trades at $13.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check LBTYB's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, AD has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while AD trades at $50.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AD's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to AD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to AD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check AD's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV and LBYKV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LBYKV's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while LBTYA trades at $12.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check LBTYA's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while CTBB trades at $20.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to CTBB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check CTBB's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while LBTYK trades at $11.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check LBTYK's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while SNRE trades at $55.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV and SNRE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SNRE's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while VEON trades at $55.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 5.96. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to VEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check VEON's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while LBRDP trades at $23.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to LBRDP's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check LBRDP's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while DISH trades at $5.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to DISH's ROE of -7555.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to DISH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check DISH's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, KYIV has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while KYIV trades at $12.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KYIV's P/E ratio is 21.69. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to KYIV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to KYIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check KYIV's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while IHS trades at $8.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to IHS's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to IHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check IHS's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while IRDM trades at $23.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check IRDM's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while TV trades at $3.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to TV's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to TV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check TV's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check ASTSW's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while LILAK trades at $8.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to LILAK's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check LILAK's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while LILA trades at $8.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to LILA's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to LILA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check LILA's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while RADI trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to RADI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check RADI's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, DVGR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while DVGR trades at $25.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DVGR's P/E ratio is 25.17. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to DVGR's ROE of -13.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV and DVGR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DVGR's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, GLIBA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while GLIBA trades at $39.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLIBA's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to GLIBA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to GLIBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check GLIBA's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while IDT trades at $49.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to IDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check IDT's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, GLIBK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while GLIBK trades at $39.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLIBK's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to GLIBK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to GLIBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check GLIBK's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while SIFY trades at $15.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is -62.64. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check SIFY's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 912.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while CCOI trades at $26.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -4.58. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to CCOI's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check CCOI's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 838.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while ATUS trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to ATUS's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check ATUS's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 739.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while SHEN trades at $13.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -18.71. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check SHEN's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, OPTU has a market cap of 722.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while OPTU trades at $1.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPTU's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to OPTU's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to OPTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check OPTU's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 672.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while ATEX trades at $34.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to ATEX's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check ATEX's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, CABO has a market cap of 592M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while CABO trades at $105.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CABO's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to CABO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to CABO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check CABO's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 587.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while GOGO trades at $4.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is -87.80. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to GOGO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check GOGO's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while CNSL trades at $4.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check CNSL's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 445.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while WOW trades at $5.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to WOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check WOW's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 427.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while ATNI trades at $28.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is -30.46. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to ATNI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check ATNI's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, RBBN has a market cap of 367.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while RBBN trades at $2.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBBN's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to RBBN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to RBBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check RBBN's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, OOMA has a market cap of 326.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while OOMA trades at $11.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OOMA's P/E ratio is 147.75. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to OOMA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to OOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check OOMA's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while HCHC trades at $3.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to HCHC's ROE of -1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check HCHC's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 182.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while RDCM trades at $11.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check RDCM's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 181M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while CXDO trades at $5.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 42.07. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check CXDO's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, GLBKV has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while GLBKV trades at $30.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLBKV's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to GLBKV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to GLBKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check GLBKV's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, GLBAV has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while GLBAV trades at $30.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLBAV's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to GLBAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to GLBAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check GLBAV's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while MTSL trades at $3.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check MTSL's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 91.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while KORE trades at $5.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to KORE's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to KORE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check KORE's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, TDI has a market cap of 79.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while TDI trades at $43.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDI's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to TDI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to TDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check TDI's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, FNGR has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while FNGR trades at $1.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNGR's P/E ratio is -12.33. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to FNGR's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to FNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check FNGR's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, KYIVW has a market cap of 53.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while KYIVW trades at $4.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KYIVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to KYIVW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to KYIVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check KYIVW's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ELWT has a market cap of 32.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while ELWT trades at $6.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELWT's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to ELWT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to ELWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check ELWT's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, ANTE has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while ANTE trades at $3.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANTE's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to ANTE's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to ANTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check ANTE's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, MIMO has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while MIMO trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIMO's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to MIMO's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to MIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check MIMO's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, UCL has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while UCL trades at $1.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UCL's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to UCL's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to UCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check UCL's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, IQST has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while IQST trades at $1.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IQST's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to IQST's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to IQST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check IQST's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, QTEK has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while QTEK trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTEK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to QTEK's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV and QTEK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QTEK's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, QTEKW has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while QTEKW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTEKW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to QTEKW's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to QTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check QTEKW's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, PCLA has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while PCLA trades at $4.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCLA's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to PCLA's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV is less volatile compared to PCLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBDAV.Check PCLA's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, COMSP has a market cap of 539. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while COMSP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to COMSP's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV and COMSP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check COMSP's competition here

LBDAV plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LBDAV stands at 13.2B. In comparison, COMSW has a market cap of 270. Regarding current trading prices, LBDAV is priced at $91.86, while COMSW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LBDAV currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBDAV's ROE is N/A, compared to COMSW's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LBDAV and COMSW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check COMSW's competition here