Kimball International, Inc.
Kimball International, Inc. (KBAL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KBAL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KBAL | $12.30 | +0.00% | 0 | -23.21 | -$0.53 | +2.93% |
| SN | $97.62 | -4.40% | 13.8B | 19.76 | $4.94 | N/A |
| TPX | $65.81 | +1.04% | 13.7B | 30.05 | $2.19 | +0.94% |
| MHK | $95.35 | -0.95% | 5.9B | 16.07 | $5.93 | N/A |
| PATK | $105.70 | -1.57% | 3.5B | 27.10 | $3.90 | +1.64% |
| ALH | $19.50 | -0.15% | 3.3B | 34.82 | $0.56 | N/A |
| WHR | $50.87 | -2.02% | 2.9B | 8.99 | $5.66 | +8.79% |
| TILE | $24.48 | -1.01% | 1.4B | 12.49 | $1.96 | +0.33% |
| LZB | $31.96 | +0.06% | 1.3B | 15.97 | $2.00 | +2.89% |
| LEG | $9.60 | +0.21% | 1.3B | 5.69 | $1.69 | +2.07% |
Stock Comparison
KBAL vs SN Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, SN has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while SN trades at $97.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas SN's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to SN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check SN's competition here
KBAL vs TPX Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, TPX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while TPX trades at $65.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas TPX's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TPX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to TPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check TPX's competition here
KBAL vs MHK Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, MHK has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while MHK trades at $95.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas MHK's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MHK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to MHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check MHK's competition here
KBAL vs PATK Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, PATK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while PATK trades at $105.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas PATK's P/E ratio is 27.10. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PATK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to PATK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check PATK's competition here
KBAL vs ALH Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, ALH has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while ALH trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas ALH's P/E ratio is 34.82. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ALH's ROE of -4.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to ALH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check ALH's competition here
KBAL vs WHR Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, WHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while WHR trades at $50.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas WHR's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WHR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to WHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check WHR's competition here
KBAL vs TILE Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, TILE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while TILE trades at $24.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas TILE's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TILE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to TILE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check TILE's competition here
KBAL vs LZB Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, LZB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while LZB trades at $31.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas LZB's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LZB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to LZB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check LZB's competition here
KBAL vs LEG Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, LEG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while LEG trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas LEG's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LEG's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to LEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check LEG's competition here
KBAL vs MBC Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, MBC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while MBC trades at $8.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas MBC's P/E ratio is 39.14. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MBC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to MBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check MBC's competition here
KBAL vs MLKN Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, MLKN has a market cap of 965.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while MLKN trades at $14.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas MLKN's P/E ratio is 93.93. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MLKN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to MLKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check MLKN's competition here
KBAL vs AMWD Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, AMWD has a market cap of 576.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while AMWD trades at $39.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas AMWD's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AMWD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to AMWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check AMWD's competition here
KBAL vs ETD Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, ETD has a market cap of 562.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while ETD trades at $22.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas ETD's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ETD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to ETD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check ETD's competition here
KBAL vs XWIN Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, XWIN has a market cap of 308M. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while XWIN trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas XWIN's P/E ratio is 238.33. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to XWIN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to XWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check XWIN's competition here
KBAL vs HBB Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, HBB has a market cap of 242.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while HBB trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas HBB's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HBB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to HBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check HBB's competition here
KBAL vs FLXS Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, FLXS has a market cap of 239.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while FLXS trades at $44.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas FLXS's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FLXS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to FLXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check FLXS's competition here
KBAL vs LOVE Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, LOVE has a market cap of 205.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while LOVE trades at $14.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas LOVE's P/E ratio is 50.14. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LOVE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to LOVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check LOVE's competition here
KBAL vs HOFT Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, HOFT has a market cap of 140.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while HOFT trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas HOFT's P/E ratio is -6.79. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HOFT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to HOFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check HOFT's competition here
KBAL vs BSET Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, BSET has a market cap of 123.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while BSET trades at $14.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas BSET's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BSET's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to BSET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check BSET's competition here
KBAL vs LCUT Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, LCUT has a market cap of 120.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while LCUT trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas LCUT's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LCUT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to LCUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check LCUT's competition here
KBAL vs VIRC Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, VIRC has a market cap of 98.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while VIRC trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas VIRC's P/E ratio is 24.12. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VIRC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to VIRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check VIRC's competition here
KBAL vs KEQU Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, KEQU has a market cap of 97.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while KEQU trades at $34.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas KEQU's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KEQU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to KEQU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check KEQU's competition here
KBAL vs NVFY Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, NVFY has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while NVFY trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas NVFY's P/E ratio is -9.09. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NVFY's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to NVFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check NVFY's competition here
KBAL vs COOK Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, COOK has a market cap of 78.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while COOK trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas COOK's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to COOK's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to COOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check COOK's competition here
KBAL vs VIOT Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, VIOT has a market cap of 71.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while VIOT trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas VIOT's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VIOT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to VIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check VIOT's competition here
KBAL vs PRPL Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, PRPL has a market cap of 70.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while PRPL trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas PRPL's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PRPL's ROE of +10.78%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to PRPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check PRPL's competition here
KBAL vs SNBR Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, SNBR has a market cap of 45.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while SNBR trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas SNBR's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SNBR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to SNBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check SNBR's competition here
KBAL vs NTZ Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, NTZ has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while NTZ trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas NTZ's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NTZ's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to NTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check NTZ's competition here
KBAL vs CRWS Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, CRWS has a market cap of 27.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while CRWS trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas CRWS's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CRWS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to CRWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check CRWS's competition here
KBAL vs NCL Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, NCL has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while NCL trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas NCL's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NCL's ROE of -5.54%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to NCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check NCL's competition here
KBAL vs EFOI Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, EFOI has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while EFOI trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas EFOI's P/E ratio is -10.33. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EFOI's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to EFOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check EFOI's competition here
KBAL vs FGI Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, FGI has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while FGI trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas FGI's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FGI's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to FGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check FGI's competition here
KBAL vs ATER Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, ATER has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while ATER trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas ATER's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ATER's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to ATER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check ATER's competition here
KBAL vs IRBT Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, IRBT has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while IRBT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas IRBT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IRBT's ROE of -32.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is more volatile compared to IRBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check IRBT's competition here
KBAL vs AUVIP Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, AUVIP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while AUVIP trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas AUVIP's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AUVIP's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to AUVIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check AUVIP's competition here
KBAL vs AUVI Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, AUVI has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while AUVI trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas AUVI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AUVI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to AUVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check AUVI's competition here
KBAL vs FGIWW Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, FGIWW has a market cap of 67.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while FGIWW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas FGIWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FGIWW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to FGIWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check FGIWW's competition here
KBAL vs WEBR Comparison April 2026
KBAL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KBAL stands at 0. In comparison, WEBR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KBAL is priced at $12.30, while WEBR trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KBAL currently has a P/E ratio of -23.21, whereas WEBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KBAL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WEBR's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, KBAL is less volatile compared to WEBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KBAL.Check WEBR's competition here