IAHL Corp.
IAHL Corp. IAHL Peers
See (IAHL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IAHL | $0.00 | -0.00% | 6.5K | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| JXHLY | $9.57 | +2.16% | 14B | 199.30 | $0.05 | +2.59% |
| JXHGF | $4.91 | +0.00% | 13.5B | 166.67 | $0.03 | +3.25% |
| NTOIY | $6.90 | +2.37% | 10.7B | -31.55 | -$0.22 | +6.96% |
| NTOIF | $13.40 | +1.13% | 10.3B | -30.45 | -$0.44 | +6.60% |
| IDKOF | $5.53 | +0.00% | 8.6B | 12.31 | $0.54 | +1.91% |
| KLYCY | $9.31 | +0.00% | 8.4B | 10.14 | $0.96 | +4.43% |
| SAAFY | $8.80 | +2.33% | 8.4B | 5.06 | $1.74 | N/A |
| IDKOY | $11.36 | -7.18% | 7.5B | 11.37 | $1.07 | +2.46% |
| DCCPF | $61.88 | -0.00% | 7.2B | 25.48 | $2.88 | +4.68% |
Stock Comparison
IAHL vs JXHLY Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, JXHLY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while JXHLY trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JXHLY's P/E ratio is 199.30. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to JXHLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and JXHLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs JXHGF Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, JXHGF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while JXHGF trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JXHGF's P/E ratio is 166.67. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to JXHGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and JXHGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs NTOIY Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, NTOIY has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while NTOIY trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTOIY's P/E ratio is -31.55. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to NTOIY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL is less volatile compared to NTOIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAHL.
IAHL vs NTOIF Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, NTOIF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while NTOIF trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTOIF's P/E ratio is -30.45. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to NTOIF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and NTOIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs IDKOF Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, IDKOF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while IDKOF trades at $5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDKOF's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to IDKOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and IDKOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs KLYCY Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, KLYCY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while KLYCY trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KLYCY's P/E ratio is 10.14. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to KLYCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and KLYCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs SAAFY Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, SAAFY has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while SAAFY trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAAFY's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to SAAFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL is less volatile compared to SAAFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAHL.
IAHL vs IDKOY Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, IDKOY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while IDKOY trades at $11.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IDKOY's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to IDKOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and IDKOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs DCCPF Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, DCCPF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while DCCPF trades at $61.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCCPF's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to DCCPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and DCCPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs KUNUF Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, KUNUF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while KUNUF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KUNUF's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to KUNUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and KUNUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs DCCPY Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, DCCPY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while DCCPY trades at $31.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DCCPY's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to DCCPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and DCCPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs MOHCY Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, MOHCY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while MOHCY trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOHCY's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to MOHCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and MOHCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs PKIUF Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, PKIUF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while PKIUF trades at $28.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKIUF's P/E ratio is 34.49. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to PKIUF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL is less volatile compared to PKIUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAHL.
IAHL vs CTXAF Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, CTXAF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while CTXAF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTXAF's P/E ratio is 58.48. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to CTXAF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and CTXAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs PNADF Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, PNADF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while PNADF trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNADF's P/E ratio is 37.33. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to PNADF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and PNADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs SHIIY Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, SHIIY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while SHIIY trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHIIY's P/E ratio is 35.84. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to SHIIY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL is less volatile compared to SHIIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAHL.
IAHL vs CTXAY Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, CTXAY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while CTXAY trades at $33.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTXAY's P/E ratio is 50.94. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to CTXAY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL is less volatile compared to CTXAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAHL.
IAHL vs RBSFY Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, RBSFY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while RBSFY trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBSFY's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to RBSFY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL is less volatile compared to RBSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAHL.
IAHL vs MOHCF Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, MOHCF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while MOHCF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOHCF's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to MOHCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and MOHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs RUBSF Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, RUBSF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while RUBSF trades at $31.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUBSF's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to RUBSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and RUBSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs TOIPY Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, TOIPY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while TOIPY trades at $9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOIPY's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to TOIPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and TOIPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs TOIPF Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, TOIPF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while TOIPF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOIPF's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to TOIPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and TOIPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs PKCPY Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, PKCPY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while PKCPY trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKCPY's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to PKCPY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and PKCPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs FJLLF Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, FJLLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while FJLLF trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FJLLF's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to FJLLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and FJLLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs IRPSY Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, IRPSY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while IRPSY trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IRPSY's P/E ratio is -4.20. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to IRPSY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and IRPSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs OILRF Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, OILRF has a market cap of 901.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while OILRF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OILRF's P/E ratio is 29.00. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to OILRF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL is less volatile compared to OILRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAHL.
IAHL vs TPHIF Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, TPHIF has a market cap of 679.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while TPHIF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPHIF's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to TPHIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and TPHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs CAOLF Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, CAOLF has a market cap of 474M. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while CAOLF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAOLF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to CAOLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and CAOLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs NZRFF Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, NZRFF has a market cap of 410M. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while NZRFF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NZRFF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to NZRFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and NZRFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs FGPRB Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, FGPRB has a market cap of 204.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while FGPRB trades at $125.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGPRB's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to FGPRB's ROE of +4.44%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and FGPRB have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs REGX Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, REGX has a market cap of 152.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while REGX trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REGX's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to REGX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and REGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs CLSZF Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, CLSZF has a market cap of 81.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while CLSZF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLSZF's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to CLSZF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and CLSZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs FGPR Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, FGPR has a market cap of 48.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while FGPR trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGPR's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to FGPR's ROE of +4.44%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL is less volatile compared to FGPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAHL.
IAHL vs BDCO Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, BDCO has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while BDCO trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BDCO's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to BDCO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and BDCO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs ISRJF Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, ISRJF has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while ISRJF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISRJF's P/E ratio is -7.52. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to ISRJF's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and ISRJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs QREE Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, QREE has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while QREE trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QREE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to QREE's ROE of +5.66%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and QREE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs LCNTU Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, LCNTU has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while LCNTU trades at $511.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCNTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to LCNTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and LCNTU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs SRNW Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, SRNW has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while SRNW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRNW's P/E ratio is -8.69. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to SRNW's ROE of -5.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL is less volatile compared to SRNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAHL.
IAHL vs WTLC Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, WTLC has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while WTLC trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTLC's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to WTLC's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and WTLC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs BERI Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, BERI has a market cap of 409.2K. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while BERI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BERI's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to BERI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and BERI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs DVFI Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, DVFI has a market cap of 28.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while DVFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DVFI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to DVFI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and DVFI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs ABLE Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, ABLE has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while ABLE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABLE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to ABLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL is less volatile compared to ABLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IAHL.
IAHL vs TOAOF Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, TOAOF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while TOAOF trades at $23.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOAOF's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to TOAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and TOAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
IAHL vs LNKE Comparison
IAHL plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IAHL stands at 6.5K. In comparison, LNKE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IAHL is priced at $0.00, while LNKE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IAHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNKE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IAHL's ROE is N/A, compared to LNKE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IAHL and LNKE have similar daily volatility (0.00).