Hennessy Capital Investment Corp. VII
Hennessy Capital Investment Corp. VII HVIIR Peers
See (HVIIR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HVIIR | $0.33 | -6.29% | 6.5M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TPGXL | $25.60 | +1.79% | 19B | N/A | N/A | +3.45% |
| VOYA-PB | $23.71 | -0.16% | 6.6B | 2.81 | $8.44 | +2.69% |
| VOYA | $66.78 | +0.36% | 6.4B | 12.48 | $5.35 | +2.69% |
| BIPH | $16.28 | +1.18% | 5.9B | N/A | N/A | +7.69% |
| PACS | $13.21 | -0.68% | 2B | 21.66 | $0.61 | N/A |
| MSDL | $19.33 | -0.36% | 1.7B | 8.87 | $2.18 | +11.35% |
| RILYM | $25.11 | N/A | 753M | N/A | N/A | +4.76% |
| BEAGU | $10.75 | +0.37% | 617.8M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| RILYO | $25.13 | -0.02% | 573.5M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HVIIR vs TPGXL Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, TPGXL has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while TPGXL trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPGXL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TPGXL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to TPGXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs VOYA-PB Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, VOYA-PB has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while VOYA-PB trades at $23.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOYA-PB's P/E ratio is 2.81. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to VOYA-PB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to VOYA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs VOYA Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, VOYA has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while VOYA trades at $66.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOYA's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to VOYA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to VOYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs BIPH Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, BIPH has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while BIPH trades at $16.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BIPH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to BIPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs PACS Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, PACS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while PACS trades at $13.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PACS's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PACS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to PACS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs MSDL Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, MSDL has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while MSDL trades at $19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSDL's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MSDL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to MSDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs RILYM Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, RILYM has a market cap of 753M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while RILYM trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RILYM's ROE of +17.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to RILYM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs BEAGU Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, BEAGU has a market cap of 617.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while BEAGU trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEAGU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BEAGU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to BEAGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs RILYO Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, RILYO has a market cap of 573.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while RILYO trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RILYO's ROE of +17.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to RILYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs TREE Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, TREE has a market cap of 472M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while TREE trades at $34.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TREE's P/E ratio is -8.42. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TREE's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to TREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs ANSCU Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, ANSCU has a market cap of 460.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while ANSCU trades at $10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANSCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ANSCU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to ANSCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs BACQU Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, BACQU has a market cap of 360.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while BACQU trades at $10.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BACQU's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to BACQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs DRDBU Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, DRDBU has a market cap of 324.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while DRDBU trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRDBU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DRDBU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to DRDBU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs POLEU Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, POLEU has a market cap of 308.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while POLEU trades at $10.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POLEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to POLEU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to POLEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs HVIIU Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, HVIIU has a market cap of 288.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while HVIIU trades at $10.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVIIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HVIIU's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to HVIIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs PLMKU Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, PLMKU has a market cap of 267.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while PLMKU trades at $10.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLMKU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PLMKU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to PLMKU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs HVII Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, HVII has a market cap of 264.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while HVII trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to HVII's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to HVII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs FACTU Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, FACTU has a market cap of 250.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while FACTU trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FACTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FACTU's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to FACTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs NTWOU Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, NTWOU has a market cap of 249.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while NTWOU trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTWOU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NTWOU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to NTWOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs PLMK Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, PLMK has a market cap of 249M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while PLMK trades at $10.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PLMK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to PLMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs DRDB Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, DRDB has a market cap of 238.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while DRDB trades at $10.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRDB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DRDB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to DRDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs DMAAU Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, DMAAU has a market cap of 237.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while DMAAU trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DMAAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DMAAU's ROE of +2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to DMAAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs BSIIU Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, BSIIU has a market cap of 165.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while BSIIU trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSIIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BSIIU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to BSIIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs TAVIU Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, TAVIU has a market cap of 165.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while TAVIU trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAVIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TAVIU's ROE of +2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to TAVIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs RANG Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, RANG has a market cap of 163.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while RANG trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RANG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RANG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to RANG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs SVCCU Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, SVCCU has a market cap of 160.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while SVCCU trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVCCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SVCCU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to SVCCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs ACOG Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, ACOG has a market cap of 142M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while ACOG trades at $9.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACOG's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ACOG's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is less volatile compared to ACOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs SPHA Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, SPHA has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while SPHA trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SPHA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to SPHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs NOEM Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, NOEM has a market cap of 96.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while NOEM trades at $10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOEM's P/E ratio is 201.40. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NOEM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to NOEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs DTSQ Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, DTSQ has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while DTSQ trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTSQ's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DTSQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to DTSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs RMI Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, RMI has a market cap of 91.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while RMI trades at $14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMI's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RMI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to RMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs RILYN Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, RILYN has a market cap of 89.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while RILYN trades at $12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RILYN's ROE of +19.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to RILYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs RILYK Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, RILYK has a market cap of 89.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while RILYK trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RILYK's ROE of +19.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to RILYK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs RILY Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, RILY has a market cap of 89.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while RILY trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILY's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RILY's ROE of +19.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to RILY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs FLDD Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, FLDD has a market cap of 85.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while FLDD trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLDD's P/E ratio is -75.13. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FLDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is less volatile compared to FLDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs RILYG Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, RILYG has a market cap of 84.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while RILYG trades at $11.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RILYG's ROE of +19.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to RILYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs CAPNU Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, CAPNU has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while CAPNU trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAPNU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CAPNU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to CAPNU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs YHNA Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, YHNA has a market cap of 80.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while YHNA trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YHNA's P/E ratio is 41.41. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to YHNA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to YHNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs RILYT Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, RILYT has a market cap of 78.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while RILYT trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RILYT's ROE of +19.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is less volatile compared to RILYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs RILYL Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, RILYL has a market cap of 58.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while RILYL trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYL's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RILYL's ROE of +19.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to RILYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs BAYAU Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, BAYAU has a market cap of 58M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while BAYAU trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BAYAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BAYAU's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to BAYAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs RILYP Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, RILYP has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while RILYP trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYP's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RILYP's ROE of +19.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is less volatile compared to RILYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs COOTW Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, COOTW has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while COOTW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COOTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to COOTW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is less volatile compared to COOTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs DRDBW Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, DRDBW has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while DRDBW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRDBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DRDBW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to DRDBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs APLMW Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, APLMW has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while APLMW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APLMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to APLMW's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is less volatile compared to APLMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs MLACR Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, MLACR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while MLACR trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLACR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MLACR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to MLACR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs PLMKW Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, PLMKW has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while PLMKW trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLMKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PLMKW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to PLMKW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs RANGR Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, RANGR has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while RANGR trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RANGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RANGR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is less volatile compared to RANGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs TENKR Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, TENKR has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while TENKR trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TENKR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TENKR's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to TENKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs NOEMR Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, NOEMR has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while NOEMR trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOEMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to NOEMR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is less volatile compared to NOEMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs EURKR Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, EURKR has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while EURKR trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EURKR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EURKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to EURKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs YHNAR Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, YHNAR has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while YHNAR trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YHNAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to YHNAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to YHNAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs CAPNR Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, CAPNR has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while CAPNR trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAPNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CAPNR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to CAPNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs DTSQR Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, DTSQR has a market cap of 980K. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while DTSQR trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTSQR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DTSQR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to DTSQR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs FSHPR Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, FSHPR has a market cap of 886.3K. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while FSHPR trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSHPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FSHPR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to FSHPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs EMCGR Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, EMCGR has a market cap of 626.9K. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while EMCGR trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMCGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to EMCGR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to EMCGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs BRACR Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, BRACR has a market cap of 536.9K. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while BRACR trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRACR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BRACR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is less volatile compared to BRACR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs ATMCR Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, ATMCR has a market cap of 486.4K. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while ATMCR trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATMCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ATMCR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to ATMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs BSLKW Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, BSLKW has a market cap of 35.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while BSLKW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BSLKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BSLKW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to BSLKW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs RILYI Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, RILYI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while RILYI trades at $25.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RILYI's ROE of +2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to RILYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs BIPJ Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, BIPJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while BIPJ trades at $22.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIPJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BIPJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to BIPJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs RILYH Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, RILYH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while RILYH trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYH's P/E ratio is 43.70. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to RILYH's ROE of +19.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to RILYH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs SPHAR Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, SPHAR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while SPHAR trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPHAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SPHAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is more volatile compared to SPHAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.
HVIIR vs LCAAW Comparison
HVIIR plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HVIIR stands at 6.5M. In comparison, LCAAW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HVIIR is priced at $0.33, while LCAAW trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HVIIR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCAAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HVIIR's ROE is -0.20%, compared to LCAAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HVIIR is less volatile compared to LCAAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HVIIR.