Independence Realty Trust, Inc. (IRT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IRT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Residential Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IRT | $17.33 | +0.99% | 4.1B | 15.07 | $1.15 | +3.98% |
| AVB | $193.96 | +1.85% | 27.5B | 21.38 | $9.07 | +3.64% |
| EQR | $69.83 | +1.75% | 26.2B | 21.29 | $3.28 | +4.00% |
| ESS | $298.33 | +1.07% | 19.2B | 21.89 | $13.63 | +3.46% |
| INVH | $30.53 | +0.59% | 18.1B | 31.15 | $0.98 | +3.90% |
| MAA | $142.19 | +1.61% | 16.5B | 18.64 | $7.63 | +4.28% |
| MAA-PI | $53.65 | -1.01% | 15.8B | 16.05 | $3.34 | +4.28% |
| SUI | $123.63 | +2.36% | 15.2B | 24.93 | $4.96 | +3.49% |
| UDR | $41.09 | +1.16% | 13.4B | 16.37 | $2.51 | +4.20% |
| AMH-PG | $22.88 | +0.18% | 12.9B | 18.71 | $1.22 | +3.70% |
Stock Comparison
IRT vs AVB Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AVB has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while AVB trades at $193.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas AVB's P/E ratio is 21.38. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AVB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to AVB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AVB's competition here
IRT vs EQR Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EQR has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while EQR trades at $69.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas EQR's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EQR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to EQR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check EQR's competition here
IRT vs ESS Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ESS has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while ESS trades at $298.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas ESS's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ESS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to ESS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check ESS's competition here
IRT vs INVH Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, INVH has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while INVH trades at $30.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas INVH's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INVH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to INVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check INVH's competition here
IRT vs MAA Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MAA has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while MAA trades at $142.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas MAA's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MAA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to MAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check MAA's competition here
IRT vs MAA-PI Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MAA-PI has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while MAA-PI trades at $53.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas MAA-PI's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MAA-PI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to MAA-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check MAA-PI's competition here
IRT vs SUI Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SUI has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while SUI trades at $123.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas SUI's P/E ratio is 24.93. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to SUI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check SUI's competition here
IRT vs UDR Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UDR has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while UDR trades at $41.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas UDR's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UDR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to UDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check UDR's competition here
IRT vs AMH-PG Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AMH-PG has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while AMH-PG trades at $22.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas AMH-PG's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMH-PG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to AMH-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AMH-PG's competition here
IRT vs ELS Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ELS has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while ELS trades at $66.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas ELS's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ELS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to ELS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check ELS's competition here
IRT vs AMH-PH Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AMH-PH has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while AMH-PH trades at $23.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas AMH-PH's P/E ratio is 19.29. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMH-PH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to AMH-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AMH-PH's competition here
IRT vs AMH Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AMH has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while AMH trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas AMH's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to AMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AMH's competition here
IRT vs CPT Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CPT has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while CPT trades at $117.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas CPT's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CPT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to CPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check CPT's competition here
IRT vs AIRC Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AIRC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while AIRC trades at $39.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas AIRC's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AIRC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to AIRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AIRC's competition here
IRT vs MRP Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MRP has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while MRP trades at $29.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas MRP's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MRP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to MRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check MRP's competition here
IRT vs VRE Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VRE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while VRE trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas VRE's P/E ratio is 26.01. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VRE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to VRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check VRE's competition here
IRT vs UMH Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UMH has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while UMH trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas UMH's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UMH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to UMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check UMH's competition here
IRT vs UMH-PD Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UMH-PD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while UMH-PD trades at $21.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas UMH-PD's P/E ratio is 97.42. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UMH-PD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to UMH-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check UMH-PD's competition here
IRT vs CSR Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CSR has a market cap of 961.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while CSR trades at $57.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas CSR's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CSR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to CSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check CSR's competition here
IRT vs CSR-PC Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CSR-PC has a market cap of 938.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while CSR-PC trades at $84.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas CSR-PC's P/E ratio is -117.54. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CSR-PC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to CSR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check CSR-PC's competition here
IRT vs NXRT Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NXRT has a market cap of 728.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while NXRT trades at $28.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas NXRT's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NXRT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to NXRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check NXRT's competition here
IRT vs AIV Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AIV has a market cap of 425.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while AIV trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas AIV's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AIV's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to AIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AIV's competition here
IRT vs BRT Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BRT has a market cap of 278.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while BRT trades at $14.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas BRT's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BRT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to BRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check BRT's competition here
IRT vs SUNS Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SUNS has a market cap of 110.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while SUNS trades at $8.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas SUNS's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUNS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to SUNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check SUNS's competition here
IRT vs CLPR Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CLPR has a market cap of 46.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while CLPR trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas CLPR's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CLPR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to CLPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check CLPR's competition here
IRT vs BHM Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BHM has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while BHM trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas BHM's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to BHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check BHM's competition here
IRT vs AMH-PF Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AMH-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while AMH-PF trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas AMH-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMH-PF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to AMH-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AMH-PF's competition here
IRT vs AMH-PE Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AMH-PE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while AMH-PE trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas AMH-PE's P/E ratio is 83.30. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMH-PE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to AMH-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check AMH-PE's competition here
IRT vs BRG Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BRG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while BRG trades at $26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas BRG's P/E ratio is -19.62. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BRG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to BRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check BRG's competition here
IRT vs ACC Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ACC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while ACC trades at $65.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas ACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ACC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to ACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check ACC's competition here
IRT vs BRG-PC Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BRG-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while BRG-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas BRG-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BRG-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to BRG-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check BRG-PC's competition here
IRT vs BRG-PD Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BRG-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while BRG-PD trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas BRG-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BRG-PD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to BRG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check BRG-PD's competition here
IRT vs UMH-PC Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UMH-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while UMH-PC trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas UMH-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UMH-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is more volatile compared to UMH-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check UMH-PC's competition here
IRT vs PPS Comparison July 2026
IRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PPS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRT is priced at $17.33, while PPS trades at $65.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.07, whereas PPS's P/E ratio is 43.31. In terms of profitability, IRT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PPS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRT is less volatile compared to PPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRT.Check PPS's competition here