Centerspace
Centerspace (CSR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CSR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Residential Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSR | $68.38 | +3.08% | 1.1B | 66.89 | $1.02 | +4.54% |
| AVB | $183.50 | +5.29% | 25.5B | 24.77 | $7.41 | +3.87% |
| EQR | $65.15 | +4.55% | 24.4B | 22.16 | $2.94 | +4.30% |
| ESS | $267.88 | +4.30% | 17.3B | 25.78 | $10.40 | +3.86% |
| INVH | $28.14 | +3.34% | 16.9B | 29.64 | $0.95 | +4.22% |
| MAA-PI | $54.53 | +0.00% | 16.1B | 10.59 | $5.15 | +4.70% |
| SUI | $128.30 | +0.52% | 15.8B | -261.82 | -$0.49 | +6.40% |
| MAA | $130.38 | +3.98% | 15.2B | 34.50 | $3.78 | +4.70% |
| AMH-PH | $23.78 | +0.08% | 12.9B | 49.34 | $0.48 | +3.94% |
| AMH-PG | $22.66 | +0.22% | 12.7B | 47.01 | $0.48 | +3.94% |
Stock Comparison
CSR vs AVB Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AVB has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while AVB trades at $183.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas AVB's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AVB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is less volatile compared to AVB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check AVB's competition here
CSR vs EQR Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EQR has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while EQR trades at $65.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas EQR's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EQR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is less volatile compared to EQR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check EQR's competition here
CSR vs ESS Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ESS has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while ESS trades at $267.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas ESS's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ESS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is less volatile compared to ESS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check ESS's competition here
CSR vs INVH Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, INVH has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while INVH trades at $28.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas INVH's P/E ratio is 29.64. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INVH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to INVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check INVH's competition here
CSR vs MAA-PI Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MAA-PI has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while MAA-PI trades at $54.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas MAA-PI's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MAA-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to MAA-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check MAA-PI's competition here
CSR vs SUI Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SUI has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while SUI trades at $128.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas SUI's P/E ratio is -261.82. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SUI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to SUI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check SUI's competition here
CSR vs MAA Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MAA has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while MAA trades at $130.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas MAA's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MAA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is less volatile compared to MAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check MAA's competition here
CSR vs AMH-PH Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AMH-PH has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while AMH-PH trades at $23.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas AMH-PH's P/E ratio is 49.34. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMH-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to AMH-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check AMH-PH's competition here
CSR vs AMH-PG Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AMH-PG has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while AMH-PG trades at $22.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas AMH-PG's P/E ratio is 47.01. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMH-PG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to AMH-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check AMH-PG's competition here
CSR vs ELS Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ELS has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while ELS trades at $62.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas ELS's P/E ratio is 31.30. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ELS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to ELS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check ELS's competition here
CSR vs UDR Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UDR has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while UDR trades at $36.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas UDR's P/E ratio is 32.03. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UDR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is less volatile compared to UDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check UDR's competition here
CSR vs AMH Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AMH has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while AMH trades at $31.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas AMH's P/E ratio is 26.69. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to AMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check AMH's competition here
CSR vs CPT Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CPT has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while CPT trades at $105.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas CPT's P/E ratio is 29.91. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CPT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is less volatile compared to CPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check CPT's competition here
CSR vs AIRC Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AIRC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while AIRC trades at $39.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas AIRC's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AIRC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to AIRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check AIRC's competition here
CSR vs MRP Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MRP has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while MRP trades at $30.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas MRP's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MRP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to MRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check MRP's competition here
CSR vs IRT Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IRT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while IRT trades at $16.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas IRT's P/E ratio is 67.96. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IRT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to IRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check IRT's competition here
CSR vs VRE Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, VRE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while VRE trades at $18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas VRE's P/E ratio is 25.99. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VRE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to VRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check VRE's competition here
CSR vs UMH Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UMH has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while UMH trades at $15.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas UMH's P/E ratio is 223.00. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UMH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to UMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check UMH's competition here
CSR vs UMH-PD Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UMH-PD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while UMH-PD trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas UMH-PD's P/E ratio is 111.64. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UMH-PD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to UMH-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check UMH-PD's competition here
CSR vs CSR-PC Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CSR-PC has a market cap of 938.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while CSR-PC trades at $84.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas CSR-PC's P/E ratio is -117.54. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CSR-PC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to CSR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check CSR-PC's competition here
CSR vs NXRT Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NXRT has a market cap of 733M. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while NXRT trades at $28.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas NXRT's P/E ratio is -22.91. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NXRT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is less volatile compared to NXRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check NXRT's competition here
CSR vs AIV Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AIV has a market cap of 611.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while AIV trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas AIV's P/E ratio is 22.37. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AIV's ROE of +3.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to AIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check AIV's competition here
CSR vs BRT Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BRT has a market cap of 278.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while BRT trades at $14.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas BRT's P/E ratio is -23.28. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BRT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is less volatile compared to BRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check BRT's competition here
CSR vs SUNS Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SUNS has a market cap of 103M. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while SUNS trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas SUNS's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SUNS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to SUNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check SUNS's competition here
CSR vs CLPR Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CLPR has a market cap of 57.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while CLPR trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas CLPR's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CLPR's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is less volatile compared to CLPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check CLPR's competition here
CSR vs BHM Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BHM has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while BHM trades at $11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas BHM's P/E ratio is -3.73. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BHM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is less volatile compared to BHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check BHM's competition here
CSR vs AMH-PF Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AMH-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while AMH-PF trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas AMH-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMH-PF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to AMH-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check AMH-PF's competition here
CSR vs UMH-PC Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UMH-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while UMH-PC trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas UMH-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UMH-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to UMH-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check UMH-PC's competition here
CSR vs ACC Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ACC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while ACC trades at $65.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas ACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ACC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to ACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check ACC's competition here
CSR vs BRG-PC Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BRG-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while BRG-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas BRG-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BRG-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to BRG-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check BRG-PC's competition here
CSR vs BRG Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BRG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while BRG trades at $26.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas BRG's P/E ratio is -19.62. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BRG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to BRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check BRG's competition here
CSR vs AMH-PE Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AMH-PE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while AMH-PE trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas AMH-PE's P/E ratio is 83.30. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMH-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to AMH-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check AMH-PE's competition here
CSR vs BRG-PD Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BRG-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while BRG-PD trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas BRG-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BRG-PD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is more volatile compared to BRG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check BRG-PD's competition here
CSR vs PPS Comparison April 2026
CSR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CSR stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PPS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CSR is priced at $68.38, while PPS trades at $65.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CSR currently has a P/E ratio of 66.89, whereas PPS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CSR's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PPS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CSR is less volatile compared to PPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CSR.Check PPS's competition here