KT Corporation
KT Corporation KT Peers
See (KT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KT | $19.32 | -0.26% | 9.46B | 21.23 | $0.91 | +3.15% |
| TMUS | $242.66 | +1.04% | 275.53B | 23.70 | $10.24 | +1.26% |
| VZA | $25.55 | -0.43% | 241.26B | 3.27 | $7.82 | N/A |
| T | $27.73 | +1.45% | 199.50B | 17.01 | $1.63 | +4.01% |
| TBB | $22.08 | +0.05% | 196.66B | 4.31 | $5.12 | +6.05% |
| VZ | $43.98 | +1.14% | 185.41B | 10.47 | $4.20 | +6.14% |
| TBC | $24.97 | -0.68% | 179.83B | N/A | N/A | +4.22% |
| T-PA | $19.93 | +0.10% | 143.41B | 8.38 | $2.38 | +4.01% |
| T-PC | $18.93 | -0.16% | 136.21B | 7.96 | $2.38 | +4.01% |
| CMCSA | $35.48 | +0.42% | 132.14B | 8.74 | $4.06 | +3.55% |
Stock Comparison
KT vs TMUS Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, TMUS has a market cap of 275.53B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while TMUS trades at $242.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas TMUS's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TMUS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to TMUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs VZA Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.26B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while VZA trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to VZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs T Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, T has a market cap of 199.50B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while T trades at $27.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas T's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs TBB Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 196.66B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while TBB trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 4.31. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to TBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs VZ Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 185.41B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while VZ trades at $43.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to VZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs TBC Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, TBC has a market cap of 179.83B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while TBC trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas TBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TBC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to TBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs T-PA Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 143.41B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while T-PA trades at $19.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs T-PC Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 136.21B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while T-PC trades at $18.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs CMCSA Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 132.14B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while CMCSA trades at $35.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs AMOV Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.61B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while AMOV trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs CHTR Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 59.97B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while CHTR trades at $427.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs AMX Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 52.86B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while AMX trades at $17.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 36.74. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to AMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs CHT Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, CHT has a market cap of 33.86B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while CHT trades at $43.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas CHT's P/E ratio is 30.10. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to CHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs ORAN Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.64B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while ORAN trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs TEF Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 27.74B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while TEF trades at $4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -49.15. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to TEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs TU Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 23.92B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while TU trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to TU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs VOD Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 23.57B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while VOD trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VOD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to VOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs BCE Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 19.87B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while BCE trades at $21.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 71.85. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to BCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs TLK Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 16.42B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while TLK trades at $16.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to TLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs VIV Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 16.09B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while VIV trades at $9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to VIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs SJR Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.94B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while SJR trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to SJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs LBRDK Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 14.50B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while LBRDK trades at $101.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs LBRDA Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 14.46B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while LBRDA trades at $100.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs RCI Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 14.12B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while RCI trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to RCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs LBRDP Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 13.92B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while LBRDP trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is 4.54. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs MBT Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.28B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while MBT trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MBT's ROE of -6.61%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to MBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs FYBR Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.18B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while FYBR trades at $36.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -23.51. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to FYBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs SKM Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 8.71B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while SKM trades at $22.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to SKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs TIMB Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 8.41B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while TIMB trades at $17.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs CTDD Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 7.70B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while CTDD trades at $17.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs TIGO Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 6.21B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while TIGO trades at $36.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs TKC Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 5.48B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while TKC trades at $6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to TKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs UZF Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 5.28B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while UZF trades at $22.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UZF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to UZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs USM Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 5.26B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while USM trades at $61.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -134.37. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to USM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to USM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs UZD Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 5.17B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while UZD trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UZD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to UZD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs UZE Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 5.16B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while UZE trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UZE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to UZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs PHI Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 5.02B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while PHI trades at $23.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to PHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs CTBB Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4.29B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while CTBB trades at $17.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTBB's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs LBYKV Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.23B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to LBYKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs LUMN Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, LUMN has a market cap of 4.21B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while LUMN trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas LUMN's P/E ratio is -12.81. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LUMN's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to LUMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs TDS Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 3.74B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while TDS trades at $34.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is -41.09. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TDS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to TDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs TDS-PU Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 3.68B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while TDS-PU trades at $21.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 24.03. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs TDS-PV Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 3.66B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while TDS-PV trades at $18.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs LBTYB Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 3.42B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while LBTYB trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -15.16. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs LBTYK Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 3.42B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while LBTYK trades at $10.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -16.18. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs SNRE Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 3.41B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while SNRE trades at $49.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -8.16. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs LBTYA Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 3.41B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while LBTYA trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -15.73. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs TEO Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 3.23B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while TEO trades at $10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TEO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to TEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs DISH Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.08B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while DISH trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DISH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to DISH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs IRDM Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 2.75B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while IRDM trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs CCOI Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 2.50B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while CCOI trades at $50.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -12.68. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CCOI's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs GSAT Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while GSAT trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -29.60. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs IHS Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 2.09B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while IHS trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IHS's ROE of +3.61%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to IHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs ASTSW Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs GOGO Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while GOGO trades at $12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is -314.00. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GOGO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs IDT Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while IDT trades at $60.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to IDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs RADI Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while RADI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to RADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs ATUS Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while ATUS trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs LILA Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while LILA trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LILA's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to LILA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs LILAK Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while LILAK trades at $5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs CABO Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, CABO has a market cap of 893.52M. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while CABO trades at $158.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas CABO's P/E ratio is -43.98. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CABO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to CABO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs RBBN Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, RBBN has a market cap of 640.85M. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while RBBN trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas RBBN's P/E ratio is -12.96. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RBBN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to RBBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs SHEN Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 621.63M. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while SHEN trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -19.27. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs CNSL Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.69M. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while CNSL trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs ATEX Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 528.14M. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while ATEX trades at $28.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is -17.54. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATEX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs OOMA Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, OOMA has a market cap of 380.34M. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while OOMA trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas OOMA's P/E ratio is -53.08. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OOMA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to OOMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs WOW Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 376.09M. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while WOW trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -6.11. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to WOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs SIFY Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 349.55M. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while SIFY trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is 242.00. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs HCHC Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.35M. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while HCHC trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HCHC's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs FNGR Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, FNGR has a market cap of 230.85M. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while FNGR trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas FNGR's P/E ratio is -40.40. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FNGR's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to FNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs ATNI Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 221.86M. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while ATNI trades at $14.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is -6.37. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATNI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs TV Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 216.55M. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while TV trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to TV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs RDCM Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 212.63M. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while RDCM trades at $13.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 30.85. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs CXDO Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 169.54M. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while CXDO trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 73.00. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs VEON Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 154.52M. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while VEON trades at $54.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to VEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs MTSL Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 91.96M. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while MTSL trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs TDI Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, TDI has a market cap of 53.48M. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while TDI trades at $31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas TDI's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TDI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to TDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs KORE Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 36.21M. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while KORE trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KORE's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to KORE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs ANTE Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, ANTE has a market cap of 10.74M. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while ANTE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas ANTE's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ANTE's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to ANTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs PCLA Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, PCLA has a market cap of 9.98M. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while PCLA trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas PCLA's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PCLA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to PCLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs MIMO Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, MIMO has a market cap of 8.43M. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while MIMO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas MIMO's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MIMO's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to MIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs QTEKW Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, QTEKW has a market cap of 4.89M. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while QTEKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas QTEKW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QTEKW's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to QTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs QTEK Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, QTEK has a market cap of 4.89M. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while QTEK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas QTEK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to QTEK's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to QTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs UCL Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, UCL has a market cap of 4.82M. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while UCL trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas UCL's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is less volatile compared to UCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs COMSP Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, COMSP has a market cap of 513.00. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while COMSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas COMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to COMSP's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to COMSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.
KT vs COMSW Comparison
KT plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KT stands at 9.46B. In comparison, COMSW has a market cap of 257.00. Regarding current trading prices, KT is priced at $19.32, while COMSW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KT currently has a P/E ratio of 21.23, whereas COMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KT's ROE is +0.04%, compared to COMSW's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, KT is more volatile compared to COMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KT.