Kundan Edifice Ltd. (KEL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KEL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KEL.NS | ₹75.40 | -8.05% | 842.3M | 10.72 | ₹7.65 | N/A |
| CGPOWER.BO | ₹940.75 | +2.92% | 1.5T | 121.80 | ₹7.68 | +0.14% |
| CGPOWER.NS | ₹940.70 | +2.87% | 1.5T | 121.81 | ₹7.68 | +0.14% |
| POLYCAB.NS | ₹9,591.50 | +0.39% | 1.4T | 54.07 | ₹176.75 | +0.37% |
| POLYCAB.BO | ₹9,589.45 | +0.39% | 1.4T | 54.08 | ₹176.72 | +0.37% |
| HAVELLS.BO | ₹1,179.60 | +2.28% | 736.2B | 49.57 | ₹23.66 | +0.85% |
| HAVELLS.NS | ₹1,180.20 | +2.26% | 734.6B | 43.55 | ₹26.89 | +0.85% |
| APARINDS.NS | ₹16,168.00 | +6.22% | 642.1B | 66.06 | ₹242.01 | +0.32% |
| APARINDS.BO | ₹16,146.80 | +5.96% | 640.9B | 65.93 | ₹242.28 | +0.32% |
| KEI.BO | ₹5,385.15 | +0.30% | 522.4B | 60.55 | ₹90.23 | +0.08% |
Stock Comparison
KEL.NS vs CGPOWER.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, CGPOWER.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while CGPOWER.BO trades at ₹940.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas CGPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 121.80. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CGPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to CGPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check CGPOWER.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs CGPOWER.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, CGPOWER.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while CGPOWER.NS trades at ₹940.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas CGPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 121.81. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CGPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to CGPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check CGPOWER.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs POLYCAB.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, POLYCAB.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while POLYCAB.NS trades at ₹9,591.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas POLYCAB.NS's P/E ratio is 54.07. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to POLYCAB.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to POLYCAB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check POLYCAB.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs POLYCAB.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, POLYCAB.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while POLYCAB.BO trades at ₹9,589.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas POLYCAB.BO's P/E ratio is 54.08. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to POLYCAB.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to POLYCAB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check POLYCAB.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs HAVELLS.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, HAVELLS.BO has a market cap of 736.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while HAVELLS.BO trades at ₹1,179.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas HAVELLS.BO's P/E ratio is 49.57. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HAVELLS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to HAVELLS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check HAVELLS.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs HAVELLS.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, HAVELLS.NS has a market cap of 734.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while HAVELLS.NS trades at ₹1,180.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas HAVELLS.NS's P/E ratio is 43.55. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HAVELLS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to HAVELLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check HAVELLS.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs APARINDS.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, APARINDS.NS has a market cap of 642.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while APARINDS.NS trades at ₹16,168.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas APARINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 66.06. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to APARINDS.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to APARINDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check APARINDS.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs APARINDS.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, APARINDS.BO has a market cap of 640.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while APARINDS.BO trades at ₹16,146.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas APARINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 65.93. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to APARINDS.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to APARINDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check APARINDS.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs KEI.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, KEI.BO has a market cap of 522.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while KEI.BO trades at ₹5,385.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas KEI.BO's P/E ratio is 60.55. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KEI.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to KEI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check KEI.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs KEI.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, KEI.NS has a market cap of 522B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while KEI.NS trades at ₹5,386.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas KEI.NS's P/E ratio is 56.82. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KEI.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to KEI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check KEI.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs HONAUT.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, HONAUT.BO has a market cap of 320.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while HONAUT.BO trades at ₹36,630.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas HONAUT.BO's P/E ratio is 60.68. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HONAUT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to HONAUT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check HONAUT.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs HONAUT.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, HONAUT.NS has a market cap of 317.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while HONAUT.NS trades at ₹36,620.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas HONAUT.NS's P/E ratio is 60.55. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HONAUT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to HONAUT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check HONAUT.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs SCHNEIDER.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, SCHNEIDER.BO has a market cap of 290.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while SCHNEIDER.BO trades at ₹1,183.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas SCHNEIDER.BO's P/E ratio is 137.54. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SCHNEIDER.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to SCHNEIDER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check SCHNEIDER.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs SCHNEIDER.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, SCHNEIDER.NS has a market cap of 290.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while SCHNEIDER.NS trades at ₹1,181.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas SCHNEIDER.NS's P/E ratio is 137.42. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SCHNEIDER.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to SCHNEIDER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check SCHNEIDER.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs RRKABEL.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, RRKABEL.NS has a market cap of 247.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while RRKABEL.NS trades at ₹2,201.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas RRKABEL.NS's P/E ratio is 50.19. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RRKABEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to RRKABEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check RRKABEL.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs RRKABEL.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, RRKABEL.BO has a market cap of 247.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while RRKABEL.BO trades at ₹2,200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas RRKABEL.BO's P/E ratio is 50.17. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RRKABEL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to RRKABEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check RRKABEL.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs HBLENGINE.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, HBLENGINE.NS has a market cap of 219.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while HBLENGINE.NS trades at ₹799.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas HBLENGINE.NS's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HBLENGINE.NS's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to HBLENGINE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check HBLENGINE.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs HBLENGINE.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, HBLENGINE.BO has a market cap of 219.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while HBLENGINE.BO trades at ₹799.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas HBLENGINE.BO's P/E ratio is 26.92. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HBLENGINE.BO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to HBLENGINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check HBLENGINE.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs FINCABLES.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, FINCABLES.BO has a market cap of 160B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while FINCABLES.BO trades at ₹1,055.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas FINCABLES.BO's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to FINCABLES.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to FINCABLES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check FINCABLES.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs FINCABLES.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, FINCABLES.NS has a market cap of 159.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while FINCABLES.NS trades at ₹1,055.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas FINCABLES.NS's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to FINCABLES.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to FINCABLES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check FINCABLES.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs ARE&M.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, ARE&M.NS has a market cap of 153.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while ARE&M.NS trades at ₹838.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas ARE&M.NS's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ARE&M.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to ARE&M.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check ARE&M.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs ARE&M.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, ARE&M.BO has a market cap of 152.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while ARE&M.BO trades at ₹839.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas ARE&M.BO's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ARE&M.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to ARE&M.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check ARE&M.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs HBLPOWER.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, HBLPOWER.BO has a market cap of 136.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while HBLPOWER.BO trades at ₹492.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas HBLPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HBLPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to HBLPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check HBLPOWER.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs HBLPOWER.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, HBLPOWER.NS has a market cap of 136.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while HBLPOWER.NS trades at ₹492.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas HBLPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 41.92. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HBLPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to HBLPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check HBLPOWER.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs VGUARD.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, VGUARD.NS has a market cap of 132.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while VGUARD.NS trades at ₹305.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas VGUARD.NS's P/E ratio is 43.35. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VGUARD.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to VGUARD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check VGUARD.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs VGUARD.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, VGUARD.BO has a market cap of 132.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while VGUARD.BO trades at ₹309.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas VGUARD.BO's P/E ratio is 43.31. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VGUARD.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to VGUARD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check VGUARD.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs GRAPHITE.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, GRAPHITE.BO has a market cap of 129.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while GRAPHITE.BO trades at ₹655.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas GRAPHITE.BO's P/E ratio is 53.72. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GRAPHITE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to GRAPHITE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check GRAPHITE.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs GRAPHITE.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, GRAPHITE.NS has a market cap of 129.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while GRAPHITE.NS trades at ₹654.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas GRAPHITE.NS's P/E ratio is 73.77. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GRAPHITE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to GRAPHITE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check GRAPHITE.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs TRIL.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, TRIL.BO has a market cap of 112B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while TRIL.BO trades at ₹745.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas TRIL.BO's P/E ratio is 133.44. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TRIL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to TRIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check TRIL.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs TRIL.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, TRIL.NS has a market cap of 111.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while TRIL.NS trades at ₹745.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas TRIL.NS's P/E ratio is 134.05. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TRIL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to TRIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check TRIL.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs HEG.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, HEG.BO has a market cap of 105.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while HEG.BO trades at ₹541.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas HEG.BO's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HEG.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to HEG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check HEG.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs HEG.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, HEG.NS has a market cap of 104.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while HEG.NS trades at ₹541.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas HEG.NS's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HEG.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to HEG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check HEG.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs AMARAJABAT.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, AMARAJABAT.NS has a market cap of 103.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while AMARAJABAT.NS trades at ₹604.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas AMARAJABAT.NS's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AMARAJABAT.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to AMARAJABAT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check AMARAJABAT.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs VOLTAMP.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, VOLTAMP.BO has a market cap of 100.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while VOLTAMP.BO trades at ₹9,930.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas VOLTAMP.BO's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VOLTAMP.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to VOLTAMP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check VOLTAMP.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs VOLTAMP.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, VOLTAMP.NS has a market cap of 100.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while VOLTAMP.NS trades at ₹9,947.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas VOLTAMP.NS's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VOLTAMP.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to VOLTAMP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check VOLTAMP.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs QPOWER.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, QPOWER.NS has a market cap of 99.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while QPOWER.NS trades at ₹1,247.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas QPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 82.03. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to QPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to QPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check QPOWER.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs TARIL.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, TARIL.NS has a market cap of 95.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while TARIL.NS trades at ₹323.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas TARIL.NS's P/E ratio is 35.98. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to TARIL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to TARIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check TARIL.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs GENUSPOWER.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, GENUSPOWER.BO has a market cap of 88.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while GENUSPOWER.BO trades at ₹328.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas GENUSPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GENUSPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to GENUSPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check GENUSPOWER.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs GENUSPOWER.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, GENUSPOWER.NS has a market cap of 88.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while GENUSPOWER.NS trades at ₹328.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas GENUSPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GENUSPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to GENUSPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check GENUSPOWER.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs PRECWIRE.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, PRECWIRE.NS has a market cap of 73.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while PRECWIRE.NS trades at ₹423.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas PRECWIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 47.06. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PRECWIRE.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to PRECWIRE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check PRECWIRE.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs PRECWIRE.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, PRECWIRE.BO has a market cap of 73.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while PRECWIRE.BO trades at ₹422.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas PRECWIRE.BO's P/E ratio is 65.13. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PRECWIRE.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to PRECWIRE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check PRECWIRE.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs QPOWER.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, QPOWER.BO has a market cap of 70.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while QPOWER.BO trades at ₹909.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas QPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 58.13. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to QPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to QPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check QPOWER.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs SHILCTECH.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, SHILCTECH.BO has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while SHILCTECH.BO trades at ₹4,172.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas SHILCTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 29.94. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SHILCTECH.BO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to SHILCTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check SHILCTECH.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs UNIVCABLES.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, UNIVCABLES.NS has a market cap of 41.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while UNIVCABLES.NS trades at ₹1,191.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas UNIVCABLES.NS's P/E ratio is 25.56. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to UNIVCABLES.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to UNIVCABLES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check UNIVCABLES.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs UNIVCABLES.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, UNIVCABLES.BO has a market cap of 41.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while UNIVCABLES.BO trades at ₹1,190.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas UNIVCABLES.BO's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to UNIVCABLES.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to UNIVCABLES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check UNIVCABLES.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs HIRECT.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, HIRECT.BO has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while HIRECT.BO trades at ₹1,148.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas HIRECT.BO's P/E ratio is 41.10. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HIRECT.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to HIRECT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check HIRECT.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs HIRECT.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, HIRECT.NS has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while HIRECT.NS trades at ₹1,145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas HIRECT.NS's P/E ratio is 83.01. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HIRECT.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to HIRECT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check HIRECT.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs RAMRAT.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, RAMRAT.BO has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while RAMRAT.BO trades at ₹394.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas RAMRAT.BO's P/E ratio is 33.16. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RAMRAT.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to RAMRAT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check RAMRAT.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs RAMRAT.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, RAMRAT.NS has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while RAMRAT.NS trades at ₹394.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas RAMRAT.NS's P/E ratio is 33.09. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RAMRAT.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to RAMRAT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check RAMRAT.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs VMARCIND.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, VMARCIND.NS has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while VMARCIND.NS trades at ₹1,608.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas VMARCIND.NS's P/E ratio is 57.55. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VMARCIND.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is less volatile compared to VMARCIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check VMARCIND.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs BBL.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, BBL.BO has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while BBL.BO trades at ₹2,801.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas BBL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BBL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to BBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check BBL.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs BBL.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, BBL.NS has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while BBL.NS trades at ₹2,796.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas BBL.NS's P/E ratio is 26.31. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BBL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to BBL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check BBL.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs INDOTECH.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, INDOTECH.NS has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while INDOTECH.NS trades at ₹2,634.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas INDOTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 30.68. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to INDOTECH.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to INDOTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check INDOTECH.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs INDOTECH.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, INDOTECH.BO has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while INDOTECH.BO trades at ₹2,655.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas INDOTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 30.57. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to INDOTECH.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to INDOTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check INDOTECH.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs EVEREADY.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, EVEREADY.NS has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while EVEREADY.NS trades at ₹345.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas EVEREADY.NS's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to EVEREADY.NS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to EVEREADY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check EVEREADY.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs EVEREADY.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, EVEREADY.BO has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while EVEREADY.BO trades at ₹345.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas EVEREADY.BO's P/E ratio is 55.29. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to EVEREADY.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to EVEREADY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check EVEREADY.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs SPECTRUM.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, SPECTRUM.NS has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while SPECTRUM.NS trades at ₹1,564.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas SPECTRUM.NS's P/E ratio is 63.28. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SPECTRUM.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to SPECTRUM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check SPECTRUM.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs HPL.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, HPL.NS has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while HPL.NS trades at ₹379.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas HPL.NS's P/E ratio is 26.16. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HPL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to HPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check HPL.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs HPL.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, HPL.BO has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while HPL.BO trades at ₹380.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas HPL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HPL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to HPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check HPL.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs SERVOTECH.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, SERVOTECH.NS has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while SERVOTECH.NS trades at ₹104.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas SERVOTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 71.54. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SERVOTECH.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to SERVOTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check SERVOTECH.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs EXICOM.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, EXICOM.BO has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while EXICOM.BO trades at ₹167.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas EXICOM.BO's P/E ratio is -7.94. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to EXICOM.BO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to EXICOM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check EXICOM.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs EXICOM.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, EXICOM.NS has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while EXICOM.NS trades at ₹167.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas EXICOM.NS's P/E ratio is -7.94. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to EXICOM.NS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to EXICOM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check EXICOM.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs MODINSU.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, MODINSU.BO has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while MODINSU.BO trades at ₹455.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas MODINSU.BO's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MODINSU.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to MODINSU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check MODINSU.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs MARSONS.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, MARSONS.BO has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while MARSONS.BO trades at ₹114.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas MARSONS.BO's P/E ratio is 41.88. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MARSONS.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to MARSONS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check MARSONS.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs DYCL.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, DYCL.NS has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while DYCL.NS trades at ₹326.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas DYCL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DYCL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to DYCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check DYCL.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs DYCL.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, DYCL.BO has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while DYCL.BO trades at ₹326.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas DYCL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DYCL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to DYCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check DYCL.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs SALZERELEC.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, SALZERELEC.BO has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while SALZERELEC.BO trades at ₹655.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas SALZERELEC.BO's P/E ratio is 21.35. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SALZERELEC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to SALZERELEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check SALZERELEC.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs SALZERELEC.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, SALZERELEC.NS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while SALZERELEC.NS trades at ₹656.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas SALZERELEC.NS's P/E ratio is 21.35. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SALZERELEC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to SALZERELEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check SALZERELEC.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs DPEL.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, DPEL.NS has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while DPEL.NS trades at ₹479.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas DPEL.NS's P/E ratio is 107.73. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DPEL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to DPEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check DPEL.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs MODISONLTD.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, MODISONLTD.BO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while MODISONLTD.BO trades at ₹291.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas MODISONLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MODISONLTD.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to MODISONLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check MODISONLTD.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs MODISONLTD.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, MODISONLTD.NS has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while MODISONLTD.NS trades at ₹291.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas MODISONLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MODISONLTD.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to MODISONLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check MODISONLTD.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs HUIL.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, HUIL.BO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while HUIL.BO trades at ₹1,247.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas HUIL.BO's P/E ratio is -33.49. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HUIL.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to HUIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check HUIL.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs MEIL.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, MEIL.NS has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while MEIL.NS trades at ₹313.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas MEIL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MEIL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to MEIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check MEIL.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs PROSTARM.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, PROSTARM.NS has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while PROSTARM.NS trades at ₹142.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas PROSTARM.NS's P/E ratio is 24.59. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PROSTARM.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to PROSTARM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check PROSTARM.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs SALZER.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, SALZER.BO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while SALZER.BO trades at ₹444.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas SALZER.BO's P/E ratio is 32.64. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SALZER.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to SALZER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check SALZER.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs SUPREMEPWR.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, SUPREMEPWR.NS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while SUPREMEPWR.NS trades at ₹244.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas SUPREMEPWR.NS's P/E ratio is 28.95. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SUPREMEPWR.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to SUPREMEPWR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check SUPREMEPWR.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs ELIN.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, ELIN.NS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while ELIN.NS trades at ₹107.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas ELIN.NS's P/E ratio is 23.22. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ELIN.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to ELIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check ELIN.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs ELIN.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, ELIN.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while ELIN.BO trades at ₹107.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas ELIN.BO's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ELIN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to ELIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check ELIN.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs HIGHENE.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, HIGHENE.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while HIGHENE.BO trades at ₹526.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas HIGHENE.BO's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HIGHENE.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to HIGHENE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check HIGHENE.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs S&SPOWER.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, S&SPOWER.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while S&SPOWER.NS trades at ₹385.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas S&SPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 45.78. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to S&SPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to S&SPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check S&SPOWER.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs WSI.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, WSI.NS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while WSI.NS trades at ₹69.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas WSI.NS's P/E ratio is 208.45. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to WSI.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to WSI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check WSI.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs SAAKSHI.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, SAAKSHI.NS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while SAAKSHI.NS trades at ₹260.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas SAAKSHI.NS's P/E ratio is 96.03. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SAAKSHI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to SAAKSHI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check SAAKSHI.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs DENORA.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, DENORA.BO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while DENORA.BO trades at ₹811.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas DENORA.BO's P/E ratio is 47.77. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DENORA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to DENORA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check DENORA.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs DENORA.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, DENORA.NS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while DENORA.NS trades at ₹812.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas DENORA.NS's P/E ratio is 47.54. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DENORA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to DENORA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check DENORA.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs AEPL.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, AEPL.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while AEPL.BO trades at ₹16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas AEPL.BO's P/E ratio is 46.20. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to AEPL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to AEPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check AEPL.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs SHERA.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, SHERA.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while SHERA.NS trades at ₹154.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas SHERA.NS's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SHERA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to SHERA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check SHERA.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs DLTNCBL.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, DLTNCBL.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while DLTNCBL.BO trades at ₹412.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas DLTNCBL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.39. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DLTNCBL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to DLTNCBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check DLTNCBL.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs WSIND.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, WSIND.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while WSIND.BO trades at ₹131.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas WSIND.BO's P/E ratio is -6.02. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to WSIND.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is less volatile compared to WSIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check WSIND.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs RMC.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, RMC.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while RMC.BO trades at ₹311.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas RMC.BO's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RMC.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to RMC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check RMC.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs COSPOWER.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, COSPOWER.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while COSPOWER.BO trades at ₹1,779.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas COSPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to COSPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to COSPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check COSPOWER.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs CORDSCABLE.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, CORDSCABLE.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while CORDSCABLE.NS trades at ₹218.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas CORDSCABLE.NS's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CORDSCABLE.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to CORDSCABLE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check CORDSCABLE.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs CORDSCABLE.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, CORDSCABLE.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while CORDSCABLE.BO trades at ₹218.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas CORDSCABLE.BO's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CORDSCABLE.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to CORDSCABLE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check CORDSCABLE.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs KAYCEEI.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, KAYCEEI.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while KAYCEEI.BO trades at ₹905.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas KAYCEEI.BO's P/E ratio is 64.02. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KAYCEEI.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to KAYCEEI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check KAYCEEI.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs VETO.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, VETO.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while VETO.NS trades at ₹144.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas VETO.NS's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VETO.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to VETO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check VETO.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs VETO.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, VETO.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while VETO.BO trades at ₹144.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas VETO.BO's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VETO.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to VETO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check VETO.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs NIPPOBATRY.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, NIPPOBATRY.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while NIPPOBATRY.BO trades at ₹358.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas NIPPOBATRY.BO's P/E ratio is -10.14. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NIPPOBATRY.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to NIPPOBATRY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check NIPPOBATRY.BO's competition here
KEL.NS vs NIPPOBATRY.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, NIPPOBATRY.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while NIPPOBATRY.NS trades at ₹358.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas NIPPOBATRY.NS's P/E ratio is -10.14. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NIPPOBATRY.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to NIPPOBATRY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check NIPPOBATRY.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs GEEKAYWIRE.NS Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, GEEKAYWIRE.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while GEEKAYWIRE.NS trades at ₹24.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas GEEKAYWIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GEEKAYWIRE.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to GEEKAYWIRE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check GEEKAYWIRE.NS's competition here
KEL.NS vs APLAB.BO Comparison June 2026
KEL.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEL.NS stands at 842.3M. In comparison, APLAB.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEL.NS is priced at ₹75.40, while APLAB.BO trades at ₹102.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.72, whereas APLAB.BO's P/E ratio is 57.87. In terms of profitability, KEL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to APLAB.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KEL.NS is more volatile compared to APLAB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEL.NS.Check APLAB.BO's competition here