Inter Parfums, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for IPAR
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for IPAR
Inter Parfums, Inc. (IPAR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IPAR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPAR | $90.61 | -2.09% | 2.9B | 17.29 | $5.24 | +3.53% |
| PG | $143.10 | -0.69% | 334.4B | 21.20 | $6.75 | +2.95% |
| UL | $55.45 | -1.09% | 121.2B | 18.48 | $3.00 | +4.18% |
| CL | $85.14 | -0.32% | 68.2B | 32.37 | $2.63 | +2.44% |
| KVUE | $17.14 | -1.38% | 32.9B | 22.55 | $0.76 | +4.83% |
| KMB | $96.13 | -1.48% | 31.9B | 19.78 | $4.86 | +5.26% |
| EL | $69.12 | -2.25% | 25B | -135.53 | -$0.51 | +2.03% |
| CHD | $92.85 | +0.00% | 22B | 30.75 | $3.02 | +1.28% |
| SGI | $72.90 | -0.96% | 15.3B | 39.62 | $1.84 | +0.85% |
| CLX | $101.14 | -2.97% | 12.3B | 16.55 | $6.11 | +4.88% |
Stock Comparison
IPAR vs PG Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PG has a market cap of 334.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while PG trades at $143.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas PG's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PG's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check PG's competition here
IPAR vs UL Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, UL has a market cap of 121.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while UL trades at $55.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas UL's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to UL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check UL's competition here
IPAR vs CL Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CL has a market cap of 68.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while CL trades at $85.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas CL's P/E ratio is 32.37. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CL's ROE of +4.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to CL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check CL's competition here
IPAR vs KVUE Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KVUE has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while KVUE trades at $17.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas KVUE's P/E ratio is 22.55. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KVUE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to KVUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check KVUE's competition here
IPAR vs KMB Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KMB has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while KMB trades at $96.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas KMB's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KMB's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to KMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check KMB's competition here
IPAR vs EL Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EL has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while EL trades at $69.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas EL's P/E ratio is -135.53. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EL's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to EL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check EL's competition here
IPAR vs CHD Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CHD has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while CHD trades at $92.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas CHD's P/E ratio is 30.75. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CHD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to CHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check CHD's competition here
IPAR vs SGI Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while SGI trades at $72.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 39.62. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to SGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check SGI's competition here
IPAR vs CLX Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CLX has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while CLX trades at $101.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas CLX's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CLX's ROE of +15.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to CLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check CLX's competition here
IPAR vs NTCO Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NTCO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while NTCO trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas NTCO's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NTCO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to NTCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check NTCO's competition here
IPAR vs ELF Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ELF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while ELF trades at $61.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas ELF's P/E ratio is 34.55. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ELF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to ELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check ELF's competition here
IPAR vs COTY Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, COTY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while COTY trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas COTY's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to COTY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to COTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check COTY's competition here
IPAR vs SPB Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SPB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while SPB trades at $73.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas SPB's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SPB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to SPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check SPB's competition here
IPAR vs NWL Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NWL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while NWL trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas NWL's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NWL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to NWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check NWL's competition here
IPAR vs EPC Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EPC has a market cap of 980.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while EPC trades at $20.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas EPC's P/E ratio is 190.73. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EPC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to EPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check EPC's competition here
IPAR vs NUS Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NUS has a market cap of 356.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while NUS trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas NUS's P/E ratio is 2.33. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NUS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to NUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check NUS's competition here
IPAR vs HELE Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HELE has a market cap of 336.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while HELE trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas HELE's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HELE's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to HELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check HELE's competition here
IPAR vs EWCZ Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EWCZ has a market cap of 316.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while EWCZ trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas EWCZ's P/E ratio is 29.05. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EWCZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to EWCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check EWCZ's competition here
IPAR vs PTNM Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PTNM has a market cap of 207.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while PTNM trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas PTNM's P/E ratio is 346.33. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTNM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to PTNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check PTNM's competition here
IPAR vs ACU Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ACU has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while ACU trades at $44.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas ACU's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to ACU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check ACU's competition here
IPAR vs SKIN Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SKIN has a market cap of 115.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while SKIN trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas SKIN's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SKIN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to SKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check SKIN's competition here
IPAR vs SLSN Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SLSN has a market cap of 98.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while SLSN trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas SLSN's P/E ratio is 70.00. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLSN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to SLSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check SLSN's competition here
IPAR vs GROV Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GROV has a market cap of 53.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while GROV trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas GROV's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GROV's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to GROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check GROV's competition here
IPAR vs AXIL Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AXIL has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while AXIL trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas AXIL's P/E ratio is 41.41. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AXIL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to AXIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check AXIL's competition here
IPAR vs UG Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, UG has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while UG trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas UG's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to UG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check UG's competition here
IPAR vs DSY Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DSY has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while DSY trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas DSY's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DSY's ROE of +14.77%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to DSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check DSY's competition here
IPAR vs MTEX Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MTEX has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while MTEX trades at $5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas MTEX's P/E ratio is -6.73. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MTEX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to MTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check MTEX's competition here
IPAR vs RAY Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while RAY trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to RAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check RAY's competition here
IPAR vs PHH Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PHH has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while PHH trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas PHH's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PHH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to PHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check PHH's competition here
IPAR vs BRSH Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BRSH has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while BRSH trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas BRSH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BRSH's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to BRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check BRSH's competition here
IPAR vs TANH Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TANH has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while TANH trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas TANH's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TANH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to TANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check TANH's competition here
IPAR vs NXTS Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NXTS has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while NXTS trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas NXTS's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NXTS's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to NXTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check NXTS's competition here
IPAR vs DSYWW Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DSYWW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while DSYWW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas DSYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DSYWW's ROE of +14.77%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to DSYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check DSYWW's competition here
IPAR vs TKLF Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TKLF has a market cap of 973.5K. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while TKLF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas TKLF's P/E ratio is 2.09. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TKLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to TKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check TKLF's competition here
IPAR vs BRSHW Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BRSHW has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while BRSHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas BRSHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BRSHW's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to BRSHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check BRSHW's competition here
IPAR vs SUMR Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SUMR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while SUMR trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas SUMR's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SUMR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to SUMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check SUMR's competition here
IPAR vs REV Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, REV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while REV trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas REV's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to REV's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to REV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check REV's competition here
IPAR vs RDEN Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RDEN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while RDEN trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas RDEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RDEN's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to RDEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check RDEN's competition here
IPAR vs GROV-WT Comparison April 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GROV-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $90.61, while GROV-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.29, whereas GROV-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GROV-WT's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to GROV-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check GROV-WT's competition here