Kirloskar Oil Engines Limited

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, CUMMINSIND.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while CUMMINSIND.NS trades at ₹4,646.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas CUMMINSIND.NS's P/E ratio is 60.42. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CUMMINSIND.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to CUMMINSIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check CUMMINSIND.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, CUMMINSIND.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while CUMMINSIND.BO trades at ₹4,645.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas CUMMINSIND.BO's P/E ratio is 60.23. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CUMMINSIND.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to CUMMINSIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check CUMMINSIND.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, ABB.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while ABB.NS trades at ₹5,719.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas ABB.NS's P/E ratio is 71.11. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ABB.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to ABB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check ABB.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, ABB.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while ABB.BO trades at ₹5,715.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas ABB.BO's P/E ratio is 70.95. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ABB.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to ABB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check ABB.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, SIEMENS.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while SIEMENS.BO trades at ₹3,110.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas SIEMENS.BO's P/E ratio is 69.73. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SIEMENS.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to SIEMENS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check SIEMENS.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, SIEMENS.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while SIEMENS.NS trades at ₹3,107.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas SIEMENS.NS's P/E ratio is 69.59. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SIEMENS.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to SIEMENS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check SIEMENS.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, BHEL.BO has a market cap of 902B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while BHEL.BO trades at ₹254.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas BHEL.BO's P/E ratio is 110.71. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BHEL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to BHEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check BHEL.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, BHEL.NS has a market cap of 899.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while BHEL.NS trades at ₹253.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas BHEL.NS's P/E ratio is 110.84. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BHEL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to BHEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check BHEL.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, VOLTAS.BO has a market cap of 509.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while VOLTAS.BO trades at ₹1,511.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas VOLTAS.BO's P/E ratio is 101.25. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VOLTAS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to VOLTAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check VOLTAS.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, VOLTAS.NS has a market cap of 509B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while VOLTAS.NS trades at ₹1,512.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas VOLTAS.NS's P/E ratio is 101.46. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VOLTAS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to VOLTAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check VOLTAS.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, BLUESTARCO.NS has a market cap of 403.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while BLUESTARCO.NS trades at ₹1,969.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas BLUESTARCO.NS's P/E ratio is 81.71. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BLUESTARCO.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to BLUESTARCO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check BLUESTARCO.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, GET&D.NS has a market cap of 397.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while GET&D.NS trades at ₹1,552.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas GET&D.NS's P/E ratio is 100.73. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GET&D.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to GET&D.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check GET&D.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, AIAENG.BO has a market cap of 358.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while AIAENG.BO trades at ₹3,959.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas AIAENG.BO's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AIAENG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to AIAENG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check AIAENG.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, AIAENG.NS has a market cap of 357.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while AIAENG.NS trades at ₹3,960.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas AIAENG.NS's P/E ratio is 30.83. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AIAENG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to AIAENG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check AIAENG.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, THERMAX.BO has a market cap of 355.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while THERMAX.BO trades at ₹3,001.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas THERMAX.BO's P/E ratio is 52.26. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to THERMAX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to THERMAX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check THERMAX.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, THERMAX.NS has a market cap of 355.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while THERMAX.NS trades at ₹3,007.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas THERMAX.NS's P/E ratio is 52.15. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to THERMAX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to THERMAX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check THERMAX.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, KAYNES.NS has a market cap of 254.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while KAYNES.NS trades at ₹3,878.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas KAYNES.NS's P/E ratio is 64.03. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KAYNES.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to KAYNES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check KAYNES.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, KAYNES.BO has a market cap of 254.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while KAYNES.BO trades at ₹3,876.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas KAYNES.BO's P/E ratio is 64.13. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KAYNES.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to KAYNES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check KAYNES.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, SCHNEIDER.NS has a market cap of 218.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while SCHNEIDER.NS trades at ₹907.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas SCHNEIDER.NS's P/E ratio is 89.30. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SCHNEIDER.NS's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to SCHNEIDER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check SCHNEIDER.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.NS has a market cap of 203.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while KIRLOSENG.NS trades at ₹1,422.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas KIRLOSENG.NS's P/E ratio is 37.46. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KIRLOSENG.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is more volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check KIRLOSENG.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, JYOTICNC.NS has a market cap of 195.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while JYOTICNC.NS trades at ₹841.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas JYOTICNC.NS's P/E ratio is 0.79. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JYOTICNC.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to JYOTICNC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check JYOTICNC.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.BO has a market cap of 185.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while LAXMIMACH.BO trades at ₹17,338.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas LAXMIMACH.BO's P/E ratio is 63.86. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LAXMIMACH.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check LAXMIMACH.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.NS has a market cap of 185.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while LAXMIMACH.NS trades at ₹17,324.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas LAXMIMACH.NS's P/E ratio is 63.45. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LAXMIMACH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check LAXMIMACH.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.BO has a market cap of 173.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while ELGIEQUIP.BO trades at ₹525.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas ELGIEQUIP.BO's P/E ratio is 43.02. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check ELGIEQUIP.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.NS has a market cap of 173.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while ELGIEQUIP.NS trades at ₹524.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas ELGIEQUIP.NS's P/E ratio is 43.02. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check ELGIEQUIP.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, LMW.BO has a market cap of 167.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while LMW.BO trades at ₹15,204.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas LMW.BO's P/E ratio is 146.78. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LMW.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to LMW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check LMW.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, LMW.NS has a market cap of 167.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while LMW.NS trades at ₹15,204.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas LMW.NS's P/E ratio is 145.60. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LMW.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to LMW.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check LMW.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, TRITURBINE.NS has a market cap of 156.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while TRITURBINE.NS trades at ₹487.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas TRITURBINE.NS's P/E ratio is 45.77. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TRITURBINE.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is more volatile compared to TRITURBINE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check TRITURBINE.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, TRITURBINE.BO has a market cap of 156.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while TRITURBINE.BO trades at ₹487.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas TRITURBINE.BO's P/E ratio is 45.66. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TRITURBINE.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is more volatile compared to TRITURBINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check TRITURBINE.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, TDPOWERSYS.NS has a market cap of 141.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while TDPOWERSYS.NS trades at ₹884.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas TDPOWERSYS.NS's P/E ratio is 64.42. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TDPOWERSYS.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to TDPOWERSYS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check TDPOWERSYS.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, TDPOWERSYS.BO has a market cap of 141B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while TDPOWERSYS.BO trades at ₹884.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas TDPOWERSYS.BO's P/E ratio is 64.30. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TDPOWERSYS.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to TDPOWERSYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check TDPOWERSYS.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, TEGA.NS has a market cap of 129.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while TEGA.NS trades at ₹1,635.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas TEGA.NS's P/E ratio is 57.43. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TEGA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to TEGA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check TEGA.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, TEGA.BO has a market cap of 129.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while TEGA.BO trades at ₹1,639.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas TEGA.BO's P/E ratio is 57.44. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TEGA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to TEGA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check TEGA.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.NS has a market cap of 128.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while KIRLOSBROS.NS trades at ₹1,603.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas KIRLOSBROS.NS's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check KIRLOSBROS.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.BO has a market cap of 128.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while KIRLOSBROS.BO trades at ₹1,599.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas KIRLOSBROS.BO's P/E ratio is 32.65. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check KIRLOSBROS.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, KSB.BO has a market cap of 126.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while KSB.BO trades at ₹713.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas KSB.BO's P/E ratio is 48.10. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KSB.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to KSB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check KSB.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, KSB.NS has a market cap of 126.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while KSB.NS trades at ₹713.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas KSB.NS's P/E ratio is 48.20. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KSB.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to KSB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check KSB.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, INGERRAND.NS has a market cap of 125.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while INGERRAND.NS trades at ₹3,844.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas INGERRAND.NS's P/E ratio is 48.72. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to INGERRAND.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is more volatile compared to INGERRAND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check INGERRAND.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, INGERRAND.BO has a market cap of 125.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while INGERRAND.BO trades at ₹3,833.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas INGERRAND.BO's P/E ratio is 47.48. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to INGERRAND.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to INGERRAND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check INGERRAND.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, MTARTECH.BO has a market cap of 114.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while MTARTECH.BO trades at ₹3,647.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas MTARTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 182.05. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MTARTECH.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to MTARTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check MTARTECH.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, MTARTECH.NS has a market cap of 114.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while MTARTECH.NS trades at ₹3,647.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas MTARTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 181.92. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MTARTECH.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to MTARTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check MTARTECH.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, AZAD.NS has a market cap of 110.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while AZAD.NS trades at ₹1,697.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas AZAD.NS's P/E ratio is 89.37. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AZAD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to AZAD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check AZAD.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, VESUVIUS.BO has a market cap of 105.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while VESUVIUS.BO trades at ₹517.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas VESUVIUS.BO's P/E ratio is 43.42. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VESUVIUS.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to VESUVIUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check VESUVIUS.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, VESUVIUS.NS has a market cap of 105.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while VESUVIUS.NS trades at ₹517.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas VESUVIUS.NS's P/E ratio is 43.29. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VESUVIUS.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to VESUVIUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check VESUVIUS.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, INOXINDIA.NS has a market cap of 103.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while INOXINDIA.NS trades at ₹1,131.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas INOXINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 41.87. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to INOXINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to INOXINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check INOXINDIA.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, ELECON.NS has a market cap of 95.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while ELECON.NS trades at ₹424.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas ELECON.NS's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELECON.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to ELECON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check ELECON.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, ELECON.BO has a market cap of 95.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while ELECON.BO trades at ₹425.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas ELECON.BO's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ELECON.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to ELECON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check ELECON.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, KIRLPNU.BO has a market cap of 74.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while KIRLPNU.BO trades at ₹1,124.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas KIRLPNU.BO's P/E ratio is 39.08. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KIRLPNU.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to KIRLPNU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check KIRLPNU.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, KIRLPNU.NS has a market cap of 74.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while KIRLPNU.NS trades at ₹1,125.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas KIRLPNU.NS's P/E ratio is 39.03. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KIRLPNU.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to KIRLPNU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check KIRLPNU.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, DIACABS.NS has a market cap of 71.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while DIACABS.NS trades at ₹134.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas DIACABS.NS's P/E ratio is 67.76. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DIACABS.NS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to DIACABS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check DIACABS.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, DIACABS.BO has a market cap of 70.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while DIACABS.BO trades at ₹134.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas DIACABS.BO's P/E ratio is 67.54. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DIACABS.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to DIACABS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check DIACABS.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.BO has a market cap of 68.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while SHAKTIPUMP.BO trades at ₹560.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.BO's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check SHAKTIPUMP.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.NS has a market cap of 68.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while SHAKTIPUMP.NS trades at ₹560.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.NS's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check SHAKTIPUMP.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, ISGEC.BO has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while ISGEC.BO trades at ₹827.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas ISGEC.BO's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ISGEC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to ISGEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check ISGEC.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, ISGEC.NS has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while ISGEC.NS trades at ₹826.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas ISGEC.NS's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ISGEC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to ISGEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check ISGEC.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.NS has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while LLOYDSENGG.NS trades at ₹50.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas LLOYDSENGG.NS's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check LLOYDSENGG.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.BO has a market cap of 59.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while LLOYDSENGG.BO trades at ₹50.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas LLOYDSENGG.BO's P/E ratio is 41.64. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check LLOYDSENGG.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, BALUFORGE.BO has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while BALUFORGE.BO trades at ₹483.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas BALUFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BALUFORGE.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to BALUFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check BALUFORGE.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, DIAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while DIAPOWER.NS trades at ₹195.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas DIAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DIAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to DIAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check DIAPOWER.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, LSIL.NS has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while LSIL.NS trades at ₹48.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas LSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 130.41. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LSIL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to LSIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check LSIL.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, TEXRAIL.NS has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while TEXRAIL.NS trades at ₹112.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas TEXRAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 25.15. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TEXRAIL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to TEXRAIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check TEXRAIL.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, TEXRAIL.BO has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while TEXRAIL.BO trades at ₹112.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas TEXRAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 25.20. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TEXRAIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to TEXRAIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check TEXRAIL.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.BO has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while GMMPFAUDLR.BO trades at ₹971.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.BO's P/E ratio is 248.96. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is more volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check GMMPFAUDLR.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.NS has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while GMMPFAUDLR.NS trades at ₹971.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.NS's P/E ratio is 248.76. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check GMMPFAUDLR.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, WPIL.BO has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while WPIL.BO trades at ₹392.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas WPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 32.76. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WPIL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to WPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check WPIL.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.BO has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while GREAVESCOT.BO trades at ₹163.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas GREAVESCOT.BO's P/E ratio is 36.03. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GREAVESCOT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check GREAVESCOT.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.NS has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while GREAVESCOT.NS trades at ₹163.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas GREAVESCOT.NS's P/E ratio is 34.69. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GREAVESCOT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check GREAVESCOT.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.BO has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while SHANTIGEAR.BO trades at ₹454.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas SHANTIGEAR.BO's P/E ratio is 41.83. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is more volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check SHANTIGEAR.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, ANUP.BO has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while ANUP.BO trades at ₹1,727.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas ANUP.BO's P/E ratio is 30.16. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ANUP.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to ANUP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check ANUP.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, ANUP.NS has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while ANUP.NS trades at ₹1,727.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas ANUP.NS's P/E ratio is 30.18. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ANUP.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to ANUP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check ANUP.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.NS has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while SHANTIGEAR.NS trades at ₹451.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas SHANTIGEAR.NS's P/E ratio is 41.75. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is more volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check SHANTIGEAR.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, SGLTL.NS has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while SGLTL.NS trades at ₹137.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas SGLTL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SGLTL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to SGLTL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check SGLTL.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, KLBRENG-B.BO has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while KLBRENG-B.BO trades at ₹519.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas KLBRENG-B.BO's P/E ratio is 27.32. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KLBRENG-B.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to KLBRENG-B.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check KLBRENG-B.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, SETL.NS has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while SETL.NS trades at ₹127.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas SETL.NS's P/E ratio is 34.67. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SETL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to SETL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check SETL.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, JASH.NS has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while JASH.NS trades at ₹398.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas JASH.NS's P/E ratio is 44.97. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JASH.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to JASH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check JASH.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, GMM.BO has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while GMM.BO trades at ₹1,563.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas GMM.BO's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GMM.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is more volatile compared to GMM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check GMM.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, HONDAPOWER.BO has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while HONDAPOWER.BO trades at ₹2,189.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas HONDAPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 30.66. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HONDAPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to HONDAPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check HONDAPOWER.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, HONDAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while HONDAPOWER.NS trades at ₹2,204.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas HONDAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 30.35. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HONDAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to HONDAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check HONDAPOWER.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, HLEGLAS.BO has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while HLEGLAS.BO trades at ₹324.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas HLEGLAS.BO's P/E ratio is 33.45. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HLEGLAS.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to HLEGLAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check HLEGLAS.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, HLEGLAS.NS has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while HLEGLAS.NS trades at ₹325.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas HLEGLAS.NS's P/E ratio is 32.64. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HLEGLAS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to HLEGLAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check HLEGLAS.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, WINDMACHIN.NS has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while WINDMACHIN.NS trades at ₹244.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas WINDMACHIN.NS's P/E ratio is -757.81. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WINDMACHIN.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to WINDMACHIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check WINDMACHIN.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, WINDMACHIN.BO has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while WINDMACHIN.BO trades at ₹245.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas WINDMACHIN.BO's P/E ratio is -745.94. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WINDMACHIN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to WINDMACHIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check WINDMACHIN.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, PIXTRANS.NS has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while PIXTRANS.NS trades at ₹1,510.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas PIXTRANS.NS's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PIXTRANS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to PIXTRANS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check PIXTRANS.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, PIXTRANS.BO has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while PIXTRANS.BO trades at ₹1,505.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas PIXTRANS.BO's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PIXTRANS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to PIXTRANS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check PIXTRANS.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, PENIND.NS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while PENIND.NS trades at ₹150.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas PENIND.NS's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PENIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to PENIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check PENIND.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, PENIND.BO has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while PENIND.BO trades at ₹150.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas PENIND.BO's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PENIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to PENIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check PENIND.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, KMEW.BO has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while KMEW.BO trades at ₹1,615.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas KMEW.BO's P/E ratio is 55.46. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KMEW.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to KMEW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check KMEW.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, THEJO.NS has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while THEJO.NS trades at ₹1,670.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas THEJO.NS's P/E ratio is 38.47. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to THEJO.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is more volatile compared to THEJO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check THEJO.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, ADOR.BO has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while ADOR.BO trades at ₹1,081.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas ADOR.BO's P/E ratio is 28.40. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADOR.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to ADOR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check ADOR.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, ADOR.NS has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while ADOR.NS trades at ₹1,085.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas ADOR.NS's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADOR.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to ADOR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check ADOR.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, ADVAIT.BO has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while ADVAIT.BO trades at ₹1,669.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas ADVAIT.BO's P/E ratio is 40.94. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADVAIT.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to ADVAIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check ADVAIT.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, DISAQ.BO has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while DISAQ.BO trades at ₹11,792.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas DISAQ.BO's P/E ratio is 34.18. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DISAQ.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to DISAQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check DISAQ.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, LXMIATO.BO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while LXMIATO.BO trades at ₹2,483.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas LXMIATO.BO's P/E ratio is 584.15. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LXMIATO.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to LXMIATO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check LXMIATO.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, ADORWELD.NS has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while ADORWELD.NS trades at ₹852.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas ADORWELD.NS's P/E ratio is 33.22. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADORWELD.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to ADORWELD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check ADORWELD.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, ADORWELD.BO has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while ADORWELD.BO trades at ₹852.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas ADORWELD.BO's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADORWELD.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to ADORWELD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check ADORWELD.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, JYOTISTRUC.BO has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while JYOTISTRUC.BO trades at ₹12.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas JYOTISTRUC.BO's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JYOTISTRUC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to JYOTISTRUC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check JYOTISTRUC.BO's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, JYOTISTRUC.NS has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while JYOTISTRUC.NS trades at ₹12.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas JYOTISTRUC.NS's P/E ratio is 27.51. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JYOTISTRUC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to JYOTISTRUC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check JYOTISTRUC.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, JNKINDIA.NS has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while JNKINDIA.NS trades at ₹241.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas JNKINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 29.93. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JNKINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to JNKINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check JNKINDIA.NS's competition here

KIRLOSENG.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSENG.BO stands at 203.5B. In comparison, EKC.NS has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSENG.BO is priced at ₹1,421.50, while EKC.NS trades at ₹118.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KIRLOSENG.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 37.48, whereas EKC.NS's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EKC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSENG.BO is less volatile compared to EKC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSENG.BO.Check EKC.NS's competition here