Gray Television, Inc.
Gray Television, Inc. GTN Peers
See (GTN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Broadcasting Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTN | $4.87 | +7.40% | 427.8M | 1.98 | $2.34 | +6.95% |
| CCZ | $61.10 | +0.00% | 57.9B | 52.13 | $1.17 | +3.46% |
| LSXMA | $22.29 | -1.20% | 7.3B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMK | $22.29 | -1.15% | 7.3B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMB | $22.51 | -4.62% | 7.3B | 8.83 | $2.55 | N/A |
| TGNA | $17.13 | +2.18% | 2.7B | 5.98 | $2.83 | +2.94% |
| FUBO | $3.68 | -4.79% | 1.3B | 18.83 | $0.20 | N/A |
| NMAX | $13.74 | -9.16% | 1.2B | -38.17 | -$0.36 | N/A |
| GTN-A | $10.11 | -6.91% | 595.9M | 4.41 | $2.34 | +6.95% |
| CURI | $5.02 | -10.83% | 294.3M | -36.43 | -$0.14 | +2.86% |
Stock Comparison
GTN vs CCZ Comparison
GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 427.8M. In comparison, CCZ has a market cap of 57.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.87, while CCZ trades at $61.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas CCZ's P/E ratio is 52.13. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CCZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to CCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.
GTN vs LSXMA Comparison
GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 427.8M. In comparison, LSXMA has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.87, while LSXMA trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas LSXMA's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LSXMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to LSXMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.
GTN vs LSXMK Comparison
GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 427.8M. In comparison, LSXMK has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.87, while LSXMK trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas LSXMK's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LSXMK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to LSXMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.
GTN vs LSXMB Comparison
GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 427.8M. In comparison, LSXMB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.87, while LSXMB trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas LSXMB's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LSXMB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to LSXMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.
GTN vs TGNA Comparison
GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 427.8M. In comparison, TGNA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.87, while TGNA trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas TGNA's P/E ratio is 5.98. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TGNA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to TGNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.
GTN vs FUBO Comparison
GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 427.8M. In comparison, FUBO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.87, while FUBO trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas FUBO's P/E ratio is 18.83. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FUBO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to FUBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.
GTN vs NMAX Comparison
GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 427.8M. In comparison, NMAX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.87, while NMAX trades at $13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas NMAX's P/E ratio is -38.17. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NMAX's ROE of +4.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to NMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.
GTN vs GTN-A Comparison
GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 427.8M. In comparison, GTN-A has a market cap of 595.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.87, while GTN-A trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas GTN-A's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GTN-A's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to GTN-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.
GTN vs CURI Comparison
GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 427.8M. In comparison, CURI has a market cap of 294.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.87, while CURI trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas CURI's P/E ratio is -36.43. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CURI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to CURI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.
GTN vs SSP Comparison
GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 427.8M. In comparison, SSP has a market cap of 267.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.87, while SSP trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas SSP's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SSP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to SSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.
GTN vs IHRT Comparison
GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 427.8M. In comparison, IHRT has a market cap of 251M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.87, while IHRT trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas IHRT's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IHRT's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to IHRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.
GTN vs EVC Comparison
GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 427.8M. In comparison, EVC has a market cap of 218.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.87, while EVC trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas EVC's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EVC's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to EVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.
GTN vs SGA Comparison
GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 427.8M. In comparison, SGA has a market cap of 83.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.87, while SGA trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas SGA's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to SGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.
GTN vs MDIA Comparison
GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 427.8M. In comparison, MDIA has a market cap of 60.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.87, while MDIA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas MDIA's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MDIA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to MDIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.
GTN vs UONE Comparison
GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 427.8M. In comparison, UONE has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.87, while UONE trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas UONE's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UONE's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to UONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.
GTN vs UONEK Comparison
GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 427.8M. In comparison, UONEK has a market cap of 40.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.87, while UONEK trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas UONEK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UONEK's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to UONEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.
GTN vs SJ Comparison
GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 427.8M. In comparison, SJ has a market cap of 36.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.87, while SJ trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas SJ's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SJ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is less volatile compared to SJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.
GTN vs SALM Comparison
GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 427.8M. In comparison, SALM has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.87, while SALM trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas SALM's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SALM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to SALM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.
GTN vs AUD Comparison
GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 427.8M. In comparison, AUD has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.87, while AUD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas AUD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUD's ROE of +1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is less volatile compared to AUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.
GTN vs XHLD Comparison
GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 427.8M. In comparison, XHLD has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.87, while XHLD trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas XHLD's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XHLD's ROE of +6.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to XHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.
GTN vs BBGI Comparison
GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 427.8M. In comparison, BBGI has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.87, while BBGI trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas BBGI's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBGI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to BBGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.
GTN vs CURIW Comparison
GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 427.8M. In comparison, CURIW has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.87, while CURIW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas CURIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CURIW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is less volatile compared to CURIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.
GTN vs CMLS Comparison
GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 427.8M. In comparison, CMLS has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.87, while CMLS trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas CMLS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMLS's ROE of -2.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is less volatile compared to CMLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.
GTN vs DISCA Comparison
GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 427.8M. In comparison, DISCA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.87, while DISCA trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas DISCA's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DISCA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is less volatile compared to DISCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.
GTN vs QVCD Comparison
GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 427.8M. In comparison, QVCD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.87, while QVCD trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas QVCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QVCD's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to QVCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.
GTN vs QVCC Comparison
GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 427.8M. In comparison, QVCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.87, while QVCC trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 1.98, whereas QVCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QVCC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to QVCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.