Kunlun Energy Company Limited
Kunlun Energy Company Limited KLYCY Peers
See (KLYCY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLYCY | $9.31 | +0.00% | 8.4B | 10.14 | $0.96 | +4.43% |
| JXHLY | $9.37 | +0.00% | 14B | 199.30 | $0.05 | +2.59% |
| JXHGF | $4.91 | +0.00% | 13.5B | 166.67 | $0.03 | +3.25% |
| NTOIY | $6.90 | +2.40% | 10.7B | -31.55 | -$0.22 | +6.96% |
| NTOIF | $13.40 | +1.13% | 10.3B | -30.45 | -$0.44 | +6.60% |
| IDKOF | $5.53 | +0.00% | 8.6B | 12.31 | $0.54 | +1.91% |
| SAAFY | $8.80 | +2.33% | 8.4B | 5.06 | $1.74 | N/A |
| IDKOY | $12.24 | +0.00% | 7.5B | 11.37 | $1.07 | +2.46% |
| DCCPF | $61.88 | -0.00% | 7.2B | 25.48 | $2.88 | +4.68% |
| KUNUF | $1.25 | +0.00% | 6.9B | 8.00 | $0.10 | +5.42% |
Stock Comparison
KLYCY vs JXHLY Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, JXHLY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while JXHLY trades at $9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas JXHLY's P/E ratio is 199.30. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JXHLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to JXHLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs JXHGF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, JXHGF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while JXHGF trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas JXHGF's P/E ratio is 166.67. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JXHGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and JXHGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs NTOIY Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, NTOIY has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while NTOIY trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas NTOIY's P/E ratio is -31.55. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NTOIY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to NTOIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs NTOIF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, NTOIF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while NTOIF trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas NTOIF's P/E ratio is -30.45. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NTOIF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and NTOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs IDKOF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, IDKOF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while IDKOF trades at $5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas IDKOF's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IDKOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and IDKOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs SAAFY Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, SAAFY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while SAAFY trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas SAAFY's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAAFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to SAAFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs IDKOY Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, IDKOY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while IDKOY trades at $12.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas IDKOY's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IDKOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to IDKOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs DCCPF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, DCCPF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while DCCPF trades at $61.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas DCCPF's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DCCPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and DCCPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs KUNUF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, KUNUF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while KUNUF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas KUNUF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KUNUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and KUNUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs DCCPY Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, DCCPY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while DCCPY trades at $31.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas DCCPY's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DCCPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and DCCPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs MOHCY Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, MOHCY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while MOHCY trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas MOHCY's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MOHCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and MOHCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs PKIUF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, PKIUF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while PKIUF trades at $28.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas PKIUF's P/E ratio is 34.49. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PKIUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to PKIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs CTXAF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, CTXAF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while CTXAF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas CTXAF's P/E ratio is 58.48. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTXAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and CTXAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs PNADF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, PNADF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while PNADF trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas PNADF's P/E ratio is 37.33. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PNADF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and PNADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs SHIIY Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, SHIIY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while SHIIY trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas SHIIY's P/E ratio is 35.84. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SHIIY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to SHIIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs CTXAY Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, CTXAY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while CTXAY trades at $33.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas CTXAY's P/E ratio is 50.94. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTXAY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to CTXAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs RBSFY Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, RBSFY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while RBSFY trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas RBSFY's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RBSFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to RBSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs MOHCF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, MOHCF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while MOHCF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas MOHCF's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MOHCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and MOHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs RUBSF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, RUBSF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while RUBSF trades at $31.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas RUBSF's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RUBSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and RUBSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs TOIPY Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, TOIPY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while TOIPY trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas TOIPY's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TOIPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and TOIPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs TOIPF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, TOIPF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while TOIPF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas TOIPF's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TOIPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and TOIPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs PKCPY Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, PKCPY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while PKCPY trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas PKCPY's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PKCPY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and PKCPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs FJLLF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, FJLLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while FJLLF trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas FJLLF's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FJLLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and FJLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs IRPSY Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, IRPSY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while IRPSY trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas IRPSY's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IRPSY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and IRPSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs OILRF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, OILRF has a market cap of 901.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while OILRF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas OILRF's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OILRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to OILRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs TPHIF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, TPHIF has a market cap of 679.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while TPHIF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas TPHIF's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TPHIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and TPHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs CAOLF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, CAOLF has a market cap of 474M. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while CAOLF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas CAOLF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAOLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and CAOLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs NZRFF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, NZRFF has a market cap of 410M. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while NZRFF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas NZRFF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NZRFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and NZRFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs FGPRB Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, FGPRB has a market cap of 204.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while FGPRB trades at $125.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas FGPRB's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FGPRB's ROE of +4.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and FGPRB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs REGX Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, REGX has a market cap of 152.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while REGX trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas REGX's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to REGX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and REGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs CLSZF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, CLSZF has a market cap of 81.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while CLSZF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas CLSZF's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLSZF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and CLSZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs FGPR Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, FGPR has a market cap of 48.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while FGPR trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas FGPR's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FGPR's ROE of +4.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to FGPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs BDCO Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, BDCO has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while BDCO trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas BDCO's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BDCO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and BDCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs ISRJF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, ISRJF has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while ISRJF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas ISRJF's P/E ratio is -7.52. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ISRJF's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and ISRJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs QREE Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, QREE has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while QREE trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas QREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to QREE's ROE of +5.66%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and QREE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs LCNTU Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, LCNTU has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while LCNTU trades at $511.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas LCNTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LCNTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and LCNTU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs SRNW Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, SRNW has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while SRNW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas SRNW's P/E ratio is -8.69. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SRNW's ROE of -5.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to SRNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs WTLC Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, WTLC has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while WTLC trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas WTLC's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WTLC's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and WTLC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs BERI Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, BERI has a market cap of 409.2K. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while BERI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas BERI's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BERI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and BERI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs DVFI Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, DVFI has a market cap of 28.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while DVFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas DVFI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DVFI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and DVFI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs IAHL Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, IAHL has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while IAHL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas IAHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IAHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and IAHL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs ABLE Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, ABLE has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while ABLE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas ABLE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY is less volatile compared to ABLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KLYCY.
KLYCY vs TOAOF Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, TOAOF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while TOAOF trades at $23.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas TOAOF's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TOAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and TOAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
KLYCY vs LNKE Comparison
KLYCY plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KLYCY stands at 8.4B. In comparison, LNKE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KLYCY is priced at $9.31, while LNKE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KLYCY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.14, whereas LNKE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KLYCY's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LNKE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KLYCY and LNKE have similar daily volatility (0.00).