The Coca-Cola Company
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KO | $77.34 | -0.34% | 332.7B | 25.44 | $3.04 | +2.66% |
| PEP | $159.88 | +0.64% | 218.7B | 26.61 | $6.01 | +3.56% |
| MNST | $77.11 | +0.16% | 75.4B | 39.75 | $1.94 | N/A |
| CCEP | $100.46 | -0.76% | 45.1B | 20.29 | $4.95 | +2.29% |
| KDP | $27.41 | +1.78% | 37.2B | 17.92 | $1.53 | +3.36% |
| KOF | $97.16 | -2.23% | 20.4B | 15.20 | $6.39 | +3.80% |
| COKE | $216.91 | +3.44% | 18.2B | 31.90 | $6.80 | +0.47% |
| CELH | $44.57 | +2.04% | 11.5B | 178.28 | $0.25 | N/A |
| PRMB | $20.76 | -0.43% | 7.6B | 98.86 | $0.21 | +2.02% |
| AKO-B | $26.47 | -0.11% | 4.2B | 15.10 | $1.76 | +0.95% |
Stock Comparison
KO vs PEP Comparison March 2026
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 332.7B. In comparison, PEP has a market cap of 218.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $77.34, while PEP trades at $159.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.44, whereas PEP's P/E ratio is 26.61. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.44%, compared to PEP's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to PEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check PEP's competition here
KO vs MNST Comparison March 2026
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 332.7B. In comparison, MNST has a market cap of 75.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $77.34, while MNST trades at $77.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.44, whereas MNST's P/E ratio is 39.75. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MNST's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to MNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check MNST's competition here
KO vs CCEP Comparison March 2026
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 332.7B. In comparison, CCEP has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $77.34, while CCEP trades at $100.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.44, whereas CCEP's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CCEP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to CCEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check CCEP's competition here
KO vs KDP Comparison March 2026
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 332.7B. In comparison, KDP has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $77.34, while KDP trades at $27.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.44, whereas KDP's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.44%, compared to KDP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to KDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check KDP's competition here
KO vs KOF Comparison March 2026
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 332.7B. In comparison, KOF has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $77.34, while KOF trades at $97.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.44, whereas KOF's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.44%, compared to KOF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to KOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check KOF's competition here
KO vs COKE Comparison March 2026
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 332.7B. In comparison, COKE has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $77.34, while COKE trades at $216.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.44, whereas COKE's P/E ratio is 31.90. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.44%, compared to COKE's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to COKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check COKE's competition here
KO vs CELH Comparison March 2026
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 332.7B. In comparison, CELH has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $77.34, while CELH trades at $44.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.44, whereas CELH's P/E ratio is 178.28. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CELH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to CELH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check CELH's competition here
KO vs PRMB Comparison March 2026
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 332.7B. In comparison, PRMB has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $77.34, while PRMB trades at $20.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.44, whereas PRMB's P/E ratio is 98.86. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.44%, compared to PRMB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to PRMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check PRMB's competition here
KO vs AKO-B Comparison March 2026
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 332.7B. In comparison, AKO-B has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $77.34, while AKO-B trades at $26.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.44, whereas AKO-B's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.44%, compared to AKO-B's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to AKO-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check AKO-B's competition here
KO vs AKO-A Comparison March 2026
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 332.7B. In comparison, AKO-A has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $77.34, while AKO-A trades at $23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.44, whereas AKO-A's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.44%, compared to AKO-A's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is more volatile compared to AKO-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check AKO-A's competition here
KO vs PRMW Comparison March 2026
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 332.7B. In comparison, PRMW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $77.34, while PRMW trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.44, whereas PRMW's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.44%, compared to PRMW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is more volatile compared to PRMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check PRMW's competition here
KO vs FIZZ Comparison March 2026
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 332.7B. In comparison, FIZZ has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $77.34, while FIZZ trades at $35.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.44, whereas FIZZ's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.44%, compared to FIZZ's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to FIZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check FIZZ's competition here
KO vs COCO Comparison March 2026
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 332.7B. In comparison, COCO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $77.34, while COCO trades at $58.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.44, whereas COCO's P/E ratio is 49.03. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.44%, compared to COCO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to COCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check COCO's competition here
KO vs CHA Comparison March 2026
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 332.7B. In comparison, CHA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $77.34, while CHA trades at $11.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.44, whereas CHA's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CHA's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to CHA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check CHA's competition here
KO vs OTLY Comparison March 2026
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 332.7B. In comparison, OTLY has a market cap of 322.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $77.34, while OTLY trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.44, whereas OTLY's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.44%, compared to OTLY's ROE of -2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to OTLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check OTLY's competition here
KO vs BUDA Comparison March 2026
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 332.7B. In comparison, BUDA has a market cap of 123.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $77.34, while BUDA trades at $9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.44, whereas BUDA's P/E ratio is 45.00. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BUDA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to BUDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check BUDA's competition here
KO vs ZVIA Comparison March 2026
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 332.7B. In comparison, ZVIA has a market cap of 86.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $77.34, while ZVIA trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.44, whereas ZVIA's P/E ratio is -8.60. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ZVIA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to ZVIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check ZVIA's competition here
KO vs SHOT Comparison March 2026
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 332.7B. In comparison, SHOT has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $77.34, while SHOT trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.44, whereas SHOT's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SHOT's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to SHOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check SHOT's competition here
KO vs BRFH Comparison March 2026
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 332.7B. In comparison, BRFH has a market cap of 43.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $77.34, while BRFH trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.44, whereas BRFH's P/E ratio is -15.11. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BRFH's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is more volatile compared to BRFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check BRFH's competition here
KO vs REED Comparison March 2026
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 332.7B. In comparison, REED has a market cap of 37M. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $77.34, while REED trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.44, whereas REED's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.44%, compared to REED's ROE of -4.09%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. KO has daily volatility of 1.11 and REED has daily volatility of N/A.Check REED's competition here
KO vs BNKK Comparison March 2026
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 332.7B. In comparison, BNKK has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $77.34, while BNKK trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.44, whereas BNKK's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BNKK's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to BNKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check BNKK's competition here
KO vs BNKKW Comparison March 2026
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 332.7B. In comparison, BNKKW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $77.34, while BNKKW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.44, whereas BNKKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BNKKW's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to BNKKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check BNKKW's competition here
KO vs NBEV Comparison March 2026
KO plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KO stands at 332.7B. In comparison, NBEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KO is priced at $77.34, while NBEV trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.44, whereas NBEV's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, KO's ROE is +0.44%, compared to NBEV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KO is less volatile compared to NBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KO.Check NBEV's competition here