Icahn Enterprises L.P.
Icahn Enterprises L.P. (IEP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IEP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEP | $9.27 | -0.96% | 5.1B | -5.65 | -$1.64 | +26.57% |
| HON | $225.08 | +0.37% | 142.9B | 25.61 | $8.79 | +2.00% |
| MMM | $152.11 | +0.56% | 81B | 21.13 | $7.20 | +1.90% |
| VMI | $357.65 | -1.05% | 7.2B | 33.09 | $10.81 | +0.71% |
| GFF | $82.19 | -0.56% | 3.9B | 17.02 | $4.83 | +0.84% |
| MDU | $16.88 | -0.88% | 3.4B | 18.55 | $0.91 | +2.72% |
| SEB | $3,100.72 | -0.88% | 3B | 30.69 | $101.04 | +0.29% |
| VRTV | $169.99 | +0.02% | 2.3B | 8.58 | $19.82 | N/A |
| BBU | $25.55 | -0.47% | 2.3B | -72.43 | -$0.35 | +0.97% |
| CODI-PC | $18.01 | -1.21% | 1.4B | 20.92 | $0.86 | +14.75% |
Stock Comparison
IEP vs HON Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, HON has a market cap of 142.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while HON trades at $225.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas HON's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to HON's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to HON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check HON's competition here
IEP vs MMM Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MMM has a market cap of 81B. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while MMM trades at $152.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas MMM's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MMM's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is less volatile compared to MMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check MMM's competition here
IEP vs VMI Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, VMI has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while VMI trades at $357.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas VMI's P/E ratio is 33.09. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to VMI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to VMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check VMI's competition here
IEP vs GFF Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, GFF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while GFF trades at $82.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas GFF's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GFF's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to GFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check GFF's competition here
IEP vs MDU Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MDU has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while MDU trades at $16.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas MDU's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MDU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to MDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check MDU's competition here
IEP vs SEB Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SEB has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while SEB trades at $3,100.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas SEB's P/E ratio is 30.69. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SEB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to SEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check SEB's competition here
IEP vs VRTV Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, VRTV has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while VRTV trades at $169.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas VRTV's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to VRTV's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to VRTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check VRTV's competition here
IEP vs BBU Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, BBU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while BBU trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas BBU's P/E ratio is -72.43. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BBU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to BBU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check BBU's competition here
IEP vs CODI-PC Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CODI-PC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while CODI-PC trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas CODI-PC's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CODI-PC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is less volatile compared to CODI-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check CODI-PC's competition here
IEP vs FBYDW Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, FBYDW has a market cap of 906.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while FBYDW trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas FBYDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FBYDW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is less volatile compared to FBYDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check FBYDW's competition here
IEP vs SPLP Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SPLP has a market cap of 804.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while SPLP trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas SPLP's P/E ratio is 3.72. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SPLP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to SPLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check SPLP's competition here
IEP vs MATW Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, MATW has a market cap of 745.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while MATW trades at $24.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas MATW's P/E ratio is -9.42. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MATW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is less volatile compared to MATW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check MATW's competition here
IEP vs FIP Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, FIP has a market cap of 734.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while FIP trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas FIP's P/E ratio is -4.96. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FIP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is less volatile compared to FIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check FIP's competition here
IEP vs CRESY Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CRESY has a market cap of 704.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while CRESY trades at $11.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas CRESY's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CRESY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is less volatile compared to CRESY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check CRESY's competition here
IEP vs CRESW Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CRESW has a market cap of 546.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while CRESW trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas CRESW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CRESW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to CRESW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check CRESW's competition here
IEP vs CODI-PB Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CODI-PB has a market cap of 510.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while CODI-PB trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas CODI-PB's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CODI-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is less volatile compared to CODI-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check CODI-PB's competition here
IEP vs CODI Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CODI has a market cap of 509.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while CODI trades at $6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas CODI's P/E ratio is -5.42. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CODI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is less volatile compared to CODI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check CODI's competition here
IEP vs CODI-PA Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, CODI-PA has a market cap of 503.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while CODI-PA trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas CODI-PA's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CODI-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is less volatile compared to CODI-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check CODI-PA's competition here
IEP vs TRC Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, TRC has a market cap of 500.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while TRC trades at $18.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas TRC's P/E ratio is 232.63. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TRC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to TRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check TRC's competition here
IEP vs SPLP-PA Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, SPLP-PA has a market cap of 369.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while SPLP-PA trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas SPLP-PA's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SPLP-PA's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is less volatile compared to SPLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check SPLP-PA's competition here
IEP vs FIPWV Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, FIPWV has a market cap of 328.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while FIPWV trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas FIPWV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FIPWV's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is less volatile compared to FIPWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check FIPWV's competition here
IEP vs FBYD Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, FBYD has a market cap of 259.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while FBYD trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas FBYD's P/E ratio is 696.00. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FBYD's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is less volatile compared to FBYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check FBYD's competition here
IEP vs RCMT Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, RCMT has a market cap of 188.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while RCMT trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas RCMT's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RCMT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to RCMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check RCMT's competition here
IEP vs TUSK Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, TUSK has a market cap of 131.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while TUSK trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas TUSK's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TUSK's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to TUSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check TUSK's competition here
IEP vs IRS Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, IRS has a market cap of 116.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while IRS trades at $15.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas IRS's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to IRS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is less volatile compared to IRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check IRS's competition here
IEP vs NNBR Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, NNBR has a market cap of 107.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while NNBR trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas NNBR's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NNBR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is less volatile compared to NNBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check NNBR's competition here
IEP vs IGC Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, IGC has a market cap of 31.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while IGC trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas IGC's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to IGC's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is less volatile compared to IGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check IGC's competition here
IEP vs EFSH Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, EFSH has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while EFSH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas EFSH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to EFSH's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is less volatile compared to EFSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check EFSH's competition here
IEP vs DOTAU Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, DOTAU has a market cap of 851. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while DOTAU trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas DOTAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to DOTAU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to DOTAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check DOTAU's competition here
IEP vs FNTEU Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, FNTEU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while FNTEU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas FNTEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FNTEU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to FNTEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check FNTEU's competition here
IEP vs JBK Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, JBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while JBK trades at $26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas JBK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to JBK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to JBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check JBK's competition here
IEP vs OBCI Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, OBCI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while OBCI trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas OBCI's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to OBCI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to OBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check OBCI's competition here
IEP vs ELECU Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, ELECU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while ELECU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas ELECU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ELECU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to ELECU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check ELECU's competition here
IEP vs STLRU Comparison July 2025
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 5.1B. In comparison, STLRU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $9.27, while STLRU trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.65, whereas STLRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to STLRU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to STLRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.Check STLRU's competition here