Kamux Oyj
Kamux Oyj KMUXF Peers
See (KMUXF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Dealerships Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMUXF | $12.17 | N/A | 485.26M | 24.84 | $0.49 | +0.99% |
| SIETY | $88.90 | +3.88% | 9.44B | 23.96 | $3.71 | +32.80% |
| SIEVF | $168.78 | N/A | 8.96B | 22.72 | $7.43 | +36.47% |
| ZHSHF | $2.56 | -0.20% | 6.05B | 7.10 | $0.36 | +4.33% |
| ATOGF | $21.71 | +0.00% | 4.74B | 217.10 | $0.10 | N/A |
| ZSHGY | $16.57 | N/A | 3.92B | 8.91 | $1.86 | +6.15% |
| USSJF | $8.17 | N/A | 3.90B | 19.00 | $0.43 | +1.78% |
| IHCPF | $9.16 | -0.03% | 3.54B | 10.53 | $0.87 | +5.38% |
| USSJY | $20.10 | +4.93% | 2.40B | 19.32 | $1.04 | +1.37% |
| CYYHF | $0.27 | N/A | 508.21M | 6.79 | $0.04 | +6.26% |
Stock Comparison
KMUXF vs SIETY Comparison
KMUXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMUXF stands at 485.26M. In comparison, SIETY has a market cap of 9.44B. Regarding current trading prices, KMUXF is priced at $12.17, while SIETY trades at $88.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMUXF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas SIETY's P/E ratio is 23.96. In terms of profitability, KMUXF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SIETY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KMUXF and SIETY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMUXF vs SIEVF Comparison
KMUXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMUXF stands at 485.26M. In comparison, SIEVF has a market cap of 8.96B. Regarding current trading prices, KMUXF is priced at $12.17, while SIEVF trades at $168.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMUXF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas SIEVF's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, KMUXF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SIEVF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KMUXF is less volatile compared to SIEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMUXF.
KMUXF vs ZHSHF Comparison
KMUXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMUXF stands at 485.26M. In comparison, ZHSHF has a market cap of 6.05B. Regarding current trading prices, KMUXF is priced at $12.17, while ZHSHF trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMUXF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas ZHSHF's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, KMUXF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZHSHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMUXF and ZHSHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMUXF vs ATOGF Comparison
KMUXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMUXF stands at 485.26M. In comparison, ATOGF has a market cap of 4.74B. Regarding current trading prices, KMUXF is priced at $12.17, while ATOGF trades at $21.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMUXF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas ATOGF's P/E ratio is 217.10. In terms of profitability, KMUXF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATOGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KMUXF is less volatile compared to ATOGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMUXF.
KMUXF vs ZSHGY Comparison
KMUXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMUXF stands at 485.26M. In comparison, ZSHGY has a market cap of 3.92B. Regarding current trading prices, KMUXF is priced at $12.17, while ZSHGY trades at $16.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMUXF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas ZSHGY's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, KMUXF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZSHGY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMUXF is less volatile compared to ZSHGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMUXF.
KMUXF vs USSJF Comparison
KMUXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMUXF stands at 485.26M. In comparison, USSJF has a market cap of 3.90B. Regarding current trading prices, KMUXF is priced at $12.17, while USSJF trades at $8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMUXF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas USSJF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, KMUXF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to USSJF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMUXF and USSJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMUXF vs IHCPF Comparison
KMUXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMUXF stands at 485.26M. In comparison, IHCPF has a market cap of 3.54B. Regarding current trading prices, KMUXF is priced at $12.17, while IHCPF trades at $9.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMUXF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas IHCPF's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, KMUXF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IHCPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KMUXF is less volatile compared to IHCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMUXF.
KMUXF vs USSJY Comparison
KMUXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMUXF stands at 485.26M. In comparison, USSJY has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, KMUXF is priced at $12.17, while USSJY trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMUXF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas USSJY's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, KMUXF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to USSJY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KMUXF is less volatile compared to USSJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMUXF.
KMUXF vs CYYHF Comparison
KMUXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMUXF stands at 485.26M. In comparison, CYYHF has a market cap of 508.21M. Regarding current trading prices, KMUXF is priced at $12.17, while CYYHF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMUXF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas CYYHF's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, KMUXF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CYYHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMUXF and CYYHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMUXF vs CMEIF Comparison
KMUXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMUXF stands at 485.26M. In comparison, CMEIF has a market cap of 432.95M. Regarding current trading prices, KMUXF is priced at $12.17, while CMEIF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMUXF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas CMEIF's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, KMUXF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMEIF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMUXF and CMEIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMUXF vs PDGNF Comparison
KMUXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMUXF stands at 485.26M. In comparison, PDGNF has a market cap of 389.23M. Regarding current trading prices, KMUXF is priced at $12.17, while PDGNF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMUXF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas PDGNF's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, KMUXF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PDGNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KMUXF and PDGNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMUXF vs LKKRF Comparison
KMUXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMUXF stands at 485.26M. In comparison, LKKRF has a market cap of 308.09M. Regarding current trading prices, KMUXF is priced at $12.17, while LKKRF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMUXF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas LKKRF's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, KMUXF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LKKRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMUXF and LKKRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMUXF vs AOCIF Comparison
KMUXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMUXF stands at 485.26M. In comparison, AOCIF has a market cap of 301.28M. Regarding current trading prices, KMUXF is priced at $12.17, while AOCIF trades at $12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMUXF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas AOCIF's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, KMUXF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AOCIF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KMUXF and AOCIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMUXF vs VTMTF Comparison
KMUXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMUXF stands at 485.26M. In comparison, VTMTF has a market cap of 281.67M. Regarding current trading prices, KMUXF is priced at $12.17, while VTMTF trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMUXF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas VTMTF's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, KMUXF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VTMTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KMUXF is less volatile compared to VTMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMUXF.
KMUXF vs MVXM Comparison
KMUXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMUXF stands at 485.26M. In comparison, MVXM has a market cap of 218.08M. Regarding current trading prices, KMUXF is priced at $12.17, while MVXM trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMUXF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas MVXM's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, KMUXF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MVXM's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, KMUXF and MVXM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMUXF vs NWAU Comparison
KMUXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMUXF stands at 485.26M. In comparison, NWAU has a market cap of 175.03M. Regarding current trading prices, KMUXF is priced at $12.17, while NWAU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMUXF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas NWAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMUXF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NWAU's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KMUXF and NWAU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMUXF vs MTPTF Comparison
KMUXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMUXF stands at 485.26M. In comparison, MTPTF has a market cap of 151.14M. Regarding current trading prices, KMUXF is priced at $12.17, while MTPTF trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMUXF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas MTPTF's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, KMUXF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTPTF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KMUXF is less volatile compared to MTPTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMUXF.
KMUXF vs CZASF Comparison
KMUXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMUXF stands at 485.26M. In comparison, CZASF has a market cap of 33.80M. Regarding current trading prices, KMUXF is priced at $12.17, while CZASF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMUXF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas CZASF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, KMUXF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CZASF's ROE of -15.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KMUXF is less volatile compared to CZASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMUXF.
KMUXF vs GBXXY Comparison
KMUXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMUXF stands at 485.26M. In comparison, GBXXY has a market cap of 26.22M. Regarding current trading prices, KMUXF is priced at $12.17, while GBXXY trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMUXF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas GBXXY's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, KMUXF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GBXXY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMUXF and GBXXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMUXF vs PREC Comparison
KMUXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMUXF stands at 485.26M. In comparison, PREC has a market cap of 247505.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMUXF is priced at $12.17, while PREC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMUXF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas PREC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMUXF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PREC's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, KMUXF is less volatile compared to PREC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMUXF.
KMUXF vs KXINW Comparison
KMUXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMUXF stands at 485.26M. In comparison, KXINW has a market cap of 59137.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMUXF is priced at $12.17, while KXINW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMUXF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas KXINW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KMUXF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KXINW's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KMUXF is less volatile compared to KXINW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMUXF.
KMUXF vs RWGI Comparison
KMUXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMUXF stands at 485.26M. In comparison, RWGI has a market cap of 24797.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMUXF is priced at $12.17, while RWGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMUXF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas RWGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMUXF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RWGI's ROE of -3.60%. Regarding short-term risk, KMUXF and RWGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMUXF vs SPMI Comparison
KMUXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMUXF stands at 485.26M. In comparison, SPMI has a market cap of 12766.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMUXF is priced at $12.17, while SPMI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMUXF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas SPMI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMUXF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SPMI's ROE of +2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, KMUXF and SPMI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMUXF vs MTAM Comparison
KMUXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMUXF stands at 485.26M. In comparison, MTAM has a market cap of 4995.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMUXF is priced at $12.17, while MTAM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMUXF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas MTAM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KMUXF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MTAM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMUXF and MTAM have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMUXF vs LASLY Comparison
KMUXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMUXF stands at 485.26M. In comparison, LASLY has a market cap of 3257.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMUXF is priced at $12.17, while LASLY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMUXF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas LASLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMUXF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LASLY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMUXF and LASLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KMUXF vs SFTGQ Comparison
KMUXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMUXF stands at 485.26M. In comparison, SFTGQ has a market cap of 1700.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMUXF is priced at $12.17, while SFTGQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMUXF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas SFTGQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KMUXF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SFTGQ's ROE of -22.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KMUXF is less volatile compared to SFTGQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMUXF.
KMUXF vs CALIQ Comparison
KMUXF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMUXF stands at 485.26M. In comparison, CALIQ has a market cap of 484.00. Regarding current trading prices, KMUXF is priced at $12.17, while CALIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMUXF currently has a P/E ratio of 24.84, whereas CALIQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KMUXF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CALIQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KMUXF is less volatile compared to CALIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMUXF.