Holley Inc. WT
Holley Inc. WT HLLY-WT Peers
See (HLLY-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLLY-WT | $0.04 | -0.24% | 185.5M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| APTV-PA | $108.66 | +0.15% | 29.4B | 92.08 | $1.18 | N/A |
| APTV | $69.28 | -1.83% | 15.1B | 11.32 | $6.12 | N/A |
| MBLY | $16.11 | -3.36% | 13.1B | -4.37 | -$3.68 | N/A |
| MGA | $41.96 | -1.29% | 11.8B | 10.47 | $4.01 | +5.69% |
| LKQ | $38.60 | -1.56% | 10B | 14.35 | $2.69 | +3.88% |
| ALV | $117.66 | -0.29% | 9.1B | 13.59 | $8.66 | +2.93% |
| BWA | $35.41 | -1.12% | 7.8B | 24.94 | $1.42 | +1.54% |
| ALSN | $91.53 | -4.17% | 7.7B | 10.59 | $8.64 | +1.13% |
| LEA | $106.57 | -1.02% | 5.7B | 12.57 | $8.48 | +3.59% |
Stock Comparison
HLLY-WT vs APTV-PA Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, APTV-PA has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while APTV-PA trades at $108.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APTV-PA's P/E ratio is 92.08. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to APTV-PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to APTV-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs APTV Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, APTV has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while APTV trades at $69.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APTV's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to APTV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to APTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs MBLY Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, MBLY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while MBLY trades at $16.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBLY's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MBLY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to MBLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs MGA Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, MGA has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while MGA trades at $41.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGA's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MGA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to MGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs LKQ Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, LKQ has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while LKQ trades at $38.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LKQ's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LKQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to LKQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs ALV Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, ALV has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while ALV trades at $117.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALV's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ALV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to ALV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs BWA Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, BWA has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while BWA trades at $35.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BWA's P/E ratio is 24.94. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BWA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to BWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs ALSN Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, ALSN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while ALSN trades at $91.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALSN's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ALSN's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to ALSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs LEA Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, LEA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while LEA trades at $106.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LEA's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LEA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to LEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs GNTX Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, GNTX has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while GNTX trades at $23.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNTX's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GNTX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to GNTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs QS Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, QS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while QS trades at $9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QS's P/E ratio is -10.13. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to QS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs MOD Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, MOD has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while MOD trades at $91.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOD's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MOD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to MOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs BC-PA Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, BC-PA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while BC-PA trades at $24.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BC-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BC-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to BC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs DORM Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, DORM has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while DORM trades at $122.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DORM's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DORM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to DORM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs BC-PB Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, BC-PB has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while BC-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BC-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BC-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to BC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs GT Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, GT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while GT trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GT's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to GT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs HSAI Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, HSAI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while HSAI trades at $23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSAI's P/E ratio is -2390.00. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HSAI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to HSAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs VC Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, VC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while VC trades at $110.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VC's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to VC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs DAN Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, DAN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while DAN trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAN's P/E ratio is -70.17. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to DAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs GTX Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, GTX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while GTX trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTX's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GTX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to GTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs PHIN Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, PHIN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while PHIN trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHIN's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PHIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to PHIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs ADNT Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, ADNT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while ADNT trades at $22.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADNT's P/E ratio is -7.03. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ADNT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to ADNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs AEVA Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, AEVA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while AEVA trades at $26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEVA's P/E ratio is -9.26. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AEVA's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to AEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs FOXF Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, FOXF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while FOXF trades at $28.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOXF's P/E ratio is -4.83. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FOXF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to FOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs XPEL Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, XPEL has a market cap of 981.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while XPEL trades at $35.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPEL's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to XPEL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to XPEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs THRM Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, THRM has a market cap of 934.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while THRM trades at $30.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THRM's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to THRM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to THRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs ECX Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, ECX has a market cap of 735.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while ECX trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECX's P/E ratio is -6.47. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ECX's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to ECX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs SMP Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, SMP has a market cap of 723.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while SMP trades at $32.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMP's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SMP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to SMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs PLOW Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, PLOW has a market cap of 704.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while PLOW trades at $30.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLOW's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PLOW's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to PLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs GTXAP Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, GTXAP has a market cap of 557.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while GTXAP trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTXAP's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GTXAP's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to GTXAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs AXL Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, AXL has a market cap of 523.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while AXL trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXL's P/E ratio is 24.53. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AXL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to AXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs MLR Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, MLR has a market cap of 516.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while MLR trades at $45.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLR's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MLR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to MLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs ALLG Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, ALLG has a market cap of 496.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while ALLG trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALLG's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ALLG's ROE of +4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to ALLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs MNRO Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, MNRO has a market cap of 482.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while MNRO trades at $16.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNRO's P/E ratio is -73.18. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MNRO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to MNRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs CPS Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, CPS has a market cap of 423.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while CPS trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPS's P/E ratio is -9.35. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CPS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to CPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs SES Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, SES has a market cap of 342M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while SES trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SES's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SES's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to SES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs INVZ Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, INVZ has a market cap of 338.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while INVZ trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INVZ's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INVZ's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to INVZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs INVZW Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, INVZW has a market cap of 290.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while INVZW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INVZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INVZW's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to INVZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs STRT Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, STRT has a market cap of 265.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while STRT trades at $63.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STRT's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to STRT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to STRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs HLLY Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, HLLY has a market cap of 256M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while HLLY trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLLY's P/E ratio is -10.24. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HLLY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to HLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs HYLN Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, HYLN has a market cap of 255M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while HYLN trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYLN's P/E ratio is -5.02. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HYLN's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to HYLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs MPAA Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, MPAA has a market cap of 226.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while MPAA trades at $11.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPAA's P/E ratio is -11.79. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MPAA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to MPAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs SRI Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, SRI has a market cap of 203.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while SRI trades at $7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SRI's P/E ratio is -11.40. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SRI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to SRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs XL Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, XL has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while XL trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XL's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to XL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to XL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs LAZR Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, LAZR has a market cap of 137.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while LAZR trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LAZR's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LAZR's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to LAZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs CAAS Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, CAAS has a market cap of 128.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while CAAS trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAAS's P/E ratio is 4.45. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CAAS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to CAAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs GGR Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, GGR has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while GGR trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGR's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GGR's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to GGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs KNDI Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, KNDI has a market cap of 103.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while KNDI trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KNDI's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KNDI's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to KNDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs CVGI Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, CVGI has a market cap of 64.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while CVGI trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVGI's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CVGI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to CVGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs WPRT Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, WPRT has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while WPRT trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WPRT's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WPRT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to WPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs SYPR Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, SYPR has a market cap of 47.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while SYPR trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SYPR's P/E ratio is -103.00. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SYPR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to SYPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs MKDWW Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, MKDWW has a market cap of 39.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while MKDWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKDWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MKDWW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to MKDWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs MKDW Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, MKDW has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while MKDW trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKDW's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MKDW's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to MKDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs ECXWW Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, ECXWW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while ECXWW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECXWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ECXWW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to ECXWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs LIDR Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, LIDR has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while LIDR trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIDR's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LIDR's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to LIDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs LIDRW Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, LIDRW has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while LIDRW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIDRW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LIDRW's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to LIDRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs NCNCW Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, NCNCW has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while NCNCW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCNCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NCNCW's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to NCNCW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs WKSP Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, WKSP has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while WKSP trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WKSP's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WKSP's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to WKSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs AMV Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, AMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while AMV trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to AMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs INEO Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, INEO has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while INEO trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INEO's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INEO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to INEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs SAG Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, SAG has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while SAG trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAG's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SAG's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to SAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs SUP Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, SUP has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while SUP trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUP's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SUP's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to SUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs FRSX Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, FRSX has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while FRSX trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRSX's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FRSX's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to FRSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs CREV Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, CREV has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while CREV trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CREV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CREV's ROE of +2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to CREV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs GGROW Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, GGROW has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while GGROW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GGROW's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to GGROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs UFAB Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, UFAB has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while UFAB trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UFAB's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UFAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to UFAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs WKSPW Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, WKSPW has a market cap of 575.3K. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while WKSPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WKSPW's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WKSPW's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to WKSPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs CREVW Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, CREVW has a market cap of 201.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while CREVW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CREVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CREVW's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to CREVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs HYZNW Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, HYZNW has a market cap of 15.5K. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while HYZNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HYZNW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HYZNW's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to HYZNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs NCNC Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, NCNC has a market cap of 13.5K. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while NCNC trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCNC's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NCNC's ROE of +3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to NCNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs MTOR Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, MTOR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while MTOR trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTOR's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MTOR's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to MTOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs RMO Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, RMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while RMO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RMO's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RMO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to RMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs VNE Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, VNE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while VNE trades at $36.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNE's P/E ratio is -10.74. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VNE's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is more volatile compared to VNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.
HLLY-WT vs HZN Comparison
HLLY-WT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLLY-WT stands at 185.5M. In comparison, HZN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLLY-WT is priced at $0.04, while HZN trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLLY-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HZN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLLY-WT's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HZN's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HLLY-WT is less volatile compared to HZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLLY-WT.