Icahn Enterprises L.P.
Icahn Enterprises L.P. IEP Peers
See (IEP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEP | $8.52 | +5.89% | 4.5B | -5.07 | -$1.64 | +29.94% |
| HON | $238.46 | +2.40% | 153.5B | 27.48 | $8.69 | +1.88% |
| MMM | $154.00 | +1.16% | 82.8B | 19.13 | $8.04 | +1.85% |
| VMI | $338.47 | +3.64% | 6.7B | 19.50 | $17.17 | +0.76% |
| GFF | $77.68 | +7.33% | 3.6B | 15.75 | $4.83 | +0.91% |
| MDU | $16.61 | -0.39% | 3.4B | 18.43 | $0.91 | +2.73% |
| SEB | $2,976.40 | +4.03% | 2.8B | 28.92 | $100.94 | +0.31% |
| BBU | $26.30 | +1.43% | 2.3B | -74.69 | -$0.35 | +0.96% |
| VRTV | $169.99 | +0.02% | 2.3B | 8.58 | $19.82 | N/A |
| CODI-PC | $19.12 | +1.43% | 1.4B | 22.18 | $0.86 | +15.38% |
Stock Comparison
IEP vs HON Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, HON has a market cap of 153.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while HON trades at $238.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas HON's P/E ratio is 27.48. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to HON's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to HON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs MMM Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MMM has a market cap of 82.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while MMM trades at $154.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas MMM's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MMM's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to MMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs VMI Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, VMI has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while VMI trades at $338.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas VMI's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to VMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to VMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs GFF Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, GFF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while GFF trades at $77.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas GFF's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GFF's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to GFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs MDU Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MDU has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while MDU trades at $16.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas MDU's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MDU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to MDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs SEB Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SEB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while SEB trades at $2,976.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas SEB's P/E ratio is 28.92. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SEB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to SEB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs BBU Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BBU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while BBU trades at $26.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas BBU's P/E ratio is -74.69. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BBU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to BBU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs VRTV Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, VRTV has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while VRTV trades at $169.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas VRTV's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to VRTV's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to VRTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs CODI-PC Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CODI-PC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while CODI-PC trades at $19.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas CODI-PC's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CODI-PC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is less volatile compared to CODI-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs SPLP Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SPLP has a market cap of 794.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while SPLP trades at $37.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas SPLP's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SPLP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to SPLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs MATW Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MATW has a market cap of 762.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while MATW trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas MATW's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MATW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is less volatile compared to MATW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs FIP Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, FIP has a market cap of 711.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while FIP trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas FIP's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FIP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is less volatile compared to FIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs CRESY Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CRESY has a market cap of 661.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while CRESY trades at $10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas CRESY's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CRESY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to CRESY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs FBYDW Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, FBYDW has a market cap of 568.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while FBYDW trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas FBYDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FBYDW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is less volatile compared to FBYDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs CRESW Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CRESW has a market cap of 515.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while CRESW trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas CRESW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CRESW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is less volatile compared to CRESW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs CODI-PA Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CODI-PA has a market cap of 506.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while CODI-PA trades at $17.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas CODI-PA's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CODI-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to CODI-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs CODI-PB Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CODI-PB has a market cap of 497.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while CODI-PB trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas CODI-PB's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CODI-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to CODI-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs CODI Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CODI has a market cap of 480.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while CODI trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas CODI's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CODI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to CODI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs TRC Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TRC has a market cap of 466.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while TRC trades at $17.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas TRC's P/E ratio is 217.06. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TRC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to TRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs SPLP-PA Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SPLP-PA has a market cap of 369.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while SPLP-PA trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas SPLP-PA's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SPLP-PA's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is less volatile compared to SPLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs FIPWV Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, FIPWV has a market cap of 328.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while FIPWV trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas FIPWV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FIPWV's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is less volatile compared to FIPWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs FBYD Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, FBYD has a market cap of 214.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while FBYD trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas FBYD's P/E ratio is 576.00. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FBYD's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is less volatile compared to FBYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs RCMT Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, RCMT has a market cap of 183.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while RCMT trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas RCMT's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RCMT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is less volatile compared to RCMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs TUSK Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, TUSK has a market cap of 135.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while TUSK trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas TUSK's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TUSK's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to TUSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs NNBR Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NNBR has a market cap of 108.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while NNBR trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas NNBR's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NNBR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is less volatile compared to NNBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs IRS Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, IRS has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while IRS trades at $14.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas IRS's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to IRS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to IRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs IGC Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, IGC has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while IGC trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas IGC's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to IGC's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is less volatile compared to IGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs EFSH Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, EFSH has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while EFSH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas EFSH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to EFSH's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is less volatile compared to EFSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs DOTAU Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, DOTAU has a market cap of 851. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while DOTAU trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas DOTAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to DOTAU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to DOTAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs OBCI Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, OBCI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while OBCI trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas OBCI's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to OBCI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to OBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs STLRU Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, STLRU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while STLRU trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas STLRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to STLRU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to STLRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs ELECU Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ELECU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while ELECU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas ELECU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ELECU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to ELECU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs FNTEU Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, FNTEU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while FNTEU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas FNTEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FNTEU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to FNTEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.
IEP vs JBK Comparison
IEP plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IEP stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IEP is priced at $8.52, while JBK trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IEP currently has a P/E ratio of -5.07, whereas JBK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IEP's ROE is -0.25%, compared to JBK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IEP is more volatile compared to JBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IEP.