Holley Inc. WT
Holley Inc. WT (HLLY-WT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HLLY-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLLY-WT | $0.05 | +4.65% | 259.2M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| APTV-PA | $108.66 | +0.15% | 29.4B | 92.08 | $1.18 | N/A |
| APTV | $65.65 | -4.36% | 14.3B | 10.73 | $6.12 | N/A |
| MGA | $41.32 | +0.78% | 11.6B | 10.30 | $4.01 | +4.66% |
| MBLY | $13.93 | -2.18% | 11.4B | -3.82 | -$3.65 | N/A |
| ALV | $110.31 | -1.11% | 8.5B | 12.09 | $9.12 | +2.52% |
| BWA | $37.52 | +1.96% | 8.2B | 35.39 | $1.06 | +1.18% |
| LKQ | $29.64 | +0.58% | 7.6B | 10.82 | $2.74 | +4.06% |
| ALSN | $87.69 | -2.64% | 7.4B | 10.15 | $8.64 | +1.19% |
| MOD | $133.70 | -0.64% | 7B | 38.30 | $3.49 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HLLY-WT vs APTV-PA Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, APTV-PA has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while APTV-PA trades at $108.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APTV-PA's P/E ratio is 92.08. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to APTV-PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to APTV-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check APTV-PA's competition here
HLLY-WT vs APTV Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, APTV has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while APTV trades at $65.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APTV's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to APTV's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to APTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check APTV's competition here
HLLY-WT vs MGA Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, MGA has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while MGA trades at $41.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGA's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to MGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check MGA's competition here
HLLY-WT vs MBLY Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, MBLY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while MBLY trades at $13.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBLY's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MBLY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to MBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check MBLY's competition here
HLLY-WT vs ALV Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, ALV has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while ALV trades at $110.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALV's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ALV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to ALV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check ALV's competition here
HLLY-WT vs BWA Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, BWA has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while BWA trades at $37.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWA's P/E ratio is 35.39. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BWA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to BWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check BWA's competition here
HLLY-WT vs LKQ Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, LKQ has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while LKQ trades at $29.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LKQ's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LKQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to LKQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check LKQ's competition here
HLLY-WT vs ALSN Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, ALSN has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while ALSN trades at $87.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALSN's P/E ratio is 10.15. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ALSN's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to ALSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check ALSN's competition here
HLLY-WT vs MOD Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while MOD trades at $133.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 38.30. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to MOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check MOD's competition here
HLLY-WT vs GNTX Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, GNTX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while GNTX trades at $26.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNTX's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GNTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to GNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check GNTX's competition here
HLLY-WT vs LEA Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, LEA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while LEA trades at $93.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LEA's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LEA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to LEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check LEA's competition here
HLLY-WT vs QS Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, QS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while QS trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QS's P/E ratio is -9.60. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QS's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to QS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check QS's competition here
HLLY-WT vs BC-PA Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, BC-PA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while BC-PA trades at $24.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BC-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BC-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to BC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check BC-PA's competition here
HLLY-WT vs BC-PB Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, BC-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while BC-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BC-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BC-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to BC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check BC-PB's competition here
HLLY-WT vs DORM Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, DORM has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while DORM trades at $119.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DORM's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DORM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to DORM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check DORM's competition here
HLLY-WT vs VC Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, VC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while VC trades at $110.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VC's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to VC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check VC's competition here
HLLY-WT vs GT Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, GT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while GT trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GT's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to GT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check GT's competition here
HLLY-WT vs GTX Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, GTX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while GTX trades at $12.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTX's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GTX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to GTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check GTX's competition here
HLLY-WT vs HSAI Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, HSAI has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while HSAI trades at $18.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSAI's P/E ratio is -1873.00. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HSAI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to HSAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check HSAI's competition here
HLLY-WT vs DAN Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, DAN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while DAN trades at $15.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAN's P/E ratio is -65.15. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to DAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check DAN's competition here
HLLY-WT vs PHIN Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, PHIN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while PHIN trades at $49.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHIN's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PHIN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to PHIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check PHIN's competition here
HLLY-WT vs ADNT Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, ADNT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while ADNT trades at $21.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADNT's P/E ratio is -6.63. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ADNT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to ADNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check ADNT's competition here
HLLY-WT vs FOXF Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, FOXF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while FOXF trades at $29.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOXF's P/E ratio is -4.89. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FOXF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to FOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check FOXF's competition here
HLLY-WT vs THRM Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, THRM has a market cap of 970.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while THRM trades at $31.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THRM's P/E ratio is 31.50. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to THRM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to THRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check THRM's competition here
HLLY-WT vs AEVA Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 871.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while AEVA trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -6.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check AEVA's competition here
HLLY-WT vs XPEL Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, XPEL has a market cap of 871.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while XPEL trades at $31.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPEL's P/E ratio is 18.31. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to XPEL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to XPEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check XPEL's competition here
HLLY-WT vs SMP Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, SMP has a market cap of 669.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while SMP trades at $30.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMP's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SMP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to SMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check SMP's competition here
HLLY-WT vs PLOW Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 647.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while PLOW trades at $27.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check PLOW's competition here
HLLY-WT vs GTXAP Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, GTXAP has a market cap of 557.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while GTXAP trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTXAP's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GTXAP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to GTXAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check GTXAP's competition here
HLLY-WT vs ECX Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, ECX has a market cap of 521.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while ECX trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECX's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ECX's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to ECX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check ECX's competition here
HLLY-WT vs AXL Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, AXL has a market cap of 511.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while AXL trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXL's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AXL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to AXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check AXL's competition here
HLLY-WT vs ALLG Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, ALLG has a market cap of 496.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while ALLG trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALLG's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ALLG's ROE of +4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to ALLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check ALLG's competition here
HLLY-WT vs CPS Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, CPS has a market cap of 462.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while CPS trades at $26.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPS's P/E ratio is -10.21. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CPS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to CPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check CPS's competition here
HLLY-WT vs MLR Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, MLR has a market cap of 460.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while MLR trades at $40.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLR's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MLR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to MLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check MLR's competition here
HLLY-WT vs SES Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, SES has a market cap of 442.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while SES trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SES's P/E ratio is -4.03. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SES's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to SES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check SES's competition here
HLLY-WT vs MNRO Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, MNRO has a market cap of 422.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while MNRO trades at $14.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNRO's P/E ratio is -20.42. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MNRO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to MNRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check MNRO's competition here
HLLY-WT vs INVZW Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, INVZW has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while INVZW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INVZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INVZW's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to INVZW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check INVZW's competition here
HLLY-WT vs INVZ Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, INVZ has a market cap of 294.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while INVZ trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INVZ's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INVZ's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to INVZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check INVZ's competition here
HLLY-WT vs STRT Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, STRT has a market cap of 258.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while STRT trades at $62.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRT's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to STRT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to STRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check STRT's competition here
HLLY-WT vs HYLN Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, HYLN has a market cap of 247.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while HYLN trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYLN's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HYLN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to HYLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check HYLN's competition here
HLLY-WT vs HLLY Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, HLLY has a market cap of 237.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while HLLY trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLLY's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HLLY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to HLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check HLLY's competition here
HLLY-WT vs SRI Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, SRI has a market cap of 204.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while SRI trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRI's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SRI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to SRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check SRI's competition here
HLLY-WT vs MPAA Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, MPAA has a market cap of 197.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while MPAA trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPAA's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MPAA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to MPAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check MPAA's competition here
HLLY-WT vs XL Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, XL has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while XL trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XL's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to XL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to XL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check XL's competition here
HLLY-WT vs LAZR Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, LAZR has a market cap of 162.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while LAZR trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LAZR's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LAZR's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to LAZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check LAZR's competition here
HLLY-WT vs CAAS Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, CAAS has a market cap of 124.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while CAAS trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAAS's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CAAS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to CAAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check CAAS's competition here
HLLY-WT vs GGR Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, GGR has a market cap of 101.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while GGR trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGR's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GGR's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to GGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check GGR's competition here
HLLY-WT vs KNDI Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, KNDI has a market cap of 96.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while KNDI trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNDI's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KNDI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to KNDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check KNDI's competition here
HLLY-WT vs LIDR Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, LIDR has a market cap of 87.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while LIDR trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIDR's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LIDR's ROE of -2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to LIDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check LIDR's competition here
HLLY-WT vs LIDRW Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, LIDRW has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while LIDRW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIDRW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LIDRW's ROE of -2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to LIDRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check LIDRW's competition here
HLLY-WT vs WPRT Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, WPRT has a market cap of 63.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while WPRT trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPRT's P/E ratio is -5.91. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WPRT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to WPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check WPRT's competition here
HLLY-WT vs CVGI Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, CVGI has a market cap of 58.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while CVGI trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVGI's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CVGI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to CVGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check CVGI's competition here
HLLY-WT vs SYPR Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, SYPR has a market cap of 43.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while SYPR trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYPR's P/E ratio is -94.50. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SYPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to SYPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check SYPR's competition here
HLLY-WT vs MKDW Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, MKDW has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while MKDW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKDW's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MKDW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to MKDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check MKDW's competition here
HLLY-WT vs ECXWW Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, ECXWW has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while ECXWW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECXWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ECXWW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to ECXWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check ECXWW's competition here
HLLY-WT vs NCNC Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, NCNC has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while NCNC trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCNC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NCNC's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to NCNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check NCNC's competition here
HLLY-WT vs NCNCW Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, NCNCW has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while NCNCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCNCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NCNCW's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to NCNCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check NCNCW's competition here
HLLY-WT vs AMV Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, AMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while AMV trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to AMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check AMV's competition here
HLLY-WT vs WKSP Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, WKSP has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while WKSP trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WKSP's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WKSP's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to WKSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check WKSP's competition here
HLLY-WT vs SAG Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, SAG has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while SAG trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAG's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SAG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to SAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check SAG's competition here
HLLY-WT vs SUP Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, SUP has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while SUP trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUP's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SUP's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to SUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check SUP's competition here
HLLY-WT vs INEO Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, INEO has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while INEO trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INEO's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INEO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to INEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check INEO's competition here
HLLY-WT vs FRSX Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, FRSX has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while FRSX trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRSX's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FRSX's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to FRSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check FRSX's competition here
HLLY-WT vs CREV Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, CREV has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while CREV trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CREV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CREV's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to CREV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check CREV's competition here
HLLY-WT vs GGROW Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, GGROW has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while GGROW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GGROW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to GGROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check GGROW's competition here
HLLY-WT vs MKDWW Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, MKDWW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while MKDWW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKDWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MKDWW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to MKDWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check MKDWW's competition here
HLLY-WT vs UFAB Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, UFAB has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while UFAB trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UFAB's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UFAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to UFAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check UFAB's competition here
HLLY-WT vs WKSPW Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, WKSPW has a market cap of 575.3K. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while WKSPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WKSPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WKSPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to WKSPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check WKSPW's competition here
HLLY-WT vs CREVW Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, CREVW has a market cap of 209.4K. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while CREVW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CREVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CREVW's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to CREVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check CREVW's competition here
HLLY-WT vs HYZNW Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, HYZNW has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while HYZNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYZNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HYZNW's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to HYZNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check HYZNW's competition here
HLLY-WT vs RMO Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, RMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while RMO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RMO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to RMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check RMO's competition here
HLLY-WT vs MTOR Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, MTOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while MTOR trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTOR's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MTOR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to MTOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check MTOR's competition here
HLLY-WT vs HZN Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, HZN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while HZN trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HZN's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to HZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check HZN's competition here
HLLY-WT vs VNE Comparison August 2025
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 259.2M. In comparison, VNE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.05, while VNE trades at $36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNE's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VNE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to VNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.Check VNE's competition here