Gray Media, Inc.

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 432.9M. In comparison, CCZ has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.69, while CCZ trades at $64.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas CCZ's P/E ratio is 54.93. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CCZ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to CCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check CCZ's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 432.9M. In comparison, LSXMA has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.69, while LSXMA trades at $22.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas LSXMA's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LSXMA's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to LSXMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check LSXMA's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 432.9M. In comparison, LSXMK has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.69, while LSXMK trades at $22.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas LSXMK's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LSXMK's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to LSXMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check LSXMK's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 432.9M. In comparison, LSXMB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.69, while LSXMB trades at $22.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas LSXMB's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LSXMB's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to LSXMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check LSXMB's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 432.9M. In comparison, TGNA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.69, while TGNA trades at $20.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas TGNA's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TGNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to TGNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check TGNA's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 432.9M. In comparison, GTN-A has a market cap of 635.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.69, while GTN-A trades at $11.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas GTN-A's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GTN-A's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is less volatile compared to GTN-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check GTN-A's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 432.9M. In comparison, NMAX has a market cap of 500.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.69, while NMAX trades at $5.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas NMAX's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NMAX's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to NMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check NMAX's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 432.9M. In comparison, IHRT has a market cap of 445M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.69, while IHRT trades at $3.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas IHRT's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IHRT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to IHRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check IHRT's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 432.9M. In comparison, FUBO has a market cap of 423.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.69, while FUBO trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas FUBO's P/E ratio is 3.75. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FUBO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to FUBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check FUBO's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 432.9M. In comparison, SSP has a market cap of 407.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.69, while SSP trades at $3.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas SSP's P/E ratio is -8.02. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SSP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is less volatile compared to SSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check SSP's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 432.9M. In comparison, EVC has a market cap of 269.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.69, while EVC trades at $2.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas EVC's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EVC's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to EVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check EVC's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 432.9M. In comparison, CURI has a market cap of 181.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.69, while CURI trades at $3.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas CURI's P/E ratio is -31.20. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CURI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is less volatile compared to CURI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check CURI's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 432.9M. In comparison, SGA has a market cap of 76.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.69, while SGA trades at $11.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas SGA's P/E ratio is 237.40. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SGA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to SGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check SGA's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 432.9M. In comparison, SJ has a market cap of 49.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.69, while SJ trades at $1.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas SJ's P/E ratio is 29.25. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is less volatile compared to SJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check SJ's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 432.9M. In comparison, UONEK has a market cap of 43.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.69, while UONEK trades at $7.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas UONEK's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UONEK's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is less volatile compared to UONEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check UONEK's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 432.9M. In comparison, MDIA has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.69, while MDIA trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas MDIA's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MDIA's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to MDIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check MDIA's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 432.9M. In comparison, UONE has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.69, while UONE trades at $10.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas UONE's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UONE's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is less volatile compared to UONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check UONE's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 432.9M. In comparison, AUD has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.69, while AUD trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas AUD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AUD's ROE of +24.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is less volatile compared to AUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check AUD's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 432.9M. In comparison, SALM has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.69, while SALM trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas SALM's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SALM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to SALM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check SALM's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 432.9M. In comparison, BBGI has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.69, while BBGI trades at $4.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas BBGI's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BBGI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to BBGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check BBGI's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 432.9M. In comparison, XHLD has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.69, while XHLD trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas XHLD's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to XHLD's ROE of -3.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to XHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check XHLD's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 432.9M. In comparison, CMLS has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.69, while CMLS trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas CMLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMLS's ROE of +10.61%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to CMLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check CMLS's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 432.9M. In comparison, CURIW has a market cap of 723.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.69, while CURIW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas CURIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CURIW's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to CURIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check CURIW's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 432.9M. In comparison, DISCA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.69, while DISCA trades at $24.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas DISCA's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DISCA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is less volatile compared to DISCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check DISCA's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 432.9M. In comparison, QVCD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.69, while QVCD trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas QVCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to QVCD's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to QVCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check QVCD's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 432.9M. In comparison, QVCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $4.69, while QVCC trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 10.88, whereas QVCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.03%, compared to QVCC's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to QVCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check QVCC's competition here