Helbiz, Inc.
Helbiz, Inc. (HLBZW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HLBZW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Recreational Vehicles Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLBZW | $0.05 | -5.10% | 0 | -0.01 | -$7.75 | N/A |
| THO | $95.18 | -0.19% | 5.1B | 22.82 | $4.17 | +2.11% |
| BC-PC | $24.31 | -0.16% | 4B | N/A | N/A | +2.83% |
| BC | $60.31 | -0.79% | 4B | 68.49 | $0.88 | +2.83% |
| DOOO | $49.37 | -1.24% | 3.6B | 27.28 | $1.81 | +1.25% |
| HOG | $23.56 | -4.19% | 2.9B | 8.44 | $2.79 | +3.00% |
| PII | $49.48 | -1.51% | 2.8B | 69.72 | $0.71 | +5.44% |
| LCII | $98.51 | -0.78% | 2.5B | 16.16 | $6.10 | +4.57% |
| WGO | $31.44 | -0.73% | 881M | -56.12 | -$0.56 | +4.32% |
| MBUU | $35.34 | +0.34% | 678.2M | -82.19 | -$0.43 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HLBZW vs THO Comparison July 2025
HLBZW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZW stands at 0. In comparison, THO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZW is priced at $0.05, while THO trades at $95.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas THO's P/E ratio is 22.82. In terms of profitability, HLBZW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to THO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZW is more volatile compared to THO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZW.Check THO's competition here
HLBZW vs BC-PC Comparison July 2025
HLBZW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZW stands at 0. In comparison, BC-PC has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZW is priced at $0.05, while BC-PC trades at $24.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BC-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLBZW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to BC-PC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZW is more volatile compared to BC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZW.Check BC-PC's competition here
HLBZW vs BC Comparison July 2025
HLBZW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZW stands at 0. In comparison, BC has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZW is priced at $0.05, while BC trades at $60.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BC's P/E ratio is 68.49. In terms of profitability, HLBZW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to BC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZW is more volatile compared to BC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZW.Check BC's competition here
HLBZW vs DOOO Comparison July 2025
HLBZW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZW stands at 0. In comparison, DOOO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZW is priced at $0.05, while DOOO trades at $49.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DOOO's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, HLBZW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to DOOO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZW is more volatile compared to DOOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZW.Check DOOO's competition here
HLBZW vs HOG Comparison July 2025
HLBZW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZW stands at 0. In comparison, HOG has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZW is priced at $0.05, while HOG trades at $23.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HOG's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, HLBZW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to HOG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZW is more volatile compared to HOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZW.Check HOG's competition here
HLBZW vs PII Comparison July 2025
HLBZW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZW stands at 0. In comparison, PII has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZW is priced at $0.05, while PII trades at $49.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PII's P/E ratio is 69.72. In terms of profitability, HLBZW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to PII's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZW is more volatile compared to PII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZW.Check PII's competition here
HLBZW vs LCII Comparison July 2025
HLBZW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZW stands at 0. In comparison, LCII has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZW is priced at $0.05, while LCII trades at $98.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LCII's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, HLBZW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to LCII's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZW is more volatile compared to LCII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZW.Check LCII's competition here
HLBZW vs WGO Comparison July 2025
HLBZW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZW stands at 0. In comparison, WGO has a market cap of 881M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZW is priced at $0.05, while WGO trades at $31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WGO's P/E ratio is -56.12. In terms of profitability, HLBZW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to WGO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZW is more volatile compared to WGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZW.Check WGO's competition here
HLBZW vs MBUU Comparison July 2025
HLBZW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZW stands at 0. In comparison, MBUU has a market cap of 678.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZW is priced at $0.05, while MBUU trades at $35.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MBUU's P/E ratio is -82.19. In terms of profitability, HLBZW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MBUU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZW is more volatile compared to MBUU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZW.Check MBUU's competition here
HLBZW vs MCFT Comparison July 2025
HLBZW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZW stands at 0. In comparison, MCFT has a market cap of 337.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZW is priced at $0.05, while MCFT trades at $20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MCFT's P/E ratio is -39.80. In terms of profitability, HLBZW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MCFT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZW is more volatile compared to MCFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZW.Check MCFT's competition here
HLBZW vs MPX Comparison July 2025
HLBZW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZW stands at 0. In comparison, MPX has a market cap of 314.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZW is priced at $0.05, while MPX trades at $8.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MPX's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, HLBZW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MPX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZW is more volatile compared to MPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZW.Check MPX's competition here
HLBZW vs ONEW Comparison July 2025
HLBZW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZW stands at 0. In comparison, ONEW has a market cap of 248.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZW is priced at $0.05, while ONEW trades at $15.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ONEW's P/E ratio is -36.21. In terms of profitability, HLBZW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to ONEW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZW is more volatile compared to ONEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZW.Check ONEW's competition here
HLBZW vs MAMO Comparison July 2025
HLBZW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZW stands at 0. In comparison, MAMO has a market cap of 108.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZW is priced at $0.05, while MAMO trades at $2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MAMO's P/E ratio is -52.40. In terms of profitability, HLBZW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MAMO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZW is more volatile compared to MAMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZW.Check MAMO's competition here
HLBZW vs HLBZ Comparison July 2025
HLBZW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZW stands at 0. In comparison, HLBZ has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZW is priced at $0.05, while HLBZ trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HLBZ's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, HLBZW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to HLBZ's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZW is more volatile compared to HLBZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZW.Check HLBZ's competition here
HLBZW vs REE Comparison July 2025
HLBZW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZW stands at 0. In comparison, REE has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZW is priced at $0.05, while REE trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas REE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, HLBZW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to REE's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZW is more volatile compared to REE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZW.Check REE's competition here
HLBZW vs VMAR Comparison July 2025
HLBZW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZW stands at 0. In comparison, VMAR has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZW is priced at $0.05, while VMAR trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VMAR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HLBZW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to VMAR's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZW is more volatile compared to VMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZW.Check VMAR's competition here
HLBZW vs VEEE Comparison July 2025
HLBZW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZW stands at 0. In comparison, VEEE has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZW is priced at $0.05, while VEEE trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VEEE's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, HLBZW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to VEEE's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZW is more volatile compared to VEEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZW.Check VEEE's competition here
HLBZW vs FUV Comparison July 2025
HLBZW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZW stands at 0. In comparison, FUV has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZW is priced at $0.05, while FUV trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FUV's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, HLBZW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to FUV's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZW is more volatile compared to FUV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZW.Check FUV's competition here
HLBZW vs FRZA Comparison July 2025
HLBZW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZW stands at 0. In comparison, FRZA has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZW is priced at $0.05, while FRZA trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FRZA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, HLBZW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to FRZA's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZW is less volatile compared to FRZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZW.Check FRZA's competition here
HLBZW vs EZGO Comparison July 2025
HLBZW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZW stands at 0. In comparison, EZGO has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZW is priced at $0.05, while EZGO trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EZGO's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, HLBZW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to EZGO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZW is more volatile compared to EZGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZW.Check EZGO's competition here
HLBZW vs MCOM Comparison July 2025
HLBZW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZW stands at 0. In comparison, MCOM has a market cap of 359.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZW is priced at $0.05, while MCOM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MCOM's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, HLBZW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MCOM's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZW is more volatile compared to MCOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZW.Check MCOM's competition here
HLBZW vs REEAW Comparison July 2025
HLBZW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLBZW stands at 0. In comparison, REEAW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLBZW is priced at $0.05, while REEAW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLBZW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas REEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLBZW's ROE is -1.48%, compared to REEAW's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLBZW is more volatile compared to REEAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLBZW.Check REEAW's competition here