Fusion Fuel Green PLC
Fusion Fuel Green PLC (HTOO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HTOO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HTOO | $3.40 | -1.88% | 6.5M | -0.23 | -$15.74 | N/A |
| GEV | $834.61 | +0.00% | 225.3B | 47.02 | $17.66 | +0.15% |
| CEG | $291.66 | +0.00% | 92.1B | 33.77 | $8.73 | +0.53% |
| AXIA | $11.72 | -0.01% | 26.7B | -22.03 | -$0.54 | +10.63% |
| AQNU | $19.34 | +2.00% | 13.3B | 37.48 | $0.52 | +3.93% |
| BEP | $31.47 | +0.00% | 9.7B | -127.36 | -$0.25 | +4.68% |
| ENLT | $68.80 | +0.00% | 9.3B | 77.83 | $0.90 | N/A |
| CWEN | $39.16 | +0.00% | 8.1B | 16.86 | $2.35 | +4.47% |
| CWEN-A | $36.77 | +0.00% | 7.8B | 15.74 | $2.35 | +4.47% |
| ORA | $120.05 | +0.00% | 7B | 53.66 | $2.16 | +0.41% |
Stock Comparison
HTOO vs GEV Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, GEV has a market cap of 225.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while GEV trades at $834.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas GEV's P/E ratio is 47.02. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to GEV's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to GEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check GEV's competition here
HTOO vs CEG Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, CEG has a market cap of 92.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while CEG trades at $291.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas CEG's P/E ratio is 33.77. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to CEG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to CEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check CEG's competition here
HTOO vs AXIA Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, AXIA has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while AXIA trades at $11.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas AXIA's P/E ratio is -22.03. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to AXIA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to AXIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check AXIA's competition here
HTOO vs AQNU Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, AQNU has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while AQNU trades at $19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas AQNU's P/E ratio is 37.48. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to AQNU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to AQNU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check AQNU's competition here
HTOO vs BEP Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, BEP has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while BEP trades at $31.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas BEP's P/E ratio is -127.36. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to BEP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to BEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check BEP's competition here
HTOO vs ENLT Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, ENLT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while ENLT trades at $68.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas ENLT's P/E ratio is 77.83. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to ENLT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to ENLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check ENLT's competition here
HTOO vs CWEN Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, CWEN has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while CWEN trades at $39.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas CWEN's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to CWEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to CWEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check CWEN's competition here
HTOO vs CWEN-A Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, CWEN-A has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while CWEN-A trades at $36.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas CWEN-A's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to CWEN-A's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to CWEN-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check CWEN-A's competition here
HTOO vs ORA Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, ORA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while ORA trades at $120.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas ORA's P/E ratio is 53.66. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to ORA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to ORA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check ORA's competition here
HTOO vs BEP-PA Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, BEP-PA has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while BEP-PA trades at $18.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas BEP-PA's P/E ratio is -35.66. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to BEP-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to BEP-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check BEP-PA's competition here
HTOO vs BEPC Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, BEPC has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while BEPC trades at $42.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas BEPC's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to BEPC's ROE of -10.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to BEPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check BEPC's competition here
HTOO vs AQN Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, AQN has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while AQN trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas AQN's P/E ratio is 95.50. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to AQN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to AQN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check AQN's competition here
HTOO vs EE Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, EE has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while EE trades at $41.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas EE's P/E ratio is 29.46. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to EE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to EE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check EE's competition here
HTOO vs SMR Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, SMR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while SMR trades at $14.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas SMR's P/E ratio is -6.29. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to SMR's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to SMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check SMR's competition here
HTOO vs AY Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, AY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while AY trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas AY's P/E ratio is 87.96. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to AY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to AY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check AY's competition here
HTOO vs SMR-WT Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, SMR-WT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while SMR-WT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas SMR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to SMR-WT's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to SMR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check SMR-WT's competition here
HTOO vs FLNC Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, FLNC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while FLNC trades at $16.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas FLNC's P/E ratio is -42.44. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to FLNC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to FLNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check FLNC's competition here
HTOO vs RNW Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, RNW has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while RNW trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas RNW's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to RNW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to RNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check RNW's competition here
HTOO vs NEP Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, NEP has a market cap of 985.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while NEP trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas NEP's P/E ratio is -105.40. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to NEP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to NEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check NEP's competition here
HTOO vs AMPS Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, AMPS has a market cap of 800.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while AMPS trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas AMPS's P/E ratio is 499.00. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to AMPS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to AMPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check AMPS's competition here
HTOO vs NRGV Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, NRGV has a market cap of 514.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while NRGV trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas NRGV's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to NRGV's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to NRGV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check NRGV's competition here
HTOO vs ELLO Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, ELLO has a market cap of 352.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while ELLO trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas ELLO's P/E ratio is -365.71. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to ELLO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to ELLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check ELLO's competition here
HTOO vs AZRE Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, AZRE has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while AZRE trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas AZRE's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to AZRE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to AZRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check AZRE's competition here
HTOO vs NXXT Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, NXXT has a market cap of 90.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while NXXT trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas NXXT's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to NXXT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is less volatile compared to NXXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check NXXT's competition here
HTOO vs VGAS Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, VGAS has a market cap of 58.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while VGAS trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas VGAS's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to VGAS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is less volatile compared to VGAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check VGAS's competition here
HTOO vs SUUN Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, SUUN has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while SUUN trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas SUUN's P/E ratio is -4.83. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to SUUN's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is less volatile compared to SUUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check SUUN's competition here
HTOO vs WAVE Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, WAVE has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while WAVE trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas WAVE's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to WAVE's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to WAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check WAVE's competition here
HTOO vs CREG Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, CREG has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while CREG trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas CREG's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to CREG's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to CREG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check CREG's competition here
HTOO vs RAIN Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, RAIN has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while RAIN trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas RAIN's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to RAIN's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to RAIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check RAIN's competition here
HTOO vs HLGN-WT Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, HLGN-WT has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while HLGN-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas HLGN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to HLGN-WT's ROE of +400.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to HLGN-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check HLGN-WT's competition here
HTOO vs HLGN Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, HLGN has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while HLGN trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas HLGN's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to HLGN's ROE of +400.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to HLGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check HLGN's competition here
HTOO vs RNWWW Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, RNWWW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while RNWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas RNWWW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to RNWWW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to RNWWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check RNWWW's competition here
HTOO vs ADN Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, ADN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while ADN trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas ADN's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to ADN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to ADN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check ADN's competition here
HTOO vs ELIQ Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, ELIQ has a market cap of 709.5K. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while ELIQ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas ELIQ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to ELIQ's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is less volatile compared to ELIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check ELIQ's competition here
HTOO vs BNRG Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, BNRG has a market cap of 525.9K. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while BNRG trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas BNRG's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to BNRG's ROE of -4.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is less volatile compared to BNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check BNRG's competition here
HTOO vs HTOOW Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, HTOOW has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while HTOOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas HTOOW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to HTOOW's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is less volatile compared to HTOOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check HTOOW's competition here
HTOO vs ALCE Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, ALCE has a market cap of 600. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while ALCE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas ALCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to ALCE's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to ALCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check ALCE's competition here
HTOO vs ADNWW Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, ADNWW has a market cap of 544. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while ADNWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas ADNWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to ADNWW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is less volatile compared to ADNWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check ADNWW's competition here
HTOO vs JNS Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, JNS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while JNS trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas JNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to JNS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to JNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check JNS's competition here
HTOO vs GXP Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, GXP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while GXP trades at $31.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas GXP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to GXP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to GXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check GXP's competition here
HTOO vs LFG Comparison February 2026
HTOO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HTOO stands at 6.5M. In comparison, LFG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HTOO is priced at $3.40, while LFG trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HTOO currently has a P/E ratio of -0.23, whereas LFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HTOO's ROE is -1.78%, compared to LFG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HTOO is more volatile compared to LFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HTOO.Check LFG's competition here