Kunlun Energy Company Limited
Kunlun Energy Company Limited KLYCY Peers
See (KLYCY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLYCY | $9.64 | +2.54% | 8.34B | 10.14 | $0.95 | +0.90% |
| IRPSY | $9.15 | -7.95% | 186.76B | -12.04 | -$0.76 | +0.32% |
| PKCPY | $1.58 | +100.00% | 31.21B | 9.29 | $0.17 | +2.86% |
| JXHGF | $5.03 | +0.60% | 13.58B | 8.38 | $0.60 | +3.24% |
| JXHLY | $9.87 | +0.89% | 13.32B | 8.22 | $1.20 | +1.23% |
| IDKOF | $7.35 | N/A | 8.85B | 12.05 | $0.61 | +1.73% |
| SAAFY | $8.80 | +2.33% | 8.37B | 5.06 | $1.74 | +8.98% |
| KUNUF | $0.96 | N/A | 8.31B | 10.67 | $0.09 | +6.42% |
| NTOIY | $5.24 | +3.76% | 8.05B | -23.82 | -$0.22 | +8.29% |
| NTOIF | $10.36 | N/A | 7.96B | -24.09 | -$0.43 | +9.45% |
Stock Comparison
KLYCY vs IRPSY Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, IRPSY has a market cap of 186.76B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while IRPSY trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas IRPSY's P/E ratio is -12.04. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IRPSY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to IRPSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs PKCPY Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, PKCPY has a market cap of 31.21B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while PKCPY trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas PKCPY's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PKCPY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and PKCPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs JXHGF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, JXHGF has a market cap of 13.58B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while JXHGF trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas JXHGF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JXHGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and JXHGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs JXHLY Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, JXHLY has a market cap of 13.32B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while JXHLY trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas JXHLY's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JXHLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to JXHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs IDKOF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, IDKOF has a market cap of 8.85B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while IDKOF trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas IDKOF's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IDKOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to IDKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs SAAFY Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, SAAFY has a market cap of 8.37B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while SAAFY trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas SAAFY's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAAFY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to SAAFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs KUNUF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, KUNUF has a market cap of 8.31B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while KUNUF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas KUNUF's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KUNUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to KUNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs NTOIY Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, NTOIY has a market cap of 8.05B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while NTOIY trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas NTOIY's P/E ratio is -23.82. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NTOIY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to NTOIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs NTOIF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, NTOIF has a market cap of 7.96B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while NTOIF trades at $10.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas NTOIF's P/E ratio is -24.09. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NTOIF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to NTOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs IDKOY Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, IDKOY has a market cap of 7.71B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while IDKOY trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas IDKOY's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IDKOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to IDKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs DCCPY Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, DCCPY has a market cap of 6.95B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while DCCPY trades at $35.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas DCCPY's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DCCPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to DCCPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs DCCPF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, DCCPF has a market cap of 6.60B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while DCCPF trades at $66.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas DCCPF's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DCCPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to DCCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs MOHCY Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, MOHCY has a market cap of 5.10B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while MOHCY trades at $11.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas MOHCY's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MOHCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to MOHCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs PKIUF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, PKIUF has a market cap of 4.90B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while PKIUF trades at $28.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas PKIUF's P/E ratio is 35.14. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PKIUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to PKIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs PNADF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, PNADF has a market cap of 4.45B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while PNADF trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas PNADF's P/E ratio is 37.33. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PNADF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and PNADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs SHIIY Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, SHIIY has a market cap of 4.28B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while SHIIY trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas SHIIY's P/E ratio is 35.84. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHIIY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to SHIIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs CTXAF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, CTXAF has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while CTXAF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas CTXAF's P/E ratio is 49.39. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTXAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to CTXAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs CTXAY Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, CTXAY has a market cap of 3.84B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while CTXAY trades at $32.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas CTXAY's P/E ratio is 48.86. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTXAY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to CTXAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs RBSFY Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, RBSFY has a market cap of 3.45B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while RBSFY trades at $6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas RBSFY's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RBSFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to RBSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs RUBSF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, RUBSF has a market cap of 3.42B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while RUBSF trades at $33.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas RUBSF's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RUBSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to RUBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs MOHCF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, MOHCF has a market cap of 2.46B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while MOHCF trades at $22.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas MOHCF's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MOHCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and MOHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs TOIPY Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, TOIPY has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while TOIPY trades at $8.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas TOIPY's P/E ratio is 5.98. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TOIPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to TOIPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs TOIPF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, TOIPF has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while TOIPF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas TOIPF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TOIPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to TOIPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs FJLLF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, FJLLF has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while FJLLF trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas FJLLF's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FJLLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and FJLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs OILRF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, OILRF has a market cap of 808.30M. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while OILRF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas OILRF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OILRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and OILRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs TPHIF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, TPHIF has a market cap of 679.34M. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while TPHIF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas TPHIF's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TPHIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and TPHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs CAOLF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, CAOLF has a market cap of 473.96M. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while CAOLF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas CAOLF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAOLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and CAOLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs NZRFF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, NZRFF has a market cap of 471.51M. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while NZRFF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas NZRFF's P/E ratio is 28.75. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NZRFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and NZRFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs FGPRB Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, FGPRB has a market cap of 208.34M. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while FGPRB trades at $129.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas FGPRB's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FGPRB's ROE of +2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and FGPRB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs REGX Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, REGX has a market cap of 152.56M. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while REGX trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas REGX's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to REGX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and REGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs CLSZF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, CLSZF has a market cap of 140.00M. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while CLSZF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas CLSZF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLSZF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to CLSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs FGPR Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, FGPR has a market cap of 42.02M. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while FGPR trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas FGPR's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FGPR's ROE of +2.86%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to FGPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs BDCO Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, BDCO has a market cap of 19.40M. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while BDCO trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas BDCO's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BDCO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to BDCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs ISRJF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, ISRJF has a market cap of 18.71M. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while ISRJF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas ISRJF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ISRJF's ROE of +1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and ISRJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs QREE Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, QREE has a market cap of 8.09M. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while QREE trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas QREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QREE's ROE of +5.66%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to QREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs LCNTU Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, LCNTU has a market cap of 7.67M. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while LCNTU trades at $511.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas LCNTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LCNTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to LCNTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs SRNW Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, SRNW has a market cap of 5.55M. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while SRNW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas SRNW's P/E ratio is -11.32. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SRNW's ROE of -4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to SRNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs WTLC Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, WTLC has a market cap of 2.87M. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while WTLC trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas WTLC's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WTLC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and WTLC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs BERI Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, BERI has a market cap of 409248.00. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while BERI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas BERI's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BERI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and BERI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs DVFI Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, DVFI has a market cap of 28091.00. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while DVFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas DVFI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DVFI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and DVFI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs IAHL Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, IAHL has a market cap of 6500.00. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while IAHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas IAHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IAHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and IAHL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs ABLE Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.34B. In comparison, ABLE has a market cap of 3004.00. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.64, while ABLE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas ABLE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to ABLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.