Kirloskar Brothers Limited
Kirloskar Brothers Limited (KIRLOSBROS.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KIRLOSBROS.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIRLOSBROS.NS | ₹1,547.80 | +0.00% | 124B | 31.08 | ₹50.24 | +0.45% |
| ABB.BO | ₹6,196.10 | +0.00% | 1.3T | 75.53 | ₹83.38 | +0.69% |
| ABB.NS | ₹6,214.00 | +0.00% | 1.3T | 80.12 | ₹78.59 | +0.69% |
| CUMMINSIND.NS | ₹4,505.70 | +0.00% | 1.3T | 57.23 | ₹80.65 | +1.16% |
| CUMMINSIND.BO | ₹4,500.55 | +0.00% | 1.3T | 56.88 | ₹81.08 | +1.16% |
| SIEMENS.BO | ₹3,077.60 | +0.00% | 1.1T | 66.12 | ₹47.37 | N/A |
| SIEMENS.NS | ₹3,079.00 | +0.00% | 1.1T | 69.15 | ₹45.26 | N/A |
| BHEL.NS | ₹251.75 | +0.00% | 912.5B | 112.47 | ₹2.33 | +0.19% |
| BHEL.BO | ₹251.65 | +0.00% | 912B | 112.40 | ₹2.33 | +0.19% |
| VOLTAS.NS | ₹1,347.20 | +0.00% | 438.3B | 87.83 | ₹15.08 | +0.53% |
Stock Comparison
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs ABB.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, ABB.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while ABB.BO trades at ₹6,196.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas ABB.BO's P/E ratio is 75.53. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ABB.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is more volatile compared to ABB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check ABB.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs ABB.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, ABB.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while ABB.NS trades at ₹6,214.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas ABB.NS's P/E ratio is 80.12. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ABB.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is more volatile compared to ABB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check ABB.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs CUMMINSIND.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, CUMMINSIND.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while CUMMINSIND.NS trades at ₹4,505.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas CUMMINSIND.NS's P/E ratio is 57.23. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CUMMINSIND.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to CUMMINSIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check CUMMINSIND.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs CUMMINSIND.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, CUMMINSIND.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while CUMMINSIND.BO trades at ₹4,500.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas CUMMINSIND.BO's P/E ratio is 56.88. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CUMMINSIND.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to CUMMINSIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check CUMMINSIND.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs SIEMENS.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, SIEMENS.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while SIEMENS.BO trades at ₹3,077.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas SIEMENS.BO's P/E ratio is 66.12. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SIEMENS.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to SIEMENS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check SIEMENS.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs SIEMENS.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, SIEMENS.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while SIEMENS.NS trades at ₹3,079.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas SIEMENS.NS's P/E ratio is 69.15. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SIEMENS.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to SIEMENS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check SIEMENS.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs BHEL.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, BHEL.NS has a market cap of 912.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while BHEL.NS trades at ₹251.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas BHEL.NS's P/E ratio is 112.47. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BHEL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to BHEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check BHEL.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs BHEL.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, BHEL.BO has a market cap of 912B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while BHEL.BO trades at ₹251.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas BHEL.BO's P/E ratio is 112.40. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BHEL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to BHEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check BHEL.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs VOLTAS.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, VOLTAS.NS has a market cap of 438.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while VOLTAS.NS trades at ₹1,347.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas VOLTAS.NS's P/E ratio is 87.83. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VOLTAS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to VOLTAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check VOLTAS.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs VOLTAS.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, VOLTAS.BO has a market cap of 438.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while VOLTAS.BO trades at ₹1,348.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas VOLTAS.BO's P/E ratio is 87.11. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VOLTAS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to VOLTAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check VOLTAS.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs GET&D.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, GET&D.NS has a market cap of 397.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while GET&D.NS trades at ₹1,552.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas GET&D.NS's P/E ratio is 100.73. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GET&D.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to GET&D.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check GET&D.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs THERMAX.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, THERMAX.NS has a market cap of 363.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while THERMAX.NS trades at ₹3,237.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas THERMAX.NS's P/E ratio is 53.89. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to THERMAX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to THERMAX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check THERMAX.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs THERMAX.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, THERMAX.BO has a market cap of 363.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while THERMAX.BO trades at ₹3,229.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas THERMAX.BO's P/E ratio is 53.42. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to THERMAX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to THERMAX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check THERMAX.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs BLUESTARCO.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, BLUESTARCO.NS has a market cap of 351.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while BLUESTARCO.NS trades at ₹1,733.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas BLUESTARCO.NS's P/E ratio is 71.13. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BLUESTARCO.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to BLUESTARCO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check BLUESTARCO.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs AIAENG.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, AIAENG.BO has a market cap of 319.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while AIAENG.BO trades at ₹3,573.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas AIAENG.BO's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AIAENG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to AIAENG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check AIAENG.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs AIAENG.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, AIAENG.NS has a market cap of 318.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while AIAENG.NS trades at ₹3,573.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas AIAENG.NS's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AIAENG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to AIAENG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check AIAENG.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs KAYNES.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, KAYNES.BO has a market cap of 242.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while KAYNES.BO trades at ₹3,569.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas KAYNES.BO's P/E ratio is 60.95. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KAYNES.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to KAYNES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check KAYNES.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs KAYNES.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, KAYNES.NS has a market cap of 242.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while KAYNES.NS trades at ₹3,567.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas KAYNES.NS's P/E ratio is 61.15. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KAYNES.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to KAYNES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check KAYNES.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs SCHNEIDER.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, SCHNEIDER.NS has a market cap of 212.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while SCHNEIDER.NS trades at ₹895.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas SCHNEIDER.NS's P/E ratio is 87.17. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SCHNEIDER.NS's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to SCHNEIDER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check SCHNEIDER.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs KIRLOSENG.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.BO has a market cap of 200.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while KIRLOSENG.BO trades at ₹1,419.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas KIRLOSENG.BO's P/E ratio is 36.94. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check KIRLOSENG.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs KIRLOSENG.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.NS has a market cap of 200.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while KIRLOSENG.NS trades at ₹1,421.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas KIRLOSENG.NS's P/E ratio is 36.88. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KIRLOSENG.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check KIRLOSENG.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs LAXMIMACH.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.BO has a market cap of 185.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while LAXMIMACH.BO trades at ₹17,338.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas LAXMIMACH.BO's P/E ratio is 63.86. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LAXMIMACH.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check LAXMIMACH.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs LAXMIMACH.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.NS has a market cap of 185.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while LAXMIMACH.NS trades at ₹17,324.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas LAXMIMACH.NS's P/E ratio is 63.45. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LAXMIMACH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check LAXMIMACH.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs JYOTICNC.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, JYOTICNC.NS has a market cap of 168.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while JYOTICNC.NS trades at ₹742.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas JYOTICNC.NS's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JYOTICNC.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to JYOTICNC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check JYOTICNC.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs ELGIEQUIP.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.NS has a market cap of 151.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while ELGIEQUIP.NS trades at ₹467.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas ELGIEQUIP.NS's P/E ratio is 37.56. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check ELGIEQUIP.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs ELGIEQUIP.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.BO has a market cap of 151.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while ELGIEQUIP.BO trades at ₹466.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas ELGIEQUIP.BO's P/E ratio is 37.52. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check ELGIEQUIP.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs LMW.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, LMW.NS has a market cap of 146.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while LMW.NS trades at ₹14,217.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas LMW.NS's P/E ratio is 126.91. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LMW.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to LMW.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check LMW.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs LMW.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, LMW.BO has a market cap of 146.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while LMW.BO trades at ₹14,217.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas LMW.BO's P/E ratio is 126.80. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LMW.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to LMW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check LMW.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs TRITURBINE.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, TRITURBINE.BO has a market cap of 145.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while TRITURBINE.BO trades at ₹463.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas TRITURBINE.BO's P/E ratio is 42.33. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TRITURBINE.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is more volatile compared to TRITURBINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check TRITURBINE.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs TRITURBINE.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, TRITURBINE.NS has a market cap of 145B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while TRITURBINE.NS trades at ₹465.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas TRITURBINE.NS's P/E ratio is 42.28. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TRITURBINE.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to TRITURBINE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check TRITURBINE.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs KSB.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, KSB.NS has a market cap of 136.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while KSB.NS trades at ₹799.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas KSB.NS's P/E ratio is 50.37. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KSB.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to KSB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check KSB.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs KSB.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, KSB.BO has a market cap of 136.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while KSB.BO trades at ₹798.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas KSB.BO's P/E ratio is 50.20. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KSB.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to KSB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check KSB.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs TDPOWERSYS.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, TDPOWERSYS.NS has a market cap of 134.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while TDPOWERSYS.NS trades at ₹833.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas TDPOWERSYS.NS's P/E ratio is 61.44. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TDPOWERSYS.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to TDPOWERSYS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check TDPOWERSYS.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs TDPOWERSYS.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, TDPOWERSYS.BO has a market cap of 134.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while TDPOWERSYS.BO trades at ₹833.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas TDPOWERSYS.BO's P/E ratio is 61.47. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TDPOWERSYS.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to TDPOWERSYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check TDPOWERSYS.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs TEGA.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, TEGA.NS has a market cap of 129.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while TEGA.NS trades at ₹1,638.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas TEGA.NS's P/E ratio is 57.18. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TEGA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to TEGA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check TEGA.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs TEGA.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, TEGA.BO has a market cap of 129B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while TEGA.BO trades at ₹1,640.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas TEGA.BO's P/E ratio is 56.87. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TEGA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to TEGA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check TEGA.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs KIRLOSBROS.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.BO has a market cap of 124.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while KIRLOSBROS.BO trades at ₹1,545.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas KIRLOSBROS.BO's P/E ratio is 31.60. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check KIRLOSBROS.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs INGERRAND.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, INGERRAND.NS has a market cap of 115.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while INGERRAND.NS trades at ₹3,587.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas INGERRAND.NS's P/E ratio is 44.49. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to INGERRAND.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to INGERRAND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check INGERRAND.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs INGERRAND.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, INGERRAND.BO has a market cap of 115B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while INGERRAND.BO trades at ₹3,586.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas INGERRAND.BO's P/E ratio is 43.50. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to INGERRAND.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to INGERRAND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check INGERRAND.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs MTARTECH.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, MTARTECH.BO has a market cap of 108.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while MTARTECH.BO trades at ₹3,495.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas MTARTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 169.93. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MTARTECH.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is more volatile compared to MTARTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check MTARTECH.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs MTARTECH.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, MTARTECH.NS has a market cap of 108.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while MTARTECH.NS trades at ₹3,492.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas MTARTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 169.89. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MTARTECH.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to MTARTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check MTARTECH.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs INOXINDIA.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, INOXINDIA.NS has a market cap of 107.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while INOXINDIA.NS trades at ₹1,182.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas INOXINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 43.36. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to INOXINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to INOXINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check INOXINDIA.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs VESUVIUS.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, VESUVIUS.NS has a market cap of 97.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while VESUVIUS.NS trades at ₹476.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas VESUVIUS.NS's P/E ratio is 36.74. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VESUVIUS.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to VESUVIUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check VESUVIUS.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs VESUVIUS.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, VESUVIUS.BO has a market cap of 96.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while VESUVIUS.BO trades at ₹476.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas VESUVIUS.BO's P/E ratio is 36.68. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VESUVIUS.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is more volatile compared to VESUVIUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check VESUVIUS.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs AZAD.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, AZAD.NS has a market cap of 94.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while AZAD.NS trades at ₹1,460.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas AZAD.NS's P/E ratio is 76.97. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AZAD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to AZAD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check AZAD.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs ELECON.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, ELECON.BO has a market cap of 87.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while ELECON.BO trades at ₹381.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas ELECON.BO's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ELECON.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to ELECON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check ELECON.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs ELECON.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, ELECON.NS has a market cap of 87.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while ELECON.NS trades at ₹383.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas ELECON.NS's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ELECON.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to ELECON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check ELECON.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs KIRLPNU.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, KIRLPNU.BO has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while KIRLPNU.BO trades at ₹1,056.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas KIRLPNU.BO's P/E ratio is 35.92. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KIRLPNU.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLPNU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check KIRLPNU.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs KIRLPNU.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, KIRLPNU.NS has a market cap of 68.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while KIRLPNU.NS trades at ₹1,058.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas KIRLPNU.NS's P/E ratio is 35.85. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KIRLPNU.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLPNU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check KIRLPNU.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs DIACABS.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, DIACABS.BO has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while DIACABS.BO trades at ₹123.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas DIACABS.BO's P/E ratio is 63.94. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DIACABS.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to DIACABS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check DIACABS.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs DIACABS.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, DIACABS.NS has a market cap of 67B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while DIACABS.NS trades at ₹123.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas DIACABS.NS's P/E ratio is 63.89. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DIACABS.NS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to DIACABS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check DIACABS.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs ISGEC.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, ISGEC.BO has a market cap of 65.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while ISGEC.BO trades at ₹888.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas ISGEC.BO's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ISGEC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to ISGEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check ISGEC.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs ISGEC.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, ISGEC.NS has a market cap of 65.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while ISGEC.NS trades at ₹888.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas ISGEC.NS's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ISGEC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to ISGEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check ISGEC.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs SHAKTIPUMP.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.BO has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while SHAKTIPUMP.BO trades at ₹492.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.BO's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is more volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check SHAKTIPUMP.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs SHAKTIPUMP.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.NS has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while SHAKTIPUMP.NS trades at ₹492.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.NS's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is more volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check SHAKTIPUMP.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs DIAPOWER.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, DIAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while DIAPOWER.NS trades at ₹195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas DIAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DIAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to DIAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check DIAPOWER.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs LSIL.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, LSIL.NS has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while LSIL.NS trades at ₹48.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas LSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 130.41. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LSIL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to LSIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check LSIL.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs BALUFORGE.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, BALUFORGE.BO has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while BALUFORGE.BO trades at ₹437.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas BALUFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BALUFORGE.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to BALUFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check BALUFORGE.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs LLOYDSENGG.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.BO has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while LLOYDSENGG.BO trades at ₹41.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas LLOYDSENGG.BO's P/E ratio is 35.01. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check LLOYDSENGG.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs LLOYDSENGG.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.NS has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while LLOYDSENGG.NS trades at ₹41.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas LLOYDSENGG.NS's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check LLOYDSENGG.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs GMMPFAUDLR.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.BO has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while GMMPFAUDLR.BO trades at ₹880.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.BO's P/E ratio is 218.84. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check GMMPFAUDLR.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs GMMPFAUDLR.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.NS has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while GMMPFAUDLR.NS trades at ₹882.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.NS's P/E ratio is 220.85. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check GMMPFAUDLR.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs WPIL.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, WPIL.BO has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while WPIL.BO trades at ₹384.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas WPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 31.44. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WPIL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to WPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check WPIL.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs TEXRAIL.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, TEXRAIL.NS has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while TEXRAIL.NS trades at ₹89.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas TEXRAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TEXRAIL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to TEXRAIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check TEXRAIL.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs TEXRAIL.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, TEXRAIL.BO has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while TEXRAIL.BO trades at ₹89.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas TEXRAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TEXRAIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to TEXRAIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check TEXRAIL.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs SHANTIGEAR.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.BO has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while SHANTIGEAR.BO trades at ₹439.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas SHANTIGEAR.BO's P/E ratio is 40.92. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is more volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check SHANTIGEAR.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs SHANTIGEAR.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.NS has a market cap of 33.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while SHANTIGEAR.NS trades at ₹440.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas SHANTIGEAR.NS's P/E ratio is 40.85. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is more volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check SHANTIGEAR.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs ANUP.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, ANUP.BO has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while ANUP.BO trades at ₹1,627.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas ANUP.BO's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ANUP.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to ANUP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check ANUP.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs ANUP.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, ANUP.NS has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while ANUP.NS trades at ₹1,627.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas ANUP.NS's P/E ratio is 27.68. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ANUP.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to ANUP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check ANUP.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs GREAVESCOT.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.BO has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while GREAVESCOT.BO trades at ₹133.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas GREAVESCOT.BO's P/E ratio is 30.29. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GREAVESCOT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check GREAVESCOT.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs GREAVESCOT.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.NS has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while GREAVESCOT.NS trades at ₹133.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas GREAVESCOT.NS's P/E ratio is 29.10. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GREAVESCOT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check GREAVESCOT.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs SGLTL.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, SGLTL.NS has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while SGLTL.NS trades at ₹137.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas SGLTL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SGLTL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is more volatile compared to SGLTL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check SGLTL.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs KLBRENG-B.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, KLBRENG-B.BO has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while KLBRENG-B.BO trades at ₹493.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas KLBRENG-B.BO's P/E ratio is 26.75. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KLBRENG-B.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to KLBRENG-B.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check KLBRENG-B.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs SETL.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, SETL.NS has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while SETL.NS trades at ₹116.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas SETL.NS's P/E ratio is 30.98. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SETL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to SETL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check SETL.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs JASH.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, JASH.NS has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while JASH.NS trades at ₹365.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas JASH.NS's P/E ratio is 41.73. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JASH.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to JASH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check JASH.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs GMM.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, GMM.BO has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while GMM.BO trades at ₹1,563.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas GMM.BO's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GMM.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is more volatile compared to GMM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check GMM.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs HONDAPOWER.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, HONDAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while HONDAPOWER.NS trades at ₹2,011.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas HONDAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 27.95. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HONDAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is more volatile compared to HONDAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check HONDAPOWER.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs HONDAPOWER.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, HONDAPOWER.BO has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while HONDAPOWER.BO trades at ₹2,018.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas HONDAPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HONDAPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is more volatile compared to HONDAPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check HONDAPOWER.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs WINDMACHIN.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, WINDMACHIN.NS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while WINDMACHIN.NS trades at ₹222.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas WINDMACHIN.NS's P/E ratio is -742.10. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WINDMACHIN.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to WINDMACHIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check WINDMACHIN.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs HLEGLAS.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, HLEGLAS.NS has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while HLEGLAS.NS trades at ₹283.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas HLEGLAS.NS's P/E ratio is 29.30. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HLEGLAS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to HLEGLAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check HLEGLAS.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs HLEGLAS.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, HLEGLAS.BO has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while HLEGLAS.BO trades at ₹283.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas HLEGLAS.BO's P/E ratio is 29.26. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HLEGLAS.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to HLEGLAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check HLEGLAS.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs WINDMACHIN.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, WINDMACHIN.BO has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while WINDMACHIN.BO trades at ₹222.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas WINDMACHIN.BO's P/E ratio is -735.48. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WINDMACHIN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to WINDMACHIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check WINDMACHIN.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs PIXTRANS.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, PIXTRANS.NS has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while PIXTRANS.NS trades at ₹1,429.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas PIXTRANS.NS's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PIXTRANS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to PIXTRANS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check PIXTRANS.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs PIXTRANS.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, PIXTRANS.BO has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while PIXTRANS.BO trades at ₹1,420.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas PIXTRANS.BO's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PIXTRANS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to PIXTRANS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check PIXTRANS.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs PENIND.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, PENIND.BO has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while PENIND.BO trades at ₹139.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas PENIND.BO's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PENIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to PENIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check PENIND.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs PENIND.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, PENIND.NS has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while PENIND.NS trades at ₹139.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas PENIND.NS's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PENIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to PENIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check PENIND.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs KMEW.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, KMEW.BO has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while KMEW.BO trades at ₹1,514.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas KMEW.BO's P/E ratio is 54.80. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KMEW.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to KMEW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check KMEW.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs ADVAIT.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, ADVAIT.BO has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while ADVAIT.BO trades at ₹1,573.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas ADVAIT.BO's P/E ratio is 39.61. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ADVAIT.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to ADVAIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check ADVAIT.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs THEJO.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, THEJO.NS has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while THEJO.NS trades at ₹1,582.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas THEJO.NS's P/E ratio is 34.71. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to THEJO.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to THEJO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check THEJO.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs DISAQ.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, DISAQ.BO has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while DISAQ.BO trades at ₹11,500.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas DISAQ.BO's P/E ratio is 31.44. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DISAQ.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to DISAQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check DISAQ.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs LXMIATO.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, LXMIATO.BO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while LXMIATO.BO trades at ₹2,483.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas LXMIATO.BO's P/E ratio is 584.15. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to LXMIATO.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to LXMIATO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check LXMIATO.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs ADOR.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, ADOR.NS has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while ADOR.NS trades at ₹937.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas ADOR.NS's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ADOR.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to ADOR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check ADOR.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs ADOR.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, ADOR.BO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while ADOR.BO trades at ₹935.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas ADOR.BO's P/E ratio is 24.26. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ADOR.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to ADOR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check ADOR.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs ADORWELD.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, ADORWELD.NS has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while ADORWELD.NS trades at ₹852.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas ADORWELD.NS's P/E ratio is 33.22. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ADORWELD.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to ADORWELD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check ADORWELD.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs ADORWELD.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, ADORWELD.BO has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while ADORWELD.BO trades at ₹852.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas ADORWELD.BO's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ADORWELD.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to ADORWELD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check ADORWELD.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs JNKINDIA.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, JNKINDIA.NS has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while JNKINDIA.NS trades at ₹233.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas JNKINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 28.97. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JNKINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to JNKINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check JNKINDIA.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs JYOTISTRUC.BO Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, JYOTISTRUC.BO has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while JYOTISTRUC.BO trades at ₹10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas JYOTISTRUC.BO's P/E ratio is 23.31. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JYOTISTRUC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to JYOTISTRUC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check JYOTISTRUC.BO's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs JYOTISTRUC.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, JYOTISTRUC.NS has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while JYOTISTRUC.NS trades at ₹10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas JYOTISTRUC.NS's P/E ratio is 23.77. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JYOTISTRUC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to JYOTISTRUC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check JYOTISTRUC.NS's competition here
KIRLOSBROS.NS vs ICEMAKE.NS Comparison March 2026
KIRLOSBROS.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIRLOSBROS.NS stands at 124B. In comparison, ICEMAKE.NS has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIRLOSBROS.NS is priced at ₹1,547.80, while ICEMAKE.NS trades at ₹774.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIRLOSBROS.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 31.08, whereas ICEMAKE.NS's P/E ratio is 87.31. In terms of profitability, KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ICEMAKE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KIRLOSBROS.NS is less volatile compared to ICEMAKE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIRLOSBROS.NS.Check ICEMAKE.NS's competition here