Kilroy Realty Corporation
Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KRC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Office Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KRC | $31.90 | -1.82% | 3.8B | 13.90 | $2.32 | +6.70% |
| DLR | $176.04 | -0.48% | 60.4B | 49.06 | $3.58 | +2.77% |
| DLR-PK | $24.21 | -0.01% | 57.5B | 5.02 | $4.83 | +2.77% |
| BXP | $60.61 | -2.59% | 9.7B | 35.00 | $1.74 | +5.46% |
| ARE | $53.53 | +0.25% | 9.3B | -6.36 | -$8.44 | +8.73% |
| VNO-PL | $18.45 | +0.16% | 7.4B | 28.65 | $0.64 | +2.56% |
| VNO-PM | $17.90 | -0.22% | 7.3B | 27.90 | $0.64 | +2.56% |
| DLR-PL | $20.93 | -0.10% | 7.2B | 4.34 | $4.83 | +2.77% |
| HPP-PC | $14.90 | -0.60% | 5.7B | -120.32 | -$0.12 | N/A |
| VNO | $28.73 | -2.23% | 5.5B | 6.92 | $4.20 | +2.56% |
Stock Comparison
KRC vs DLR Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DLR has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while DLR trades at $176.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas DLR's P/E ratio is 49.06. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DLR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is more volatile compared to DLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check DLR's competition here
KRC vs DLR-PK Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DLR-PK has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while DLR-PK trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas DLR-PK's P/E ratio is 5.02. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DLR-PK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is more volatile compared to DLR-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check DLR-PK's competition here
KRC vs BXP Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BXP has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while BXP trades at $60.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas BXP's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BXP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is less volatile compared to BXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check BXP's competition here
KRC vs ARE Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ARE has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while ARE trades at $53.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas ARE's P/E ratio is -6.36. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is less volatile compared to ARE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check ARE's competition here
KRC vs VNO-PL Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VNO-PL has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while VNO-PL trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas VNO-PL's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VNO-PL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is more volatile compared to VNO-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check VNO-PL's competition here
KRC vs VNO-PM Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VNO-PM has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while VNO-PM trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas VNO-PM's P/E ratio is 27.90. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VNO-PM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is more volatile compared to VNO-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check VNO-PM's competition here
KRC vs DLR-PL Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DLR-PL has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while DLR-PL trades at $20.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas DLR-PL's P/E ratio is 4.34. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DLR-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is more volatile compared to DLR-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check DLR-PL's competition here
KRC vs HPP-PC Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HPP-PC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while HPP-PC trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas HPP-PC's P/E ratio is -120.32. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HPP-PC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is less volatile compared to HPP-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check HPP-PC's competition here
KRC vs VNO Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VNO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while VNO trades at $28.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas VNO's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VNO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is less volatile compared to VNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check VNO's competition here
KRC vs SLG-PI Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SLG-PI has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while SLG-PI trades at $22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas SLG-PI's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLG-PI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is more volatile compared to SLG-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check SLG-PI's competition here
KRC vs CUZ Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CUZ has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while CUZ trades at $23.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas CUZ's P/E ratio is 99.83. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CUZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is more volatile compared to CUZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check CUZ's competition here
KRC vs CDP Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CDP has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while CDP trades at $32.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas CDP's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CDP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is more volatile compared to CDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check CDP's competition here
KRC vs VNO-PN Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VNO-PN has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while VNO-PN trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas VNO-PN's P/E ratio is 28.03. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VNO-PN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is more volatile compared to VNO-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check VNO-PN's competition here
KRC vs VNO-PO Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VNO-PO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while VNO-PO trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas VNO-PO's P/E ratio is 23.69. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VNO-PO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is more volatile compared to VNO-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check VNO-PO's competition here
KRC vs SLG Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SLG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while SLG trades at $37.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas SLG's P/E ratio is -23.63. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is less volatile compared to SLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check SLG's competition here
KRC vs HIW Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HIW has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while HIW trades at $23.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas HIW's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HIW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is less volatile compared to HIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check HIW's competition here
KRC vs CLI Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while CLI trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas CLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CLI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is less volatile compared to CLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check CLI's competition here
KRC vs DEI Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DEI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while DEI trades at $10.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas DEI's P/E ratio is 116.28. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DEI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is more volatile compared to DEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check DEI's competition here
KRC vs OGCP Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, OGCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while OGCP trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas OGCP's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OGCP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is more volatile compared to OGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check OGCP's competition here
KRC vs FISK Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FISK has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while FISK trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas FISK's P/E ratio is 30.15. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FISK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is more volatile compared to FISK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check FISK's competition here
KRC vs ESBA Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ESBA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while ESBA trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas ESBA's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ESBA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is less volatile compared to ESBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check ESBA's competition here
KRC vs WRE Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, WRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while WRE trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas WRE's P/E ratio is 158.29. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WRE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is less volatile compared to WRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check WRE's competition here
KRC vs PGRE Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PGRE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while PGRE trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas PGRE's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PGRE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is more volatile compared to PGRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check PGRE's competition here
KRC vs DEA Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DEA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while DEA trades at $24.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas DEA's P/E ratio is 80.47. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DEA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is less volatile compared to DEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check DEA's competition here
KRC vs PDM Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PDM has a market cap of 992.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while PDM trades at $7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas PDM's P/E ratio is -11.90. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PDM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is less volatile compared to PDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check PDM's competition here
KRC vs JBGS Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JBGS has a market cap of 928M. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while JBGS trades at $15.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas JBGS's P/E ratio is -7.72. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JBGS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is more volatile compared to JBGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check JBGS's competition here
KRC vs CXP Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CXP has a market cap of 695.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while CXP trades at $19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas CXP's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CXP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is more volatile compared to CXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check CXP's competition here
KRC vs PSTL Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PSTL has a market cap of 641.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while PSTL trades at $19.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas PSTL's P/E ratio is 39.09. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSTL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is less volatile compared to PSTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check PSTL's competition here
KRC vs BDN Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BDN has a market cap of 559.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while BDN trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas BDN's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BDN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is more volatile compared to BDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check BDN's competition here
KRC vs HPP Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HPP has a market cap of 345.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while HPP trades at $6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas HPP's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HPP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is less volatile compared to HPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check HPP's competition here
KRC vs CIO-PA Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CIO-PA has a market cap of 285.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while CIO-PA trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas CIO-PA's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CIO-PA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is more volatile compared to CIO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check CIO-PA's competition here
KRC vs CIO Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CIO has a market cap of 282.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while CIO trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas CIO's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CIO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is more volatile compared to CIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check CIO's competition here
KRC vs OPINL Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, OPINL has a market cap of 244.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while OPINL trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas OPINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OPINL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is less volatile compared to OPINL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check OPINL's competition here
KRC vs NLOP Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NLOP has a market cap of 202.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while NLOP trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas NLOP's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NLOP's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is less volatile compared to NLOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check NLOP's competition here
KRC vs ELME Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ELME has a market cap of 192.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while ELME trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas ELME's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ELME's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is more volatile compared to ELME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check ELME's competition here
KRC vs EQC Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, EQC has a market cap of 169.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while EQC trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas EQC's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EQC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is less volatile compared to EQC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check EQC's competition here
KRC vs ONL Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ONL has a market cap of 144.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while ONL trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas ONL's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ONL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is more volatile compared to ONL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check ONL's competition here
KRC vs FSP Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FSP has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while FSP trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas FSP's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FSP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is less volatile compared to FSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check FSP's competition here
KRC vs NYC Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NYC has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while NYC trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas NYC's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NYC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is more volatile compared to NYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check NYC's competition here
KRC vs OPI Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, OPI has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while OPI trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas OPI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OPI's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is less volatile compared to OPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check OPI's competition here
KRC vs CMCT Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CMCT has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while CMCT trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas CMCT's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMCT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is less volatile compared to CMCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check CMCT's competition here
KRC vs EQC-PD Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, EQC-PD has a market cap of 584.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while EQC-PD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas EQC-PD's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EQC-PD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is less volatile compared to EQC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check EQC-PD's competition here
KRC vs OFC Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, OFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while OFC trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas OFC's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OFC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is more volatile compared to OFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check OFC's competition here
KRC vs DTLA-P Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DTLA-P has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while DTLA-P trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas DTLA-P's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DTLA-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is less volatile compared to DTLA-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check DTLA-P's competition here
KRC vs CMCTP Comparison February 2026
KRC plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRC stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CMCTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KRC is priced at $31.90, while CMCTP trades at $29.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRC currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas CMCTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRC's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMCTP's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KRC is more volatile compared to CMCTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRC.Check CMCTP's competition here