Heliogen, Inc.
Heliogen, Inc. HLGN-WT Peers
See (HLGN-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Renewable Utilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLGN-WT | $0.02 | +7.53% | 11.2M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| GEV | $529.15 | +0.00% | 138.1B | 72.91 | $6.94 | +0.05% |
| CEG | $322.76 | +0.00% | 96.5B | 32.45 | $9.49 | +0.48% |
| AQNU | $19.34 | +2.00% | 13.3B | 37.48 | $0.52 | +4.67% |
| SMR | $39.56 | +0.00% | 10.7B | -26.36 | -$1.37 | N/A |
| BEP-PA | $17.33 | +0.00% | 7.4B | -34.60 | -$0.51 | +5.67% |
| BEP | $25.51 | +0.00% | 7.3B | -25.37 | -$1.01 | +5.67% |
| CWEN-A | $30.26 | +0.00% | 6.3B | 37.28 | $0.80 | +5.41% |
| CWEN | $32.00 | +0.02% | 6.3B | 39.41 | $0.80 | +5.41% |
| ORA | $83.76 | +0.00% | 5.1B | 41.15 | $2.06 | +0.56% |
Stock Comparison
HLGN-WT vs GEV Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, GEV has a market cap of 138.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while GEV trades at $529.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEV's P/E ratio is 72.91. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to GEV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to GEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs CEG Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, CEG has a market cap of 96.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while CEG trades at $322.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CEG's P/E ratio is 32.45. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to CEG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to CEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs AQNU Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, AQNU has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while AQNU trades at $19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AQNU's P/E ratio is 37.48. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to AQNU's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to AQNU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs SMR Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, SMR has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while SMR trades at $39.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMR's P/E ratio is -26.36. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to SMR's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to SMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs BEP-PA Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, BEP-PA has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while BEP-PA trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEP-PA's P/E ratio is -34.60. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to BEP-PA's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to BEP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs BEP Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, BEP has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while BEP trades at $25.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEP's P/E ratio is -25.37. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to BEP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to BEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs CWEN-A Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, CWEN-A has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while CWEN-A trades at $30.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWEN-A's P/E ratio is 37.28. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to CWEN-A's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to CWEN-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs CWEN Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, CWEN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while CWEN trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CWEN's P/E ratio is 39.41. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to CWEN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to CWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs ORA Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, ORA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while ORA trades at $83.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORA's P/E ratio is 41.15. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to ORA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to ORA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs BEPC Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, BEPC has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while BEPC trades at $32.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BEPC's P/E ratio is -23.65. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to BEPC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to BEPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs AQN Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, AQN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while AQN trades at $5.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AQN's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to AQN's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to AQN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs EE Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, EE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while EE trades at $29.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EE's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to EE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to EE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs ENLT Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, ENLT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while ENLT trades at $22.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ENLT's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to ENLT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to ENLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs AY Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, AY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while AY trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AY's P/E ratio is 87.96. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to AY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is more volatile compared to AY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs SMR-WT Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, SMR-WT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while SMR-WT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to SMR-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to SMR-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs RNW Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, RNW has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while RNW trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNW's P/E ratio is 56.75. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to RNW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to RNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs RNWWW Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, RNWWW has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while RNWWW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RNWWW's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to RNWWW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to RNWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs NEP Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, NEP has a market cap of 985.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while NEP trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEP's P/E ratio is -105.40. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to NEP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to NEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs FLNC Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, FLNC has a market cap of 959.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while FLNC trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLNC's P/E ratio is -33.36. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to FLNC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to FLNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs AMPS Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, AMPS has a market cap of 800.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while AMPS trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMPS's P/E ratio is 499.00. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to AMPS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is more volatile compared to AMPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs NXXT Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, NXXT has a market cap of 326.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while NXXT trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXXT's P/E ratio is -13.45. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to NXXT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to NXXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs ELLO Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, ELLO has a market cap of 238.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while ELLO trades at $17.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELLO's P/E ratio is -30.39. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to ELLO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to ELLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs VGAS Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, VGAS has a market cap of 152.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while VGAS trades at $3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGAS's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to VGAS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to VGAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs NRGV Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, NRGV has a market cap of 123.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while NRGV trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRGV's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to NRGV's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to NRGV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs AZRE Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, AZRE has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while AZRE trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AZRE's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to AZRE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to AZRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs SUUN Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, SUUN has a market cap of 54.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while SUUN trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUUN's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to SUUN's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to SUUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs BNRG Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, BNRG has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while BNRG trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNRG's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to BNRG's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to BNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs RAIN Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, RAIN has a market cap of 23.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while RAIN trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAIN's P/E ratio is -3.89. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to RAIN's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to RAIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs HLGN Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, HLGN has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while HLGN trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLGN's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to HLGN's ROE of -4.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to HLGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs CREG Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, CREG has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while CREG trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CREG's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to CREG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to CREG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs ADN Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, ADN has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while ADN trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADN's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to ADN's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to ADN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs ALCE Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, ALCE has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while ALCE trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALCE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to ALCE's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to ALCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs HTOO Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, HTOO has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while HTOO trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTOO's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to HTOO's ROE of -5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to HTOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs WAVE Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, WAVE has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while WAVE trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WAVE's P/E ratio is -16.22. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to WAVE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to WAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs HTOOW Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, HTOOW has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while HTOOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HTOOW's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to HTOOW's ROE of -5.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to HTOOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs ELIQ Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, ELIQ has a market cap of 709.5K. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while ELIQ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELIQ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to ELIQ's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to ELIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs ADNWW Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, ADNWW has a market cap of 16K. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while ADNWW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADNWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to ADNWW's ROE of +4.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is less volatile compared to ADNWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.
HLGN-WT vs LFG Comparison
HLGN-WT plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLGN-WT stands at 11.2M. In comparison, LFG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLGN-WT is priced at $0.02, while LFG trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLGN-WT currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLGN-WT's ROE is -4.14%, compared to LFG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLGN-WT is more volatile compared to LFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLGN-WT.