Kennametal Inc.
Kennametal Inc. KMT Peers
See (KMT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMT | $22.13 | -0.54% | 1.7B | 16.04 | $1.38 | +3.62% |
| SNA | $307.24 | -1.63% | 16.1B | 16.09 | $19.10 | +2.70% |
| RBC | $366.95 | -0.58% | 11.6B | 47.84 | $7.67 | N/A |
| LECO | $200.16 | -2.09% | 11.2B | 24.68 | $8.11 | +1.46% |
| SWH | $124.86 | +0.22% | 10.4B | 21.57 | $5.79 | +5.12% |
| ROLLP | $107.15 | -2.99% | 10.1B | 54.95 | $1.95 | N/A |
| SWK | $64.15 | -2.44% | 9.9B | 27.18 | $2.36 | +5.12% |
| TTC | $68.99 | +0.06% | 6.8B | 17.64 | $3.91 | +2.71% |
| ROLL | $212.38 | -3.73% | 6.2B | 105.66 | $2.01 | N/A |
| TKR | $70.41 | -1.70% | 4.9B | 15.17 | $4.64 | +1.95% |
Stock Comparison
KMT vs SNA Comparison
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SNA has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $22.13, while SNA trades at $307.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas SNA's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SNA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to SNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.
KMT vs RBC Comparison
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RBC has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $22.13, while RBC trades at $366.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas RBC's P/E ratio is 47.84. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RBC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to RBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.
KMT vs LECO Comparison
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LECO has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $22.13, while LECO trades at $200.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas LECO's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LECO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to LECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.
KMT vs SWH Comparison
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SWH has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $22.13, while SWH trades at $124.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas SWH's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SWH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to SWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.
KMT vs ROLLP Comparison
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ROLLP has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $22.13, while ROLLP trades at $107.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas ROLLP's P/E ratio is 54.95. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROLLP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to ROLLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.
KMT vs SWK Comparison
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SWK has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $22.13, while SWK trades at $64.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas SWK's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SWK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to SWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.
KMT vs TTC Comparison
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TTC has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $22.13, while TTC trades at $68.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas TTC's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to TTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.
KMT vs ROLL Comparison
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ROLL has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $22.13, while ROLL trades at $212.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas ROLL's P/E ratio is 105.66. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROLL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to ROLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.
KMT vs TKR Comparison
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TKR has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $22.13, while TKR trades at $70.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas TKR's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TKR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to TKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.
KMT vs RBCP Comparison
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RBCP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $22.13, while RBCP trades at $123.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas RBCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RBCP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to RBCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.
KMT vs HLMN Comparison
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HLMN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $22.13, while HLMN trades at $6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas HLMN's P/E ratio is 66.90. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HLMN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to HLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.
KMT vs EML Comparison
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EML has a market cap of 141.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $22.13, while EML trades at $23.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas EML's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EML's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to EML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.
KMT vs SCX Comparison
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SCX has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $22.13, while SCX trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas SCX's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to SCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.
KMT vs PFIN Comparison
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 1.7B. In comparison, PFIN has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $22.13, while PFIN trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas PFIN's P/E ratio is -56.50. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PFIN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to PFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.
KMT vs CVR Comparison
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CVR has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $22.13, while CVR trades at $13.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas CVR's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CVR's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is less volatile compared to CVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.
KMT vs TBLT Comparison
KMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KMT stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TBLT has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KMT is priced at $22.13, while TBLT trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KMT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.04, whereas TBLT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KMT's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TBLT's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, KMT is more volatile compared to TBLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KMT.