iRobot Corporation
iRobot Corporation (IRBT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IRBT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IRBT | $4.22 | +7.93% | 116.6M | -0.50 | -$7.48 | N/A |
| SN | $114.16 | -0.90% | 16.3B | 36.75 | $3.16 | N/A |
| TPX | $65.81 | +1.04% | 13.7B | 30.05 | $2.19 | +0.85% |
| MHK | $121.18 | +0.61% | 7.5B | 16.02 | $7.53 | N/A |
| WHR | $82.92 | -0.99% | 4.7B | -31.34 | -$2.67 | +8.35% |
| PATK | $102.50 | +1.35% | 3.4B | 27.65 | $3.63 | +1.55% |
| MBC | $12.38 | +3.34% | 1.5B | 16.58 | $0.72 | N/A |
| LZB | $36.69 | +0.58% | 1.5B | 15.40 | $2.35 | +2.37% |
| TILE | $25.71 | +3.34% | 1.5B | 15.35 | $1.62 | +0.16% |
| MLKN | $19.78 | -0.40% | 1.4B | -36.89 | -$0.54 | +3.75% |
Stock Comparison
IRBT vs SN Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, SN has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while SN trades at $114.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SN's P/E ratio is 36.75. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to SN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to SN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check SN's competition here
IRBT vs TPX Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, TPX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while TPX trades at $65.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TPX's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to TPX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to TPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check TPX's competition here
IRBT vs MHK Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, MHK has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while MHK trades at $121.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas MHK's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to MHK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to MHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check MHK's competition here
IRBT vs WHR Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, WHR has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while WHR trades at $82.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas WHR's P/E ratio is -31.34. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to WHR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to WHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check WHR's competition here
IRBT vs PATK Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, PATK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while PATK trades at $102.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas PATK's P/E ratio is 27.65. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to PATK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to PATK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check PATK's competition here
IRBT vs MBC Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, MBC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while MBC trades at $12.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas MBC's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to MBC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is less volatile compared to MBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check MBC's competition here
IRBT vs LZB Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, LZB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while LZB trades at $36.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas LZB's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to LZB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to LZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check LZB's competition here
IRBT vs TILE Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, TILE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while TILE trades at $25.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TILE's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to TILE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to TILE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check TILE's competition here
IRBT vs MLKN Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, MLKN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while MLKN trades at $19.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas MLKN's P/E ratio is -36.89. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to MLKN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to MLKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check MLKN's competition here
IRBT vs LEG Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, LEG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while LEG trades at $8.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas LEG's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to LEG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to LEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check LEG's competition here
IRBT vs AMWD Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, AMWD has a market cap of 878M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while AMWD trades at $62.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas AMWD's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to AMWD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is less volatile compared to AMWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check AMWD's competition here
IRBT vs ETD Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, ETD has a market cap of 744.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while ETD trades at $29.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ETD's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to ETD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to ETD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check ETD's competition here
IRBT vs LOVE Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, LOVE has a market cap of 260.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while LOVE trades at $18.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas LOVE's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to LOVE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to LOVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check LOVE's competition here
IRBT vs VIOT Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, VIOT has a market cap of 247.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while VIOT trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas VIOT's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to VIOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to VIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check VIOT's competition here
IRBT vs SNBR Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, SNBR has a market cap of 202.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while SNBR trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SNBR's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to SNBR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to SNBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check SNBR's competition here
IRBT vs COOK Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, COOK has a market cap of 190.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while COOK trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas COOK's P/E ratio is -5.85. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to COOK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to COOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check COOK's competition here
IRBT vs HBB Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, HBB has a market cap of 189.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while HBB trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas HBB's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to HBB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to HBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check HBB's competition here
IRBT vs FLXS Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, FLXS has a market cap of 180.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while FLXS trades at $33.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas FLXS's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to FLXS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to FLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check FLXS's competition here
IRBT vs KEQU Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, KEQU has a market cap of 155.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while KEQU trades at $53.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas KEQU's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to KEQU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to KEQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check KEQU's competition here
IRBT vs BSET Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, BSET has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while BSET trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas BSET's P/E ratio is 58.79. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to BSET's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to BSET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check BSET's competition here
IRBT vs VIRC Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, VIRC has a market cap of 125.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while VIRC trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas VIRC's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to VIRC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to VIRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check VIRC's competition here
IRBT vs HOFT Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, HOFT has a market cap of 99.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while HOFT trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas HOFT's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to HOFT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to HOFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check HOFT's competition here
IRBT vs LCUT Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, LCUT has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while LCUT trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas LCUT's P/E ratio is -6.52. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to LCUT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to LCUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check LCUT's competition here
IRBT vs PRPL Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, PRPL has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while PRPL trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas PRPL's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to PRPL's ROE of -9.94%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to PRPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check PRPL's competition here
IRBT vs CRWS Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, CRWS has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while CRWS trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas CRWS's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to CRWS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to CRWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check CRWS's competition here
IRBT vs NTZ Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, NTZ has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while NTZ trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas NTZ's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to NTZ's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is less volatile compared to NTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check NTZ's competition here
IRBT vs NVFY Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, NVFY has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while NVFY trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas NVFY's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to NVFY's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is less volatile compared to NVFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check NVFY's competition here
IRBT vs NCL Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, NCL has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while NCL trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas NCL's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to NCL's ROE of -3.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to NCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check NCL's competition here
IRBT vs ATER Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, ATER has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while ATER trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ATER's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to ATER's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to ATER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check ATER's competition here
IRBT vs EFOI Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, EFOI has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while EFOI trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas EFOI's P/E ratio is -6.79. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to EFOI's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to EFOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check EFOI's competition here
IRBT vs FGI Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, FGI has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while FGI trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas FGI's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to FGI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to FGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check FGI's competition here
IRBT vs AUVIP Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, AUVIP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while AUVIP trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas AUVIP's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to AUVIP's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is less volatile compared to AUVIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check AUVIP's competition here
IRBT vs AUVI Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, AUVI has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while AUVI trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas AUVI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to AUVI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to AUVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check AUVI's competition here
IRBT vs FGIWW Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, FGIWW has a market cap of 61.2K. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while FGIWW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas FGIWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to FGIWW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is less volatile compared to FGIWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check FGIWW's competition here
IRBT vs KBAL Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, KBAL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while KBAL trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas KBAL's P/E ratio is -23.21. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to KBAL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to KBAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check KBAL's competition here
IRBT vs WEBR Comparison August 2025
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 116.6M. In comparison, WEBR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $4.22, while WEBR trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas WEBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -3.82%, compared to WEBR's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to WEBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.Check WEBR's competition here