IHS Holding Limited
IHS Holding Limited IHS Peers
See (IHS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IHS | $5.80 | -8.52% | 1.9B | -44.65 | -$0.13 | N/A |
| TMUS | $237.42 | -1.69% | 269.6B | 23.21 | $10.23 | +1.36% |
| VZA | $25.55 | -0.43% | 241.3B | 3.27 | $7.82 | N/A |
| T | $28.31 | -1.97% | 203.7B | 17.37 | $1.63 | +3.85% |
| TBB | $22.83 | +1.65% | 201.8B | 4.45 | $5.12 | +5.94% |
| VZ | $43.59 | -0.21% | 183.8B | 10.38 | $4.20 | +6.18% |
| TBC | $24.97 | -0.68% | 179.8B | N/A | N/A | +5.63% |
| T-PA | $20.50 | +0.66% | 147.4B | 8.62 | $2.38 | +3.85% |
| T-PC | $19.56 | +1.08% | 140.7B | 8.22 | $2.38 | +3.85% |
| CMCSA | $35.83 | -1.36% | 133.4B | 8.83 | $4.06 | +3.46% |
Stock Comparison
IHS vs TMUS Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TMUS has a market cap of 269.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while TMUS trades at $237.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas TMUS's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TMUS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to TMUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs VZA Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while VZA trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to VZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs T Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, T has a market cap of 203.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while T trades at $28.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas T's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to T's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to T. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs TBB Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 201.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while TBB trades at $22.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 4.45. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to TBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs VZ Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 183.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while VZ trades at $43.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to VZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs TBC Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TBC has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while TBC trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas TBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TBC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to TBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs T-PA Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 147.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while T-PA trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs T-PC Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 140.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while T-PC trades at $19.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs CMCSA Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 133.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while CMCSA trades at $35.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs AMOV Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while AMOV trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs CHTR Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 56.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while CHTR trades at $412.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs AMX Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while AMX trades at $18.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 37.69. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to AMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs CHT Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CHT has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while CHT trades at $46.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas CHT's P/E ratio is 28.93. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to CHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs TEF Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while TEF trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -53.30. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to TEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs ORAN Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while ORAN trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs VOD Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while VOD trades at $10.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is -5.76. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VOD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to VOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs TU Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while TU trades at $16.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to TU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs BCE Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while BCE trades at $22.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 73.71. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to BCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs VIV Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while VIV trades at $11.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to VIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs RCI Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while RCI trades at $31.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to RCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs TLK Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while TLK trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to TLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs SJR Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while SJR trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to SJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs LBRDA Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while LBRDA trades at $98.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs LBRDK Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while LBRDK trades at $99.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs LBRDP Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while LBRDP trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs KT Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while KT trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to KT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs TIMB Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while TIMB trades at $20.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs MBT Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while MBT trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MBT's ROE of -7.48%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is less volatile compared to MBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs FYBR Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while FYBR trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -23.40. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to FYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs SKM Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while SKM trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to SKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs CTDD Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while CTDD trades at $18.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs TIGO Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while TIGO trades at $38.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs USM Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while USM trades at $63.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -138.48. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to USM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs TKC Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while TKC trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to TKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs UZE Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while UZE trades at $20.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UZE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to UZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs UZF Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while UZF trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UZF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to UZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs UZD Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while UZD trades at $23.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UZD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to UZD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs PHI Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while PHI trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to PHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs LUMN Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LUMN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while LUMN trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas LUMN's P/E ratio is -13.92. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LUMN's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to LUMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs CTBB Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while CTBB trades at $18.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTBB's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs LBYKV Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to LBYKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs SNRE Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while SNRE trades at $56.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -13.78. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs TDS Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while TDS trades at $35.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is -33.86. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to TDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs TDS-PV Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while TDS-PV trades at $18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs TDS-PU Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while TDS-PU trades at $19.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs LBTYA Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while LBTYA trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -16.15. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs LBTYK Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while LBTYK trades at $10.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -16.46. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs LBTYB Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while LBTYB trades at $10.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -16.23. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is less volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs IRDM Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while IRDM trades at $31.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 30.03. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs DISH Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while DISH trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DISH's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to DISH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs VEON Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while VEON trades at $43.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to VEON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs GSAT Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while GSAT trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -38.39. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs TEO Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while TEO trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is 89.50. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TEO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to TEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs CCOI Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while CCOI trades at $50.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -12.69. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CCOI's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs GOGO Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while GOGO trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is -387.25. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GOGO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs IDT Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while IDT trades at $69.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to IDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs ASTSW Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs RADI Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while RADI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to RADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs LILA Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while LILA trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LILA's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to LILA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs LILAK Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while LILAK trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs ATUS Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 977.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while ATUS trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs SHEN Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 783.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while SHEN trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -20.40. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs CABO Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CABO has a market cap of 764.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while CABO trades at $136.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas CABO's P/E ratio is -37.64. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CABO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to CABO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs RBBN Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RBBN has a market cap of 731.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while RBBN trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas RBBN's P/E ratio is -14.80. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RBBN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to RBBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs CNSL Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while CNSL trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs ATEX Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 469.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while ATEX trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is -41.18. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATEX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs OOMA Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OOMA has a market cap of 358.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while OOMA trades at $13.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas OOMA's P/E ratio is -68.37. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OOMA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to OOMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs WOW Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 350.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while WOW trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to WOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs HCHC Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while HCHC trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs ATNI Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 261.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while ATNI trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is -7.51. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATNI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs TV Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 248.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while TV trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to TV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs RDCM Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 218.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while RDCM trades at $13.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs CXDO Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 187.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while CXDO trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 80.75. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs FNGR Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, FNGR has a market cap of 115.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while FNGR trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas FNGR's P/E ratio is -22.33. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FNGR's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to FNGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs MTSL Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while MTSL trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is less volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs SIFY Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 58.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while SIFY trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is -5.53. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs TDI Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TDI has a market cap of 57.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while TDI trades at $33.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas TDI's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to TDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs PCLA Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PCLA has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while PCLA trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas PCLA's P/E ratio is -14.54. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PCLA's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is less volatile compared to PCLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs KORE Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 38.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while KORE trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KORE's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to KORE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs IQST Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, IQST has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while IQST trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas IQST's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IQST's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is less volatile compared to IQST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs ANTE Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ANTE has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while ANTE trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas ANTE's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANTE's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is less volatile compared to ANTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs MIMO Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MIMO has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while MIMO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas MIMO's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MIMO's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to MIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs UCL Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, UCL has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while UCL trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas UCL's P/E ratio is -9.15. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UCL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to UCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs QTEK Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, QTEK has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while QTEK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas QTEK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QTEK's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to QTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs QTEKW Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, QTEKW has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while QTEKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas QTEKW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QTEKW's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is less volatile compared to QTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs COMSP Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, COMSP has a market cap of 513. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while COMSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas COMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COMSP's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to COMSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs COMSW Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, COMSW has a market cap of 257. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while COMSW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas COMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COMSW's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to COMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs LORL Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LORL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while LORL trades at $41.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas LORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LORL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to LORL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs GTT Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, GTT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while GTT trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas GTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GTT's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is less volatile compared to GTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs PTNR Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, PTNR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while PTNR trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas PTNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PTNR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to PTNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs TDA Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TDA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while TDA trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas TDA's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to TDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs MIMO-WT Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, MIMO-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while MIMO-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas MIMO-WT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MIMO-WT's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is less volatile compared to MIMO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs ALSK Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, ALSK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while ALSK trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas ALSK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALSK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to ALSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs STRY Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, STRY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while STRY trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas STRY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STRY's ROE of +6.74%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to STRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs OIBR-C Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, OIBR-C has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while OIBR-C trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas OIBR-C's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OIBR-C's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to OIBR-C. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs LBYAV Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, LBYAV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while LBYAV trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas LBYAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBYAV's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to LBYAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs CBB Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, CBB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while CBB trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas CBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CBB's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to CBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs UZA Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, UZA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while UZA trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas UZA's P/E ratio is 72.43. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UZA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is more volatile compared to UZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.
IHS vs TIGOR Comparison
IHS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IHS stands at 1.9B. In comparison, TIGOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IHS is priced at $5.80, while TIGOR trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IHS currently has a P/E ratio of -44.65, whereas TIGOR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IHS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIGOR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IHS is less volatile compared to TIGOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IHS.