India Glycols Limited
India Glycols Limited (INDIAGLYCO.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (INDIAGLYCO.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INDIAGLYCO.NS | ₹928.80 | -1.18% | 62.3B | 21.52 | ₹43.16 | +0.54% |
| UPL.BO | ₹630.45 | -2.20% | 532.2B | 30.06 | ₹20.97 | +0.95% |
| FLUOROCHEM.NS | ₹3,538.60 | +1.17% | 388.7B | 59.36 | ₹59.61 | +0.08% |
| DEEPAKNI.BO | ₹2,436.10 | +0.33% | 332.3B | 57.46 | ₹42.40 | N/A |
| NAVINFLUOR.BO | ₹6,337.45 | -4.73% | 324.7B | 58.81 | ₹107.77 | +0.21% |
| NAVINFLUOR.NS | ₹6,328.00 | -4.83% | 324.2B | 58.74 | ₹107.72 | +0.21% |
| DEEPAKNTR.NS | ₹1,588.40 | -1.74% | 216.6B | 40.58 | ₹39.14 | +0.47% |
| DEEPAKNTR.BO | ₹1,587.65 | -1.76% | 216.5B | 40.56 | ₹39.14 | +0.47% |
| BAYERCROP.BO | ₹4,714.80 | -1.53% | 211.9B | 31.58 | ₹149.28 | +2.65% |
| TATACHEM.NS | ₹710.00 | -0.62% | 180.9B | 111.46 | ₹6.37 | +1.55% |
Stock Comparison
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs UPL.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, UPL.BO has a market cap of 532.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while UPL.BO trades at ₹630.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas UPL.BO's P/E ratio is 30.06. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UPL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to UPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check UPL.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs FLUOROCHEM.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, FLUOROCHEM.NS has a market cap of 388.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while FLUOROCHEM.NS trades at ₹3,538.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas FLUOROCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 59.36. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLUOROCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to FLUOROCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check FLUOROCHEM.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs DEEPAKNI.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, DEEPAKNI.BO has a market cap of 332.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while DEEPAKNI.BO trades at ₹2,436.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas DEEPAKNI.BO's P/E ratio is 57.46. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DEEPAKNI.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS and DEEPAKNI.BO have similar daily volatility (1.74).Check DEEPAKNI.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs NAVINFLUOR.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, NAVINFLUOR.BO has a market cap of 324.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while NAVINFLUOR.BO trades at ₹6,337.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas NAVINFLUOR.BO's P/E ratio is 58.81. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NAVINFLUOR.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to NAVINFLUOR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check NAVINFLUOR.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs NAVINFLUOR.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, NAVINFLUOR.NS has a market cap of 324.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while NAVINFLUOR.NS trades at ₹6,328.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas NAVINFLUOR.NS's P/E ratio is 58.74. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NAVINFLUOR.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to NAVINFLUOR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check NAVINFLUOR.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs DEEPAKNTR.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, DEEPAKNTR.NS has a market cap of 216.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while DEEPAKNTR.NS trades at ₹1,588.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas DEEPAKNTR.NS's P/E ratio is 40.58. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DEEPAKNTR.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to DEEPAKNTR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check DEEPAKNTR.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs DEEPAKNTR.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, DEEPAKNTR.BO has a market cap of 216.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while DEEPAKNTR.BO trades at ₹1,587.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas DEEPAKNTR.BO's P/E ratio is 40.56. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DEEPAKNTR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is more volatile compared to DEEPAKNTR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check DEEPAKNTR.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs BAYERCROP.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, BAYERCROP.BO has a market cap of 211.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while BAYERCROP.BO trades at ₹4,714.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas BAYERCROP.BO's P/E ratio is 31.58. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAYERCROP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to BAYERCROP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check BAYERCROP.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs TATACHEM.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, TATACHEM.NS has a market cap of 180.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while TATACHEM.NS trades at ₹710.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas TATACHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 111.46. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TATACHEM.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to TATACHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check TATACHEM.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs TATACHEM.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, TATACHEM.BO has a market cap of 180.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while TATACHEM.BO trades at ₹709.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas TATACHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 111.03. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TATACHEM.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to TATACHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check TATACHEM.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs DEEPAKFERT.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, DEEPAKFERT.NS has a market cap of 125.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while DEEPAKFERT.NS trades at ₹994.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas DEEPAKFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DEEPAKFERT.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to DEEPAKFERT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check DEEPAKFERT.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs DEEPAKFERT.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, DEEPAKFERT.BO has a market cap of 125.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while DEEPAKFERT.BO trades at ₹994.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas DEEPAKFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DEEPAKFERT.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to DEEPAKFERT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check DEEPAKFERT.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs SPLPETRO.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, SPLPETRO.NS has a market cap of 122.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while SPLPETRO.NS trades at ₹649.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas SPLPETRO.NS's P/E ratio is 45.65. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPLPETRO.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to SPLPETRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check SPLPETRO.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs ACI.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, ACI.NS has a market cap of 71B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while ACI.NS trades at ₹574.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas ACI.NS's P/E ratio is 48.42. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACI.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to ACI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check ACI.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs ACI.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, ACI.BO has a market cap of 71B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while ACI.BO trades at ₹574.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas ACI.BO's P/E ratio is 48.50. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACI.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to ACI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check ACI.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs GNFC.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, GNFC.BO has a market cap of 67.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while GNFC.BO trades at ₹458.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas GNFC.BO's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GNFC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is more volatile compared to GNFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check GNFC.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs GNFC.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, GNFC.NS has a market cap of 67.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while GNFC.NS trades at ₹457.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas GNFC.NS's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GNFC.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is more volatile compared to GNFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check GNFC.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs INDIAGLYCO.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, INDIAGLYCO.BO has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while INDIAGLYCO.BO trades at ₹927.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas INDIAGLYCO.BO's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INDIAGLYCO.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is more volatile compared to INDIAGLYCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check INDIAGLYCO.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs RAIN.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, RAIN.BO has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while RAIN.BO trades at ₹147.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas RAIN.BO's P/E ratio is -37.24. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RAIN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to RAIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check RAIN.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs RAIN.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, RAIN.NS has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while RAIN.NS trades at ₹146.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas RAIN.NS's P/E ratio is -37.10. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RAIN.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to RAIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check RAIN.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs GHCL.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, GHCL.BO has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while GHCL.BO trades at ₹490.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas GHCL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GHCL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is more volatile compared to GHCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check GHCL.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs GHCL.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, GHCL.NS has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while GHCL.NS trades at ₹489.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas GHCL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GHCL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to GHCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check GHCL.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs MFL.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, MFL.NS has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while MFL.NS trades at ₹1,062.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas MFL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MFL.NS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to MFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check MFL.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs CHEMPLASTS.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, CHEMPLASTS.BO has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while CHEMPLASTS.BO trades at ₹263.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas CHEMPLASTS.BO's P/E ratio is -14.57. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHEMPLASTS.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to CHEMPLASTS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check CHEMPLASTS.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs CHEMPLASTS.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, CHEMPLASTS.NS has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while CHEMPLASTS.NS trades at ₹262.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas CHEMPLASTS.NS's P/E ratio is -14.53. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHEMPLASTS.NS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to CHEMPLASTS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check CHEMPLASTS.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs EPIGRAL.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, EPIGRAL.BO has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while EPIGRAL.BO trades at ₹942.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas EPIGRAL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EPIGRAL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to EPIGRAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check EPIGRAL.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs EPIGRAL.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, EPIGRAL.NS has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while EPIGRAL.NS trades at ₹940.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas EPIGRAL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EPIGRAL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to EPIGRAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check EPIGRAL.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs MEGH.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, MEGH.NS has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while MEGH.NS trades at ₹139.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas MEGH.NS's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MEGH.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to MEGH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check MEGH.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs GUJALKALI.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, GUJALKALI.BO has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while GUJALKALI.BO trades at ₹476.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas GUJALKALI.BO's P/E ratio is -410.60. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GUJALKALI.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to GUJALKALI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check GUJALKALI.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs GUJALKALI.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, GUJALKALI.NS has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while GUJALKALI.NS trades at ₹475.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas GUJALKALI.NS's P/E ratio is -402.71. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GUJALKALI.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to GUJALKALI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check GUJALKALI.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs STYRENIX.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, STYRENIX.NS has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while STYRENIX.NS trades at ₹1,915.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas STYRENIX.NS's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STYRENIX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to STYRENIX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check STYRENIX.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs STYRENIX.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, STYRENIX.BO has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while STYRENIX.BO trades at ₹1,912.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas STYRENIX.BO's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STYRENIX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is more volatile compared to STYRENIX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check STYRENIX.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs ELLEN.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, ELLEN.NS has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while ELLEN.NS trades at ₹238.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas ELLEN.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELLEN.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to ELLEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check ELLEN.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs RPEL.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, RPEL.BO has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while RPEL.BO trades at ₹716.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas RPEL.BO's P/E ratio is 65.97. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RPEL.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to RPEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check RPEL.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs RPEL.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, RPEL.NS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while RPEL.NS trades at ₹715.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas RPEL.NS's P/E ratio is 65.98. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RPEL.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to RPEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check RPEL.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs FOSECOIND.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, FOSECOIND.NS has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while FOSECOIND.NS trades at ₹4,731.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas FOSECOIND.NS's P/E ratio is 38.09. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FOSECOIND.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to FOSECOIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check FOSECOIND.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs FOSECOIND.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, FOSECOIND.BO has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while FOSECOIND.BO trades at ₹4,708.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas FOSECOIND.BO's P/E ratio is 37.96. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FOSECOIND.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is more volatile compared to FOSECOIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check FOSECOIND.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs DDEVPLASTIK.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, DDEVPLASTIK.BO has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while DDEVPLASTIK.BO trades at ₹262.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas DDEVPLASTIK.BO's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DDEVPLASTIK.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to DDEVPLASTIK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check DDEVPLASTIK.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs BEPL.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, BEPL.NS has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while BEPL.NS trades at ₹82.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas BEPL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BEPL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to BEPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check BEPL.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs BEPL.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, BEPL.BO has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while BEPL.BO trades at ₹82.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas BEPL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BEPL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is more volatile compared to BEPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check BEPL.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs SANSTAR.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, SANSTAR.NS has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while SANSTAR.NS trades at ₹86.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas SANSTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 80.93. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SANSTAR.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to SANSTAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check SANSTAR.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs DCW.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, DCW.BO has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while DCW.BO trades at ₹48.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas DCW.BO's P/E ratio is 28.85. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DCW.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to DCW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check DCW.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs DCW.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, DCW.NS has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while DCW.NS trades at ₹48.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas DCW.NS's P/E ratio is 34.55. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DCW.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to DCW.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check DCW.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs INEOSSTYRO.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, INEOSSTYRO.NS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while INEOSSTYRO.NS trades at ₹807.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas INEOSSTYRO.NS's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INEOSSTYRO.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to INEOSSTYRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check INEOSSTYRO.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs GODAVARIB.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, GODAVARIB.NS has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while GODAVARIB.NS trades at ₹272.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas GODAVARIB.NS's P/E ratio is 69.44. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GODAVARIB.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to GODAVARIB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check GODAVARIB.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs PUNJABCHEM.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, PUNJABCHEM.NS has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while PUNJABCHEM.NS trades at ₹1,039.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas PUNJABCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PUNJABCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to PUNJABCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check PUNJABCHEM.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs PUNJABCHEM.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, PUNJABCHEM.BO has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while PUNJABCHEM.BO trades at ₹1,032.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas PUNJABCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 21.07. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PUNJABCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to PUNJABCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check PUNJABCHEM.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs IGPL.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, IGPL.BO has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while IGPL.BO trades at ₹368.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas IGPL.BO's P/E ratio is 34.93. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IGPL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to IGPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check IGPL.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs A1L.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, A1L.BO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while A1L.BO trades at ₹21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas A1L.BO's P/E ratio is 273.13. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to A1L.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to A1L.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check A1L.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs GEMAROMA.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, GEMAROMA.NS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while GEMAROMA.NS trades at ₹191.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas GEMAROMA.NS's P/E ratio is 35.77. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GEMAROMA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to GEMAROMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check GEMAROMA.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs ANDHRSUGAR.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, ANDHRSUGAR.BO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while ANDHRSUGAR.BO trades at ₹71.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas ANDHRSUGAR.BO's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANDHRSUGAR.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to ANDHRSUGAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check ANDHRSUGAR.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs ANDHRSUGAR.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, ANDHRSUGAR.NS has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while ANDHRSUGAR.NS trades at ₹71.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas ANDHRSUGAR.NS's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANDHRSUGAR.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to ANDHRSUGAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check ANDHRSUGAR.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs GULPOLY.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, GULPOLY.BO has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while GULPOLY.BO trades at ₹153.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas GULPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GULPOLY.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to GULPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check GULPOLY.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs ZUARI.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, ZUARI.BO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while ZUARI.BO trades at ₹225.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas ZUARI.BO's P/E ratio is 0.98. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZUARI.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is more volatile compared to ZUARI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check ZUARI.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs GULPOLY.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, GULPOLY.NS has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while GULPOLY.NS trades at ₹151.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas GULPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GULPOLY.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to GULPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check GULPOLY.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs AMNPLST.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, AMNPLST.BO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while AMNPLST.BO trades at ₹162.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas AMNPLST.BO's P/E ratio is 26.26. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMNPLST.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is more volatile compared to AMNPLST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check AMNPLST.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs AMNPLST.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, AMNPLST.NS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while AMNPLST.NS trades at ₹161.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas AMNPLST.NS's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMNPLST.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to AMNPLST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check AMNPLST.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs SRHHYPOLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, SRHHYPOLTD.BO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while SRHHYPOLTD.BO trades at ₹472.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas SRHHYPOLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 8.78. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRHHYPOLTD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is more volatile compared to SRHHYPOLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check SRHHYPOLTD.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs ORIENTCQ.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, ORIENTCQ.BO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while ORIENTCQ.BO trades at ₹810.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas ORIENTCQ.BO's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ORIENTCQ.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to ORIENTCQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check ORIENTCQ.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs SRHHYPOLTD.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, SRHHYPOLTD.NS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while SRHHYPOLTD.NS trades at ₹471.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas SRHHYPOLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRHHYPOLTD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is more volatile compared to SRHHYPOLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check SRHHYPOLTD.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs INDOAMIN.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, INDOAMIN.NS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while INDOAMIN.NS trades at ₹109.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas INDOAMIN.NS's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INDOAMIN.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to INDOAMIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check INDOAMIN.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs INDOAMIN.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, INDOAMIN.BO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while INDOAMIN.BO trades at ₹108.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas INDOAMIN.BO's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INDOAMIN.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to INDOAMIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check INDOAMIN.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs INDOBORAX.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, INDOBORAX.NS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while INDOBORAX.NS trades at ₹243.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas INDOBORAX.NS's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INDOBORAX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is more volatile compared to INDOBORAX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check INDOBORAX.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs INDOBORAX.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, INDOBORAX.BO has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while INDOBORAX.BO trades at ₹242.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas INDOBORAX.BO's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INDOBORAX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is more volatile compared to INDOBORAX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check INDOBORAX.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs UNIENTER.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, UNIENTER.NS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while UNIENTER.NS trades at ₹107.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas UNIENTER.NS's P/E ratio is 37.72. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UNIENTER.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to UNIENTER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check UNIENTER.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs VALIANTORG.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, VALIANTORG.BO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while VALIANTORG.BO trades at ₹239.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas VALIANTORG.BO's P/E ratio is 28.79. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VALIANTORG.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to VALIANTORG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check VALIANTORG.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs VALIANTORG.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, VALIANTORG.NS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while VALIANTORG.NS trades at ₹239.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas VALIANTORG.NS's P/E ratio is 28.70. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VALIANTORG.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to VALIANTORG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check VALIANTORG.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs SUNSHIEL.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, SUNSHIEL.BO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while SUNSHIEL.BO trades at ₹834.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas SUNSHIEL.BO's P/E ratio is 25.84. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUNSHIEL.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to SUNSHIEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check SUNSHIEL.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs NATPEROX.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, NATPEROX.BO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while NATPEROX.BO trades at ₹1,040.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas NATPEROX.BO's P/E ratio is 399.75. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NATPEROX.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to NATPEROX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check NATPEROX.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs DMCC.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, DMCC.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while DMCC.BO trades at ₹217.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas DMCC.BO's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DMCC.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to DMCC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check DMCC.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs DMCC.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, DMCC.NS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while DMCC.NS trades at ₹216.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas DMCC.NS's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DMCC.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to DMCC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check DMCC.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs PRIMO.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, PRIMO.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while PRIMO.NS trades at ₹19.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas PRIMO.NS's P/E ratio is 62.31. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRIMO.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to PRIMO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check PRIMO.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs OCCLLTD.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, OCCLLTD.NS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while OCCLLTD.NS trades at ₹88.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas OCCLLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OCCLLTD.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to OCCLLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check OCCLLTD.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs SHIVALIK.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, SHIVALIK.BO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while SHIVALIK.BO trades at ₹282.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas SHIVALIK.BO's P/E ratio is 31.72. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHIVALIK.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to SHIVALIK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check SHIVALIK.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs ARIES.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, ARIES.BO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while ARIES.BO trades at ₹337.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas ARIES.BO's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARIES.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to ARIES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check ARIES.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs NAPEROL.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, NAPEROL.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while NAPEROL.BO trades at ₹629.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas NAPEROL.BO's P/E ratio is 39.04. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NAPEROL.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to NAPEROL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check NAPEROL.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs KANORICHEM.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, KANORICHEM.NS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while KANORICHEM.NS trades at ₹71.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas KANORICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is -4.22. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KANORICHEM.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to KANORICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check KANORICHEM.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs KANORICHEM.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, KANORICHEM.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while KANORICHEM.BO trades at ₹71.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas KANORICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is -4.19. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KANORICHEM.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is more volatile compared to KANORICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check KANORICHEM.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs DCMSRMIND.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, DCMSRMIND.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while DCMSRMIND.BO trades at ₹175.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas DCMSRMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DCMSRMIND.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to DCMSRMIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check DCMSRMIND.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs LORDSCHLO.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, LORDSCHLO.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while LORDSCHLO.BO trades at ₹120.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas LORDSCHLO.BO's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LORDSCHLO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to LORDSCHLO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check LORDSCHLO.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs LORDSCHLO.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, LORDSCHLO.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while LORDSCHLO.NS trades at ₹118.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas LORDSCHLO.NS's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LORDSCHLO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to LORDSCHLO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check LORDSCHLO.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs INDGELA.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, INDGELA.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while INDGELA.BO trades at ₹348.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas INDGELA.BO's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INDGELA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to INDGELA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check INDGELA.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs OCCL.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, OCCL.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while OCCL.NS trades at ₹233.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas OCCL.NS's P/E ratio is 77.52. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OCCL.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is more volatile compared to OCCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check OCCL.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs DIAMINESQ.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, DIAMINESQ.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while DIAMINESQ.BO trades at ₹235.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas DIAMINESQ.BO's P/E ratio is -25.25. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DIAMINESQ.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to DIAMINESQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check DIAMINESQ.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs DIAMINESQ.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, DIAMINESQ.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while DIAMINESQ.NS trades at ₹235.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas DIAMINESQ.NS's P/E ratio is -25.28. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DIAMINESQ.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to DIAMINESQ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check DIAMINESQ.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs JAYSYNTH.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, JAYSYNTH.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while JAYSYNTH.BO trades at ₹12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas JAYSYNTH.BO's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JAYSYNTH.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to JAYSYNTH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check JAYSYNTH.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs ISHANCH.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, ISHANCH.NS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while ISHANCH.NS trades at ₹61.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas ISHANCH.NS's P/E ratio is -29.45. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ISHANCH.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to ISHANCH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check ISHANCH.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs PAUSHAKLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, PAUSHAKLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while PAUSHAKLTD.BO trades at ₹487.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas PAUSHAKLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAUSHAKLTD.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to PAUSHAKLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check PAUSHAKLTD.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs CHEMCRUX.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, CHEMCRUX.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while CHEMCRUX.BO trades at ₹98.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas CHEMCRUX.BO's P/E ratio is 70.36. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHEMCRUX.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to CHEMCRUX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check CHEMCRUX.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs RESGEN.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, RESGEN.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while RESGEN.BO trades at ₹59.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas RESGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RESGEN.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is more volatile compared to RESGEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check RESGEN.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs DEEPAKCHEM.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, DEEPAKCHEM.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while DEEPAKCHEM.BO trades at ₹101.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas DEEPAKCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DEEPAKCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to DEEPAKCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check DEEPAKCHEM.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs POLYCHEM.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, POLYCHEM.BO has a market cap of 857.5M. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while POLYCHEM.BO trades at ₹2,122.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas POLYCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to POLYCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to POLYCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check POLYCHEM.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs ASHOKALC.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, ASHOKALC.BO has a market cap of 551.4M. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while ASHOKALC.BO trades at ₹119.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas ASHOKALC.BO's P/E ratio is -10.04. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASHOKALC.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to ASHOKALC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check ASHOKALC.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs ZR2.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, ZR2.BO has a market cap of 510.9M. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while ZR2.BO trades at ₹143.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas ZR2.BO's P/E ratio is 954.33. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZR2.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to ZR2.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check ZR2.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs GARODCH.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, GARODCH.BO has a market cap of 482.7M. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while GARODCH.BO trades at ₹138.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas GARODCH.BO's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GARODCH.BO's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is more volatile compared to GARODCH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check GARODCH.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs SHIVAAGRO.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, SHIVAAGRO.BO has a market cap of 383.4M. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while SHIVAAGRO.BO trades at ₹38.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas SHIVAAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 174.41. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHIVAAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to SHIVAAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check SHIVAAGRO.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs SANGINITA.NS Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, SANGINITA.NS has a market cap of 376.9M. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while SANGINITA.NS trades at ₹14.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas SANGINITA.NS's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SANGINITA.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to SANGINITA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check SANGINITA.NS's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs CAPRO.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, CAPRO.BO has a market cap of 334M. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while CAPRO.BO trades at ₹72.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas CAPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 7261.00. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CAPRO.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to CAPRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check CAPRO.BO's competition here
INDIAGLYCO.NS vs VINEETLAB.BO Comparison February 2026
INDIAGLYCO.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, INDIAGLYCO.NS stands at 62.3B. In comparison, VINEETLAB.BO has a market cap of 281.2M. Regarding current trading prices, INDIAGLYCO.NS is priced at ₹928.80, while VINEETLAB.BO trades at ₹30.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
INDIAGLYCO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.52, whereas VINEETLAB.BO's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, INDIAGLYCO.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VINEETLAB.BO's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, INDIAGLYCO.NS is less volatile compared to VINEETLAB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for INDIAGLYCO.NS.Check VINEETLAB.BO's competition here