Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, KO has a market cap of 308.59B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while KO trades at $71.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas KO's P/E ratio is 28.80. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to KO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, PEP has a market cap of 179.25B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while PEP trades at $130.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas PEP's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PEP's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to PEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, MNST has a market cap of 58.50B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while MNST trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas MNST's P/E ratio is 40.53. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MNST's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to MNST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, NNFSF has a market cap of 56.01B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while NNFSF trades at $4.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas NNFSF's P/E ratio is 33.20. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NNFSF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to NNFSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, CCEP has a market cap of 41.71B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while CCEP trades at $90.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas CCEP's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCEP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to CCEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, CCHBF has a market cap of 18.87B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while CCHBF trades at $51.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas CCHBF's P/E ratio is 20.36. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCHBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to CCHBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, CCHGY has a market cap of 18.85B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while CCHGY trades at $51.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas CCHGY's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCHGY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to CCHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, EMBVF has a market cap of 18.26B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while EMBVF trades at $10.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas EMBVF's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EMBVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to EMBVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, ITONF has a market cap of 13.24B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while ITONF trades at $61.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas ITONF's P/E ratio is 87.73. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ITONF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to ITONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, PRMB has a market cap of 12.56B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while PRMB trades at $33.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas PRMB's P/E ratio is -660.80. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRMB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to PRMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, COKE has a market cap of 10.24B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while COKE trades at $1,174.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas COKE's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COKE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to COKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, CELH has a market cap of 9.15B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while CELH trades at $35.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas CELH's P/E ratio is 78.93. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CELH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to CELH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, BTVCY has a market cap of 7.31B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while BTVCY trades at $29.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas BTVCY's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BTVCY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to BTVCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, YKLTY has a market cap of 6.19B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while YKLTY trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas YKLTY's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YKLTY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to YKLTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, YKLTF has a market cap of 6.06B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while YKLTF trades at $19.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas YKLTF's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YKLTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to YKLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, COCSF has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while COCSF trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas COCSF's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COCSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to COCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, UPCHY has a market cap of 4.88B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while UPCHY trades at $112.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas UPCHY's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UPCHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to UPCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, FIZZ has a market cap of 4.10B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while FIZZ trades at $43.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas FIZZ's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FIZZ's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to FIZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, BTVCF has a market cap of 4.10B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while BTVCF trades at $16.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas BTVCF's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BTVCF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to BTVCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, PRMW has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while PRMW trades at $24.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas PRMW's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRMW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to PRMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, UNPSF has a market cap of 3.83B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while UNPSF trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas UNPSF's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UNPSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to UNPSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, AKO-A has a market cap of 3.51B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while AKO-A trades at $19.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas AKO-A's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AKO-A's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to AKO-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, AKO-B has a market cap of 3.51B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while AKO-B trades at $25.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas AKO-B's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AKO-B's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to AKO-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, CCOJY has a market cap of 3.08B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while CCOJY trades at $8.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas CCOJY's P/E ratio is 126.29. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCOJY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to CCOJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, CCOJF has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while CCOJF trades at $12.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas CCOJF's P/E ratio is 67.79. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CCOJF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to CCOJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, ITOEF has a market cap of 2.22B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while ITOEF trades at $22.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas ITOEF's P/E ratio is 30.14. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ITOEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to ITOEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, AQPW has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while AQPW trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas AQPW's P/E ratio is -26.94. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AQPW's ROE of -7.72%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to AQPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, COCO has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while COCO trades at $35.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas COCO's P/E ratio is 34.65. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COCO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to COCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, KOF has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while KOF trades at $94.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas KOF's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to KOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, OSOPF has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while OSOPF trades at $0.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas OSOPF's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OSOPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to OSOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, FQVTF has a market cap of 1.32B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while FQVTF trades at $10.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas FQVTF's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FQVTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to FQVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, LSDAF has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while LSDAF trades at $149.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas LSDAF's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LSDAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to LSDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, YNAJF has a market cap of 915.84M. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while YNAJF trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas YNAJF's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to YNAJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to YNAJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, BAGFF has a market cap of 734.17M. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while BAGFF trades at $6.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas BAGFF's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BAGFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to BAGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, NJMVF has a market cap of 697.28M. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while NJMVF trades at $19.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas NJMVF's P/E ratio is 106.06. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NJMVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to NJMVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, OTLY has a market cap of 323.52M. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while OTLY trades at $10.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas OTLY's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OTLY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to OTLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, HAATF has a market cap of 201.97M. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while HAATF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas HAATF's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HAATF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to HAATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, ZVIA has a market cap of 133.44M. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while ZVIA trades at $2.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas ZVIA's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZVIA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to ZVIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, REED has a market cap of 78.49M. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while REED trades at $1.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas REED's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to REED's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to REED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, CHFHY has a market cap of 46.85M. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while CHFHY trades at $6.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas CHFHY's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHFHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to CHFHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, SHOT has a market cap of 40.31M. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while SHOT trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas SHOT's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHOT's ROE of -12.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to SHOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, BRFH has a market cap of 37.00M. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while BRFH trades at $2.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas BRFH's P/E ratio is -12.32. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRFH's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to BRFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, JSDA has a market cap of 27.22M. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while JSDA trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas JSDA's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JSDA's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to JSDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, KGKG has a market cap of 12.27M. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while KGKG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas KGKG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KGKG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to KGKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, KRTL has a market cap of 10.00M. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while KRTL trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas KRTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KRTL's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to KRTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, MOJO has a market cap of 9.00M. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while MOJO trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas MOJO's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MOJO's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to MOJO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, FLWBF has a market cap of 4.51M. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while FLWBF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas FLWBF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FLWBF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to FLWBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, DRNK has a market cap of 3.67M. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while DRNK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas DRNK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DRNK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to DRNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, APRU has a market cap of 3.66M. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while APRU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas APRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to APRU's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to APRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, HIRU has a market cap of 3.50M. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while HIRU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas HIRU's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HIRU's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to HIRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, NTEI has a market cap of 2.72M. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while NTEI trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas NTEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NTEI's ROE of -3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to NTEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, INKW has a market cap of 2.33M. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while INKW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas INKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INKW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to INKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, RVBR has a market cap of 2.31M. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while RVBR trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas RVBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RVBR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to RVBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, PLVFF has a market cap of 2.10M. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while PLVFF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas PLVFF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PLVFF's ROE of -4.78%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to PLVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, FBEC has a market cap of 1.76M. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while FBEC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas FBEC's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FBEC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to FBEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, PURT has a market cap of 1.71M. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while PURT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas PURT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PURT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to PURT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, RMHB has a market cap of 1.46M. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while RMHB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas RMHB's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RMHB's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to RMHB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, ALKM has a market cap of 864639.00. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while ALKM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas ALKM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALKM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to ALKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, ASII has a market cap of 796047.00. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while ASII trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas ASII's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASII's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to ASII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, HSEEF has a market cap of 739814.00. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while HSEEF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas HSEEF's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HSEEF's ROE of -19.98%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to HSEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, FMBV has a market cap of 509782.00. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while FMBV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas FMBV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FMBV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to FMBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, VGID has a market cap of 378382.00. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while VGID trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas VGID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VGID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to VGID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, PDPG has a market cap of 371634.00. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while PDPG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas PDPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PDPG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to PDPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, DNDT has a market cap of 348516.00. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while DNDT trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas DNDT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNDT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to DNDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, HFBG has a market cap of 262614.00. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while HFBG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas HFBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HFBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to HFBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, WTER has a market cap of 235830.00. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while WTER trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas WTER's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WTER's ROE of +11.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to WTER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, EQLB has a market cap of 228374.00. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while EQLB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas EQLB's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EQLB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to EQLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, FHBC has a market cap of 199559.00. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while FHBC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas FHBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FHBC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to FHBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, DNAX has a market cap of 171816.00. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while DNAX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas DNAX's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DNAX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to DNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, GHMP has a market cap of 155461.00. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while GHMP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas GHMP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GHMP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to GHMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, MLHC has a market cap of 119956.00. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while MLHC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas MLHC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MLHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to MLHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, TBEV has a market cap of 39715.00. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while TBEV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas TBEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TBEV's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to TBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, NBVG has a market cap of 25613.00. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while NBVG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas NBVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NBVG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to NBVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, STZU has a market cap of 22922.00. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while STZU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas STZU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to STZU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to STZU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, FGFT has a market cap of 22350.00. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while FGFT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas FGFT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FGFT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to FGFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, BVNNF has a market cap of 12326.00. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while BVNNF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas BVNNF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BVNNF's ROE of +11.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to BVNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, BGEM has a market cap of 9262.00. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while BGEM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas BGEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BGEM's ROE of -3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to BGEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, SWRI has a market cap of 1861.00. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while SWRI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas SWRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SWRI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to SWRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, PPBV has a market cap of 1124.00. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while PPBV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas PPBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PPBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to PPBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, HKBV has a market cap of 1080.00. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while HKBV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas HKBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HKBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to HKBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, MCHA has a market cap of 505.00. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while MCHA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas MCHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MCHA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to MCHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, BBDA has a market cap of 287.00. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while BBDA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas BBDA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BBDA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to BBDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, KRED has a market cap of 226.00. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while KRED trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas KRED's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KRED's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to KRED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, AQUI has a market cap of 20.00. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while AQUI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas AQUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AQUI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to AQUI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, ABVG has a market cap of 3.00. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while ABVG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas ABVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABVG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to ABVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, GGGRF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while GGGRF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas GGGRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GGGRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is more volatile compared to GGGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, NBEV comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while NBEV trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas NBEV's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NBEV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to NBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, RMIL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while RMIL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas RMIL's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RMIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to RMIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.

KDP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KDP stands at 46.34B. In comparison, CLCL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, KDP is priced at $34.12, while CLCL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KDP currently has a P/E ratio of 31.02, whereas CLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KDP's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CLCL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDP is less volatile compared to CLCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDP.