Jullundur Motor Agency (Delhi) Limited (JMA.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (JMA.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JMA.NS | ₹94.60 | +0.16% | 2.2B | 7.20 | ₹13.13 | +2.11% |
| MOTHERSON.NS | ₹143.40 | +1.89% | 1.5T | 39.29 | ₹3.65 | +0.41% |
| MOTHERSON.BO | ₹143.40 | +1.88% | 1.5T | 39.07 | ₹3.67 | +0.41% |
| BOSCHLTD.NS | ₹39,060.00 | +3.98% | 1.2T | 41.53 | ₹940.97 | +1.31% |
| BOSCHLTD.BO | ₹39,054.10 | +4.02% | 1.2T | 42.92 | ₹910.02 | +1.31% |
| BHARATFORG.BO | ₹1,946.00 | +0.22% | 931B | 86.07 | ₹22.61 | +0.41% |
| BHARATFORG.NS | ₹1,945.10 | +0.11% | 929.9B | 86.76 | ₹22.42 | +0.41% |
| SCHAEFFLER.NS | ₹4,055.70 | +5.06% | 633.9B | 52.14 | ₹77.79 | +0.86% |
| SCHAEFFLER.BO | ₹4,050.00 | +4.76% | 629.6B | 52.06 | ₹77.80 | +0.86% |
| UNOMINDA.NS | ₹1,057.70 | -0.90% | 610.8B | 51.07 | ₹20.71 | +0.25% |
Stock Comparison
JMA.NS vs MOTHERSON.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MOTHERSON.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while MOTHERSON.NS trades at ₹143.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas MOTHERSON.NS's P/E ratio is 39.29. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MOTHERSON.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to MOTHERSON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check MOTHERSON.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs MOTHERSON.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MOTHERSON.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while MOTHERSON.BO trades at ₹143.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas MOTHERSON.BO's P/E ratio is 39.07. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MOTHERSON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to MOTHERSON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check MOTHERSON.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs BOSCHLTD.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BOSCHLTD.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while BOSCHLTD.NS trades at ₹39,060.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas BOSCHLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 41.53. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOSCHLTD.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to BOSCHLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check BOSCHLTD.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs BOSCHLTD.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BOSCHLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while BOSCHLTD.BO trades at ₹39,054.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas BOSCHLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOSCHLTD.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to BOSCHLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check BOSCHLTD.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs BHARATFORG.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BHARATFORG.BO has a market cap of 931B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while BHARATFORG.BO trades at ₹1,946.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas BHARATFORG.BO's P/E ratio is 86.07. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHARATFORG.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to BHARATFORG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check BHARATFORG.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs BHARATFORG.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BHARATFORG.NS has a market cap of 929.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while BHARATFORG.NS trades at ₹1,945.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas BHARATFORG.NS's P/E ratio is 86.76. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHARATFORG.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to BHARATFORG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check BHARATFORG.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs SCHAEFFLER.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SCHAEFFLER.NS has a market cap of 633.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while SCHAEFFLER.NS trades at ₹4,055.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas SCHAEFFLER.NS's P/E ratio is 52.14. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCHAEFFLER.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to SCHAEFFLER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check SCHAEFFLER.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs SCHAEFFLER.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SCHAEFFLER.BO has a market cap of 629.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while SCHAEFFLER.BO trades at ₹4,050.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas SCHAEFFLER.BO's P/E ratio is 52.06. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCHAEFFLER.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to SCHAEFFLER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check SCHAEFFLER.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs UNOMINDA.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, UNOMINDA.NS has a market cap of 610.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while UNOMINDA.NS trades at ₹1,057.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas UNOMINDA.NS's P/E ratio is 51.07. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UNOMINDA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to UNOMINDA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check UNOMINDA.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs UNOMINDA.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, UNOMINDA.BO has a market cap of 610.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while UNOMINDA.BO trades at ₹1,057.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas UNOMINDA.BO's P/E ratio is 51.04. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UNOMINDA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to UNOMINDA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check UNOMINDA.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs MRF.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MRF.NS has a market cap of 532.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while MRF.NS trades at ₹125,515.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas MRF.NS's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MRF.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to MRF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check MRF.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs MRF.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MRF.BO has a market cap of 532B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while MRF.BO trades at ₹125,457.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas MRF.BO's P/E ratio is 28.74. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MRF.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to MRF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check MRF.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs BALKRISIND.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BALKRISIND.NS has a market cap of 389.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while BALKRISIND.NS trades at ₹2,013.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas BALKRISIND.NS's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BALKRISIND.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to BALKRISIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check BALKRISIND.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs BALKRISIND.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BALKRISIND.BO has a market cap of 388.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while BALKRISIND.BO trades at ₹2,012.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas BALKRISIND.BO's P/E ratio is 29.68. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BALKRISIND.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to BALKRISIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check BALKRISIND.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs SONACOMS.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SONACOMS.BO has a market cap of 368.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while SONACOMS.BO trades at ₹593.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas SONACOMS.BO's P/E ratio is 57.60. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SONACOMS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to SONACOMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check SONACOMS.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs SONACOMS.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SONACOMS.NS has a market cap of 368.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while SONACOMS.NS trades at ₹593.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas SONACOMS.NS's P/E ratio is 57.52. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SONACOMS.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to SONACOMS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check SONACOMS.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs ENDURANCE.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ENDURANCE.BO has a market cap of 353.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while ENDURANCE.BO trades at ₹2,511.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas ENDURANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 37.17. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENDURANCE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to ENDURANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check ENDURANCE.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs ENDURANCE.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ENDURANCE.NS has a market cap of 352B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while ENDURANCE.NS trades at ₹2,502.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas ENDURANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 37.02. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ENDURANCE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to ENDURANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check ENDURANCE.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs EXIDEIND.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, EXIDEIND.BO has a market cap of 333.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while EXIDEIND.BO trades at ₹391.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas EXIDEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 40.24. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXIDEIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to EXIDEIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check EXIDEIND.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs EXIDEIND.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, EXIDEIND.NS has a market cap of 333.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while EXIDEIND.NS trades at ₹391.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas EXIDEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 38.96. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXIDEIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to EXIDEIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check EXIDEIND.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs ZFCVINDIA.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ZFCVINDIA.BO has a market cap of 279.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while ZFCVINDIA.BO trades at ₹14,700.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas ZFCVINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 53.86. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZFCVINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to ZFCVINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check ZFCVINDIA.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs ZFCVINDIA.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ZFCVINDIA.NS has a market cap of 279.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while ZFCVINDIA.NS trades at ₹14,714.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas ZFCVINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 54.05. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZFCVINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to ZFCVINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check ZFCVINDIA.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs TVSHLTD.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TVSHLTD.BO has a market cap of 269.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while TVSHLTD.BO trades at ₹13,314.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas TVSHLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TVSHLTD.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to TVSHLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check TVSHLTD.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs TVSHLTD.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TVSHLTD.NS has a market cap of 269.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while TVSHLTD.NS trades at ₹13,310.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas TVSHLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TVSHLTD.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to TVSHLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check TVSHLTD.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs APOLLOTYRE.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, APOLLOTYRE.NS has a market cap of 251.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while APOLLOTYRE.NS trades at ₹396.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas APOLLOTYRE.NS's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APOLLOTYRE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to APOLLOTYRE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check APOLLOTYRE.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs APOLLOTYRE.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, APOLLOTYRE.BO has a market cap of 251.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while APOLLOTYRE.BO trades at ₹396.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas APOLLOTYRE.BO's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to APOLLOTYRE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to APOLLOTYRE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check APOLLOTYRE.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs MSUMI.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MSUMI.BO has a market cap of 244.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while MSUMI.BO trades at ₹36.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas MSUMI.BO's P/E ratio is 39.21. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MSUMI.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to MSUMI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check MSUMI.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs MSUMI.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MSUMI.NS has a market cap of 244.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while MSUMI.NS trades at ₹36.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas MSUMI.NS's P/E ratio is 39.19. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MSUMI.NS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to MSUMI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check MSUMI.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs ASAHIINDIA.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ASAHIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 225.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while ASAHIINDIA.NS trades at ₹883.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas ASAHIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 63.80. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASAHIINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to ASAHIINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check ASAHIINDIA.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs ASAHIINDIA.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ASAHIINDIA.BO has a market cap of 224.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while ASAHIINDIA.BO trades at ₹879.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas ASAHIINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 63.51. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASAHIINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to ASAHIINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check ASAHIINDIA.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs CRAFTSMAN.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CRAFTSMAN.BO has a market cap of 213.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while CRAFTSMAN.BO trades at ₹8,887.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas CRAFTSMAN.BO's P/E ratio is 55.25. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRAFTSMAN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to CRAFTSMAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check CRAFTSMAN.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs CRAFTSMAN.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CRAFTSMAN.NS has a market cap of 212.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while CRAFTSMAN.NS trades at ₹8,917.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas CRAFTSMAN.NS's P/E ratio is 55.44. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check CRAFTSMAN.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs BELRISE.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BELRISE.NS has a market cap of 203.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while BELRISE.NS trades at ₹228.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas BELRISE.NS's P/E ratio is 39.21. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BELRISE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to BELRISE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check BELRISE.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs BELRISE.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BELRISE.BO has a market cap of 203B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while BELRISE.BO trades at ₹228.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas BELRISE.BO's P/E ratio is 40.44. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BELRISE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to BELRISE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check BELRISE.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs MAHINDCIE.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MAHINDCIE.NS has a market cap of 194.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while MAHINDCIE.NS trades at ₹512.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas MAHINDCIE.NS's P/E ratio is 30.59. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAHINDCIE.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to MAHINDCIE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check MAHINDCIE.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs SUNDRMFAST.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SUNDRMFAST.BO has a market cap of 176.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while SUNDRMFAST.BO trades at ₹841.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas SUNDRMFAST.BO's P/E ratio is 31.91. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUNDRMFAST.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to SUNDRMFAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check SUNDRMFAST.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs SUNDRMFAST.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SUNDRMFAST.NS has a market cap of 176.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while SUNDRMFAST.NS trades at ₹840.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas SUNDRMFAST.NS's P/E ratio is 29.87. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUNDRMFAST.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to SUNDRMFAST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check SUNDRMFAST.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs CIEINDIA.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CIEINDIA.NS has a market cap of 171B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while CIEINDIA.NS trades at ₹450.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas CIEINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIEINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to CIEINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check CIEINDIA.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs CIEINDIA.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CIEINDIA.BO has a market cap of 171B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while CIEINDIA.BO trades at ₹451.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas CIEINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIEINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to CIEINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check CIEINDIA.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs JBMA.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, JBMA.BO has a market cap of 161.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while JBMA.BO trades at ₹683.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas JBMA.BO's P/E ratio is 211.03. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JBMA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to JBMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check JBMA.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs JBMA.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, JBMA.NS has a market cap of 161.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while JBMA.NS trades at ₹683.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas JBMA.NS's P/E ratio is 73.76. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JBMA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to JBMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check JBMA.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs SHRIPISTON.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SHRIPISTON.NS has a market cap of 155.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while SHRIPISTON.NS trades at ₹3,524.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas SHRIPISTON.NS's P/E ratio is 28.12. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHRIPISTON.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to SHRIPISTON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check SHRIPISTON.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs MINDACORP.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MINDACORP.NS has a market cap of 150B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while MINDACORP.NS trades at ₹637.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas MINDACORP.NS's P/E ratio is 42.31. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MINDACORP.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to MINDACORP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check MINDACORP.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs MINDACORP.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MINDACORP.BO has a market cap of 150B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while MINDACORP.BO trades at ₹636.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas MINDACORP.BO's P/E ratio is 42.28. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MINDACORP.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to MINDACORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check MINDACORP.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs GABRIEL.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GABRIEL.NS has a market cap of 149.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while GABRIEL.NS trades at ₹1,040.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas GABRIEL.NS's P/E ratio is 59.29. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GABRIEL.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to GABRIEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check GABRIEL.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs GABRIEL.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GABRIEL.BO has a market cap of 149.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while GABRIEL.BO trades at ₹1,040.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas GABRIEL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GABRIEL.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to GABRIEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check GABRIEL.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs MAHSCOOTER.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MAHSCOOTER.NS has a market cap of 141B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while MAHSCOOTER.NS trades at ₹12,335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas MAHSCOOTER.NS's P/E ratio is 45.44. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAHSCOOTER.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to MAHSCOOTER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check MAHSCOOTER.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs MAHSCOOTER.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MAHSCOOTER.BO has a market cap of 141B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while MAHSCOOTER.BO trades at ₹12,343.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas MAHSCOOTER.BO's P/E ratio is 39.47. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAHSCOOTER.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to MAHSCOOTER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check MAHSCOOTER.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs CEATLTD.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CEATLTD.NS has a market cap of 134.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while CEATLTD.NS trades at ₹3,334.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas CEATLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CEATLTD.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to CEATLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check CEATLTD.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs CEATLTD.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CEATLTD.BO has a market cap of 134.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while CEATLTD.BO trades at ₹3,333.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas CEATLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CEATLTD.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to CEATLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check CEATLTD.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs LUMAXTECH.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, LUMAXTECH.NS has a market cap of 111.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while LUMAXTECH.NS trades at ₹1,634.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas LUMAXTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LUMAXTECH.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to LUMAXTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check LUMAXTECH.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs LUMAXTECH.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, LUMAXTECH.BO has a market cap of 111.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while LUMAXTECH.BO trades at ₹1,634.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas LUMAXTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 52.56. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LUMAXTECH.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to LUMAXTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check LUMAXTECH.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs SUNCLAYLTD.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SUNCLAYLTD.NS has a market cap of 109.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while SUNCLAYLTD.NS trades at ₹5,426.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas SUNCLAYLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUNCLAYLTD.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to SUNCLAYLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check SUNCLAYLTD.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs JKTYRE.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, JKTYRE.NS has a market cap of 109B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while JKTYRE.NS trades at ₹378.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas JKTYRE.NS's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JKTYRE.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to JKTYRE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check JKTYRE.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs JKTYRE.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, JKTYRE.BO has a market cap of 108.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while JKTYRE.BO trades at ₹377.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas JKTYRE.BO's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JKTYRE.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to JKTYRE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check JKTYRE.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs BANCOINDIA.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BANCOINDIA.BO has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while BANCOINDIA.BO trades at ₹689.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas BANCOINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 43.69. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BANCOINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to BANCOINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check BANCOINDIA.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs BANCOINDIA.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BANCOINDIA.NS has a market cap of 98.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while BANCOINDIA.NS trades at ₹689.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas BANCOINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BANCOINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to BANCOINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check BANCOINDIA.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs VARROC.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VARROC.BO has a market cap of 88.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while VARROC.BO trades at ₹570.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas VARROC.BO's P/E ratio is 38.69. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VARROC.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to VARROC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check VARROC.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs VARROC.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VARROC.NS has a market cap of 87.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while VARROC.NS trades at ₹570.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas VARROC.NS's P/E ratio is 38.72. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VARROC.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to VARROC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check VARROC.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs ASKAUTOLTD.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ASKAUTOLTD.NS has a market cap of 84.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while ASKAUTOLTD.NS trades at ₹429.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas ASKAUTOLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 28.51. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASKAUTOLTD.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to ASKAUTOLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check ASKAUTOLTD.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs ASKAUTOLTD.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ASKAUTOLTD.BO has a market cap of 84.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while ASKAUTOLTD.BO trades at ₹428.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas ASKAUTOLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 28.44. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASKAUTOLTD.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to ASKAUTOLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check ASKAUTOLTD.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs BENGALASM.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BENGALASM.BO has a market cap of 73.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while BENGALASM.BO trades at ₹6,476.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas BENGALASM.BO's P/E ratio is 27.98. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BENGALASM.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to BENGALASM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check BENGALASM.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs DYNAMATECH.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.NS has a market cap of 69.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while DYNAMATECH.NS trades at ₹10,171.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas DYNAMATECH.NS's P/E ratio is 213.09. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DYNAMATECH.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check DYNAMATECH.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs DYNAMATECH.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.BO has a market cap of 68.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while DYNAMATECH.BO trades at ₹10,168.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas DYNAMATECH.BO's P/E ratio is 212.15. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DYNAMATECH.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check DYNAMATECH.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs SJS.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SJS.NS has a market cap of 67.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while SJS.NS trades at ₹2,115.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas SJS.NS's P/E ratio is 39.92. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SJS.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to SJS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check SJS.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs SJS.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SJS.BO has a market cap of 67.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while SJS.BO trades at ₹2,112.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas SJS.BO's P/E ratio is 41.37. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SJS.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to SJS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check SJS.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs PRICOLLTD.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PRICOLLTD.NS has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while PRICOLLTD.NS trades at ₹550.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas PRICOLLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRICOLLTD.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to PRICOLLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check PRICOLLTD.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs PRICOLLTD.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PRICOLLTD.BO has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while PRICOLLTD.BO trades at ₹550.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas PRICOLLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 26.76. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRICOLLTD.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to PRICOLLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check PRICOLLTD.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs SUPRAJIT.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SUPRAJIT.BO has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while SUPRAJIT.BO trades at ₹460.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas SUPRAJIT.BO's P/E ratio is 39.68. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUPRAJIT.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to SUPRAJIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check SUPRAJIT.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs SUPRAJIT.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SUPRAJIT.NS has a market cap of 63.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while SUPRAJIT.NS trades at ₹460.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas SUPRAJIT.NS's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUPRAJIT.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to SUPRAJIT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check SUPRAJIT.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs FIEMIND.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FIEMIND.BO has a market cap of 60.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while FIEMIND.BO trades at ₹2,309.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas FIEMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 26.77. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FIEMIND.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to FIEMIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check FIEMIND.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs FIEMIND.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FIEMIND.NS has a market cap of 60.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while FIEMIND.NS trades at ₹2,308.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas FIEMIND.NS's P/E ratio is 23.77. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FIEMIND.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to FIEMIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check FIEMIND.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs LUMAXIND.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, LUMAXIND.NS has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while LUMAXIND.NS trades at ₹5,311.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas LUMAXIND.NS's P/E ratio is 28.78. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LUMAXIND.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to LUMAXIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check LUMAXIND.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs LUMAXIND.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, LUMAXIND.BO has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while LUMAXIND.BO trades at ₹5,302.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas LUMAXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 28.73. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LUMAXIND.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to LUMAXIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check LUMAXIND.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs JAMNAAUTO.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, JAMNAAUTO.NS has a market cap of 48.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while JAMNAAUTO.NS trades at ₹121.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas JAMNAAUTO.NS's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JAMNAAUTO.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to JAMNAAUTO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check JAMNAAUTO.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs LGBBROSLTD.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, LGBBROSLTD.BO has a market cap of 48.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while LGBBROSLTD.BO trades at ₹1,525.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas LGBBROSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LGBBROSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to LGBBROSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check LGBBROSLTD.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs LGBBROSLTD.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, LGBBROSLTD.NS has a market cap of 48.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while LGBBROSLTD.NS trades at ₹1,524.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas LGBBROSLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 15.24. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LGBBROSLTD.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to LGBBROSLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check LGBBROSLTD.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs JAMNAAUTO.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, JAMNAAUTO.BO has a market cap of 48.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while JAMNAAUTO.BO trades at ₹121.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas JAMNAAUTO.BO's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JAMNAAUTO.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to JAMNAAUTO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check JAMNAAUTO.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs SUBROS.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SUBROS.BO has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while SUBROS.BO trades at ₹722.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas SUBROS.BO's P/E ratio is 28.43. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUBROS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to SUBROS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check SUBROS.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs SUBROS.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SUBROS.NS has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while SUBROS.NS trades at ₹721.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas SUBROS.NS's P/E ratio is 28.40. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUBROS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to SUBROS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check SUBROS.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs SWARAJENG.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SWARAJENG.NS has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while SWARAJENG.NS trades at ₹3,703.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas SWARAJENG.NS's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWARAJENG.NS's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to SWARAJENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check SWARAJENG.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs SWARAJENG.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SWARAJENG.BO has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while SWARAJENG.BO trades at ₹3,716.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas SWARAJENG.BO's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWARAJENG.BO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to SWARAJENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check SWARAJENG.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs SHARDAMOTR.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SHARDAMOTR.NS has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while SHARDAMOTR.NS trades at ₹782.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas SHARDAMOTR.NS's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHARDAMOTR.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to SHARDAMOTR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check SHARDAMOTR.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs SHARDAMOTR.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SHARDAMOTR.BO has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while SHARDAMOTR.BO trades at ₹781.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas SHARDAMOTR.BO's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHARDAMOTR.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to SHARDAMOTR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check SHARDAMOTR.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs SANDHAR.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SANDHAR.BO has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while SANDHAR.BO trades at ₹712.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas SANDHAR.BO's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SANDHAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is less volatile compared to SANDHAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check SANDHAR.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs SANDHAR.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SANDHAR.NS has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while SANDHAR.NS trades at ₹712.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas SANDHAR.NS's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SANDHAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is less volatile compared to SANDHAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check SANDHAR.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs NRBBEARING.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, NRBBEARING.NS has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while NRBBEARING.NS trades at ₹425.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas NRBBEARING.NS's P/E ratio is 28.87. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NRBBEARING.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to NRBBEARING.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check NRBBEARING.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs NRBBEARING.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, NRBBEARING.BO has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while NRBBEARING.BO trades at ₹425.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas NRBBEARING.BO's P/E ratio is 44.88. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NRBBEARING.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to NRBBEARING.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check NRBBEARING.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs WHEELS.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, WHEELS.BO has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while WHEELS.BO trades at ₹1,634.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas WHEELS.BO's P/E ratio is 25.40. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WHEELS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to WHEELS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check WHEELS.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs WHEELS.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, WHEELS.NS has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while WHEELS.NS trades at ₹1,634.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas WHEELS.NS's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WHEELS.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to WHEELS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check WHEELS.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs SSWL.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SSWL.BO has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while SSWL.BO trades at ₹231.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas SSWL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSWL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to SSWL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check SSWL.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs SSWL.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SSWL.NS has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while SSWL.NS trades at ₹231.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas SSWL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSWL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to SSWL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check SSWL.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs JTEKTINDIA.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, JTEKTINDIA.NS has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while JTEKTINDIA.NS trades at ₹125.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas JTEKTINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 44.14. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JTEKTINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to JTEKTINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check JTEKTINDIA.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs JTEKTINDIA.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, JTEKTINDIA.BO has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while JTEKTINDIA.BO trades at ₹125.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas JTEKTINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 44.17. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JTEKTINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to JTEKTINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check JTEKTINDIA.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs TVSSRICHAK.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TVSSRICHAK.BO has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while TVSSRICHAK.BO trades at ₹3,988.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas TVSSRICHAK.BO's P/E ratio is 42.88. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TVSSRICHAK.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to TVSSRICHAK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check TVSSRICHAK.BO's competition here
JMA.NS vs TVSSRICHAK.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TVSSRICHAK.NS has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while TVSSRICHAK.NS trades at ₹3,985.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas TVSSRICHAK.NS's P/E ratio is 42.83. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TVSSRICHAK.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to TVSSRICHAK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check TVSSRICHAK.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs CARRARO.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CARRARO.NS has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while CARRARO.NS trades at ₹525.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas CARRARO.NS's P/E ratio is 22.92. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CARRARO.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to CARRARO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check CARRARO.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs AUTOAXLES.NS Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AUTOAXLES.NS has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while AUTOAXLES.NS trades at ₹1,689.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas AUTOAXLES.NS's P/E ratio is 15.52. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUTOAXLES.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to AUTOAXLES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check AUTOAXLES.NS's competition here
JMA.NS vs RML.BO Comparison June 2026
JMA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, JMA.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RML.BO has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, JMA.NS is priced at ₹94.60, while RML.BO trades at ₹920.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
JMA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.20, whereas RML.BO's P/E ratio is 33.03. In terms of profitability, JMA.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RML.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, JMA.NS is more volatile compared to RML.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for JMA.NS.Check RML.BO's competition here