Hillman Solutions Corp.
Hillman Solutions Corp. (HLMN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HLMN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLMN | $8.07 | -0.12% | 1.6B | 80.70 | $0.10 | N/A |
| SNA | $330.27 | -0.02% | 17.2B | 17.61 | $18.76 | +2.51% |
| LECO | $227.72 | +1.71% | 12.7B | 28.03 | $8.12 | +1.30% |
| RBC | $388.37 | +0.87% | 12.2B | 50.40 | $7.71 | N/A |
| SWK | $73.90 | +1.66% | 11.4B | 31.32 | $2.36 | +4.44% |
| SWH | $124.86 | +0.22% | 10.5B | 21.57 | $5.79 | +4.44% |
| ROLLP | $107.15 | -2.99% | 10.1B | 54.95 | $1.95 | N/A |
| TTC | $75.36 | +0.91% | 7.4B | 19.37 | $3.89 | +1.99% |
| ROLL | $212.38 | -3.73% | 6.2B | 105.66 | $2.01 | N/A |
| TKR | $81.66 | +1.11% | 5.7B | 17.60 | $4.64 | +1.68% |
Stock Comparison
HLMN vs SNA Comparison July 2025
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SNA has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $8.07, while SNA trades at $330.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 80.70, whereas SNA's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SNA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is more volatile compared to SNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check SNA's competition here
HLMN vs LECO Comparison July 2025
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LECO has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $8.07, while LECO trades at $227.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 80.70, whereas LECO's P/E ratio is 28.03. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LECO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is less volatile compared to LECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check LECO's competition here
HLMN vs RBC Comparison July 2025
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RBC has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $8.07, while RBC trades at $388.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 80.70, whereas RBC's P/E ratio is 50.40. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RBC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is more volatile compared to RBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check RBC's competition here
HLMN vs SWK Comparison July 2025
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SWK has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $8.07, while SWK trades at $73.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 80.70, whereas SWK's P/E ratio is 31.32. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SWK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is less volatile compared to SWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check SWK's competition here
HLMN vs SWH Comparison July 2025
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SWH has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $8.07, while SWH trades at $124.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 80.70, whereas SWH's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SWH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is less volatile compared to SWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check SWH's competition here
HLMN vs ROLLP Comparison July 2025
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ROLLP has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $8.07, while ROLLP trades at $107.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 80.70, whereas ROLLP's P/E ratio is 54.95. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ROLLP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is more volatile compared to ROLLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check ROLLP's competition here
HLMN vs TTC Comparison July 2025
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TTC has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $8.07, while TTC trades at $75.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 80.70, whereas TTC's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TTC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is more volatile compared to TTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check TTC's competition here
HLMN vs ROLL Comparison July 2025
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ROLL has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $8.07, while ROLL trades at $212.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 80.70, whereas ROLL's P/E ratio is 105.66. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ROLL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is less volatile compared to ROLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check ROLL's competition here
HLMN vs TKR Comparison July 2025
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TKR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $8.07, while TKR trades at $81.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 80.70, whereas TKR's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TKR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is less volatile compared to TKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check TKR's competition here
HLMN vs RBCP Comparison July 2025
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RBCP has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $8.07, while RBCP trades at $123.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 80.70, whereas RBCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RBCP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is more volatile compared to RBCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check RBCP's competition here
HLMN vs KMT Comparison July 2025
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KMT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $8.07, while KMT trades at $25.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 80.70, whereas KMT's P/E ratio is 18.38. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KMT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is less volatile compared to KMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check KMT's competition here
HLMN vs EML Comparison July 2025
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, EML has a market cap of 142.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $8.07, while EML trades at $23.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 80.70, whereas EML's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EML's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is less volatile compared to EML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check EML's competition here
HLMN vs SCX Comparison July 2025
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SCX has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $8.07, while SCX trades at $16.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 80.70, whereas SCX's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SCX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is more volatile compared to SCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check SCX's competition here
HLMN vs PFIN Comparison July 2025
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PFIN has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $8.07, while PFIN trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 80.70, whereas PFIN's P/E ratio is -56.50. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PFIN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is more volatile compared to PFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check PFIN's competition here
HLMN vs CVR Comparison July 2025
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CVR has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $8.07, while CVR trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 80.70, whereas CVR's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CVR's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is less volatile compared to CVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check CVR's competition here
HLMN vs TBLT Comparison July 2025
HLMN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLMN stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TBLT has a market cap of 865.9K. Regarding current trading prices, HLMN is priced at $8.07, while TBLT trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLMN currently has a P/E ratio of 80.70, whereas TBLT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLMN's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TBLT's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, HLMN is less volatile compared to TBLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLMN.Check TBLT's competition here