iRobot Corporation
iRobot Corporation IRBT Peers
See (IRBT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IRBT | $3.98 | +6.70% | 130.2M | -0.52 | -$8.07 | N/A |
| SN | $111.25 | +2.30% | 15.6B | 35.16 | $3.16 | N/A |
| TPX | $65.81 | +1.04% | 13.7B | 30.05 | $2.19 | +0.82% |
| MHK | $112.41 | +0.08% | 7.1B | 14.88 | $7.65 | N/A |
| WHR | $108.17 | +0.27% | 6B | 833.46 | $0.13 | +8.04% |
| PATK | $100.13 | +0.36% | 3.4B | 24.20 | $4.16 | +2.28% |
| LZB | $39.23 | -1.78% | 1.6B | 17.03 | $2.35 | +2.63% |
| MBC | $11.77 | +1.16% | 1.5B | 15.68 | $0.77 | N/A |
| MLKN | $20.63 | -0.75% | 1.4B | -39.31 | -$0.54 | +4.41% |
| LEG | $10.05 | -0.30% | 1.4B | -2.76 | -$3.74 | +2.41% |
Stock Comparison
IRBT vs SN Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, SN has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while SN trades at $111.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas SN's P/E ratio is 35.16. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to SN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to SN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs TPX Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, TPX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while TPX trades at $65.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas TPX's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to TPX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to TPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs MHK Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, MHK has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while MHK trades at $112.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas MHK's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to MHK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to MHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs WHR Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, WHR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while WHR trades at $108.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas WHR's P/E ratio is 833.46. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to WHR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to WHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs PATK Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, PATK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while PATK trades at $100.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas PATK's P/E ratio is 24.20. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to PATK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to PATK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs LZB Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, LZB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while LZB trades at $39.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas LZB's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to LZB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to LZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs MBC Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, MBC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while MBC trades at $11.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas MBC's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to MBC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to MBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs MLKN Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, MLKN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while MLKN trades at $20.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas MLKN's P/E ratio is -39.31. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to MLKN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to MLKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs LEG Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, LEG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while LEG trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas LEG's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to LEG's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to LEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs TILE Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, TILE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while TILE trades at $21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas TILE's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to TILE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to TILE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs AMWD Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, AMWD has a market cap of 836.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while AMWD trades at $56.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas AMWD's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to AMWD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to AMWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs ETD Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, ETD has a market cap of 771.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while ETD trades at $29.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas ETD's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to ETD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to ETD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs LOVE Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, LOVE has a market cap of 274M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while LOVE trades at $18.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas LOVE's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to LOVE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to LOVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs HBB Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, HBB has a market cap of 272.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while HBB trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas HBB's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to HBB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to HBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs COOK Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, COOK has a market cap of 270.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while COOK trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas COOK's P/E ratio is -8.31. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to COOK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to COOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs FLXS Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, FLXS has a market cap of 209.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while FLXS trades at $38.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas FLXS's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to FLXS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to FLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs VIOT Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, VIOT has a market cap of 195.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while VIOT trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas VIOT's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to VIOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to VIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs SNBR Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, SNBR has a market cap of 173.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while SNBR trades at $7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas SNBR's P/E ratio is -8.05. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to SNBR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to SNBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs KEQU Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, KEQU has a market cap of 167.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while KEQU trades at $58.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas KEQU's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to KEQU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to KEQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs BSET Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, BSET has a market cap of 166.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while BSET trades at $18.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas BSET's P/E ratio is -25.21. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to BSET's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to BSET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs VIRC Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, VIRC has a market cap of 126.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while VIRC trades at $7.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas VIRC's P/E ratio is 6.49. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to VIRC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to VIRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs HOFT Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, HOFT has a market cap of 117.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while HOFT trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas HOFT's P/E ratio is -10.07. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to HOFT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to HOFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs LCUT Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, LCUT has a market cap of 112.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while LCUT trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas LCUT's P/E ratio is -8.22. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to LCUT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to LCUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs PRPL Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, PRPL has a market cap of 78.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while PRPL trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas PRPL's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to PRPL's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to PRPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs NTZ Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, NTZ has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while NTZ trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas NTZ's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to NTZ's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to NTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs CRWS Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, CRWS has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while CRWS trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas CRWS's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to CRWS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to CRWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs NVFY Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, NVFY has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while NVFY trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas NVFY's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to NVFY's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to NVFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs NCL Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, NCL has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while NCL trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas NCL's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to NCL's ROE of -3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to NCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs EFOI Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, EFOI has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while EFOI trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas EFOI's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to EFOI's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is less volatile compared to EFOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs ATER Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, ATER has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while ATER trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas ATER's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to ATER's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to ATER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs FGI Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, FGI has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while FGI trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas FGI's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to FGI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is less volatile compared to FGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs AUVIP Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, AUVIP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while AUVIP trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas AUVIP's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to AUVIP's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is less volatile compared to AUVIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs AUVI Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, AUVI has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while AUVI trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas AUVI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to AUVI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to AUVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs FGIWW Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, FGIWW has a market cap of 337.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while FGIWW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas FGIWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to FGIWW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is less volatile compared to FGIWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs WEBR Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, WEBR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while WEBR trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas WEBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to WEBR's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to WEBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.
IRBT vs KBAL Comparison
IRBT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRBT stands at 130.2M. In comparison, KBAL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IRBT is priced at $3.98, while KBAL trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRBT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.52, whereas KBAL's P/E ratio is -23.21. In terms of profitability, IRBT's ROE is -2.68%, compared to KBAL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRBT is more volatile compared to KBAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRBT.