Gray Television, Inc.

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 536M. In comparison, CCZ has a market cap of 57.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $6.00, while CCZ trades at $60.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 3.79, whereas CCZ's P/E ratio is 51.92. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CCZ's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to CCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check CCZ's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 536M. In comparison, LSXMA has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $6.00, while LSXMA trades at $22.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 3.79, whereas LSXMA's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LSXMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to LSXMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check LSXMA's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 536M. In comparison, LSXMK has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $6.00, while LSXMK trades at $22.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 3.79, whereas LSXMK's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LSXMK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to LSXMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check LSXMK's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 536M. In comparison, LSXMB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $6.00, while LSXMB trades at $22.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 3.79, whereas LSXMB's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LSXMB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to LSXMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check LSXMB's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 536M. In comparison, TGNA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $6.00, while TGNA trades at $21.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 3.79, whereas TGNA's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TGNA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to TGNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check TGNA's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 536M. In comparison, FUBO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $6.00, while FUBO trades at $3.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 3.79, whereas FUBO's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FUBO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to FUBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check FUBO's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 536M. In comparison, NMAX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $6.00, while NMAX trades at $11.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 3.79, whereas NMAX's P/E ratio is -38.75. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NMAX's ROE of -2.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to NMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check NMAX's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 536M. In comparison, GTN-A has a market cap of 630.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $6.00, while GTN-A trades at $11.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 3.79, whereas GTN-A's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GTN-A's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to GTN-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check GTN-A's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 536M. In comparison, IHRT has a market cap of 288.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $6.00, while IHRT trades at $2.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 3.79, whereas IHRT's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IHRT's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is less volatile compared to IHRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check IHRT's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 536M. In comparison, SSP has a market cap of 254.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $6.00, while SSP trades at $2.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 3.79, whereas SSP's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SSP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is less volatile compared to SSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check SSP's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 536M. In comparison, CURI has a market cap of 243.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $6.00, while CURI trades at $4.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 3.79, whereas CURI's P/E ratio is -46.78. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CURI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is less volatile compared to CURI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check CURI's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 536M. In comparison, EVC has a market cap of 223.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $6.00, while EVC trades at $2.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 3.79, whereas EVC's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EVC's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to EVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check EVC's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 536M. In comparison, SGA has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $6.00, while SGA trades at $13.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 3.79, whereas SGA's P/E ratio is 39.61. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to SGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check SGA's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 536M. In comparison, MDIA has a market cap of 69.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $6.00, while MDIA trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 3.79, whereas MDIA's P/E ratio is 1.48. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MDIA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is less volatile compared to MDIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check MDIA's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 536M. In comparison, UONEK has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $6.00, while UONEK trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 3.79, whereas UONEK's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UONEK's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is less volatile compared to UONEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check UONEK's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 536M. In comparison, UONE has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $6.00, while UONE trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 3.79, whereas UONE's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UONE's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to UONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check UONE's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 536M. In comparison, SJ has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $6.00, while SJ trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 3.79, whereas SJ's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SJ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is less volatile compared to SJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check SJ's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 536M. In comparison, SALM has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $6.00, while SALM trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 3.79, whereas SALM's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SALM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to SALM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check SALM's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 536M. In comparison, AUD has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $6.00, while AUD trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 3.79, whereas AUD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AUD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is less volatile compared to AUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check AUD's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 536M. In comparison, XHLD has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $6.00, while XHLD trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 3.79, whereas XHLD's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XHLD's ROE of -10.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is less volatile compared to XHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check XHLD's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 536M. In comparison, BBGI has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $6.00, while BBGI trades at $4.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 3.79, whereas BBGI's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BBGI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is less volatile compared to BBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check BBGI's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 536M. In comparison, CMLS has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $6.00, while CMLS trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 3.79, whereas CMLS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMLS's ROE of -6.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is less volatile compared to CMLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check CMLS's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 536M. In comparison, CURIW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $6.00, while CURIW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 3.79, whereas CURIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CURIW's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is less volatile compared to CURIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check CURIW's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 536M. In comparison, DISCA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $6.00, while DISCA trades at $24.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 3.79, whereas DISCA's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DISCA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is less volatile compared to DISCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check DISCA's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 536M. In comparison, QVCD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $6.00, while QVCD trades at $9.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 3.79, whereas QVCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QVCD's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to QVCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check QVCD's competition here

GTN plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GTN stands at 536M. In comparison, QVCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GTN is priced at $6.00, while QVCC trades at $9.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GTN currently has a P/E ratio of 3.79, whereas QVCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GTN's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QVCC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GTN is more volatile compared to QVCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GTN.Check QVCC's competition here